S Rajesh runs the rule over players of yesteryear

The era of India's slow bowlers

When spin was king

For much of the 1960s and '70s, India's bowling attack consisted almost entirely of spinners who were varied and highly skilled. Just how good were they?

S Rajesh

September 12, 2011

Comments: 35 | Text size: A | A

Bishan Bedi in his delivery stride, June 1974
Bishan Bedi was the most successful of India's spin foursome, but the others weren't far behind © Getty Images
Enlarge

India have always featured prominently in any discussion about spin bowling, but never was this emphasis on spin greater than in the 1960s and 1970s, when four of their most celebrated slow-bowling exponents played together. There were high-quality spinners from India before - Subhash Gupte scalped 149 wickets at 29.55, and was rated better than Shane Warne by no less a player than Garry Sobers; Vinoo Mankad snared 162 at just over 32 and also contributed mightily with the bat; while Bapu Nadkarni was the king of thrift, taking 88 wickets and conceding 1.67 runs per over. However, when Bishan Bedi, Bhagwat Chandrasekhar, Erapalli Prasanna and S Venkataraghavan broke into the team in the 1960s, they established such a hold over the Indian bowling attack that for the next decade and more they became the core of the bowling unit, in all countries and conditions, to such an extent that India's seam and swing bowlers became almost redundant.

It was a diet by spin for opposition batsmen, and yet there was plenty of variety in the menu to choose from. Bedi was the classical left-arm spinner with a smooth action and fantastic deception; Chandrasekhar was as unorthodox as Bedi was orthodox, bowling sharp topspinners, googlies and legspinners at almost medium pace; Prasanna and Venkataraghavan were both offspinners, but while Prasanna was guileful and crafty, Venkat was accurate and relentless. Together they defined the Indian bowling attack, on turning tracks at home and in seaming conditions abroad.

The overall stats for three of those four spinners are pretty similar: Bedi led in terms of matches played, wickets taken and bowling averages, but Chandrasekhar and Prasanna weren't far behind. Venkat's stats suffered in comparison to the other three - he averaged less than three wickets per Test - but his career economy rate of 2.27 shows he was tough to score off.

Chandrasekhar's average was slightly higher than Bedi's, but his strike rate was easily the best among them all. At his best he was probably the most unplayable of them, and he was the only one among the four who averaged more than four wickets per Test. India didn't win too many overseas Tests during that time, but when they did, Chandrasekhar had a significant role to play in each: in five overseas wins he took six in an innings five times, and averaged 17.14.

Career stats of India's four spinners
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM Wkts/ Test
Bishan Bedi 67 266 28.71 80.3 14/ 1 3.97
BS Chandrasekhar 58 242 29.74 65.9 16/ 2 4.17
Erapalli Prasanna 49 189 30.38 75.9 10/ 2 3.86
S Venkataraghavan 57 156 36.11 95.3 3/ 1 2.74

Apart from Venkat, the other spinners did pretty well overseas too. Chandrasekhar, Bedi and Prasanna all averaged less than 34 in away Tests, which is significantly better than India's top spinner today: Harbhajan Singh's away average is 38.83. The only bowler among the quartet who didn't have much success abroad was Venkat, averaging more than 44 and taking only one five-for in 25 Tests.

The four spinners, home and away
Bowler Home - Tests Wickets Average Away - Tests Wickets Average
Bishan Bedi 30 137 23.99 37 129 33.72
BS Chandrasekhar 32 142 27.69 26 100 32.66
Erapalli Prasanna 22 95 26.94 27 94 33.85
S Venkataraghavan 32 94 30.64 25 62 44.40

Between December 31, 1966 and the end of 1978, India played 68 Tests, of which at least three of these four spinners played in 55. (In one Test, against England at Edgbaston, all four played but India lost by 132 runs.) In the 55 Tests, India's record read thus: won 14, lost 25, drew 16. It doesn't look all that imposing, but it's a whole lot better than India's Test record before they came along: in the 12 years before these four started playing together, between the beginning of 1955 and the end of 1966, India had won only seven out of 56 and had lost 19. The win-loss ratio thus changed from 0.37 to 0.56, an improvement of 51%.

Among those 14 wins were some pretty significant ones. In 1971, they won a Test in the West Indies for the first time, and followed that with their first win in England. On both occasions they won the series. The win in Port-of-Spain in 1976 is remembered mostly for the run-chase of 403, but the spinners did their job too, with Chandrasekhar taking eight wickets in the match and Bedi five. In Auckland in 1976, Chandrasekhar and Prasanna combined to take 19 wickets in the match as India won by eight wickets. And then there were the two wins in Melbourne and Sydney in 1977-78 - albeit against a depleted Australian team - which brought India back in the series after they lost the first two Tests. Overall, of the 14 Tests that India won, six were overseas.

India, before and during the spin quartet
Period Tests W/L/D W/L ratio Bowling ave
Jan 1955 to 30 Dec 1966 56 7/19/30 0.37 36.41
At least 3 of spin quartet 55 14/25/16 0.56 32.86

During this period when the spinners were in full flow, the role of pace in the Indian bowling attack was reduced to a bare minimum. In the 68 Tests between 1967 and 1978, spin contributed 766 wickets, an average of more than 11 per match. No team came close to that average, with Pakistan's 6.46 being the next best. Spin also contributed almost 78% of the wickets that Indian bowlers took during this period.

Team-wise stats for spinners in Tests between Dec 31, 1966 and Dec 31, 1978
Team Tests Spin wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM Spin wkts per Test Total wickets
India 68 766 30.58 77.8 42/ 4 11.26 987
England 112 575 29.10 81.0 26/ 6 5.13 1755
Australia 91 417 34.71 88.0 12/ 1 4.58 1509
West Indies 76 364 39.02 105.6 14/ 0 4.79 1148
Pakistan 46 297 32.09 79.7 11/ 2 6.46 637
New Zealand 54 204 40.53 101.3 4/ 0 3.78 725

And in the 55 matches when at least three of them played together, their numbers were pretty identical to those listed above - an average of about 11 wickets per match and 30 runs per wicket.

India's bowling when at least three from the spin quartet played
Tests Spin wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM Spin wkts per Test Total wickets Percentage
55 635 30.60 76.8 35/ 4 11.54 786 80.79

The four Indian spinners were among the best during this period, but there were a few others who were in that bracket. England's Derek Underwood led the way in terms of both wickets and averages, taking 264 at an excellent rate of 24.34 runs per wicket. Bedi was next in terms of wickets, but Ashley Mallett, Australia's offspinner, had excellent numbers too, averaging less than 28 for his 125 wickets. West Indies' Lance Gibbs was the other offspinner in this list, taking 172 wickets in 47 games.

Spinners in Tests between 31 Dec 1966 and 31 Dec 1978
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Derek Underwood 72 264 24.34 70.3 16/ 6
Bishan Bedi 64 259 28.52 80.0 14/ 1
BS Chandrasekhar 46 199 29.39 63.4 15/ 1
Erapalli Prasanna 47 185 30.16 75.3 10/ 2
Lance Gibbs 47 172 33.22 99.6 8/ 0
Ashley Mallett 35 125 27.95 73.0 6/ 1
S Venkataraghavan 35 99 35.39 93.4 2/ 0
Intikhab Alam 30 98 32.63 75.6 5/ 2

Playing four spinners in the same XI wasn't a luxury India could afford, though, so three in the side was the staple. Here's a look at how the spinners and the team fared when various combinations of three spinners played.

Bedi, Chandrasekhar and Prasanna
In the 24 Tests that Chandrasekhar, Bedi and Prasanna played together, India won seven and lost 12. Four of these wins were in two five-Test series when India fought back from 0-2 deficits to draw level, only to then lose the final match. The trio helped India beat West Indies in Kolkata and Chennai in the 1974-75 series, before they lost the last match in Mumbai, while that sequence of results was repeated in Australia in 1977-78 - wins in Melbourne and Sydney to draw level, followed by defeat in Adelaide to lose the series.

Among the three bowlers, Chandrasekhar and Bedi had identical numbers, taking just over 100 wickets at excellent averages. Chandrasekhar's best was in that Melbourne game, when he took figures of 6 for 52 in each innings to finish with match figures of 12 for 104 - his best in his 58-Test career. Bedi took two six-fors as well, but in two matches, and with hugely contrasting results - 6 for 71 against England in Bangalore in 1977 (a match in which Chandrasekhar took six as well), and 6 for 226 in the Lord's drubbing in 1974.

Among the three, the bowler with the least impressive stats in these 24 Tests was Prasanna, with only 61 wickets at an average of 40. His only five-for was against West Indies in that Chennai Test in 1974-75. And six times he finished wicketless in an innings despite bowling 20 or more overs.

Overall, in the 24 Tests that all these spinners played, they accounted for 266 out of 346 wickets taken by the Indian bowlers - a percentage of 76.88.

Tests that Bedi, Chandrasekhar and Prasanna played together
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
BS Chandrasekhar 24 103 27.81 60.1 8/ 1
Bishan Singh Bedi 24 102 28.34 71.7 5/ 0
Erapalli Prasanna 24 61 40.01 101.8 1/ 0
Together 24 266 30.82 74.19 14/ 1

Bedi, Chandrasekhar and Venkataraghavan
Bedi, Chandrasekhar and Venkat played together 18 times, and of those Tests, India won four and lost seven. A couple of those wins were especially famous: in 1971 at The Oval, India won a Test, and a series, for the first time in England; and in Port-of-Spain in 1976, India chased down 403, at the time the highest fourth-innings total in a win.

Among these three, Chandrasekhar was again the bowler who was the most influential in the two wins: at The Oval his 6 for 38 destroyed England in their second innings, while in Trinidad his 6 for 120 kept West Indies down to a manageable 359 in their first innings. Overall, though, Bedi was the most successful in these 18 Tests, with 85 wickets at 24.96. Venkat played a strictly supporting role in most of these matches, taking only 39 wickets at more than 40 each. Overall, these three bowlers took 208 out of 262 wickets taken by all Indian bowlers in the 18 Tests.

Tests that Bedi, Chandrasekhar and Venkataraghavan played together
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
Bishan Bedi 18 85 24.96 74.2 5/ 1
BS Chandrasekhar 18 84 29.25 65.3 6/ 0
S Venkataraghavan 18 39 43.82 118.8 0/ 0
Together 18 208 30.22 79.01 11/ 1

Bedi, Prasanna, Venkataraghavan
Prasanna didn't do too well when he played alongside Bedi and Chandrasekhar, but his performances lifted when Venkataraghavan was around. In 13 Tests that he played with Venkat and Bedi, Prasanna took 61 wickets at less than 28. Venkat himself didn't do too badly: though he took only 41 wickets, his average was the best among the three. Bedi was relatively less successful in terms of wickets, but his economy rate of 2.04 runs per over was the best among the three.

In these 13 Tests, India won only two and lost seven. One of the wins was against West Indies in Port-of-Spain in 1971 - Sunil Gavaskar's debut Test. The three bowlers together picked up 145 wickets out of 181 that the Indian bowlers took - a percentage of 80.11.

Tests that Bedi, Prasanna and Venkat played together
Bowler Tests Wickets Average Strike rate 5WI/ 10WM
S Venkataraghavan 13 41 27.19 68.8 2/ 0
Erapalli Prasanna 13 61 27.86 67.5 4/ 1
Bishan Bedi 13 43 34.11 100.0 2/ 0
Together 13 145 29.53 77.6 8/ 1

And finally, a look at the batsmen who excelled against India during this period. No one dominated them like Zaheer Abbas on India's tour to Pakistan in 1977-78. In five innings his scores read thus: 176, 96, 235*, 34*, 42. In fact, that series hastened the end for the three spinners who played in that series: Chandrasekhar averaged 48.12, Bedi 74.83 and Prasanna 125.50. Prasanna didn't play any Tests after that, Chandrasekhar played five and Bedi six. Venkataraghavan was around for much longer - till 1983, but in his last four series he wasn't much of a force, averaging more than 50 in each of them. In fact, in his last 14 Tests he managed only 23 wickets.

The era of the four Indian spinners ended with a bit of a whimper, but while it lasted it was glorious.

Batsmen with highest averages against India between Dec 31, 1966 and Dec 31, 1978 (Qual: 500 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Zaheer Abbas 3 583 194.33 2/ 1
Charlie Davis 4 529 132.25 2/ 3
Garry Sobers 7 836 83.60 3/ 4
Viv Richards 9 909 69.92 4/ 2
Doug Walters 7 540 60.00 1/ 5
Alvin Kallicharran 12 1071 59.50 3/ 6
(Click here for the full list of batsmen.)

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by samrao on (September 14, 2011, 15:56 GMT)

It is difficult to compare players of different era .The better statistics of the current spinners only confirms that statistics can be deceiving. The number of matches were few in the past and I am sure if the quartret had played now the statistics would have been much better. Physical fitness and fielding is much superior now.Present day spin bowling appears unimaginative and mechanical. Thats why a bowler like Shane Warne or Murali ( and noew Swann) give so much pleasure to the spectators. Thats why past spinners still command admiration from those who have seen them play and still are considered superior to recent bowlers.

Posted by bumsonseats on (September 14, 2011, 8:48 GMT)

i know they were great spinners. but at that time there was no netural umpires. like me anyone who remembers those times. there could be absolute shockers in some descisions. dpk

Posted by Sydney66 on (September 14, 2011, 8:40 GMT)

@Graeme_Pollock: Just out of interest; who was more likely to get your wicket with an 'unplayable ball'? Prasanna or Chandra? And hence, what is more important to an Indian team that lacks the class of someone like Dennis Lillee, Malcolm Marshall, or Imran Khan (no disrespect to Kapil Dev): strike-power and unpredictability, or variety?

Posted by Percy_Fender on (September 14, 2011, 4:34 GMT)

As someone pointed out,the close in specialist fielders to the then Indian spin combination were made up of Solkar,Abid Ali,Wadekar and Venkat himself. They were not just ordinary fielders. They anticipated and dived to catch the ball like the famous one taken by Solkar to I think a Chandrasekhar delivery of one of the English batsmen in the 1971 Test that we won in England.In later years I saw this on TV and was totally taken in by the sheer agility of this group of players. They were never unfit as we see nowadays.They used to run a lot I suppose as the great West Indian fast bowlers used to. I feel that it is the Gym culture which is causing fitness problems.This needs looking into. I am sure if the present lot of spin bowlers had that level of close in fielding, Indian spin would have been very good even today.I have seen Shahbaz Nadeem of Jharkhand and Barghav Bhatt. Both have good flight and variations to decieve batsmen.and look like Test bowlers.It is not so gloomyafter all.

Posted by PeterCook on (September 13, 2011, 20:23 GMT)

AsherCA - kind of agree but Dravid? Dravid scored 3 hundreds and cannot be blamed at all for India's miserable performance. In fact, without Dravid, India would have lost by record margins in at least 2 of the tests against.

Posted by m_ilind on (September 13, 2011, 16:12 GMT)

Chandra was a real match-winner. He had captured the hearts and imagination of the Indian fans with his mesmerizing spells! He could run thru a batting side within a session once he found his line and length. People used to chant "Chandra Chandra" just to get the captain to give him a bowl.

Posted by StatisticsRocks on (September 13, 2011, 16:02 GMT)

The point of this article is WHAT? We Should have more spinners

Posted by   on (September 13, 2011, 15:46 GMT)

What the article misses is the genius of Salim Durani, whose magic spell was responsible for India's first ever series win in West Indies !

Posted by AsherCA on (September 13, 2011, 15:16 GMT)

I fully agree with m_ilind - at least 30% if not half the success of those spinners was an entity called Eknath Solkar at shortleg. Give our today's spinners the same level of support in the close-in cordon & I dare say these bowlers will also become as successful. However, that would mean batsmen have to work. The Indian media does not like that. The media talks about the Indian bowling being bad becuase they don't get wickets - I am surprised anyone even turns up to bowl - remember their support structure - Fielders - drop sitters, misfield & worse - think nothing about over-throwing to show-off when there is no chance of a runout ! Team Management - makes them scaptegoats for everything including non-performance by Indian batsmen who rested at home for 2 months, just because the batsmen in question were media favorites (Dhoni never had the guts to call a spade a spade & say Sachin, Dravid, Lakshman & Raina not getting runs was the reason we lost the test series) !

Posted by spinkingKK on (September 13, 2011, 13:21 GMT)

Its really amazing to know how India was playing with 4 spinners in a test team!! It's just wonderful. I don't care that India didn't win many matches. But, to be competitive with that soft bowling machine was a great achievement. I have also read that Indian soccer team played an olympics semi-final or quarter final against France, playing bare-footed and nearly won it. India always showed to the world that you don't have to use brute force to make an impact. Just the mind over the matter is what is needed. The way India plays sports is a fairy tale in itself.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

'Virtually impossible to replace Kallis'

Modern Masters: Without Jacques Kallis you don't see balance in the South African side

    How do you view sporting success?

Do you gauge it by rewards or in terms of the experiences accumulated on the way, Ed Smith asks

    Mesmeric Sachin, sopoforic Boycs

ESPNcricinfo XI: From Mankad to KP, we look at some memorable innings in England-India Tests

    Dhoni wins the first round in the captaincy battle

Ian Chappell: Both Dhoni and Cook have made some inexplicable blunders, but India's captain pulls ahead slightly

When the weak can resist the strong

Jonathan Wilson: Cricket and football give lesser teams and players a chance to hold against stronger opposition

News | Features Last 7 days

India look for their Indian summer

Billboards are calling the series England's Indian Summer, but it is India who are looking for that period of warmth, redemption after the last whitewash, for they have seen how bleak the winter that can follow is

South Africa face the Kallis question

Accommodation for a great player like Jacques Kallis should be made with careful consideration and South Africa cannot get carried away with sentiment

India's bowling leader conundrum

The present Indian bowling line-up will tackle its first five-Test series without the proven guidance of Zaheer Khan, their bowling captain. India had unravelled without him in 2011. Will they do better this time around?

Five key head-to-heads

From two embattled captains to the challenge for India's openers against the new ball, ESPNcricinfo picks five contests that could determine the series

Anderson shines in era of the No. 11

There are few endeavors as silly as No. 11s batting. Anderson's innings was another piece of history for cricket's most comical and undervalued batting position

News | Features Last 7 days

    India look for their Indian summer (87)

    Billboards are calling the series England's Indian Summer, but it is India who are looking for that period of warmth, redemption after the last whitewash, for they have seen how bleak the winter that can follow is

    Why isn't Ashwin playing? (74)

    It's close to inexplicable how India's best spinner is being left out in favour of bits-and-pieces players

    South Africa face the Kallis question (56)

    Accommodation for a great player like Jacques Kallis should be made with careful consideration and South Africa cannot get carried away with sentiment

    India's bowling leader conundrum (44)

    The present Indian bowling line-up will tackle its first five-Test series without the proven guidance of Zaheer Khan, their bowling captain. India had unravelled without him in 2011. Will they do better this time around?

    Anderson shines in era of the No. 11 (34)

    There are few endeavors as silly as No. 11s batting. Anderson's innings was another piece of history for cricket's most comical and undervalued batting position