Features FeaturesRSS FeedFeeds

Bangladesh in 2009

With heads held high

Two Test wins, 14 in ODIs, an inspiring captain, and a promising newcomer made Bangladesh's 2009 their most successful 12 months ever

Abu Choudhury

December 29, 2009

Comments: 22 | Text size: A | A

Shakib Al Hasan is all smiles after a splendid all-round performance, West Indies v Bangladesh, 2nd Test, 4th day, Grenada, July 20, 2009
Shakib Al Hasan led Bangladesh to their first overseas series win © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links

If 2008 was a year to forget for Bangladesh cricket, 2009 has been a rare treat: one to savour.

At first glance, heading into the year, it seemed that cricket's youngest Test nation was destined to have a tumultuous 12 months. Having lost arguably some of their best players to the ICL, Bangladesh also had to contend with injuries to their most reliable bowler and the change of captaincy that ensued. Mohammad Ashraful, Mashrafe Mortaza and Shakib Al Hasan have all skippered the side at one time or another in 2009. Shakib, who signed for Worcestershire late in 2009, proved to be an inspirational captain, and largely under his leadership, Bangladesh have had their most successful year since they gained Test status.

Bangladesh played three Tests in 2009. Having lost the first against Sri Lanka in January in a predictably nonchalant style, they went on to surprise the world and possibly themselves by notching up their first Test series victory against West Indies, who fielded a depleted side. But the victory was no less sweet for success-starved Bangladesh supporters.

Bangladesh's year in Test cricket was notable for other reasons too. They made a top score of 345 in St Vincent, where Tamim Iqbal scored his maiden Test century, and on all but one occasion they were able to post at least 200 runs in an innings. For a side that is accustomed to the ignominy of innings defeats, this was no mean feat.

It was in ODI cricket, however, that Bangladesh made the most impressive strides in 2009. Of the 19 ODIs they played, they won 14 and lost five. This compares favourably to 2008, when they only won five of their 26 ODIs. A success rate of 74% is impressive by itself, but they also twice scored over 300 against Zimbabwe in Bulwayo - a remarkable statistic for a side that frequently struggles to score above 250 in 50-over cricket.

It will be argued that Bangladesh hardly faced the better-ranked sides in 2009, and while this is of course true, it is also worth noting that one of those ODI victories came against a full-strength Sri Lanka side and that Zimbabwe fielded one of their strongest teams in recent years.

High point
There is no doubt that the team's tour to the West Indies in July was the highlight of Bangladesh's year. Bangladesh had tasted Test success just once previously, against Zimbabwe in 2005. Since then, they have come close but ultimately failed to cross the finish line. In 2009 they not only swept the Test series but also the ODIs.

A cursory glance at the scorecards for those Tests will reflect that West Indies fielded an inexperienced side and that both matches were closely fought. However, statistics alone cannot paint an accurate picture. Although lacking big-name players, Reifer's side contained some cricketers who were an injury or two away from selection to a full-strength side (for example, Kemar Roach, Travis Dowlin and Darren Sammy are all currently touring Australia). Moreover, while West Indies were undercooked before the first Test, they were certainly better prepared for the second. It was the nature of those wins that gives Bangladesh supporters cause for optimism.

 
 
Bangladesh continue to be overly reliant on their army of spinners and will be acutely aware that matches are rarely won through left-arm spin alone. The lack of seam-bowling support will need to be addressed
 

Amid all the uncertainty and controversy on that tour, Bangladesh could easily have succumbed to yet another loss. Followers of Bangladesh cricket will know only too well the team's habit of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. But this proved not to be Multan in 2003 or Fatullah in 2006. Ultimately Bangladesh triumphed.

There were other high points too. In Zimbabwe, Charles Coventry posted the highest individual ODI score, but this could not prevent Shakib's men taking the series 4-1, and then repeating the feat with an identical scoreline at home in November. Bangladesh supporters only dare to whisper it right now, but there is an increasing suspicion that their side has finally discovered the art of winning.

Low point
It was not all success and accolades for Bangladesh this year. In Twenty20s, which would appear in theory to be tailormade for the trigger-happy Bangladesh batsmen, the team have had a year to forget, losing every match they played. The most embarrassing of these was against Ireland at Trent Bridge, where the Bangladesh batting reverted to type and the O'Brien brothers enhanced their reputations.

In this review last year Utpal Shuvro nominated Mohammad Ashraful as Bangladesh's "fading star". This year he averaged just under 13 in Tests and under 25 in ODIs. Ashraful's career has descended into cliché; an apparently gifted young batsman unable to assert himself on the international stage is a story heard before, as the careers of Mark Ramprakash and Mohammad Kaif will attest. Ashraful did make some valuable contributions in 2009, but these were with the ball rather than the bat.

The loss of the captaincy means Ashraful is no longer guaranteed a place in the side. He may be only 25 but he has also played 50 Tests, and more ODIs than Andrew Flintoff. His future must now surely be in doubt.


Rubel Hossain roars his delight at dismissing Ryan Austin, West Indies v Bangladesh, 1st Test, Kingstown, 3rd day, July 11, 2009
Rubel Hossain: Bangladesh's answer to Mohammad Aamer © AFP
Enlarge

New kid on the block
Just one cricketer made debuts in all three formats for Bangladesh in 2009, and what a debut it was. Rubel Hossain is young, energetic and capable of regularly hitting 85mph. He returned figures of 4 for 33 from just 5.3 overs in his maiden ODI, against Sri Lanka in January. The 19-year-old from Bagerhat is Bangladesh's answer to Mohammad Aamer, and while he has much to learn, he is certainly an exciting prospect.

What 2010 holds
Bangladesh have a surprisingly busy schedule in 2010, when they will face some of the bigger beasts in world cricket. Sri Lanka, India, New Zealand and England will all provide much sterner tests.

Although they have performed admirably in 2009, there are still unanswered questions. It is not yet clear whether the injury-prone Mortaza will reclaim the captaincy or whether the selectors will keep faith with Shakib. The selectors must also decide whether to recall any former ICL players, who become eligible for selection in the New Year.

Bangladesh continue to be overly reliant on their army of spinners and will be acutely aware that matches are rarely won through left-arm spin alone. The lack of seam bowling support will need to be addressed.

A relatively successful year has come to an end, but Bangladesh's performances in 2010 will provide a truer reflection of how much they have evolved. Greater challenges lie ahead, but a side that constantly has to battle for respectability can venture into the New Year full of hope and optimism, and it is not very often that one can say that.

Abu Choudhury is a regular contributor to Banglacricket.com. He lives in London

RSS Feeds: Abu Choudhury

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Nipun on (December 31, 2009, 12:25 GMT)

@Right Arm Fast :- Both Mark Ramprakash & Mohammad Kaif can be thought to be amongst players who couldn't do full justice to their talent-this can be figured out by looking @ their 1st class & list A statistics,& their bursts of talent in international cricket.But Ashraful can't fall into that category straightaway.Ashraful has played 7/8 gems in a 10 year career,so that's even less that 1 every year.Plus Ashraful's test,ODI,1st class,& list A statistics tell that his highest average in any form of cricket is 29,& that too after spending 10 years in the game.People love to talk about him being only 25,but he has been playing international cricket since 2001.Such lowly statistics won't even make bowling allrounders proud.

Posted by Nipun on (December 31, 2009, 12:18 GMT)

@Right Arm Fast :- I am not a supporter of any team.It's just that comparing Ashraful to the likes of Kaif & Ramprakash,& comparing Rubel to Aamer is just gross !!!

Posted by NBZ1 on (December 30, 2009, 21:41 GMT)

Come on people give some credit where it's due. Of course Bangladesh's 2009 success must be heavily qualified by the fact that they played little top-class opposition. But success it still is of a sort,especially when compared to previous years. The performances against WI and Zimbabwe showed a clinical side to their play that has too often been missing in the past. There were a few memorable moments against SL too- a win in the ODI series and nearly an ODi series victory, and a rather gallant chase of 521 where they got as much as 413 of the runs required.

It's a pity then that there are those who feel compelled to take cheap shots at the Bangladeshi team, who in 2009 rarely put a foot wrong and showed considerable improvement (even if they are still not a match for most Test teams). Blame the ICC for the poor schedule, if you will, but don't blame the BD team for latching onto those opportunities that did come their way this year.

Posted by Right_Arm_Fast on (December 30, 2009, 17:26 GMT)

A couple of points for Nipun (who I am guessing is an India supporter). Firstly, both mark ramprakash (who I note you didn't mention) and Mohammad kaif have achieved far more in their careers than Ashraful has, so a comparison to that degree would indeed be absurd. I was comparing them only in so far as they have failed to fulfil their potential at international level - I think that much is clear even from a cursory reading of the article.

Secondly, Mohammad Amamer has made some huge strides in 2009, the only reason I compare him to rubel is because they are both fast (though aamer is faster), both rose through the ranks of Under 19 cricket, are both roughly the same age and both came to international prominence in last years World T20.

Posted by rohan024 on (December 30, 2009, 16:59 GMT)

i guess one of the ways to make test cricket competitive is to revoke bangladesh's test membership. Thats important because one, bangladesh is a poor cricket team and secondaly they are blocking other deserving teams like ireland and kenya. Its largely due to the BCCI largesse that they have been holding on to test membership for so long. Though for BCCI, Bangladesh is nothing more than a vote, thats why Bdesh has never been allowed to play cricket in India. Having said that, i believe that Shakib Hasan is a very good player but its a case of one excellent player among 15 ordinary/poor players. Of all the talks about NZ winning their first test match in 23 years is ridiculous. NZ didn't get a quarter of oppurtunities to play test matches, which bdesh has got all these years.

Posted by aimmunity on (December 30, 2009, 16:15 GMT)

The improvement as well as the success or failure of a team is judged by its performance in the field. Compared to its own previous performances, there is no denying fact that Bangladesh has performed better in 2009. But it is also true that Bangladesh needs to continue improvement of its performance. I am following comments on the performance of Bangladesh posted here. It is frustrating that some commentators have not acknowledged Bangladesh's improved performance instead criticizing the team unduly. All of us know the cricket histories of all the established teams. Support from cricket fans is one of the most important things for any team's improvement and it is essential to popularize Cricket globally. I wish a very successful new year for BANGLADESH team.

Posted by subrata_banarjee2 on (December 30, 2009, 10:34 GMT)

Why some people are denying Bangladeshi's successs i cannt understand,think NewZealand even won their first test after 23 years,so Bangladesh have contributed much in this sector and right this moment they have some world class player and they are performing well.So they should give more opportunity to play more games with strong nations.

Posted by Arifutm on (December 30, 2009, 10:29 GMT)

if you compare with the previous years you have to agree that 2009 is the best for BD so far. their success was due to their battery of spinners and if they use the same tactics against better teams in 2010 definitely they will pay for that. hope BD will serve some good competitive cricket and shakib will continue to amaze in 2010...

Posted by NoDir_BaKe on (December 30, 2009, 9:13 GMT)

2009 is a most remarkable calender year for Bangladesh Cricket. in this year we got rubel gussain a young speed star, we got a allrounder/captain shakib al hasan. guys, plsss dont blame bangladesh team, ICL returning player also coming to the team, so let's see how they come good in 2010, & let's pray for tigers, wish u all the best!!

Posted by Hemel21 on (December 30, 2009, 8:40 GMT)

Plz guy dont nullify our achievements.Danish Kaneria initially got all his 5 wickets haul against weaker sides ,then he started to get against England,Australia India all the top ranked sides.It needs some time to fight the big teams for us.We are progressing.And we hope to beat Sri Lanka in this tri-nation in Janury

Posted by gumzaat on (December 30, 2009, 4:37 GMT)

"Rubel Hossain ... The 19-year-old from Bagerhat is Bangladesh's answer to Mohammad Aamer" - Sounds like quite the delusional/ridiculous answer.

Posted by Percy_Fender on (December 29, 2009, 23:49 GMT)

There is simply no doubt that the Bangladeshis have all the flair and talent needed to do well in all formats of the game. Which is why I feel sad when I see how little they have achieved over the years barring the odd upsets here and there. They resemble on occasions, a bunch of disparate individuals pulling in different directions. It is nice to know that Shakib has taken over as Captain because he is a great all rounder apart from having the ability to captain the side. I look forward to the Indian team's visit to Bangladesh soon. It is not going to be a cake walk as many might be inclined to think it will be. Bagladesh have some very good batsmen, a decent pace attack and world class spinners. Dhoni would be well advised to keep complacence at bay.

Posted by Nipun on (December 29, 2009, 17:55 GMT)

& Abu better be careful before comparing Ashraful with Kaif.Ashraful is nothing compared to Mohammad Kaif.Why on earth do you make such horrific,nonsense comparisons,like comparing a Rubel-who with Mohammad Aamer ???

Posted by gochargers999 on (December 29, 2009, 17:30 GMT)

this article is a joke?? i mean reaalllly?? let's look at the stats..Bangladesh won 5 of 26 matches in 2008 of which 3 were against Ireland, 1 against UAE and 1 against NZ..they lost ALL of the remaning matches against the test playing nations..they won 14 ODIs this year out of which a whopping 10 were against Zimbabwe!!..even then they managed to lose 4 against Zimbabwe!!..no wonder they want to play so much against them...what next? they'll play against Timbuctoo in 2010 and win all of their 100 matches? that would be an awesome record..100-0 for 2010 - great for an end-of-the year pat-on-the-back...no wonder no self-respecting test playing nation wants to play against them..after almost 10 years of having test match status..forget a draw..they cannot last even 4 days of a proper test match..give me a break please!

Posted by Nipun on (December 29, 2009, 15:42 GMT)

@SettingSun:-It will perhaps be one of the mysteries of the century that someone like Mushfiqur Rahim,who drops about one catch or misses one stumping every over,is considered to be an exciting wicketkeeper-batsman.He is sometimes solid with the bat,but wicketkeeping?I'm sorry!

Posted by KAZabbar on (December 29, 2009, 14:51 GMT)

Another thing I would like to add, Bangladesh's definite strength in bowling are their spinners, and I dont see anything wrong with that. Their pace attack is definitely below world class, but not something you can toy with. You must consider Mashrafe was injured most of the year, so was Rasel and many other pacers. Near the end of the year Bangladesh ended up with one or two front line pacers, its true the second line of pacers are dreadful. But a pace attack with Mashrafe, Rasel, Nazmul is still of very high quality.

Posted by SettingSun on (December 29, 2009, 12:47 GMT)

I'm sorry, but Bangladesh are palpably NOT improving. Shakib is clearly an outstanding all-round cricketer but an enormous amount is already being expected of him, whilst Mushfiqur Rahim is clearly an exciting wicketkeeper-batsman. Outside of those, it is a batting line-up that will whack a run-a-ball 20 each before playing some witless shot and a seam bowling line-up that will hurl down at least one four ball an over and fail to maintain any lengthy pressure.

How is that an improvement exactly?

Posted by dontalon on (December 29, 2009, 11:48 GMT)

"... Reifer's side contained some cricketers who were an injury or two away from selection to a full-strength side (for example, Kemar Roach, Travis Dowlin and Darren Sammy are all currently touring Australia)...."

That is incorrect. Kemar, i can only assume, would have been lost to WI cricket.

1.The Barbados selectors are known to go with Fast bowlers who have already played test cricket, than go for players who have potential to play TESTS and if Kemar Roach had not made his debut against B'desh there is no way he would have toured Australia.

2. Travis Dowlin would never ever have played test cricket if those 1st team guys did not go on strike and if the other 10 or 12 guy the board asked to play had accepted it's invitation. He was a below average played who maybe was on his way out of first class cricket in a year or two.

2. Sammy would not have toured simply because he's not a good enough bowler for the hard Aus pitches and he is not a genuine test class bat.

Posted by RSG476 on (December 29, 2009, 10:58 GMT)

I think it is a bit unfair to play down the win by Bangladesh in West Indies. Yes, the WI side was weak and it was not the regular team. But to be fair, the first test wins by countries like India were also against MCC sides which did not have many of the 1st rung players (1952). To that extent, I think Bangladesh's win needs to be viewed in the same light. Certainly, they should play more cricket with other nations, and hopefully, they shall sustain and enhance this trend. But it also means that other nations should take an interest in playing Bangladesh. They have a duty too

Posted by KAZabbar on (December 29, 2009, 9:46 GMT)

There is no way denying the success of Bangladesh, they have scored some amazing wins in 2009, specially the tests against WIN. Depleted or not, West Indies were not pushovers, and you also have to consider that Bangladesh is a team who have just won one test over 8 years, and to win both the tests, coming from a first innings deficit shows mental growth if nothing else. Another point that Abu is missing is the tri series final against Srilanka, SL were reduced to 6/5 and Bangladesh were only denied due to some reckless and fluky batting from Srilanka. Jayawardene said after the match that his team probably did not deserve to win. But the real test for Bangladesh will be in 2010, when they will battle NZ and ENG at home, a tour in which sub continent teams have been struggling for some time.

Posted by Nipun on (December 29, 2009, 8:08 GMT)

Kemar Roach,Travis Dowlin,& Darren Sammy may also have played for the regular West Indies team had all the players been available,& these 3 players duly hammered Bangladesh individually.So don't you understand what would have happened to Bangladesh had the regular players been available ? The fact that such a poor West Indies team stretched Bangladesh to the limit speaks volumes about Bangladesh team not making any progress at all.Zimbabwe has been a non test playing team for ages,& yet Bangladesh lost 4 matches to them this year.Even the matches Bangladesh team were mostly very hard fought & most of the matches could have gone either way.Sakib is a merit player,but maximum of Bangladesh players are below-club standard.The fact that Bangladesh fans consider this year to be their best ever speaks a lot about their cricketing poverty which,worryingly,shows no signs of improvement even after 10 torturous years in international cricket.

Posted by tfjones1978 on (December 29, 2009, 3:30 GMT)

"It will be argued that Bangladesh hardly faced the better-ranked sides in 2009". This is proof that test cricket needs to be organised as an overlap between top 8 and next best teams (Bang, Zimb, Irel, etc). Best structures to improve cricket would be test cricket being prom&releg multi-tiered (currently 3 tiered with no relegation) or a 4 tier test world cup (similar to ODI world cup) with Group Stage[Yr1 - 4 groups of 5], Super Eights[Yr2-3 1 group of 8], Semis[6 months] and Final[6 months]. This would allow best 4 teams to compete against each other over 3 years, best 8 teams over 2 years and associates to compete against top teams over 12 months. With Regional Qualifiers (Y1) and Associate Qualifiers (Yrs2-4), all 100 teams in world would have chance to qualify for positions 9-12, with Super Eights auto qualifying for next test world cup (round 1 - Group Stage).

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Abu ChoudhuryClose

    'Lara v McGrath was a great battle of our generation'

Dravid and Manjrekar discuss Brian Lara's adaptability

    'Bailey should lead Australia in the World Cup'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on why keepers don't make good captains

    A good time to invest in Smith stock

Mark Nicholas: Australia's new captain has shown more responsibility in his batting without shedding his youthful bravado

    'Why I was dropped is still an unsolved mystery'

Former India opener Madhav Apte talks about his short-lived Test career, and touring the West Indies

Was it right to play the fourth ODI?

Ahmer Naqvi: Why there really is no point in the PCB trying to get international cricket back to Pakistan

News | Features Last 7 days

The terrifying bouncer

When Mitchell Johnson hit Virat Kohli on the helmet with a bouncer, Australian fielders came from everywhere. Mental disintegration had gone, replaced by the cricket unity. Two teams, one family.

Johnson and Kohli fight their demons

From the bouncer that struck him on the badge of his helmet to the bouncer that dismissed him, Virat Kohli's century, and his duel with Mitchell Johnson, made for compelling human drama

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Kohli attains batting nirvana

Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

News | Features Last 7 days