June 10, 2012

Quick picks

Five all-time great fast bowlers who had pace as well as every trick in the book

Ray Lindwall heads my list of the five best fast bowlers I have seen.

This artist-cricketer changed his pace with all the subtle artifices any fast bowler of any era has achieved, and he did what all great bowlers must do: broke the rhythm of the batsman. At his peak he had the power to slay by thunder or defeat by guile.

Stocky and strong, Lindwall was like a well-toned welterweight, ready to punch and counter-punch. He bowled outswingers at genuine speed, and had what Pelham Warner called "shades of pace". To the purists, Lindwall's bowling arm was too low, but that helped his skidding bouncer. Instead of climbing harmlessly over the batsman's head, it came at the throat, earning him the nickname "Killer".

Lindwall was at the height of his powers when he spearheaded Don Bradman's bowling attack - which included Bill Johnston, Keith Miller and Ernie Toshack - on the celebrated 1948 Australian tour of England. In five Tests there, he took 27 wickets. Through the 1950s he reigned supreme as Australia's spearhead, bowling his heart out against some of the greatest batsmen of any era, including such luminaries as Len Hutton, Denis Compton, Garry Sobers, Everton Weekes, Clyde Walcott, Frank Worrell and Vijay Hazare.

Just before World War II erupted, then St George Cricket Club captain Bill O'Reilly took Lindwall under his wing. It is said that O'Reilly brought to the club the technology called "electric-eye photography", which allowed the youngster to watch his action on film in slow motion, a tool to help identify any technical faults. O'Reilly remembered Lindwall as a starry-eyed kid, who always timed his after-school cricket in the street with his mates to coincide with when O'Reilly, secretary of the Lion Tile Company, walked the streets of Kogarah on his way home. The instant O'Reilly turned into the street, there was young Lindwall in full flight.

Lindwall's first Test was O'Reilly's last - the 1945-46 one-off match against New Zealand in Wellington. O'Reilly took a match haul of 8 for 33 off 19 overs, and his protégé got 2 for 29 off 17. Lindwall played 61 Tests, 228 wickets at 23.03, with a Test best of 7 for 38. However, his 6 for 20 in the England first innings of the fifth Test at The Oval in 1948 to demolish Hutton's men for 52 was his piece de resistance.


Good judges describe Dennis Lillee as the "complete bowler", one who always stayed a step ahead of the pack.

In the Test arena, Lillee was never beaten. He did what it took to take you out, and sometimes he roughed you up along the way.

His battles with West Indian champion Viv Richards were legendary. Richards put to the sword to all the international bowlers of his era, but from the first time that he came up against Lillee, it was two irresistible forces meeting: a heavyweight fight between two unrelenting combatants. Their contests were always take-no-prisoners affairs.

In December 1971, Lillee blitzed a strong World Xl batting line-up in Perth, taking 8 for 29 and then four in the follow-on. He bowled magnificently as well in England in 1972, taking 31 wickets at 17.67 in the series.

Many believed Lillee's career was all but over late in the summer of 1972-73, when he sustained multiple stress fractures in his back. He underwent a long regime of intensive physiotherapy, during which his determination became legend. He came back to big cricket in 1974-75, perfect timing to partner Jeff Thomson against England Down Under, when the two destroyed the visiting team as Australia won 4-1.

Lillee played World Series Cricket for a couple of years, during which he worked diligently on his approach to the wicket and his delivery. He became an even better bowler technically, if that was even possible. The famous "caught Marsh bowled Lillee" dismissal appears on Test match scorecards 95 times. In 70 Tests, Lillee took 355 wickets at 23.92 with 23 hauls of five wickets, and his best Test figures were 7 for 83 against West Indies at the MCG in 1981. But figures cannot tell of a bowler's strategy, the way a victim is stalked and finally put to the sword. When he had to struggle with his body - and he often had to, over his stellar career - Lillee called upon all his inner reserves and often drove himself upward and onward by sheer will power.


To me, cricketing heaven would be Wasim Akram and Shane Warne bowling in tandem to Victor Trumper and Don Bradman.

When he came in to bowl, Wasim was a mirror image of Keith Miller, the great Australian allrounder, whose build, athleticism and good looks captured the imagination. Wasim excelled at the highest level with the ball - often on wickets that did not provide much in the way of pace and bounce. He could move the ball - new or old - either way. His efforts with the old ball, especially, were fabulous; he learnt better than anyone how to rough one side of the ball up in such a way that he could achieve reverse swing.

Wasim had a style of his own. He'd shuffle to the crease, transfer his weight from back foot to front, and with an incredibly swift arm action left fly with a searing bouncer, a late inswinging yorker, or a ball he held back to lure the batsman into an indiscreet off- or cover drive. The best Pakistani fast bowler since the halcyon days of Imran Khan, Wasim was a match-winner with the ball, but I also recall him once batting with Imran when both of them hit centuries at the Adelaide Oval to thwart an Australian victory.

I've seen some fabulous left-arm pace bowlers in my time, including Alan Davidson and Garry Sobers, but none of them at their top quite gets above Wasim. He invariably wove some magic and brought the deadest of pitches to life. I can still see in that Adelaide Test Steve Waugh shoulder arms to a wonderful inswinging yorker that would have scattered all three uprights, ending up being palpably lbw.


Alan Davidson's strength, smooth action and skill saw him take 186 wickets in 44 Tests at an average of 20.53. He bowled from a 15-paced approach and eased into a lovely side-on position just before delivery. While he didn't have the bustle or rapid bowling arm of Wasim, Davo had a nice rhythm. He used his front arm to good effect and had the ability to swing in late to the right-handers or angle the ball away. It was, of course, his ability to swing the ball that made his away angle so dangerous. So many of his Test victims were caught behind by the ever reliable Wally Grout.

Davo took some time to emerge from the shadow of Bill Johnston, one of the bowling stalwarts of the 1948 side, and it was Johnston who showed him how to adjust his grip ever so slightly to achieve subtle changes of pace and swing. "Bill was terrific to me on my first tour of England in 1953," Davidson recalled. "I fielded mid-on to him in the county matches and he'd say to me, 'Ready, Davo?' For a beautifully disguised slower one he pushed the ball back into his palm and spun it in the orthodox fashion. The ball seemed to curve in and drop, thus creating a lot of mis-hits and scoops to me at mid-on." Davo was then just 21 and fielding to Johnston was quite the education for him.

Through his career and beyond, Davo made a study of the craft of bowling. He practised bowling deliveries with his fingers strategically placed along the seam, using his thumb as rudder. "I think of the grip as a kangaroo - two fingers at the top of the ball are the kangaroo's legs, the thumb at the bottom of the ball is the kangaroo's tail. When a kangaroo wants to change direction, he stops squats and his tail points the way. My thumb became the kangaroo's tail."

Davo was immensely strong, with the shoulders of a colossus, which gave extraordinary power to every ball he delivered.

The WACA ground in Perth was the venue for the only hat-trick he ever got in first class cricket - on a day I took a "sickie" from my post at the Commonwealth Bank to watch. It was WA versus NSW in 1962. Davo's first victim in the hat-trick was John Parker, a solid right-hander, who lost his castle to an inswinging yorker. Next came the WA captain, Barry Shepherd. "I got him with a yorker which moved in late to knock out the leg stump," Davo remembered. The new batsman, Russell Waugh, walked briskly towards the centre, hell-bent upon saving the team from the third wicket in three balls. "I tried the inswing yorker," Davo said, "and Waugh came forward, getting an inside edge onto his pad, and the ball ballooned to Norm O'Neill at silly point."


Malcolm Marshall emerged from a pack of tremendous fast bowlers. When he started his international career, the likes of Andy Roberts. Joel Garner, Colin Croft and Michael Holding provided an armoury of fast bowling riches for West Indies captain Clive Lloyd to call upon. But where with the likes of Roberts, Garner and Holding, a batsman needed to be able to hook a bouncer and dig out a searing yorker, it was different with Marshall.

Here was a man who bustled to the crease with sparkling little steps. There was a twinkle and a bustle about him. Some purists thought his action too open, but while Marshall was very chest-on at the point of delivery, he managed to get the ball to swing away late from right-handers.

In terms of pace, he seemed to always have a little in reserve - quite unsettling, for you knew as a batsman that this man could take things to another level. His front-on action allowed him to bowl an outswinger or an inswinger from exactly the same position, and that gave him an enormous advantage. Only top-class batsmen could negotiate controlled swing of that nature at genuine pace.

Like Wasim, Marshall possessed a wickedly fast arm that took him at will from fast-medium to express. Marshall did not have the height of a Garner or a Holding, and like Lindwall's, his bouncer skidded at the batsman. In being very front-on, he was much like South Africa's Mike Procter; also in that he was relentlessly at you: both bowlers were hunters.

Late in his career Marshall developed a splendid legcutter. On an absolute turner at the SCG, in a game in which Allan Border took 11 Test wickets - Marshall bowled 31 overs and took 5 for 29: masterly pace bowling on a wicket that provided nothing for any type of fast bowler. His strike rate of 46.22 was phenomenal, and he got 22 bags of five wickets, with a Test best of 7 for 22.

His great courage was ever with him. His bravest, most astonishing, performance came against England at Headingley in 1984. Marshall had broken his left thumb and was not expected to take any more part in the match. When the ninth West Indies wicket fell in their first innings, some of the England players began to stroll towards the pavilion, but they stopped when they saw Marshall emerge from the shadows. He batted one-handed, enough to allow Larry Gomes to complete his century. Then, with his lower left arm encased in pink-coloured plaster, he demolished England with a take-no-prisoners 7 for 53.

He excelled for West Indies and for Hampshire, the county team he loved. He may well have been the greatest quick of them all. Vale Malcolm Marshall.

Ashley Mallett took 132 Tests wickets in 38 Tests for Australia. An author of over 25 books, he has written biographies of Clarrie Grimmett, Doug Walters, Jeff Thomson and Ian Chappell

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Andrew on June 13, 2012, 1:26 GMT

    @Dravid_Gravitas - just another comment on Hadlee. He was probably the 2nd most sledged cricketer to have played in Oz (behind Douglas Jardine) I reckon. I don't think anyone has ever come close to coping a verbal bashing to what Hadlee copped thru the 80s. Ozzy fans will say it was out of respect, but it was too far for my liking. Since then a lot of people say Murali was sledged in Oz, from what I saw/heard it came nowhere near what Hadlee copped. Murali's bagging was mainly - humorous (no-ball) comments. Hadlee's sledging was in the main would involve half the crowd chanting "Hadlee's a ------", it was catchy but IMO in retrospect very embarrassing. So it makes his achievements in Oz even more meritorious.

  • Andrew on June 13, 2012, 1:20 GMT

    @peterhrt - interesting comment, liked the way you put a time line on it. @Dravid_Gravitas - Lillee re-worked his action, & so later in his career was not as likely to be injured. His action is admired for the way in which it enbled him to use variations without giving much away to the batsmen. It is why Marshall is a bit of a freak, as his action would of suggested that an outswinger to a RHB - would be unlikely. He did it somehow. I don't think you can get too hung up on a bowlers action in deciding whether they are great or not. I loved Kapil Dev's action, & as good as he was, he is nowhere near an alltime great pacer. I agree that Hadlee is someone that would not be out of place on this list, I still shudder at the mention of his name after that routing he gave us at the Gabba (9/50ish). That whole summer I was almost physically sick everytime he was bowling to our boys! I couldn't wait for the over to be called & ANY other Kiwi bowled!

  • Srinivas on June 12, 2012, 17:51 GMT

    Lillee has the most ridiculous action leading to career threatening injury. That itself is a disqualification to say that he is a 'complete' fast bowler. A complete fast bowler is the one who must be able to bowl express pace sans ridiculous action that would put strain on your back. I love Shane Bond too, but he wouldn't be in my list of top pacers of the world because he is too injury prone just like Lillee. To me, it has to be Sir Richard Hadlee miles ahead of Lillee. In fact, Lillee, Waqar and Shane Bond should never be talked about while we are talking of just 5 best pacers in the world. Their bowling actions are just too complicated and went against their bodies and by extension would have gone against the bodies of pacers in general. Period! Why would you put a bowler like Lillee in that list and remove the silk smooth Sir Richard Hadlee from it?

  • Chris on June 12, 2012, 11:19 GMT

    Such pieces are always great to read for cricket tragics (like me) and generate much conversation. Ambrose, Holding, Wes Hall, Hadlee, Donald, Trueman, Larwood, McGrath, Younis could all press a case for inclusion..ohh for winter to be over and the cricket to be here again down under.

  • Prasanna on June 12, 2012, 8:10 GMT

    Wasim Akram... I have never seen such a fantastic left-arm fast bowler than Wasim !! The searing yorkers that he would bowl are still fresh in memory !! The one he bowled ( i think ) to Paul Reiffel in a WC match in 1999 hit the root of the leg stump !! A crafty bowler who had a lot of control on almost every ball he bowled !! And someone who doesnt really depend on the pitch to assist him. Surely my pick for the "Best fast bowler of his era award" !! Wish we have Wasim as our fast-bowling coach than De Winter !!

  • Wicky on June 12, 2012, 4:36 GMT

    @Bublu Bhayan,well ,by d same count srinath would nt b considrd among top 100 bowlrs,prasad among 300,kumble among 200.Check out kumble stat outsid india,he was D prime example of "HOME MADE CHAMPION",WAQAR,WASIM,IMRAN would be obvious choice of any cric analyst,expert whenevr anybdy deems to cmpile list of all time greatest top 10 bowlrs,they would b featurng in top 5 of majority of writrs,if ur dravid,s z bad against aus,he should nt b cnsidred 4 top 50 batsmen,as simple as that.I DN'T THNK WRLD Has seen wasim,waqar,imran trio before n they woudn't be watchng it in near futur.

  • Zaccharia on June 12, 2012, 2:11 GMT

    @nayjot2000: "With the exception of maybe Wasim all the others bowled in an era poor athleticism and low workload."

    You can't be serious can you? How about you do some reading--read about Davidson's workload, in particular on one particular Indian tour. Read about about how many overs he bowled (still 8 ball overs too I believe) and he had a back injury at the time. As for poor athleticism, Davidson was fit as a fiddle--he grew up on a farm as a woodchopper. In fact he was far fitter than I ever saw Wasim.

  • Dummy4 on June 12, 2012, 1:57 GMT

    KiwiRocker: Let's look at how Waqar Younis performed against the two best batting line ups of his time, Australia and India. Against Australia he averages 33.80 at a strike rate of 62.7, against India he averages 48.75 at a strike rate of 80.2. That's how good he was against better batting line ups. He isn't good enough to be among the top 30 bowlers of all time.

  • Bunty on June 12, 2012, 0:04 GMT

    I am sorry Sir Richard Hadlee has to be on that list of Top 5 wicket-takers.I remember that series of 1989-90 when Hadlee toured India last and to see some of his spell then on dead Indian wickets was quite an education.None of the above mentioned bowlers have 5 wickets or more on Indian wickets in an innings ( Akram included) - he did. Plus his single handed destruction of various batting lineup of his time is legendary.He could bowl the leg cutter,out swinger,in-swinger and incutter from literally the same spot .Ok he had outsized shoes but still it required great skill.

  • Peter on June 11, 2012, 20:43 GMT

    The article's subtitle mentions all-time great fast bowlers. Informed opinion has bestowed the accolade of greatest-ever fast bowler on relatively few. A progressive chronological list would look something like this. 1860 John Jackson. 1870 George Freeman. 1878 Fred Spofforth. 1895 Tom Richardson (Spofforth still regarded best ever all-round bowler). 1921 Ted McDonald. 1932 Harold Larwood. 1948 Ray Lindwall. 1975 Dennis Lillee. 1984 to present - Malcolm Marshall. In Australia and England Lillee is still considered number one. Elsewhere Marshall. Ray Lindwall held the unofficial title for nearly 30 years and Mallett would have grown up believing he was the greatest. Marshall has now widely been regarded the best-ever for just as long, but has faced sterner competition - from Lillee as well as others from the modern era, such as Hadlee and Wasim Akram. Whereas Hadlee's reputation has faded a little since retirement, Wasim's seems to have grown. But not enough to supplant Marshall.

  • No featured comments at the moment.