Mark Nicholas
Mark Nicholas Mark NicholasRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Hampshire batsman; host of Channel Nine's cricket coverage

England v South Africa, 1st Investec Test, The Oval, 4th day

The joy of Test-match batting

Hashim Amla and Jacques Kallis gave a lesson in Test match batting during their record stand, showcasing skills that can only be found in the game's original format

Mark Nicholas

July 22, 2012

Comments: 62 | Text size: A | A

Hashim Amla sweeps during his record-breaking innings, England v South Africa, 1st Investec Test, The Oval, 4th day, July, 22, 2012
Hashim Amla spent more than 13 hours at the crease and was content to give periods to the bowlers © Getty Images

For the first hour of both the third and fourth morning at The Oval, the cricket belonged exclusively to the purist. If a visitor who knew only Twenty20 had walked in and paid attention, he would have marvelled at the inertia and the interest given to it by a full house. Probably, he would have decided that it was not for him.

This is Test match cricket's great dichotomy. A brilliantly conceived game for another, more patient, age. Leonard Hutton batted 13 hours and 17 minutes when he broke Don Bradman's world record score here at The Oval in 1938. Hutton was on the front page, back page and newsreel of every medium in the land. There is something quite sadistic about such play, something cold that tells one about the mind of the practioner.

Hashim Amla was at the wicket for 13 hours and 10 minutes while making 311. He showed not a hint of emotion during this time, batting without any evident joy or display of flourish. And yet his innings will long be remembered as an epic, one to cherish for its excellence and effect of course, but also for the pleasure brought by wristy brush strokes that add variety and style to the white and green canvas of a cricket field. For Amla, there will be reflected glory.

In the first hour today Jacques Kallis made just 12 runs; Amla 24; South Africa only 36. England's bowling was straight and mainly full, as it had to be. The ball would not deviate a millimetre for the much celebrated home seam attack. When it did spin for Graeme Swann the batsmen reacted with a technical mastery rarely seen in the age of crash, bang, wallop. On a pitch so true as this, 36 in the first 15 minutes of a T20 game would be the starting point for a violent assault. There are some miles in this pair and, sensing England's last hurrah, they stayed on the ropes, sucked up the punches and waited their moment. In the next hour, they scored 75. Enough said.

Unlike one-day cricket, where the limitation of overs dictates to players, Test cricket allows choices. There is Virender Sehwag's way and Rahul Dravid's way; Alastair Cook's and Kevin Pietersen's. The team needs both

Unlike one-day cricket, where the limitation of overs dictates to players, Test cricket allows choices. There is Virender Sehwag's way and Rahul Dravid's way; Alastair Cook's and Kevin Pietersen's. The team needs both, much as it needs steady Vernon Philander and magic Morne Morkel. Amla, like Kallis as it happens - this may not be a coincidence - prefers to stay within himself. This is smart for it gives the bowlers no expression of character with which to work. Think Bjorn Borg against John McEnroe. Some players you can tease or taunt. Others you can seduce. But not this pair.

God knows England tried everything. New ball, old ball, orthodox swing and reverse. Over the wicket and around, close to the wicket and wide. Slips and gullies. No slips or gully. Doubtless they said some stuff, little jibes to disturb concentration but the scoreboard rendered the side-of-the-mouth stuff useless. Off-side biased fields, leg-side fields (though not enough of those). Some cutters here and there, the odd bouncer (wasted). Lots of off-spin but no doosra - and thereby hangs a tale about a changed game in the modern era.

On slow pitches the doosra is the trump card simply because the batsmen cannot play back so safely. The doosra is the unknown: it is the fear of the unknown. With Swann covered, the threat of England's attack halved. Memo to the world - get Swann, diminish England.

Watching the South Africans warm up before play, one sensed seniority and authority. These were men with pedigree, men sure of themselves and comfortable with their game. It was not a surprise that Amla and Kallis played their first hour every bit as intelligently as Amla had played the first hour on Saturday with Graeme Smith. For once, England could not bully and it showed.

Some of us could not get enough of it, slaves to our fascination with the game that strips a man to the bone. It is not called Test cricket for nothing; 36 in the first hour on Sunday; for the record a mere 40 in the first hour on Saturday - 11 of which came in the last over of that hour. So two hours cricket, 76 runs, no wickets, barely an appeal. Loved it. We would take that, us fanatics, every day of the week. See, you just can't explain the thrill in the sheer tension of a Test match. If you transcend it when a player, as Amla and Kallis did, you often go on to win. Those of us who are watching think we have always won.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

RSS Feeds: Mark Nicholas

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 23, 2012, 17:10 GMT)

S.A will become No.1 and HASHIM AMLA can rule all formats of world cricket.

Posted by cricjaffa on (July 23, 2012, 17:02 GMT)

First of all i am glad to see England walloped in their own backyard. I read the post match comments of Andrew Strauss boasting of an outstanding England pace attack which can take 20 wickets on any surface. Well, first of all England does not have an outstanding attack barring James Anderson. Maybe they should have picked Steve Finn to add more teeth to their attack. Secondly, it was great watching Amla, Kallis & Smith bat. It was a special treat to us cricket fans to watch a languid player like Amla score a triple hundred. Amla showed his class and showed once again that test match cricket is the real deal. Finally, hats off to Kallis. Players like Kallis & Dravid are always a treat to watch. Dale steyn once again showed why he is world's no 1 bowler by picking 5 wickets on a "Sub-continental" wicket with no swing !!.

Posted by roarster on (July 23, 2012, 13:18 GMT)

I was at Saturday's days play and despite the lure of gratis hospitality behind me in the Ashes Suite I could not be dragged away from a thoroughly engaging display of old school test match batting. Sods law of course dictated that I was taking a comfort break when Bresnan, albeit briefy, broke the tempo of the day with the rather fortunate scalp of Smith. Often after the demise of these big partnerships you're optimisitic that "One gets you two", but when big Jaques comes sauntering down the steps you pretty much know that it's more likely to be a case of "As you were chaps!"

Posted by cric_fan_ on (July 23, 2012, 13:14 GMT)

well played cook, smith, amla and kallis but if it were a sub continent pitch, heads would have started rolling with comments criticizing the pitch. A result is still possible with England loosing but it would be because of England's own failings and some superb bowling from SA rather than the pitch being result oriented.

Posted by Charith99 on (July 23, 2012, 12:47 GMT)

when batsmen score over 600 for just 2 wickets in england its great batting but when they score 450 all out in SL its a batting paradise therefore a poor pitch.Double standards any one

Posted by jathoma on (July 23, 2012, 12:18 GMT)

My personal opinion is that test cricket has had its day.The so called battle between bat and ball and the elements is interesting only for those 22 players and to no one else.It is high time the ICC abolished this format or maybe try limited overs for each innings say 120 overs/innings to make it interesting for even a die hard fan like me!To watch cricket in England is expensive with ticket prices around £60.For a family of four with travel that would come to nearly £500/day and that too to see a player scratch around all day!!

Posted by Harmony111 on (July 23, 2012, 11:19 GMT)

@sandy_bangalore: You make a great Troll dude. And you ignore the fact that Kallis was in fact batting only for his double else he would have accelerated after his 150 but for your mal-programmed thinking process, it is only "OUR" batsmen who continue to seek records with little regard for the match and team needs. Btw, which batsmen do you point at specifically? Sachin? For his 100th 100? His SR in that match was 77 and Kohli's SR was 80. If you blame Sachin for batting slowly then what about Kohli? Or may be it is possible that the pitch was indeed a bit slow and stroke making was difficult - why do you preclude this possibility? In any case, what is your opinion about Sangakkara's super slow 100 in the 1st ODI - Was KS selfless in his innings huh?

Posted by popcorn on (July 23, 2012, 10:17 GMT)

It was beautiful to watch Hashim Amla elegantly grind the English bowling to the dust. Only a fool who wants Crickentainment like Slogging T20 will say no to Test Cricket.

Posted by Noman_Yousuf_Dandore on (July 23, 2012, 10:02 GMT)

As usual, brilliantly articulated Mark. Though more often than not, I would like to see the wicket offering some assistance to the bowlers for warriors like S. Waugh and super heroes like BC Lara to shine through!

Posted by   on (July 23, 2012, 9:05 GMT)

Pretty good article Mark. Am currently in Peru and therefore haven't been able to follow the action live (on either TV or at the ground) but your article helped me visualise, at least first hour of Saturday & Sunday's play, the artistry displayed by Amla-Smith & Amla- Kallis respectively. Test is the ultimate form of Cricket, long may it live :-))

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Mark NicholasClose
Mark Nicholas A prolific and stylish middle-order batsman for Hampshire, Mark Nicholas was unlucky never to have played for England, but after captaining his county to four major trophies he made his reputation as a presenter, commentator and columnist. Named the UK Sports Presenter of the Year in 2001 and 2005 by the Royal Television Society, he has commentated all over the world, from the World Cup in the West Indies to the Indian Premier League. He now hosts the cricket coverage for Channel Nine in Australia and Channel 5 in England.

    Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

Ian Chappell: India's batting is going the way of their bowling, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

    Dressing-room discontent weighs Holder down

Tony Cozier: The young WI captain must challenge the indifference shown by several of his senior players

    'I'd get rid of warm-ups in cricket'

Samit Patel also doesn't like hotel rooms without WiFi and running singles

    An order for an overhaul

Sambit Bal: The tenor of the Supreme Court verdict on the IPL corruption case is unambiguous, and it makes clear that it's time for the BCCI to look within

What do we talk about when we talk about aggression?

Alex Bowden: Why do people think players who get up in the opposition's faces also have aggressive approaches in their cricket?

News | Features Last 7 days

44 balls, 16 sixes, 149 runs

Stats highlights from an incredible day in Johannesburg, where AB de Villiers smashed the record for the fastest ODI ton

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

'The definition of a cricketing genius'

Twitter reactions to AB de Villiers' record-shattering 31-ball ODI hundred

Why cricket needs yellow and red cards

David Warner's repeated transgressions tell us that the game has a discipline problem that has got out of hand

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

News | Features Last 7 days