S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Mohammad Hafeez's second coming

He struggled in international cricket in his first attempt, but the Pakistani allrounder is doing much better this time around

S Rajesh

April 29, 2011

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Mohammad Hafeez steers one through the off side during his fifty, West Indies v Pakistan, 1st ODI, St Lucia, April 23, 2011
Finding his groove: Mohammad Hafeez has scored five fifties and a century in 26 ODI innings in the last eight months © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

If there were to be a contest for the most consistent scorer of elegant and effortless 30s and 40s in international cricket, Pakistan's Mohammad Hafeez would be a strong contender to bag the prize. The ease with which he unveils a wide range of strokes, mostly with the aid of impeccable timing rather than brute force, suggests he is a batsman with far greater ability than his modest numbers indicate - a Test batting average of 31.44 after 29 innings, and an ODI one of 24.09 are usually the numbers of a strictly average performer. The good news for Pakistan supporters is that over the last eight months, Hafeez is gradually starting to translate some of that potential into performance - in ODIs at least.

Since making a comeback into Pakistan's one-day team on the tour to England in the summer of 2010 after a three-year hiatus, Hafeez has averaged close to 35, with six 50-plus scores in 26 innings, all as an opener, and has also scored a maiden century, in Christchurch earlier this year. In percentage terms, his average in his last 26 games is almost 88% better than that before 2010. Admittedly his numbers since 2010 aren't earth-shattering, but given Pakistan's problems at the top of the order in recent years and Hafeez's own dismal record in his first five years in international cricket, these stats are certainly encouraging.

As a bowler Hafeez remains a reliable option: reasonably economical, and consistently chipping in with wickets. Thus in his last 26 ODIs Hafeez has been excellent value for Pakistan, averaging almost 35 at a strike rate touching 80, and bowling about seven overs per game at an economy rate of 4.24. Not surprisingly three of his five Man-of-the-Match awards have come in 2011; the other two were in 2003.

Hafeez's ODI batting stats before and since 2010
Period ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Before 2010 48 874 18.59 58.15 0/ 4
Jan 2010 onwards 26 837 34.87 78.51 1/ 5
Career 74 1711 24.09 66.60 1/ 9
Hafeez's ODI bowling stats, before and since 2010
Period ODIs Wickets Average Economy rate
Before 2010 48 38 33.63 4.45
Jan 2010 onwards 26 22 32.59 4.24
Career 74 60 33.25 4.37

In fact, since the beginning of 2010 no Pakistan batsman has scored more ODI runs than Hafeez. Shahid Afridi has scored as many, but in eight more games. And among Pakistan batsmen who've scored at least 500 runs during this period, only the prolific Misbah-ul-Haq has a higher average.

Highest scorers for Pakistan in ODIs since Jan 2010
Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Mohammad Hafeez 26 837 34.87 78.51 1/ 5
Shahid Afridi 34 837 27.90 140.67 2/ 1
Umar Akmal 29 824 34.33 83.23 0/ 5
Kamran Akmal 26 704 30.60 81.57 0/ 5
Misbah-ul-Haq 17 598 59.80 73.91 0/ 6
Younis Khan 24 515 24.52 64.45 0/ 4
Asad Shafiq 18 504 33.60 70.98 0/ 3

A break-up of Hafeez's recent ODI innings shows how his consistency has improved: before 2010 almost one in every two innings he played ended in single digits; now it has reduced by almost half. The disappointment is that though he has got starts, he has often wasted them, despite batting at a position that gives him the maximum number of overs at the crease. Forty percent of his innings since 2010 have ended between 20 and 49, which isn't a good stat for any top-order batsman, and is even worse for an opener. In terms of partnerships, though, Hafeez has forged one of the most successful for Pakistan post-2000 in terms of average partnership, putting together 60.70 with Kamran Akmal, with six 50-plus stands in 11 innings.

Hafeez's recent numbers are quite a contrast to some of the other Pakistan batsmen. For example, Ahmed Shehzad has scored two centuries in 12 innings in 2011, but in the 10 innings when he hasn't got a hundred, he has aggregated 139.

No. of innings in each range of scores
  0-9* 10-19* 20-49* 50+
Before 2010 22 (46.81%) 7 (14.89%) 14 (29.79%) 4 (8.51%)
Since Jan 2010 6 (24%) 3 (12%) 10 (40%) 6 (24%)
* excludes not-outs

Add his offspin to his batting ability and Hafeez is one of seven allrounders to have scored more than 500 runs and taken more than 20 wickets in ODIs since the beginning of 2010. In terms of the difference between batting and bowling averages, he is in fifth place, after Shane Watson, Kevin O'Brien, Yuvraj Singh and Shakib Al Hasan.

Allrounders who've scored more than 500 runs and taken more than 20 wickets in ODIs since Jan 2010
Player ODIs Runs Bat average Wickets Bowl average
Shane Watson 37 1661 48.85 34 29.29
Kevin O'Brien 23 650 40.62 29 22.65
Yuvraj Singh 29 802 40.10 31 28.70
Shakib Al Hasan 36 998 30.24 55 27.92
Mohammad Hafeez 26 837 34.87 22 32.59
Shahid Afridi 34 837 27.90 46 30.58
Kieron Pollard 24 579 26.31 20 33.60

The challenge for Hafeez is to sustain these numbers in ODIs - after all, it's less than a year since he started his revival - and achieve similar figures in Tests and Twenty20 internationals as well. In Tests Hafeez hasn't had too many chances, having played only four since 2010, but in the 20-over version he has been a disappointment at international level, showing little of the fire power that has made him such a potent force in domestic 20-over competitions. In domestic Twenty20 games since 2009, he has scored 377 runs at an average of 47.12 and a strike rate of 144.44, with a century and three fifties in nine innings. In 11 innings in Twenty20 internationals, on the other hand, he averages 17 at a strike rate of 108, with a highest score of 46.

All stats updated till the second ODI of the five-match series between West Indies and Pakistan.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (May 1, 2011, 9:02 GMT)

I think he has filled the all important role of the opener that Pakistan has been lacking for so long. Even an average opening partnership was an improvement on what there was before. The importance of a good steady start cannot be over emphasised (I refer to one day games). The confidence it gives the middle an lower orders invariably wins matches in my book.

I hope he lives up to his talent and Pakistan rise to the top where they should be. Pakistan lost to India in the Semi Final, India didnt win it. My Indian friends have also agreed with me on this point. Misbah is not a man for important games against India and should be dropped when we play India. He lost us the T20 Final a few years ago too.

Posted by   on (April 30, 2011, 22:52 GMT)

Hey Guys Listen, Few ppl become greats after one or two super inns in cricket. But, guys there are few players who never become hero cause they have not played such inns or taken wickets like this one of them is this man. Muhammad Hafeez, notice his performances in all the games Pakistan have won. Can you guys ever see his strokes. I never seen a player like him in the current arena. I am not saying he is better than Tendulkar or others.. I am saying see the perfection of his strokes. Play cricket in video games and see when u get % timing and placement as a batsman. It looks like a perfect shot and they say what a classic shot. Similarly when he plays It seems he is playing game not genuine cricket. The only player I know who plays like this is Rahul Dravid , pure cricketing shots which are defined in the Coaching manuals. Please don't disgrace anybody cause If someone represents his country that surely means that man has some talent. And this man does have talent a lot.

Posted by pk_cric_rox on (April 30, 2011, 10:20 GMT)

@Yacoob Nakhuda ... u seem to b kind of person who picks one name from the top of list n believe he is the only one to look at, n the rest of list is just formality.but guess wat dude , they all have achievements n talent n thats why they r seen on field and we r left to talk like experts in our tv rooms.the players like razzaq r not flash in the pan they have long cricketing career with quite some achievements. not every car is mercedez and not every cricketer is gary sobers so learn to appreciate them all bcoz if nothing they r atleast better cricketers then us :) . if u want to tell us about flash in pan, lets talk about rohit n ishant sharmas n sreesanths n pathans n the other recent IPL superstars. if u rly wana pick one allrounder from top of list then talk about kallis, not watson n gilly

Posted by ather_aziz on (April 29, 2011, 22:40 GMT)

I see him as a potential test captain after misbah ul haq loses his test captaincy whenever that maybe

Posted by   on (April 29, 2011, 22:29 GMT)

oh, for god's sake and crying out loud - dont hype him up - he is again in the long line of trundlers we have produced suffering from Wasim Raja Syndrome - is it a bowler who can bat or batter who can bowl - the razaaqs and azhar mahmoods - flash in the pan stuff. Get proper players not jack of all trades and master of none. The best teams of the 80s and 90s and noughties did not have an all rounder. The only proper allrounder of the last decade was a wicket keeper batsman Adam Gilcrichrist and this decade will be Shane Watson. Don't breed horses for courses kind of players. The only batsman who was a match winner for Pakistan was Saeed Anwar and similarly Wasim as a bowler - the rest were contributors - supporting actors.

Posted by bulldawgs on (April 29, 2011, 21:55 GMT)

The problem that I have with him is that he forgets the simple formula that if it ain't broken, don't fix it. He gets 40 runs playing normal good cricketing shots. Then suddenly starts playing shots out of tail ender slogging almanac for no reason. He doesn't realize that he has played normal Cricket which brought him 40+ runs and if he carries on like that, he'll have 80+ runs in same number of minutes/overs. The century he got, he did not play a single manufactured/ agricultural shot, just regular Cricketing shots.

Posted by Jarr30 on (April 29, 2011, 21:24 GMT)

Mo Hafeez should thank the IPL for his comeback because he's been improving after that. Nobody knew Hafeez until IPL 2008.He should also thank Kamran Akmal, if Akmal haven't dropped dollies of the bowling off Danish Kaneria and destroyed his career, Hafeez wouldn't had got a chance.

Posted by   on (April 29, 2011, 21:01 GMT)

Hafeez is just like brad haddin, I think these days he concentrate on his bowling rather then batting, He got start almost in every match... We got two exceptionally talented player in form of U.Akmal and Asad shafique,,,, but we need some one combination of these both, means player who can hit like Umar and defend like Asad. Long live Pakistan

Posted by   on (April 29, 2011, 18:04 GMT)

Excellent analysis of M.Hafeez's performance by S.Rajesh. The sad reallity of our Pakistani openers is that their focus span is very short. They tend to throw thier wickets away even at times when they are well settled. If Hafeez can improve on his concentration, perservation and stamina to stay at the crease and learn from other International openers strategies to score more runs; then no doubt he will be a great asset to the Pakistan Cricket for many years to come. He needs to take his batting to the next level, sooner than later.

Posted by khurramsch on (April 29, 2011, 17:13 GMT)

yes agree since his return last year he is most consistant performer of pak side BUt only bad thing is that he dnt transform his starts in to big inings and most of time get out with very poor shot out of no where.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Crunch time for Sehwag and Gambhir

Numbers Game: The Indian T20 tournament presents an opportunity to both to show their class once again

The rise of the Associates

Firdose Moonda: Cricket below the international top tier is well structured. It's a pity the Test-playing world doesn't take a leaf out of their book

    The choking problem

Martin Crowe: If they are to live up to their potential in next year's World Cup at home, New Zealand need to look within

    Impressing Viv and Greg

Five Firsts: Former Pakistan batsman Haroon Rasheed on the compliments he received, and his admiration for Gavaskar

Why India are not cricket's Brazil yet

Samir Chopra: The numbers might be in their favour, but they can't boast sustained excellence or a distinctive playing style

News | Features Last 7 days

UAE all set to host lavish welcoming party

The controversy surrounding the IPL has done little to deter fans in UAE from flocking the stadiums, as they gear up to watch the Indian stars in action for the first time since 2006

Attention on Yuvraj, Gambhir in IPL 2014

ESPNcricinfo picks five players for whom this IPL is of bigger significance

The watch breaker, and Malinga specials

The Plays of the day from the match between Kolkata and Mumbai, in Abu Dhabi

India: cricket's Brazil

It's difficult to beat a huge talent base exposed to good facilities, and possessed of a long history of competing as a nation

'I love to take batsmen on'

Wahab Riaz, the Pakistan left-arm quick, on the pain of missing out on a ten-for, and his love for numbers and batting

News | Features Last 7 days