November 6, 2011

It's time cricket got tough with the crooks

Show zero tolerance and impose life bans on any cricketer or official who is involved in fixing matches

It's time to cut through all the crap surrounding cricket's fixing problem. Sure, the jailing of three Pakistan players and a fixer sends a strong message to other players about what might happen to them if they decide to take a walk on the dark side. But what about all the questions left unanswered?

The ICC's Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU) has had little to do with the capture of any of cricket's major conspirators. This is a concern since there's enough information out there for more players to at least have had their cages rattled.

I had a conversation with an ACSU man that left me wondering if they really understand the type of people who are behind this dirty business. He expressed surprise when it was alleged that bookies were aware of certain scoring patterns during the Oval ODI between England and Pakistan last year. He couldn't believe a fix could have been arranged so soon after the newspaper sting on the Lord's Test had become public knowledge. The fact that he thought the players who had been compromised had some say in when the fix went down left me incredulous. If he didn't understand that it's the crooks who make the demands once they have got their hooks into a player, it's not surprising the ACSU doesn't catch more cricketers.

The troublemakers at the top are serious crooks with no morals or compunction about the harm they cause, and certainly no feelings for the game.

And if anyone thinks Bob Woolmer's death wasn't slightly suspicious and that Pakistan players are the only ones involved in this racket, I have a rewarding Nigerian investment opportunity you'd be interested in.

Ronnie Flanagan, the head of the ACSU, said, "The ICC is the enemy of any corrupt cricketer." That statement would be more credible if there weren't so many ex-players with high-profile jobs in the game who have either been adversely named in reports on match-fixing or were members of a team captained by a match-fixer.

The administrators would also gain credibility if there was a life ban in place for every player involved in fixing. That's it - fixing is fixing in any form - get involved and get caught in the dirty business and your career in the cricket is over for life.

The fact that players like Marlon Samuels are allowed back into the game after being suspended doesn't imply zero tolerance. The game needs to be more proactive in unsettling suspect players or officials. A few well-placed threats to these players might produce some interesting results, or, at the very least, a nervy reaction.

Flanagan's statement would also have more meaning if the ICC hadn't moved its headquarters to Dubai in 2004, shortly after international matches were put on hold in Sharjah once the match-fixing scandal first broke out in 2000. Some questionable games might have been played in Sharjah, but the dirty money was coming from Dubai.

There's no doubt the jail sentences for the three Pakistan players has sent a warning to all cricketers and officials. But what about cricket sending out an equally strong message to the crooks? So far cricket, with its fragmented international administration, hasn't done much to frighten off the crooks.

The game needs to come up with a cricket-related method to end the career of any suspect rather than trying to do it solely through the courts. The chances of finding a suspect cricketer guilty in a court of law are slim. However, any suspicious behaviour by a player should first bring a warning from the authorities, and any repeat performance ought to result in his removal from the game.

There was one text that appeared among the evidence during the London court case. It said: "Let's do it, let's get hold of cricket and squeeze everything we can from it." That should alert the cricket officials to the life-or-death struggle they are involved in, and that's how they should approach any solutions to this game-threatening problem.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • jaswant on November 7, 2011, 3:00 GMT

    Greed is increasingly on the go, if examples are not put in place,this unfathomable disease will create darkness in daylight.I feel sorry for these young cricketers who were lured by some big guns,but its a message for those who are still on the run,and for those who may be lured in the future.This sort of deceit takes the flavour away from the game and robs the sports and its audience of a symbiotic relationship.People anticipate a series long before the day of the first match,and to cheat them is a grave crime.The law needs to go after the big fish,the bookies,the embodiment of corruption,those that live on the blood of the innocent.

  • Ejaz on November 6, 2011, 18:49 GMT

    Agree. There should be hard punishments for these acts which are against the spirit of cricket whether its match fixing or spot fixing or selling weather and pitch conditions to bookmakers.

  • Rajagopal on November 6, 2011, 16:55 GMT

    It's a good thing that Jose Puliampatta is not in a aposition of authority. He seems to have forgotten that every person is innocent before proven guilty. You can not punish someone if he's not proven guilty.

  • Dummy4 on November 6, 2011, 16:22 GMT

    Agree, agree, agree...!!! I am so glad that for once Ian Chappell has come up with an article which is positive and made wonderful reading. I hope his form continues..!!

  • Dummy4 on November 6, 2011, 15:12 GMT

    Cricket Boards can be more effective. There could be situations where there are clear indications of malpractices by cricketers, but not adequate to prove in a court of law. If the senior administrators really love cricket and are worth trier salt, they can instructors NOT to select even such players to represent their respective countries. Every cricketer aspires to play for his/her country and inability to do so is a powerful deterrent. As Chappel says they should be "banned" /"dropped"/ "rested"/ for good. I don't care, what phraseology the Boards want to use! But act.Not mouth meaningless intents!

  • Sai on November 6, 2011, 14:00 GMT

    I agree, Salman and Asif got the right punishments, as Salman was a senior player and captain of the team, and because Asif was a senior player and knew the rules of cricket. I think Amir's punishment was fair as well, 6 months, because he is a youngster and does not know much. It will take him time to learn, and this is a good experience. Anyways, hopefully they'll never commit the same mistake in their life.

  • Dummy4 on November 6, 2011, 12:57 GMT

    I think it's a step in right direction. However ICC can't just be policing. I think quite a few cricketers coming into international cricket at a young age can get distracted or coerced into this, without even knowing as to what they are getting into. If they are very talented, they are easy targets!! ICC should do it's part by making some sort of one or two week training on ethics a mandatory requirement for international cricketers, where they tell new cricketers about what's wrong, what's not ethical in cricket, what's illegal, case studies etc. It's an opportunity for ICC to indoctrinate new cricketers the way they want. There could be a shorter version of this training made mandatory for first class cricket or so called List A. Once the training is done, there is no excuse that you are 16 or 14 or 18.

  • Randolph on November 6, 2011, 12:55 GMT

    Good call Chaps, no player will match fix in England again. Hopefully the same can be said here!

  • Rakesh on November 6, 2011, 11:33 GMT

    @oe C Parathara - completely agree with u. Compratively these 3 shameless crooks have been let off easily. Specially the poor child wonder.

  • Dummy4 on November 6, 2011, 6:34 GMT

    These players have got what they deserve nothing more nothing less. The text msg that you mentioned in your article is pointless, you should also mentioned the text in response to which this text was send. It's completely out of context.

  • No featured comments at the moment.