S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

Mind the gap

Rahul Dravid is one short of equalling the record for being bowled most often in Tests, but which player has the highest percentage of such dismissals?

S Rajesh

January 6, 2012

Comments: 37 | Text size: A | A

Rahul Dravid was bowled between bat and pad, again, Australia v India, 2nd Test, Sydney, 3rd day, January 5, 2012
Just two more such dismissals, and the world record will belong to Rahul Dravid © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links
Numbers Game : Previous column: Openers on the back foot
Players/Officials: Rahul Dravid
Series/Tournaments: India tour of Australia

In the first Test of the ongoing Australia-India series at the MCG, something quite unexpected happened: Rahul Dravid was bowled three times - twice legitimately, and once off a no-ball. It was only the fourth time in his entire Test career that he had been bowled in both innings of a Test, and the first time in 49 matches. And when Ben Hilfenhaus dismissed him in the same manner in the second innings in Sydney, it meant Dravid had been bowled in six times in his last eight innings - he had also been dismissed in that manner three times in the home series against West Indies. During this period, his tally of bowled dismissals in Tests increased from 46 to 52. At this rate, he'll take over from Allan Border as the batsman to be bowled most often in Tests well before this series is over - Border's record stands at 53.

Dravid has played the second-highest number of innings in Test cricket, so perhaps it shouldn't be such a surprise that he has also been dismissed bowled the second-most number of times. However, it goes against the enduring image of Dravid, which is of him playing an exaggerated defensive shot with everything - bat, pad, body - between the ball and the stumps.

Obviously, plenty has been written and said about these recent dismissals, which makes it a pretty good time to check out the numbers, for Dravid and for other batsmen who've played over a significant period of time. A cut-off of 175 innings ensures that most of the modern greats make the cut. (There are a couple of bowlers in there too, but they can safely be ignored.) This excludes some of the top players from an earlier age, but then a comparison across eras in this aspect isn't a fair one anyway: batsmen in an earlier era had a greater likelihood of getting bowled due to the variable bounce of uncovered pitches and the lack of enough protective gear.

Wally Hammond, for instance, was dismissed 124 times in Tests of which 38 were bowled (30.65%); Len Hutton was out bowled 31 times out of his 123 dismissals (25.2%); Don Bradman was bowled 23 times out of his 70 dismissals (32.86%). In Tests before 1960, bowled dismissals constituted 30.85% of total outs; since 1970, it's dropped to 17.71%.

However, in the list below all the batsmen save one have played their cricket after 1970. And it so happens that the batsmen who've been bowled often also have a high percentage of such dismissals: Border, Dravid and Jacques Kallis, who are among the top four in terms of bowled dismissals, are also in the top five percentages (calculated as a percentage of total dismissals for each batsman).

For Border, almost a fourth of his dismissals were bowled: he was out in that fashion 53 times. Malcolm Marshall was chief tormentor, getting him out bowled five times, while Kapil Dev and Shivlal Yadav got him three times each. (In all, Marshall dismissed him 11 times and Kapil 10.) No bowler has dismissed Dravid bowled more than three times: Shane Warne leads with three, while a bunch of others have got him twice.

In percentage terms, though, Viv Richards was out bowled more often than Dravid - out of 170 dismissals, Richards was bowled 36 times, with Dennis Lillee getting him out in that manner three times. (Click here for the list of bowlers.)

VVS Laxman figures prominently too - he is one of six batsmen with a percentage of 20 or more. (A lot of high-class fast bowlers are among those who've dismissed him bowled more than once.) Sachin Tendulkar has got out bowled 48 times, but in percentage terms that's a relatively lower 17.52.

The only batsman from an earlier era in this list is Colin Cowdrey, who played between 1954 and 1975. He was bowled 31 times out of 173, a percentage of 17.92.

Highest percentage of bowleds (among batsmen* with at least 175 innings)
Batsman Innings Dismissals Bowled Percent (of dismissals)
Allan Border 265 221 53 23.98
Mark Boucher 202 179 39 21.79
Viv Richards 182 170 36 21.18
Jacques Kallis 254 215 45 20.93
Rahul Dravid 282 250 52 20.80
VVS Laxman 220 186 38 20.43
David Boon 190 170 32 18.82
Alec Stewart 235 214 40 18.69
Steve Waugh 260 214 39 18.22
Colin Cowdrey 188 173 31 17.92
Graham Thorpe 179 151 27 17.88
Geoff Boycott 193 170 30 17.65
Sachin Tendulkar 307 274 48 17.52
Desmond Haynes 202 177 31 17.51
Graham Gooch 215 209 36 17.22
* Excludes the specialist bowlers

At the other end of the scale are the batsmen who seldom got out bowled. That has no correlation to whether they were better or worse batsmen than those in the list above, but their techniques were different, which meant they got out in other ways more often than they got bowled.

Take Dilip Vengsarkar, for instance. He played 116 Tests, 185 innings, was dismissed 163 times, of which just 16 were bowled. He was lbw more often than he was bowled (19 time), while he was caught 120 times, which is almost 75% of his total dismissals. Kumar Sangakkara's stats are very similar to Vengsarkar's: 167 dismissals, of which 17 are bowled and 124 caught.

Shivnarine Chanderpaul's technique isn't the most pleasing aesthetically, but it's worked wonderfully for him, especially in keeping the deliveries from knocking his stumps over. Chanderpaul's pronounced shuffle has kept his bowled percentage down to 11.17 (22 out of 197), but that technique has resulted in him being lbw 43 times, almost twice as many as his bowled dismissals. Similarly, Javed Miandad was bowled only 21 times, but lbw on 33 occasions.

On the other hand, Dravid has been bowled 52 times, but lbw on 34 occasions; for Border the ratio is even more skewed - 53 bowled, 16 lbws.

These ratios indicate the different batting techniques going around, but to get the extremes in the ratios, we need to move over to the bowlers, for all these batsmen in the list are bookended by two legendary bowlers. Among those who've batted at least 175 innings, the one who got out bowled most often was Courtney Walsh: out of 124 dismissals, 37 were bowled (29.84). And the one with the least percentage of bowled dismissals is Shane Warne. He dismissed 116 batsmen in that fashion, but was himself bowled only 12 times out of his 182 dismissals, a measly percentage of 6.59.

Batsmen with low percentages of bowleds (Qual: 175 innings*)
Batsman Innings Dismissals Bowled Percent (of dismissals)
Dilip Vengsarkar 185 163 16 9.82
Ian Healy 182 159 16 10.06
Kumar Sangakkara 179 167 17 10.18
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 234 197 22 11.17
Matthew Hayden 184 170 21 12.35
Javed Miandad 189 168 21 12.50
Mahela Jayawardene 213 200 25 12.50
Inzamam-ul-Haq 200 178 23 12.92
Ricky Ponting 273 245 32 13.06
Stephen Fleming 189 179 24 13.41
* Excludes the specialist bowlers

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT)

@ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

Posted by   on (January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT)

@ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

Posted by   on (January 8, 2012, 3:43 GMT)

Hole in the Wall.............

Posted by   on (January 7, 2012, 18:05 GMT)

I feel Dravid was out inner-edging more times than clean bowled. I would like some stats on it, if they are available. Having said that, I feel getting out by playing-on deserves the status of being a distinct dismissal in itself because the dynamics involved behind inner-edging and getting clean bowled are, more often than not, distinctly dissimilar. For example, Dravid's natural inclination is to defend the ball rather than driving or flicking. Therefore, umpteen times in his career, he jumped to defend a bouncy delivery outside the off and ended up inner-edging on to the stumps. That kind of dismissal is entirely different from, say,Tendulkar getting clean bowled, which happened many times because of his inclination to flick. The major distinction between the two dismissals is that the inner-edged ball is often not meant to knock-out the stumps whereas the ball that effects a 'clean-bowl' is heading straight towards the stumps.

Posted by   on (January 7, 2012, 13:35 GMT)

india should start playing the domestic sides of the countries they visit............if by chance they succeed then they should b allowed to play against that country's international side.....................even if india had played against the sides of westren australia,victoria or new south wales the result would have been the same so they should not be allowed to play australia.......teams like bangladesh,india,srilanka and zimbabwe should only be allowed to play against the domestic sides then they should play test cricket in that country.....................one sided matches that give results in 3 or 4 days are not going to do any good for test cricket.........!!!

Posted by chandau on (January 7, 2012, 10:29 GMT)

@ billios: LOL other than HEALY everyone else in the least bowled list will be affronted at being called MIDDLE ORDER BATSMEN. Only of lte has Chanders batted down the order, else most of these guys play 1,2,3,4. @ rnarayan: ditto it will be interesting to see the combined stat for bowled & LBW. this list may show a drastic change in such a case. for example Ponting is well known for falling over at the begining of an inning. Mahela also has been a LBW candidate trying to sweep and so has Hayden. @ kiwiviktor81: showing the balls faced would only make someone look bad. any batsman is vulnerable at the start of an inning so the chance of being bowled without facing many is higher. On the flip side, after facing so many balls when his "eye is in", it looks bad to be bowled or lazy or both. in fact anyone who has played leather ball cricket would say that to be bowled at 10 is better than at 110 or 210 :) maybe crickinfo will provide a table of rabbits on the same lines JUST FOR LAUGHS

Posted by US_Indian on (January 7, 2012, 3:05 GMT)

Getting bowled is not a real bad thing and the joy you see on a bowlers face is insurmountable and even for the spectators too. Now coming to our two greats namely Sachin the man and media made God, and Rahul the Wall Dravid, of late both these players have given bowlers few chances to break through their defenses which was not the case earlier, I can see cracks appearing in the Wall and man made God becoming ordinary mortals like Saibaba his Guru. If it was some experienced bowlers or some deadly toe crushing yorkers or some really deadly unreadable ball those two can be excused but such a huge gap between the pad and bat looks like india gate to the bowlers. It is high time either they fix it permanently or honorably quit before making themselves a laughing stock and a walking wicket.

Posted by tompuffin on (January 7, 2012, 2:55 GMT)

What about the legendary CHRIS MARTIN? I wonder how many times he's been bowled in his fruitful batting career.

Posted by   on (January 7, 2012, 1:31 GMT)

Well one thing is for sure, Matty Hayden and Inzamam have such low percentages because, let's face it- could the bowlers even see the stumps when they were batting?

Posted by TheDoctor394 on (January 6, 2012, 23:28 GMT)

Careful, Indians, don't go calling for Dravid's sacking yet. Remember his superb series in England. You're starting to sound like Australians.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    Crunch time for Sehwag and Gambhir

Numbers Game: The Indian T20 tournament presents an opportunity to both to show their class once again

The rise of the Associates

Firdose Moonda: Cricket below the international top tier is well structured. It's a pity the Test-playing world doesn't take a leaf out of their book

    The choking problem

Martin Crowe: If they are to live up to their potential in next year's World Cup at home, New Zealand need to look within

    Impressing Viv and Greg

Five Firsts: Former Pakistan batsman Haroon Rasheed on the compliments he received, and his admiration for Gavaskar

Why India are not cricket's Brazil yet

Samir Chopra: The numbers might be in their favour, but they can't boast sustained excellence or a distinctive playing style

News | Features Last 7 days

UAE all set to host lavish welcoming party

The controversy surrounding the IPL has done little to deter fans in UAE from flocking the stadiums, as they gear up to watch the Indian stars in action for the first time since 2006

Attention on Yuvraj, Gambhir in IPL 2014

ESPNcricinfo picks five players for whom this IPL is of bigger significance

The watch breaker, and Malinga specials

The Plays of the day from the match between Kolkata and Mumbai, in Abu Dhabi

India: cricket's Brazil

It's difficult to beat a huge talent base exposed to good facilities, and possessed of a long history of competing as a nation

Fifty for the pantheon

What if you had to narrow all of cricket greatness down to 50 names?

News | Features Last 7 days