January 6, 2012

Mind the gap

Rahul Dravid is one short of equalling the record for being bowled most often in Tests, but which player has the highest percentage of such dismissals?
37

In the first Test of the ongoing Australia-India series at the MCG, something quite unexpected happened: Rahul Dravid was bowled three times - twice legitimately, and once off a no-ball. It was only the fourth time in his entire Test career that he had been bowled in both innings of a Test, and the first time in 49 matches. And when Ben Hilfenhaus dismissed him in the same manner in the second innings in Sydney, it meant Dravid had been bowled in six times in his last eight innings - he had also been dismissed in that manner three times in the home series against West Indies. During this period, his tally of bowled dismissals in Tests increased from 46 to 52. At this rate, he'll take over from Allan Border as the batsman to be bowled most often in Tests well before this series is over - Border's record stands at 53.

Dravid has played the second-highest number of innings in Test cricket, so perhaps it shouldn't be such a surprise that he has also been dismissed bowled the second-most number of times. However, it goes against the enduring image of Dravid, which is of him playing an exaggerated defensive shot with everything - bat, pad, body - between the ball and the stumps.

Obviously, plenty has been written and said about these recent dismissals, which makes it a pretty good time to check out the numbers, for Dravid and for other batsmen who've played over a significant period of time. A cut-off of 175 innings ensures that most of the modern greats make the cut. (There are a couple of bowlers in there too, but they can safely be ignored.) This excludes some of the top players from an earlier age, but then a comparison across eras in this aspect isn't a fair one anyway: batsmen in an earlier era had a greater likelihood of getting bowled due to the variable bounce of uncovered pitches and the lack of enough protective gear.

Wally Hammond, for instance, was dismissed 124 times in Tests of which 38 were bowled (30.65%); Len Hutton was out bowled 31 times out of his 123 dismissals (25.2%); Don Bradman was bowled 23 times out of his 70 dismissals (32.86%). In Tests before 1960, bowled dismissals constituted 30.85% of total outs; since 1970, it's dropped to 17.71%.

However, in the list below all the batsmen save one have played their cricket after 1970. And it so happens that the batsmen who've been bowled often also have a high percentage of such dismissals: Border, Dravid and Jacques Kallis, who are among the top four in terms of bowled dismissals, are also in the top five percentages (calculated as a percentage of total dismissals for each batsman).

For Border, almost a fourth of his dismissals were bowled: he was out in that fashion 53 times. Malcolm Marshall was chief tormentor, getting him out bowled five times, while Kapil Dev and Shivlal Yadav got him three times each. (In all, Marshall dismissed him 11 times and Kapil 10.) No bowler has dismissed Dravid bowled more than three times: Shane Warne leads with three, while a bunch of others have got him twice.

In percentage terms, though, Viv Richards was out bowled more often than Dravid - out of 170 dismissals, Richards was bowled 36 times, with Dennis Lillee getting him out in that manner three times. (Click here for the list of bowlers.)

VVS Laxman figures prominently too - he is one of six batsmen with a percentage of 20 or more. (A lot of high-class fast bowlers are among those who've dismissed him bowled more than once.) Sachin Tendulkar has got out bowled 48 times, but in percentage terms that's a relatively lower 17.52.

The only batsman from an earlier era in this list is Colin Cowdrey, who played between 1954 and 1975. He was bowled 31 times out of 173, a percentage of 17.92.

Highest percentage of bowleds (among batsmen* with at least 175 innings)
Batsman Innings Dismissals Bowled Percent (of dismissals)
Allan Border 265 221 53 23.98
Mark Boucher 202 179 39 21.79
Viv Richards 182 170 36 21.18
Jacques Kallis 254 215 45 20.93
Rahul Dravid 282 250 52 20.80
VVS Laxman 220 186 38 20.43
David Boon 190 170 32 18.82
Alec Stewart 235 214 40 18.69
Steve Waugh 260 214 39 18.22
Colin Cowdrey 188 173 31 17.92
Graham Thorpe 179 151 27 17.88
Geoff Boycott 193 170 30 17.65
Sachin Tendulkar 307 274 48 17.52
Desmond Haynes 202 177 31 17.51
Graham Gooch 215 209 36 17.22
* Excludes the specialist bowlers

At the other end of the scale are the batsmen who seldom got out bowled. That has no correlation to whether they were better or worse batsmen than those in the list above, but their techniques were different, which meant they got out in other ways more often than they got bowled.

Take Dilip Vengsarkar, for instance. He played 116 Tests, 185 innings, was dismissed 163 times, of which just 16 were bowled. He was lbw more often than he was bowled (19 time), while he was caught 120 times, which is almost 75% of his total dismissals. Kumar Sangakkara's stats are very similar to Vengsarkar's: 167 dismissals, of which 17 are bowled and 124 caught.

Shivnarine Chanderpaul's technique isn't the most pleasing aesthetically, but it's worked wonderfully for him, especially in keeping the deliveries from knocking his stumps over. Chanderpaul's pronounced shuffle has kept his bowled percentage down to 11.17 (22 out of 197), but that technique has resulted in him being lbw 43 times, almost twice as many as his bowled dismissals. Similarly, Javed Miandad was bowled only 21 times, but lbw on 33 occasions.

On the other hand, Dravid has been bowled 52 times, but lbw on 34 occasions; for Border the ratio is even more skewed - 53 bowled, 16 lbws.

These ratios indicate the different batting techniques going around, but to get the extremes in the ratios, we need to move over to the bowlers, for all these batsmen in the list are bookended by two legendary bowlers. Among those who've batted at least 175 innings, the one who got out bowled most often was Courtney Walsh: out of 124 dismissals, 37 were bowled (29.84). And the one with the least percentage of bowled dismissals is Shane Warne. He dismissed 116 batsmen in that fashion, but was himself bowled only 12 times out of his 182 dismissals, a measly percentage of 6.59.

Batsmen with low percentages of bowleds (Qual: 175 innings*)
Batsman Innings Dismissals Bowled Percent (of dismissals)
Dilip Vengsarkar 185 163 16 9.82
Ian Healy 182 159 16 10.06
Kumar Sangakkara 179 167 17 10.18
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 234 197 22 11.17
Matthew Hayden 184 170 21 12.35
Javed Miandad 189 168 21 12.50
Mahela Jayawardene 213 200 25 12.50
Inzamam-ul-Haq 200 178 23 12.92
Ricky Ponting 273 245 32 13.06
Stephen Fleming 189 179 24 13.41
* Excludes the specialist bowlers

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT

    @ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

    We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

  • on January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT

    @ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

    We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

  • on January 8, 2012, 3:43 GMT

    Hole in the Wall.............

  • on January 7, 2012, 18:05 GMT

    I feel Dravid was out inner-edging more times than clean bowled. I would like some stats on it, if they are available. Having said that, I feel getting out by playing-on deserves the status of being a distinct dismissal in itself because the dynamics involved behind inner-edging and getting clean bowled are, more often than not, distinctly dissimilar. For example, Dravid's natural inclination is to defend the ball rather than driving or flicking. Therefore, umpteen times in his career, he jumped to defend a bouncy delivery outside the off and ended up inner-edging on to the stumps. That kind of dismissal is entirely different from, say,Tendulkar getting clean bowled, which happened many times because of his inclination to flick. The major distinction between the two dismissals is that the inner-edged ball is often not meant to knock-out the stumps whereas the ball that effects a 'clean-bowl' is heading straight towards the stumps.

  • on January 7, 2012, 13:35 GMT

    india should start playing the domestic sides of the countries they visit............if by chance they succeed then they should b allowed to play against that country's international side.....................even if india had played against the sides of westren australia,victoria or new south wales the result would have been the same so they should not be allowed to play australia.......teams like bangladesh,india,srilanka and zimbabwe should only be allowed to play against the domestic sides then they should play test cricket in that country.....................one sided matches that give results in 3 or 4 days are not going to do any good for test cricket.........!!!

  • chandau on January 7, 2012, 10:29 GMT

    @ billios: LOL other than HEALY everyone else in the least bowled list will be affronted at being called MIDDLE ORDER BATSMEN. Only of lte has Chanders batted down the order, else most of these guys play 1,2,3,4. @ rnarayan: ditto it will be interesting to see the combined stat for bowled & LBW. this list may show a drastic change in such a case. for example Ponting is well known for falling over at the begining of an inning. Mahela also has been a LBW candidate trying to sweep and so has Hayden. @ kiwiviktor81: showing the balls faced would only make someone look bad. any batsman is vulnerable at the start of an inning so the chance of being bowled without facing many is higher. On the flip side, after facing so many balls when his "eye is in", it looks bad to be bowled or lazy or both. in fact anyone who has played leather ball cricket would say that to be bowled at 10 is better than at 110 or 210 :) maybe crickinfo will provide a table of rabbits on the same lines JUST FOR LAUGHS

  • US_Indian on January 7, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Getting bowled is not a real bad thing and the joy you see on a bowlers face is insurmountable and even for the spectators too. Now coming to our two greats namely Sachin the man and media made God, and Rahul the Wall Dravid, of late both these players have given bowlers few chances to break through their defenses which was not the case earlier, I can see cracks appearing in the Wall and man made God becoming ordinary mortals like Saibaba his Guru. If it was some experienced bowlers or some deadly toe crushing yorkers or some really deadly unreadable ball those two can be excused but such a huge gap between the pad and bat looks like india gate to the bowlers. It is high time either they fix it permanently or honorably quit before making themselves a laughing stock and a walking wicket.

  • tompuffin on January 7, 2012, 2:55 GMT

    What about the legendary CHRIS MARTIN? I wonder how many times he's been bowled in his fruitful batting career.

  • on January 7, 2012, 1:31 GMT

    Well one thing is for sure, Matty Hayden and Inzamam have such low percentages because, let's face it- could the bowlers even see the stumps when they were batting?

  • TheDoctor394 on January 6, 2012, 23:28 GMT

    Careful, Indians, don't go calling for Dravid's sacking yet. Remember his superb series in England. You're starting to sound like Australians.

  • on January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT

    @ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

    We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

  • on January 8, 2012, 19:14 GMT

    @ Mehmood Khan, could you please remind me the result of the WC semifinal? :D

    We are at a very bad level, but even if we're world no 2 even after losing 6 in a row away (and that too disgracefully!), then we must have been good at a point of time. And till now , when most teams come to India, we do manage to give them a thrashing (in between some hospitality through some absolute 'roads)' As for Dravid (I am one of his biggest fans), isn't it time to retire, no? The youngsters deserve a chance. Time for one last selfless act (maybe I demand too much!)

  • on January 8, 2012, 3:43 GMT

    Hole in the Wall.............

  • on January 7, 2012, 18:05 GMT

    I feel Dravid was out inner-edging more times than clean bowled. I would like some stats on it, if they are available. Having said that, I feel getting out by playing-on deserves the status of being a distinct dismissal in itself because the dynamics involved behind inner-edging and getting clean bowled are, more often than not, distinctly dissimilar. For example, Dravid's natural inclination is to defend the ball rather than driving or flicking. Therefore, umpteen times in his career, he jumped to defend a bouncy delivery outside the off and ended up inner-edging on to the stumps. That kind of dismissal is entirely different from, say,Tendulkar getting clean bowled, which happened many times because of his inclination to flick. The major distinction between the two dismissals is that the inner-edged ball is often not meant to knock-out the stumps whereas the ball that effects a 'clean-bowl' is heading straight towards the stumps.

  • on January 7, 2012, 13:35 GMT

    india should start playing the domestic sides of the countries they visit............if by chance they succeed then they should b allowed to play against that country's international side.....................even if india had played against the sides of westren australia,victoria or new south wales the result would have been the same so they should not be allowed to play australia.......teams like bangladesh,india,srilanka and zimbabwe should only be allowed to play against the domestic sides then they should play test cricket in that country.....................one sided matches that give results in 3 or 4 days are not going to do any good for test cricket.........!!!

  • chandau on January 7, 2012, 10:29 GMT

    @ billios: LOL other than HEALY everyone else in the least bowled list will be affronted at being called MIDDLE ORDER BATSMEN. Only of lte has Chanders batted down the order, else most of these guys play 1,2,3,4. @ rnarayan: ditto it will be interesting to see the combined stat for bowled & LBW. this list may show a drastic change in such a case. for example Ponting is well known for falling over at the begining of an inning. Mahela also has been a LBW candidate trying to sweep and so has Hayden. @ kiwiviktor81: showing the balls faced would only make someone look bad. any batsman is vulnerable at the start of an inning so the chance of being bowled without facing many is higher. On the flip side, after facing so many balls when his "eye is in", it looks bad to be bowled or lazy or both. in fact anyone who has played leather ball cricket would say that to be bowled at 10 is better than at 110 or 210 :) maybe crickinfo will provide a table of rabbits on the same lines JUST FOR LAUGHS

  • US_Indian on January 7, 2012, 3:05 GMT

    Getting bowled is not a real bad thing and the joy you see on a bowlers face is insurmountable and even for the spectators too. Now coming to our two greats namely Sachin the man and media made God, and Rahul the Wall Dravid, of late both these players have given bowlers few chances to break through their defenses which was not the case earlier, I can see cracks appearing in the Wall and man made God becoming ordinary mortals like Saibaba his Guru. If it was some experienced bowlers or some deadly toe crushing yorkers or some really deadly unreadable ball those two can be excused but such a huge gap between the pad and bat looks like india gate to the bowlers. It is high time either they fix it permanently or honorably quit before making themselves a laughing stock and a walking wicket.

  • tompuffin on January 7, 2012, 2:55 GMT

    What about the legendary CHRIS MARTIN? I wonder how many times he's been bowled in his fruitful batting career.

  • on January 7, 2012, 1:31 GMT

    Well one thing is for sure, Matty Hayden and Inzamam have such low percentages because, let's face it- could the bowlers even see the stumps when they were batting?

  • TheDoctor394 on January 6, 2012, 23:28 GMT

    Careful, Indians, don't go calling for Dravid's sacking yet. Remember his superb series in England. You're starting to sound like Australians.

  • Rajeev1996 on January 6, 2012, 23:09 GMT

    Dravid has played many innnings, he has to get out somehow.Remember half of his career was played with Australia in total dominance of the world. S. Rajesh has written a meaningless article here. Does anybody really care if Dravid was bowled,caught or run out? He is 38, and like Tendulkar, is not at his prime. 2011 was a great year for Rahul, do not detract from him

  • Theldyrn on January 6, 2012, 22:55 GMT

    Dravid isn't the Wall - he's the Fence!

  • rahulnori on January 6, 2012, 22:45 GMT

    One would think... why does Dravid get bowled so often? Because he tries to play straight most often. And batsmen that play straight are the most technically sound. What if he gets bowled a higher "Percentage" of times. He is strong at what he does, let him keep doing that.

  • on January 6, 2012, 22:18 GMT

    The big differnce between the 1970 and the earlier era is covered pitches. In the earlier era before pitches were covered, "sticky" wickets were so common. Balls wood scoot along the ground after pitching on length. Some would turn square or seam produigiously. It would be intersting to see the number of bowled wickets that Derek Underwood got in the 1960s.

  • Gaganaut on January 6, 2012, 22:18 GMT

    So there have been 38 instances of the priceless expression on VVS Laxman's face. It still amuses me how he brings out the "how the hell did that happen?" on his face when he is bowled out. Legend. But he is a great player nonetheless.

  • happy-go-lucky on January 6, 2012, 22:17 GMT

    Well, The Wall is fast turning into The Hole.

  • on January 6, 2012, 21:25 GMT

    tendulkar isn't too far away as well !! Any one realised that there is no Pakistani batsman in the list for "Highest percentage of bowleds"

  • Tangles74 on January 6, 2012, 21:08 GMT

    An interesting split here would be clean bowled vs played on. I do remember Border being bowled through the gate from time to time, but the most common memory was of him slashing/cutting and playing on.

  • MNaseemAshraf on January 6, 2012, 16:40 GMT

    Tendulkar is also 2 short of his 50 in the field of bowled dismissals in Tests. Dravid+Tendulkar together hvae made =52+48= 100 in this category. WOW.

  • Advanced_Donkeys on January 6, 2012, 15:53 GMT

    jayasuriya????what about him?

  • on January 6, 2012, 15:34 GMT

    Bye Bye Mr Dravid, you time is up!

  • billios on January 6, 2012, 15:26 GMT

    surprised most of the 'least bowled' list are middle-order batsmen; would have expected to see openers topping this list, they are supposed to be the best at knowing where their off stump is!

  • kiwiviktor81 on January 6, 2012, 15:10 GMT

    The problem with this analysis is that a batsman has to go out somehow. To truly reflect how awesome Dravid is, you ought to do an analysis of bowleds per 1000 balls faced. I expect that such a table would reinforce why The Wall is called The Wall.

  • on January 6, 2012, 14:39 GMT

    And the bowler who has hit the stumps the most? The legend, Waqar Yonis

  • sureshshankar on January 6, 2012, 13:06 GMT

    very enlightening. for the full story, we need to add one more statistic - caught behind the wicket or in the slip cordon - and show them all side by side. We will then have the % bowled, the % LBW and the % caught behind. This is the the right way to look at these stats. Because then we will figure out whether the classicists get bowled because they are good at leaving the ball outside off stump more (resulting less caught behinds) and more often commit the mistake of not dealing well with the ball coming in a shade. To some extent this shows in the lower LBW ratio of those getting bowled. However, we need the full stats to make a rightful comparison.

  • yorkshirematt on January 6, 2012, 12:15 GMT

    I can see him getting this unwanted record before Tendulkar gets his hundredth hundred.

  • ebiem2010 on January 6, 2012, 11:51 GMT

    if dravid was a non sub continent batsman his bowled out would have been even higher. he may be a wall but only in his backyard

  • on January 6, 2012, 10:28 GMT

    Who cares bout these things as he is 1oif the greatest test batsman ?

  • sajjad.kernel on January 6, 2012, 10:25 GMT

    really good stats....nice way to end the article

  • raviies on January 6, 2012, 9:51 GMT

    at this Rahul "the Wall" Dravid is becoming a "window" :)

  • rnarayan on January 6, 2012, 9:27 GMT

    Nice article. It is interesting that some have low 'bowled' dismissals, but are prone to lbws.What would be moire meaningful, perhaps, is the combined figures for bowled and lbw. The point being that this is when they got out after missing the ball.

  • on January 6, 2012, 8:39 GMT

    What about Brian Lara? I'm surprised he is not on either list.

  • on January 6, 2012, 8:22 GMT

    the irony of the Wall being Bowled...lol...anyways doesnt make a difference...a great great player and an even more wonderful human being...respect sir...!

  • YoBro on January 6, 2012, 7:00 GMT

    I still recall Kapil bowling out Allan Border bowling those late outswingers (that is, swinging away from a right hander) from over the wicket. The late swing inevitably beat Border's forward prod and sneaked in through his defenses to uproot his stumps. That was Kapil at his peak.

  • Meety on January 6, 2012, 6:51 GMT

    Interesting that Ian Healy is on the "Least bowled" list!

  • 5why on January 6, 2012, 6:46 GMT

    Rajesh, why have you not included Saurav Ganguly in the list ? His record is leaning towards the excellent lot, only 15% times he has been bowled out in 188 Test match innings played.

  • donda on January 6, 2012, 6:17 GMT

    Simple answer to this question is that Dravid is getting old, he is no more WALL of cricket and his reflexes are slow now.

    I do think that it's really the time for Dravid and Laxman to take retirement from test cricket. They are worth watching million times but for how many years they will play. It's time to say good bye to great players one by one and with honor and respect.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • donda on January 6, 2012, 6:17 GMT

    Simple answer to this question is that Dravid is getting old, he is no more WALL of cricket and his reflexes are slow now.

    I do think that it's really the time for Dravid and Laxman to take retirement from test cricket. They are worth watching million times but for how many years they will play. It's time to say good bye to great players one by one and with honor and respect.

  • 5why on January 6, 2012, 6:46 GMT

    Rajesh, why have you not included Saurav Ganguly in the list ? His record is leaning towards the excellent lot, only 15% times he has been bowled out in 188 Test match innings played.

  • Meety on January 6, 2012, 6:51 GMT

    Interesting that Ian Healy is on the "Least bowled" list!

  • YoBro on January 6, 2012, 7:00 GMT

    I still recall Kapil bowling out Allan Border bowling those late outswingers (that is, swinging away from a right hander) from over the wicket. The late swing inevitably beat Border's forward prod and sneaked in through his defenses to uproot his stumps. That was Kapil at his peak.

  • on January 6, 2012, 8:22 GMT

    the irony of the Wall being Bowled...lol...anyways doesnt make a difference...a great great player and an even more wonderful human being...respect sir...!

  • on January 6, 2012, 8:39 GMT

    What about Brian Lara? I'm surprised he is not on either list.

  • rnarayan on January 6, 2012, 9:27 GMT

    Nice article. It is interesting that some have low 'bowled' dismissals, but are prone to lbws.What would be moire meaningful, perhaps, is the combined figures for bowled and lbw. The point being that this is when they got out after missing the ball.

  • raviies on January 6, 2012, 9:51 GMT

    at this Rahul "the Wall" Dravid is becoming a "window" :)

  • sajjad.kernel on January 6, 2012, 10:25 GMT

    really good stats....nice way to end the article

  • on January 6, 2012, 10:28 GMT

    Who cares bout these things as he is 1oif the greatest test batsman ?