Pune Warriors v Mumbai Indians, IPL 2012, Pune

Mumbai defend 120 by one run

The Report by Abhishek Purohit

May 3, 2012

Comments: 122 | Text size: A | A

Mumbai Indians 120 for 9 (Tendulkar 34, Bhuvneshwar 2-9, Nehra 2-19) beat Pune Warriors 119 for 6 (Manhas 42*, Harbhajan 2-18, Malinga 2-25) by one run
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Sourav Ganguly was bowled for 16 off 24 balls, Pune Warriors v Mumbai Indians, IPL, Pune, May 3, 2012
Sourav Ganguly struggled to get going © AFP
Enlarge

In the end, Mumbai Indians deserved two points for having rendered a target of 121 so difficult that Pune Warriors played catch-up for most of the chase. And the one-run margin magnified the impact of Sourav Ganguly's crawl in the final analysis. There were other Warriors batsmen who found run-scoring difficult on the low pitch, but they did not hang around for as long as Ganguly did and consequently, did not make it as difficult for the doughty Mithun Manhas as Ganguly did.

When Ganguly arrived at 40 for 2 in the seventh over, the asking-rate was just over six runs an over. By the time he was bowled for 16 off 24 by Lasith Malinga off the last ball of the 17th over, slogging and missing tamely, the asking-rate had climbed to nine. Manhas tried to make the most of the strike he got in a 47-run fifth-wicket stand in which Ganguly contributed 13. But he was up against a class Mumbai Indians attack, and with Malinga to bowl two overs at the death, Warriors' chances diminished even further. They needed 12 off the final over, but Munaf Patel managed to hold them off, just about.

The early damage had been done by Munaf when he trapped Robin Uthappa lbw, after the batsman had kickstarted the chase with some big strokes. Mumbai Indians' battery of specialist spinners - though one of them, Robin Peterson, was never used - then broke the back of Warriors' chase. Jesse Ryder chipped Harbhajan Singh to long-on, Michael Clarke got a rough lbw decision and Steven Smith walked past a Pragyan Ojha delivery to be bowled. Warriors had slipped from 40 for 1 to 47 for 4 but with 74 needed from 61, they were right in the game still.

Ganguly's innings ensured they slowly went out of it. He was on 12 off 22 at one stage, unable to earn anything more than singles. He managed to make room and lift Malinga down the ground for a four, but was bowled in the same over.

Manhas wasn't giving up, though. Backing himself to cut almost everything, he and Wayne Parnell took 11 off Pragyan Ojha in the 18th over. But Harbhajan had another over from Malinga left, and it did what Morne Morkel's penultimate over had done for Delhi Daredevils against Rajasthan Royals. Malinga gave just four runs, and left Warriors with too much to do in the last over.

With eight needed off the last two balls, Bhuvneshwar Kumar drilled Munaf over extra cover for four, but could only hit a low full toss - the final ball - to deep midwicket as Warriors ended agonizingly short.

That Mumbai Indians managed even 120 was down to the opening partnership between Sachin Tendulkar and James Franklin. Mumbai Indians did not begin badly for a side that has now changed its opening combination seven times in ten matches. Well past the halfway stage of the tournament, they might have finally even found the combination that clicks. Tendulkar and Franklin added fifty-plus runs for the third time in as many matches, but Mumbai Indians could not build much on that base, losing 5 for 12 from a position of 81 for 2 after 12 overs.

Warriors were accurate with their fast bowlers. Smith led the way in the field with three run-outs, two of them at crucial junctures. He first ran out Rohit Sharma to dent Mumbai Indians after the steady start, and then caught Thisara Perera short to hurt their hopes of a lower-order fightback.

Ashish Nehra recovered from an expensive first over to go for just five runs in his next three overs. It was Nehra who triggered the collapse, getting Tendulkar to edge a steer to the wicketkeeper in the 12th over. He then surprised Peterson with a skiddy short delivery in the 14th, and the top-edged pull was taken by Ganguly.

The middle-order implosion undid the decent start from Tendulkar and Franklin. The duo were kept quiet by Warriors but took Nehra and Ashok Dinda for an expensive over each to ensure the run-rate did not suffer much. Bhuvneshwar got the breakthrough in the eighth over when Franklin top-edged a pull.

Tendulkar could not pick up his scoring-rate beyond a run a ball, and after he fell, Mumbai Indians stalled. Ganguly could not score at remotely close to a run a ball, and after he finally fell, it was too late for Warriors, who have now lost six of their last seven games.

Abhishek Purohit is an editorial assistant at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Abhishek Purohit

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by SuperSharky on (May 5, 2012, 10:00 GMT)

Only Manhas seems to be the only batsmen who could find a way, in the middle of the innings, to score more than 20 runs on a strike rate better than a run a ball. All the other batsmen struggled in that conditions. Not just Tendulkar and Ganguly. They were the sensible ones for letting the spectators see 2 full innings'. Great bowling from both sides.

Posted by SuperSharky on (May 5, 2012, 9:14 GMT)

Some of these comments are totally ridiculous and gives me a hint that most of these commentators on this report, has never batted, in their lives, on a low scoring pitch. I've seen a team collapse even before they could reach a team total of 70 runs. It was Professionals with international standard batsmen. To be precise, a game between SA Domestic Champions, Titans vs Freestate Eagles. The biggest and most harsh criticism came for not completing the 20 overs and not using all your 120 balls, because they wanted to hit everything out of the park. This game was a game for the bowlers to brag. Both teams had coaches like Donald and Pollock and I'm just glad that Tendulkar and Ganguly had the experience to try and bat out the 20 overs. It was a spectacular finish with 1 team winning by 1 run. No team would have reached a total of a 100 runs or would have had this close finish if Tendulkar and Ganguly tried to play like youngsters Smith and Sharma.

Posted by   on (May 5, 2012, 6:52 GMT)

Dada was struggling.......he is not supposed to be in the format as captain,better to sit as Coach for Pune Warriors

Posted by   on (May 4, 2012, 19:44 GMT)

DADA pls QUIT.....................................

Posted by JG2704 on (May 4, 2012, 18:09 GMT)

Unless he is injured - why is Alf Thomas not playing? More money than sense

Posted by   on (May 4, 2012, 16:34 GMT)

Well bowled Malinga.Proved that he is the best death bowler in the word!

don't blame much 2 gunguly.he tried to anchor the inings but he 4gt singles.MATHEWS is the ideal man also dhoni to chase the targets.PWI should think about it!

I think in next auction MI should purchase a Sri lankan,Pakisthan or Indian opener to their team! Levi,blizaad,jecobs all are strugling!

Posted by Kalii on (May 4, 2012, 14:26 GMT)

It is very heart wrenching to see 2 of the greatest Indian batsman trying to make their mark in a field which is dominated by younger (Y), fitter (F) and attacking (A) cricketers.

Someone has rightly said, as a human being starts aging, his vision starts getting narrow and he can see only himself, he thinks that he is only the right person, he thinks his strategy is always right. But alas!!

Sachin played out a maiden, then holed out when it was really necessary to step up, putting pressure on people like Rohit Sharma, Rayudu, Peterson.

Ganguly, though can be spared here as instead of opening he gave the opportunity to others, however that was all wiped out by the silly and senseless display of slow batting. At one end you have a YFA cricketer in Manhas trying desperately to innovate shots, keep the scoreboard ticking and the other hand you have Ganguly making it more difficult for him.

I was really disgusted to see the attitude of both great players. I am really in a conundrum now

Posted by   on (May 4, 2012, 13:45 GMT)

Ganguly is shadow of the history.In the last two games he drowned PW.Even he cant make run by ball in T20 format. I was a big fan of him in the past,he is alltime great player of india and cricketing world.But to keep alive that respect he shouldnt play T20 now.Dada will feel better as a cricket expert in espn or coaching job bt not as a player.This is harsh reality.

Posted by nitin1090 on (May 4, 2012, 13:44 GMT)

Player like Tamim Iqbal is lucky that he is playing in IPL.. Many better player then him are not even auctioned..

Posted by soumyas on (May 4, 2012, 13:21 GMT)

if malinga didn't bowl him out...and had ganguly played till last ball.... Mumbai would hav won by big margin....;)

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abhishek PurohitClose
Tournament Results
KKR v Super Kings at Chennai - May 27, 2012
KKR won by 5 wickets (with 2 balls remaining)
Daredevils v Super Kings at Chennai - May 25, 2012
Super Kings won by 86 runs
Super Kings v Mum Indians at Bangalore - May 23, 2012
Super Kings won by 38 runs
Daredevils v KKR at Pune - May 22, 2012
KKR won by 18 runs
Royals v Mum Indians at Jaipur - May 20, 2012
Mum Indians won by 10 wickets (with 12 balls remaining)
Chargers v RCB at Hyderabad (Deccan) - May 20, 2012
Chargers won by 9 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!