Sharda Ugra
Sharda Ugra Sharda UgraRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

Finally, the IPL comes back to the cricket

The organisers and the sponsors aim to make up for the off-field debacles and sagas of last year, but the IPL must also prove that India's appetite for the game is insatiable

Sharda Ugra

April 7, 2011

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

Sachin Tendulkar and Gautam Gambhir walk with the trophy, India v Sri Lanka, final, World Cup 2011, Mumbai, April 2, 2011
After the euphoria of the World Cup win, can the country still consume 74 Twenty20 games over the next six weeks? © Getty Images
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: Indian Premier League
Teams: India

Ever thought you'd be sitting around in the first week of April 2011, thinking, "Sober up now, everyone, the IPL is here"?

It is what six weeks of the "Cup that counts" have done. Give or take three decades, the World Cup has produced India's best-ever display of 50-over cricket and fireworks, followed by an outbreak of national euphoria. All of which has led to a lingering hangover. Kindly stop the tuk tuk because after the World Cup victory, India has gone quite giddy.

Suddenly it's the IPL that must throw the switch, and it can only be calculated later, whether that ends up on or off. Indian cricket and its vast audience must now answer the anxious queries of the IPL's marketing men and advertisers. Can India move seamlessly from the not-so-fuddy-duddy and now suddenly meaningful 50-over format to the snap, crackle and pop of Twenty20? Can a country set aside a deep, intoxicating national loyalty and once again indulge in somewhat scripted dancing in the aisles for clubs created out of commercial enterprise?

IPL 4 must prove that India's appetite for cricket is insatiable. That even after a six-week drama that had the happiest of endings for India, the country can still consume more cricket for another 74 matches over six weeks. Everyone involved in the IPL must find a way to make the League the primary option of choice for all summer-night entertainment, over soaps, news and all other sport. (Getting past the soaps should not, truthfully, be difficult.) Actually that's a dilemma the IPL organisers, its chief patrons, the BCCI and their sponsors, wouldn't exactly mind. At least it's about asking what the IPL's cricket can do and whether its sponsors' investments will eventually be worth it.

Anything will be better that what's happened with the IPL in the last 10 months. Everything will need to be better than what happened as the Season 3 drew to a close. In between last season's ceaseless cycle of matches, came a storm that wouldn't stop. It began with a tweet that led to the resignation of a cabinet minister and moved on to other things: Lalit Modi's banishment from his disreputable Eden, a raid across IPL franchise offices by the Income Tax Department, questions from the enforcement directorate about the routing of broadcast and sponsorship deals, the Kochi franchise's tangled web of ownership, Bombay High court battles against Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab, and, a few months ago, the grumbling of the franchises about the auction process.

The IPL's most precious assets, apart from the stars that take part in it, are its bottom line and its brand value. In 2010 a most public of beatings dented its image and the jury will stay out until the end of Season 4 as to whether that has in any way affected profits. The one way the IPL could get the gloss back onto its "brand" is by staging an efficient, watchable and scandal-free season four.

Given the uneven nature of Indian state cricket administration, the franchises work to put out a 21st century event (or "product" if you prefer) with a 1970s delivery system

It will be a season of many firsts: the first with 10 teams rather than eight, the first with a newly shuffled player pool across teams, the first without after-parties and perhaps even cheerleaders, the first without the once-foremost Mr Modi. The man's Twitter bio defines him as "Founder and architect of the Indian Premier League and Champions League T20". The day before the IPL began, he told us all at 7:29pm IST that he "supports Anna Hazare totally" and then philosophically mused at 7:52pm, "The show must Go on. IPL is a world class tournament. It's for the fans globally. Each Game will be riveting."

The 10 franchises must be ready to host this "world class tournament" amid some third-class organisation, whether over-ticketing, crowd control, security or hospitality. Here is where franchises run into trouble every season as they conduct matches in venues they do not own or have any control over. Given the uneven nature of Indian state cricket administration, the franchises work to put out a 21st century event (or "product" if you prefer) with a 1970s delivery system. A Rs 20,000 IPL ticket must somehow become an experience worth the expense, even if the grounds have no parking or kitchen or storage / refrigeration facilities. It is what the ICC ran into a few times during the World Cup and all those old issues - ticket sales versus VIP passes, sponsors' demands versus local association quotas - will once again come into play. At least seven times, if not more, per franchise.

Out in the market, the word is that ticket sales have actually climbed in this fourth season and franchises in the major metros can look to pull in more than the Rs 20 crore (US$ 4.5 million approx) they did over seven games in the previous season, on ticketing alone. The advent of 10 teams means that the sponsors' honey pot will have more gathering towards it. Smaller advertisers may find themselves fatigued after the World Cup. Yet, no matter how severe the government inquiries or bitter the court cases, there was no shortage of cash when the player pool was put into auction again a few months ago. Never mind its non-governing Governing Council or conflicted interests, the IPL is a pie of which the cricket business still wants more than a mouthful.

This season, however, IPL 4's future significance and (shock, horror) brand image will be decided in India's living rooms and the capacity of its audience to get addicted. Cricketers may sometimes choose to make the contest between club and country a little murky, their audience always has more definite answers. Never mind ad spots or strike rates or brand valuations, IPL4's most telling numbers will come from its six-weeks of TV ratings.

Predictions from the living room couches says it may take a while to get used to IPL4, where rival World Cup finalists like Sachin Tendulkar and Lasith Malinga will celebrate the fall of MS Dhoni's wicket. It will take a while but the IPL will succeed for the same reasons it did when it was first launched. Those with large stakes in it will simply not allow it to flounder.

Sharda Ugra is senior editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sharda Ugra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Dashgar on (April 9, 2011, 9:12 GMT)

Nobody outside India cares about the IPL. Apart from the players who get contracts, but even then most overseas players don't get a game cos they play Indian kids instead

Posted by SSRajan on (April 9, 2011, 8:45 GMT)

Don't worry about the appetite for cricket in India. We cannot have enough of it. At least I didn't know know what to do with 24hrs in the day with no live cricket on TV. I am sure I am not the only one.

Posted by memoriesofthepast on (April 9, 2011, 7:08 GMT)

After IPL, Indian team tours WI and England and dont know how many players will make it fit for WI and England. This is worst schedule for Indian cricket team. Players will get unfit and even retire and the performance will go down. Indian players will have to be selective about which match to play and which not to play if they want a long injury-free career.

Posted by landl47 on (April 9, 2011, 6:50 GMT)

It's a nothing competition, created purely for cash. It will fail simply because money isn't a reason for fans to support teams. When the novelty wears off, it will be cancelled like a TV series which has become merely a formula. It's not real cricket, it's a version of baseball played with cricket equipment. The Indian fans will tire of it as the rest of the world has already tired of it.

Posted by tompuffin on (April 9, 2011, 4:17 GMT)

74 games of 6 weeks- almost 2 games a day is way too overkill.

IPL will never match the likes of NBA or EPL because these sorta things need to be spaced out to create anticipation and build fan bases, not come, mess things around and blow away like a bad smell.

Its too long too be a carnival like sevens but too long to actually be a decent sports league competition

Posted by NP_NY on (April 8, 2011, 21:25 GMT)

There is no way IPL will ever fail because there is a large enough fan base (atleast 100 million) just in India. The fans outside India can mock IPL all they want but I bet a lot of them will be watching (for instance, the SL fans will watch the Kochi games because Mahela and Murali play for Kochi) even if they don't admit it. IPL was a success the last three years and it will be this year too.

Posted by harsha_chu on (April 8, 2011, 18:51 GMT)

@gnana, when did sachin, bhajji, Dhoni, Zaheer last play ranji? I am a huge fan of test cricket, but lets admit- IPL gives the local indian players a BIG platform to prove themselves. And dont forget what IPL did to the careers of Watson, Nannes, Yusuf and Ashwin.

Posted by sams235 on (April 8, 2011, 17:53 GMT)

@Hassan.Farooqi: I guess your comments come from the fact that there arent any players from your country?

Posted by akhilesh0109 on (April 8, 2011, 15:38 GMT)

can any1 help me out on how to comment during commentary??

Posted by Hassan.Farooqi on (April 8, 2011, 15:37 GMT)

The WWE of cricket. A circus bigger than the Kerry Packer Circus.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Sharda UgraClose

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

Going for glory and falling just short

Anantha Narayanan: An anecdotal account of close finishes similar to the recent Adelaide Test

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Gilchrist's conscientious moment

In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days