India news

Supreme Court recommends that Srinivasan step down

ESPNcricinfo staff

March 25, 2014

Comments: 95 | Text size: A | A
'Court has come down with a sledgehammer'

The Supreme Court of India has asked BCCI president N Srinivasan to step down as the first move towards a fair investigation of the IPL corruption saga. A two-judge bench of India's top court, which made the observation, gave Srinivasan two days to take a decision before it resumes hearing the case on March 27.

While the recommendation is not a direct order, Justice AK Patnaik was unambiguous: "Mr Srinivasan should step down or else we'll be forced to pass an order." He questioned Srinivasan's position as BCCI president asking, "How did he stay on despite all the allegations? His staying on is nauseating for cricket." The other judge on the bench, Justice Ibrahim Kalifulla, told the counsel: "If there has to be a fair and dispassionate enquiry, Mr. Srinivasan must step down."


Should N Srinivasan resign as BCCI president?
See results ยป

The development - and the strong language used by the court - is believed to have caught the BCCI by surprise and thrown it into some disarray. While Srinivasan has refused to comment, three vice-presidents of the board have said there was no option but for him to comply with the court's orders. A board meeting is likely to be convened on Wednesday, at which the BCCI's response will be formalised.

The hearing, the first case of the day to be taken up in Supreme Court's Court No. 5, began with the BCCI lawyers stating that the Board agreed with the findings of the Mudgal panel report and asking the court to allow the BCCI to take its own actions in the light of panel recommendations. That was turned down by the court.

A PTI report said that the court stated that while it could not divulge details of the sealed envelope given to them by the Mudgal panel, the BCCI's lawyers were shown certain portions of the report. When the counsel, CA Sundaram, said "We have not seen the contents of the report in the sealed cover", Justice Patnaik is believed to have summoned him to the bench and had him read a portion of the sealed envelope report.

Justice Patnaik said: "Though there is no definite finding in the report in the sealed cover, the allegations are so serious they require further investigation, which the BCCI can't do on its own and it has to be done by an outside agency. That's why we are saying that Mr. Srinivasan must step down for a fair probe....In view of this, I need some answers, come back with an answer."

N Srinivasan at a media gathering after a meeting of the BCCI, Kolkata, May 26, 2013
If N Srinivasan does not heed the court's recommendation to step down, it will be 'forced to pass an order' on Thursday © AFP

In his early statements, Justice Patnaik questioned the wide divergence in the findings of the investigations conducted by the BCCI-appointed two-man probe panel and the Mudgal Committee panel. He wanted to know if the BCCI-appointed panel had been "managed." The BCCI counsel's reply was that the two-man BCCI panel did not have the "wherewithal" of the Mudgal panel, that the Mumbai and Delhi police investigations were under way and that the Mumbai police had refused to depose before their panel.

Srinivasan would not comment on the issue saying he had not "read" the court's recommendations. However Ravi Savant, a BCCI vice-president, said if the Supreme Court had issued a clear directive it would have to be followed. His words were echoed by Shivlal Yadav, who said he would be willing to take up any task he is given.

Another BCCI vice-president said no one was prepared for this scenario. "No one knows what can be done now. The court is yet to pass the order. But it is now up to him (Srinivasan). The court has asked him to step down. Otherwise it will pass an order. It is not good for the BCCI," the official said.

"We know what has happened to Subrata Roy [the Sahara chief]," the official said. "He defied the court's order and look where he is now."

The Supreme Court had appointed a three-member committee, headed by former High Court judge Mukul Mudgal and comprising additional solicitor general L Nageswara Rao and Assam Cricket Association member Nilay Dutta, in October 2013 to conduct an independent inquiry into the allegations of corruption against Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan, Super Kings owner India Cements, and Rajasthan Royals team owner Jaipur IPL Cricket Private Ltd, as well as with the larger mandate of allegations around betting and spot-fixing in IPL matches and the involvement of players. The committee had submitted its findings to the court on February 10.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 28, 2014, 7:07 GMT)

better time for indian cricket will start now

Posted by   on (March 27, 2014, 11:41 GMT)

Orders of Sumpreme must be obeyed

Posted by thinkgood on (March 26, 2014, 14:26 GMT)

Udendra : Not more than Sharad Pawar or Jagmohan Dalmia have played cricket.

Posted by Udendra on (March 26, 2014, 6:58 GMT)

For my information, has Srinivasan ever played cricket?

Posted by archis100 on (March 26, 2014, 4:55 GMT)

It is neither purely an Indian problem, nor just an IPL problem -- it is a Srinivasan problem. Let us recognize it as such and fix it, once and for all. Also, with our collective goodwill, let India and its IPL prosper! Anyone involved should also be eliminated. However, why bring down the whole CSK? As a process, can we see a day when cricketers are given due control and leadership roles in these organizations? They can always hire professional help for management/administration logistics, but the core should never be left to people like Srinivasan.

Posted by   on (March 26, 2014, 4:52 GMT)

its the right decision the culprits in this corruption saga must be punished

Posted by   on (March 26, 2014, 4:03 GMT)

Comments by Indian fans are most encouraging. It shows that as much as we, the helpless third tier Asian Fans, Indian Fans too loath Indian Cricket Administration, more so Mr. Sirinivasan. They know that it is their Cricket Administrators who have sullied the respect and admiration we had for Indian Cricketers and the team as a whole. As some comments rightly claimed I, too love India getting beaten by any team. It is pathetic but is true by most now.

Posted by techie77 on (March 25, 2014, 18:27 GMT)

Wow. It's best news have heard in relation to Indian cricket for a long time. Hopefully this starts a process of thorough clean-up within the Indian Cricket system. Supreme Court!! You Rock !!

Posted by   on (March 25, 2014, 18:24 GMT)

GOOD, not only for Indian Cricket but for World Cricket..

Posted by metadata on (March 25, 2014, 18:20 GMT)

This is a good day for cricket. Hopefully this will lead to a more sensible dialogue in world cricket/

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
Country Fixtures Country Results
3rd ODI: India Women v SA Women at Bangalore
Nov 28, 2014 (15:00 local | 09:30 GMT | 04:30 EST | 03:30 CST | 01:30 PST)
Quarter-final: Central Zone v South Zone at Mumbai
Nov 29, 2014 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT | 22:30 EST | 21:30 CST | 19:30 PST)
1st Semi-final: East Zone v North Zone at Mumbai
Nov 30, 2014 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT | 22:30 EST | 21:30 CST | 19:30 PST)
Only T20I: India Women v SA Women at Bangalore
Nov 30, 2014 (10:00 local | 04:30 GMT | 23:30 EST | 22:30 CST | 20:30 PST)
2nd Semi-final: TBA v West Zone at Mumbai
Dec 1, 2014 (09:00 local | 03:30 GMT | 22:30 EST | 21:30 CST | 19:30 PST)
Complete fixtures » | Download Fixtures »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days