| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Report by Alan Gardner
January 27, 2013
England 227 for 3 (Bell 113*) beat India 226 (Raina 83, Bresnan 4-45) by seven wickets
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Tim Bresnan
| Suresh Raina
Matches:
India v England at Dharamsala
Series/Tournaments:
England tour of India
|
|||
Ian Bell's third one-day century guided England to a consolation victory in the fifth and final ODI against India to bookend an ultimately disappointing tour with a second success. Although the series was already lost, a 3-2 defeat represents a marked improvement on recent efforts in the country, but Alastair Cook's chief regret will be that his side took so long to put in a second accomplished performance, after they had taken a 1-0 lead in Rajkot a little more than two weeks ago.
The bowlers, lead by Tim Bresnan, Steven Finn and James Tredwell, had made good use of Cook winning the toss to restrict India to 226, despite a fighting 83 from Suresh Raina, and England looked to have a modest hike ahead of them in order to secure only a third ODI win against India at home in 23 attempts. At times, the target seemed to loom higher than the Himalayas visible behind Dharamsala's multicoloured pavilion but Bell is an experienced climber these days and Eoin Morgan brought along his spare oxygen canister to ease the ascent at the end.
Smart stats |
Like Raina, whose fourth half-century in as many innings helped drag India from a potentially disastrous 79 for 5 earlier in the day, Bell was not entirely secure at the crease, twice edging past his stumps early on and struggling to time the ball as the surface got slower. But he stuck around as England lost two wickets for 11 runs in 6.2 overs and after a diligent, restorative partnership with Joe Root, he began to look more imposing, stepping out of his crease to hit the disappointing R Ashwin for six and striking timely boundaries whenever the asking rate began to enquire a little more urgently.
Although Root was bowled by Ravindra Jadeja, slogging across the line in ungainly fashion after another level-headed knock, Morgan buckled down before adding a few flourishes of his own to ease England past their target with 16 balls to spare. At 1317 metres above sea level, the Himachal Pradesh Cricket Association Stadium is among the loftiest international grounds in the world and Morgan seemed keen to see just how far he could hit a six in the thin mountain air.
Despite being described as a match of "no consequence" in some local papers, India chose not to experiment with their line-up, again leaving Cheteshwar Pujara on the bench. They could perhaps have done with his monkish self-discipline, as Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli departed to consecutive deliveries via loose drives outside off to trigger a top-order collapse. It was left to Raina, India's leading run-scorer in the series, and Jadeja, who has also toyed regularly with England over the last month, to pull things together with a spiky, 78-run partnership, before some late hitting from the tail, combined with a rash of dropped catches, helped the score towards respectability.
Before the match, Raina had expressed a desire to usurp one of his colleagues up the order and he made good use of a longer spell at the crease after coming in during the seventh over. A harsher judge, however, may conclude that he failed to construct the truly big innings that the situation provided an opportunity for.
England have been quiescent opponents in the past for Raina, who improved his average against them to 47.47 with his 11th fifty, but he was allowed let-offs on 5 and 61 before pulling idly to midwicket with a hundred in sight. The first was a difficult, diving chance that would have completed a hat-trick of slip catches for Tredwell but the latter opportunity, grassed by Cook at backward square leg, was much more straightforward.
Perhaps Raina was deserving of some benevolence after the fiery start England's bowlers made in chilly, if bright, conditions. The Dalai Lama is based in exile at nearby McLeodganj but the early exchanges were far from peaceable on a hard, fast surface with enough juice in it to make a Tibetan monk sit up and blink.
There was initial seam movement on offer for Finn but it was Bresnan who made the first incursion, removing ersatz opener Rohit. Having timed one exquisite square drive for four, Rohit attempted a reprise to a slightly wider delivery that drifted further away from his crease-bound push, the ball slicing off the outside edge to the right of Tredwell at second slip, where he took a tumbling catch. The very next ball produced a facsimile swish from Kohli, though Tredwell went in for a bit of variety on this occasion, juggling the ball three times in front of the kneeling Cook before grasping it for good with a giddy grin.
When Yuvraj got a thick edge to point trying to turn Finn through square leg, the match was beginning to resemble an early season encounter in England - at least in temperature and bowling conditions, if not the setting. It could have been even better for England had Raina's edge off Chris Woakes - replacing Jade Dernbach - stuck but he battled pugnaciously after being hit on the shoulder by his first ball, from Finn.
Tredwell has spent the one-day series doing a passable impression of Graeme Swann, particularly to left-handers, and he had Gautam Gambhir caught by the sprawling Bell at point. The wicket came from Tredwell's second ball, an immediate, Swann-esque intervention, and England's delight ratcheted up further when Finn won an lbw decision against MS Dhoni. Only during the spells of the part-time bowlers, Root and Samit Patel, did India's batsmen display any sense of comfort. Their combined 11 overs cost 80 runs as Raina gave India one last spin of the prayer wheel in pursuit of 4-1 - but he could not turn a molehill into a mountain.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Well played India , winning the series. TBH I think 3-2 probably flattered our side and it was probably a very good toss for England to win today as it was for India to win in the last game.Bell was a little streaky early on but I'm pleased he went on to see out the game for us. I do however feel that we have come away with more questions than answers and I still feel that we are no nearer to finding out what the best line up is. For me , the 2 biggest plus's have been the continuity of Finn's control and Tredwell who is surely nailed on for the future in shorter formats. I look forward to seeing Tredwell and Swann in tandem
England have a great opening batsman in Cook. Bell to me is a better middile order batsman but if he understands that he does not have to score at more than 6 per over at the start of the innings I think he will do well. Bell's skill is in rotating the stiking and finding boundaries against the spinner during the middle overs. The problem for England(at least that's what they think) is that once Trott comes back they have too many people at the top of the order that have a lower stike rate. But England should keep in mind that with the new rules they can always make up for slow starts. Also I think they should keep their batting order flexible depening on the start they get. If they lose a wicket early then Trott walks in at No.3. But if they do not loose a wicket till the 20th over then KP or Morgan should come in at No.3. This should fix most of their batting problems. More on their bowling choices in my next set of commets
1. Congratulations to Bell & Morgan. Both regained form just before the trip to NZ. 2. Mohali & Dharmasala provided he England team a nice & smooth transition to the cold climes of NZ. 3. Woakes, though the wicket column may not show,has proved a better bet than Dernbach. 4. Root proved his talents, and maturity beyond his years (Except the one shot with which he got out today). He is a star for the future. England will get even more from him as an opener, both in ODI & Test matches. Even before Staruss retired, I have been saying that Root will be a good replacement than Strauss. (In fact better, with his offspin) 5. India never learn. Can't just understand why they did not bench the consistently under-performing Gambhir (for quite some time) to give a chance to Pujara! 6. Ashwin's development as a bowler seem to be over. Nothing new for nearly an year. NO improvement in avoiding the mandatory loose deliveries, & lethargic movements in the field. Need a new lead spinner Pronto.
Bell - disappointing Tour? I agree with Nasser. As opener you know you can get out early but when you have logged 50 you have to bat on. Bell was unlucky to be run out on 85 in the first match. Two high scores, two wins. To carry your bat is really difficult. To bat through against the moving ball even more so. Bell's innings was a match winner as acknowledged by India, especially after we lost Cook and KP. Root and Morgan played extremely well to create partnerships with Bell. Can we at least have some credit to Bell here? To put the word 'disappointing' in the first paragraph after such an important knock - his first one day century in India - and not out as well, strikes me as a bit mean. Ever thus....
Have to agree with Jackiethpen. Bell - highest number of runs scored, highest average for the series. Hardly disappointing. The only thing England needed to win the series was a good tosser!
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 29, 2013, 18:20 GMT)The case of Pujara vs other Indian batsmen is that of a man Akash who is madly in love with an awesome woman Ramya for 3 years and then sees another terrific woman Binya (single & flirty) joining his office as intern. Akash knows that if he tries a bit then Binya would be his but even though he is tempted by this possibility he just can't leave Ramya for no reason. In fact, even if he had some issues with Ramya he would/should first try to fix them and move out ONLY if they are irretrievably broken.
It would make no sense for Akash to ask Ramya to leave just cos Binya was there now. Firstly, Akash has no issues with Ramya and Binya is just a stranger woman and who knows what she may be like in reality? If he tries for Binya and she disappoints him then with what face will he go back to Ramya?
Replace Akash with MSD, Binya with CP & Ramya with GG/RS/VK/YS/SR/RJ.
Forget about ethics & morals, even from PoV of logic it would be stupid to do such sort of an experiment.
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 29, 2013, 17:28 GMT)All those who love Pujara, it is one thing to root for your fav player and nothing's wrong in it and it is completely diff thing to start blaming the captain or ascribing malicious motives to his decisions just cos he is not going as per your thinking. First of all, they need to explain this excessive support for Pujara. Por boy has played a handful of tests and has had some success but by no means AND BY NO MEANS WHATSOEVER does he look like a finished product to me even in the longer format. He is good but not all that good as of now that you start talking of him as any sort of hope. Doing so will only put him under more pressure.
A guy here is often seen here saying O Pujara O Pujara, claims that Pujara would have scored a 100 just like Bell never mind it would have been his debut match, claims that Pujara already is captaincy candidate and thus MS dislikes/fears him and then says he is a realistic guy.
I would love to see CP play but I also see MSD's PoV. Sad some ppl can't/don't
Posted by Harmony111 on (January 29, 2013, 16:41 GMT)@wakaPAK & @mzm149 : WT20 may not have World Cup in its name but I am sure you would agree that it is the most (& in fact only) reputed tournament where various national T20 teams compete. You can't say the same for ICC Champions Trophy. It is neither here not there as it has a more reputed more coveted World Cup towering above it. And your talk about WT20 not being a World Cup technically is funny really. When Pak won the WT20 & its players were not bought in IPL it was said that Pak players were not bought even though they were World Champions. You and I both know very well that ICC WT20 is World Cup indeed.
And like I said, include ICC CT too if you want, India have won it too & been runner up once, your Pak team never even reached the finals (or even the SF IIRC). +2/+4 for Finalists/Winner is obvious. You get more points for winning titles than winning matches - ok?
If Pak reaches finals or wins then Pak should get +2/+4, why shud Ind get -2/-4? Rubbish.
India still winning.
Posted by pakistan_victorious on (January 29, 2013, 16:37 GMT)@Fast_Track_Bully, we have drawn a test series in South Africa 1-1 in our inaugural tour there in 1998. You asked the question " What you have archived there?". Haha we dont go on tours to archive anything. We play to win always unlike your power greedy BCCI who wants to own cricket and ruin it always. If cricket is extinct, BCCI is to blame.
Haha grow up. What is the issue about the world T20? We were a better team and we made it to the semi finals but India FAILED to make it to the T20 semi finals just like you all failing to qualify for the semis of the 2009 and 2010 T20 world cups.
We managed to thrash England 3-0 in tests in UAE but you all lost 2-1 to England at home in front of all home fans. If not for umpiring specials in aid of India, we would have seen a 4-0 triumph for England in the tests and a 5-0 triumph for England in ODIs. Aussies will have no trouble winning 4-0 in tests shortly unless umpires come to India's rescue at the helms of BCCI. Cricinfo please publish.
Posted by pakistan_victorious on (January 29, 2013, 16:15 GMT)@Fast_Track_Bully we never have umpires giving test matches against Bangladesh. Bangladesh deserves more respect cos they are no minnows unlike you. Keep living in a deluded world.
You minnows are pure flat track bullies. What is the fastness as your name implies? Pakistan are the fast track bullies for producing the greatest pace bowlers ever. We are also spin track bullies for producing top class spinners. Your nation has produced all over hyped overrated batsmen. Your side is nothing but mediocre to the maximum that Afghanistan can easily beat you for sure. Should India make it to 2nd round of the next T20 world cup, it is the biggest upset of the century.