Sanjay Manjrekar
Former India batsman; now a cricket commentator and presenter on TV

What's luck got to do with injury?

When a player walks off the field injured, we tend to sympathise. We need to pause to think if he is culpable

Sanjay Manjrekar

August 4, 2011

Comments: 114 | Text size: A | A

Kapil Dev bowls, fourth Test, India v England, Calcutta, 1982
Kapil Dev bowled with an action that didn't cause any discomfort to his body. Are current Indian seamers doing the same? Adrian Murrell / © Getty Images

Over the last few days MS Dhoni has been fending off questions about his team's fitness about as frequently as some of his young batsmen have had to fend bouncers in England.

I'm certain Dhoni has his own views on fitness, and I would love to hear them one day, for he is one of the fittest men in international cricket, but as captain - well, he has to say the right things, doesn't he? His patent response to questions about injuries to his key players has been that they are unfortunate and there is nothing one can do. I agree with him that injuries are indeed unfortunate, but I hope he does not really mean it when he says there is nothing one can do about them. There is plenty you can do about injuries, and there is a very good, logical explanation for why some cricketers suffer more of them than others.

When a player gets injured, it is often termed unlucky, and he is generally spared criticism, on the assumption that it was beyond the poor cricketer's control. I have seen, during my playing career, cricketers take advantage of this mindset of the fans and media to tackle their insecurities as players: you would often find a short period of poor form quickly followed by an injury absence.

Except in obvious cases, like where fingers are broken while batting or fielding - like with Yuvraj Singh at Trent Bridge - I really think most injuries should be held against players, as you would a poor performance on the field. Injuries too largely happen because of poor performance - off the field. A player who does not forget that he is a top-level international cricketer, even when he is not playing matches, simply does not get injured often.

Kapil Dev, the great Indian allrounder, who I had the privilege of playing with, was one of the fittest Indian cricketers there has been, and there is no better role model of a fit Indian cricketer than him. Was Kapil lucky that he could play 131 Test matches as a fast-medium bowling allrounder, missing only one Test in between, when he was dropped for playing a wild slog at a delicate stage in a match? No, he wasn't. There was a good reason for why he was so durable.

Kapil's greatest asset was that he was an outstanding athlete. Unathletic cricketers tend to suffer more injuries than athletic ones, and there are numerous examples in Indian cricket of fast bowlers who were talented but not good athletes. Should the lack of athleticism of a player not be held against him? Wouldn't the lack of a natural flair for numbers be held against a chartered accountant who keeps bungling up balance sheets?

Kapil was a superb athlete, and admirably, it was an advantage he never took for granted. He may not have given you the impression of being a thinking batsman, but when it came to his bowling, fielding and general approach to fitness, there was no one quite as sharp. He knew his body well and he made sure that he never pushed it beyond a certain limit, but he was also careful to not keep it in cold storage for too long.

During fielding drills, even before matches, Kapil would always throw the ball back to the keeper with real pace, while most fast bowlers I saw, would want to rest their bowling shoulders. Kapil thought different. He made sure his shoulder was always ready and never surprised - in case he had to throw hard for a run-out first ball of a match, for instance. Damage to a body often happens due to such sudden acts, resulting in the player missing games because of an "unfortunate" injury. Mind you, Kapil was not injury-free through his long career, but he planned the rehabilitation well, so he was always ready and raring to go for the next Test. Playing for India meant a lot to him.

Kapil did not let anyone influence him into changing his natural bowling action - though it had the potential threat of creating lower-back problems. He believed that if his body was allowing him to bowl without discomfort, it had to be the right action for him. I wonder, when I watch some of our Indian seamers who keep breaking down, whether they have strayed from their natural actions so much that their bodies have started protesting.

Rest to the body, as we know, is as critical as physical training, for a long, relatively injury-free career, and that is the big challenge for modern-day players: to get time off to rest their tired bodies. But it is also true that a cricketer opting out of an international series is not as big a deal as it used to be; players are usually given their time off without it being held against them. There is always a tour of West Indies or Bangladesh to take a break from, as we have seen.

I saw a couple of Indian players come into the England Test series off a period of relaxation, with chubby faces and bulging midriffs. That's not something you'd ever see with Rahul Dravid. The only international cricket he plays these days is Test cricket, and he often has to come into the team off long periods of "inactivity", but each time he turns up, he looks lean and mean. Dravid is another player with an excellent record of long-term fitness in Indian cricket, and he does not even have great natural athleticism to thank for it. What he has plenty of, though, as we all know, is discipline. He is the perfect example of that cricketer I mentioned earlier, who even when he is not playing reminds himself every day when he wakes up that he is still an active international player, only waiting for his next international assignment.

Players who are willing to make sacrifices, I have found, sustain fewer injuries than others, so the next time we see a cricketer suffer yet another pulled muscle, let's pause for a moment more before saying, "That's unlucky."

Former India batsman Sanjay Manjrekar is a cricket commentator and presenter on TV. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Sanjay Manjrekar

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ramli on (August 5, 2011, 12:08 GMT)

To compare Rahul Dravid, purely a batsman, with fast bowlers, in terms of fitness is unfair and uncharitable. To be a world class batsman, one need not be an athlete at all (gavaskar, vishwanath, vengsrkar, etc..). They can still deliver. But, if a fast bowler is not an athlete, he cannot survive for long in tests. I agree that fast bowlers need to look after themselves more carefully than anybody else. But that is what the support staff are supposed to monitor and offer help. I thought players hide their injuries or poor fitness to get included in the team rather than out of it. The debacle in England has more to do with unpreparedness than anything else. Let us hope for a turnaround soon. Cheers.

Posted by arpzzz on (August 5, 2011, 10:03 GMT)

Sanjay M. Can only crticise.... Is not he the same person,who once said, Sachin fear from injuries and failures, thats why he skip to play for world XI in Aus......He gives example of kapil dev. He is great allrounder, but kapil took his 300th wicket in 1987,400th in 1992, and 434th in 1994. that show Kapil did not have that impact in last phase of his career.

Posted by FabLE on (August 5, 2011, 9:46 GMT)

Good one, Kapil was my hero when I was in school. But I do not agree with you Sanjay, when I was in school cricket was on Doordarshan and I get to see cricket very rarely, thats because of the amount of cricket India used to play.Things have changed now there are dedicated cricket channels purely becuase of the amont of cricket played.When a player goes through so much cricket it is only natural to get Injured. Fans and commentators are fickle minded, we all say that a cricketer is making lots money now a days and he does not play for his country with pride anymore and all that.More than me you know that there are lots of cricketers that we cheered, who are now broke and disappeared into balckhole - What are we/media/BCCI doing about it ?? Nothing ..Leave cricketers alone it is a demanding job as it is let us not put pressure on them.For god sake they made or country proud TWICE (1984 and 2011)

Posted by harikeshan on (August 5, 2011, 8:34 GMT)

Sanjay, utterly and completely agree with you a 100%. Remember a past legend stating that he never went to a Gym and thought the only way to make his body stronger was to condition it by bowling repeatedly. Walsh and Ambrose bowled much faster than any of the present Indian New ball bowlers but rarely missed a test due to injury. We as South Asians arent naturally gifted athletes but that does not mean we cant become good athletes. Makaya Nitni has been known to run long distances before and during test matches. Injury seems to be an excuse modern day cricketers use to mask poor form and fitness.

Posted by Realforever on (August 5, 2011, 7:00 GMT)

Hi Sanjay,

I am completely agreed with all the points and you already know that World-cup is a hectic process and after playing 45 days of intense cricket, do you really think that our players really needed to play IPL-4. They have got enough money from endrosements and winning the worldcup rakes enolugh money.So why they toiled their bodies and inhured themselves and finally skipped WIndies tour.After that The other thing is that England is consistently playing great cricket(winnig Ashes in Australia) and our boys have prepared so pathetically so such a high profile seriies is an puzzle one can't hardly digest.Another Important point is that whether ODI cricket still needs to played or in my view it has to scrapped!

Posted by   on (August 5, 2011, 6:53 GMT)

@sajay manjrekar, you didn't consider how much cricket these guys are playing and kapil has played. Did you?

Posted by bharat.agr on (August 5, 2011, 5:33 GMT)

Completely agree with Sanjay, when it comes to take care off field to avoid injuries. Just one question Mr. Manjrekar. How many tests or ODIs India used to play in 80s and 90s?

Posted by Biophysicist on (August 5, 2011, 4:25 GMT)

Several people commented that the current players have more work load than earlier cricketers like Kapil Dev. To verify if this is true, I compared the bowling load of Kapil and Zaheer during their career using the data given in Cricinfo. If you combine the total deliveries bowled in tests, onedayers and firstclass matches, Kapil bowled 87795 deliveries in his 19 year first class career (1975-1994). This averages to 4621 balls per year. In Zaheer's case I also included the T20 matches. He has bowled a total of 56811 deliveries in his first class career spanning 12 years so far (1999-2011). His average is 4734 deliveries per year. That is roughly two deliveries more than Kapil per week! I don't know if we can call this too much more work load than Kapil had to bear. Let us not forget that Kapil was a genuine allrounder who also spent a lot of time batting, something which we can not say holds good for Zaheer.

Posted by   on (August 5, 2011, 3:14 GMT)

why can't cricketers like Gambhir and Sehwag, skip the IPL to heal their injuries instead of skipping so called low profile international series?

Posted by daredevilzz on (August 5, 2011, 2:55 GMT)

@rgajria- who else but yuvi??!

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Sanjay ManjrekarClose

    A year of triumph and disaster

Martin Crowe: Misbah, McCullum, and the ICC's efforts against chucking were the positive highlights in a year that ended with the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death

    Two fortresses called Brisbane and Centurion

Numbers Game: Australia haven't lost at the Gabba since 1988, while South Africa have a 14-2 record in Centurion

Zimbabwe's decade of hurt

The Cricket Monthly: Ten years ago 15 white Zimbabwean cricketers went on strike. The game has not been the same since
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    'Lara v McGrath was a great battle of our generation'

Dravid and Manjrekar discuss Brian Lara's adaptability

Would Brearley have picked Cook as captain?

Nicholas Hogg: Cook lacks certain qualities the ex-England captain listed as those fitting of an ideal leader, in particular, charisma

News | Features Last 7 days

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Kohli attains batting nirvana

Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days

    BCCI's argument against DRS not 100% (164)

    Turning your back on a system that the whole cricketing world wants a discussion on, refusing to discuss it because it is not 100%, is not good enough

    Karn struggles to stay afloat (114)

    The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

    Kohli attains batting nirvana (110)

    Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

    When defeat isn't depressing (57)

    After a long time we have seen an Indian team and captain enjoy the challenge of trying to overcome stronger opposition in an overseas Test

    What ails Rohit and Watson? (50)

    Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena