VVS Laxman retires

Top-class against top sides

VVS Laxman made a slow start to Test cricket, but once he found his groove, his stats compared favourably with the best in the world

S Rajesh

August 19, 2012

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

VVS Laxman crunches one through the off side, India v Sri Lanka, 1st Test, Ahmedabad, 5th day, November 20, 2009
Of the 23 hundreds VVS Laxman scored in international cricket, ten came against Australia © AFP

In terms of batting artistes, VVS Laxman ranks among the best of them. However, there was much more to him than elegance and beauty: he scored tough runs, in difficult conditions, in crucial match situations, against top-class bowling attacks. Being a contemporary of Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid meant he was measured against extremely stiff standards, and in that comparison, he only fell short in terms of overall averages: Tendulkar currently averages 55.44, Dravid finished at 52.31, while Laxman missed that coveted 50-mark, ending on 45.97.

However, if you look beyond the overall numbers, the difference isn't as much. One of the major handicaps for Laxman was his poor start to Test cricket: in his first 16 Tests, he averaged 24.07, largely because the lack of openings in the middle order forced him to bat at the top, a position that was unfamiliar to him. Exclude those 16 Tests, and his averages shoots up to 49.42 in 118 matches. Then, there was the small matter of milking Zimbabwe and Bangladesh. Tendulkar and Dravid scored runs pretty much everywhere, but they also made use of the opportunities to score against weaker sides: Tendulkar averaged 96.55 against those two teams, and Dravid 85.50. They're also the only two Indian batsmen to score more than 1500 Test runs against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe; Laxman, on the other hand, scored 397 in 12 innings at 39.70. In 109 Tests against the top sides (excluding Bangladesh and Zimbabwe) since 2000, Laxman averaged 50.05; Dravid's career average against these top teams was 50.11, and Tendulkar's 52.61. Since 2000, Dravid's average against these eight top teams is 50.49, and Tendulkar's is 49.34. There's absolutely nothing to choose among these numbers.

However, Laxman took much longer to get going. His first Test century came in his 30th innings, a glorious 167 in Sydney in what was admittedly a lost cause, but that was the beginning of a new Laxman, a batsman who could hold his own in a heavyweight middle order. Four Tests after that Sydney hundred came that innings in Kolkata against Steve Waugh's Australia, which is part of every discussion on the greatest Test innings ever. The period between 2000 and the beginning of 2004 was among the best of his career: in 34 Tests, bookended by 150-plus scores in Sydney, he aggregated 2834 runs at 60.29. That was also the period when his conversion rate of fifties into hundreds was the best - seven out of 20.

After that, though, came a period of slump, when his average dropped to less than 34 over his next 30 Tests. In eleven series during that period, only three times did his average go past 40. He broke out of that slump soon after, though, and over a glorious 50-Test period between 2007 and 2011, averaged more than 55. In 15 series in which he played more than one Test, his average went beyond 45 ten times. Though he only scored seven hundreds during that period, he scripted some superb innings under pressure, including the unbeaten 103 against Sri Lanka and 73 not out against Australia - both in fourth innings, both in wins. His fourth-innings average during this period was 76.42, much higher than his career fourth-innings average of 40.55. (Click here for Laxman's career summary, and here for his series-wise averages.)

VVS Laxman's Test career
Period Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Till Dec 1999 16 626 24.07 0/ 5
Jan 2000 to Jan 2004 34 2834 60.29 7/ 13
Feb 2004 to Jan 2007 30 1418 33.76 3/ 9
Feb 2007 to Nov 2011 50 3748 55.11 7/ 28
Dec 2011 onwards 4 155 19.37 0/ 1
Career 134 8781 45.97 17/ 56

His favourite opponent
A couple of aspects about Laxman's career stand out more than others. One was his record against the best team of his generation. He unfortunately ended his battles against Australia on a low, averaging less than 20 in his final series, but in 29 Tests against them he scored almost 2500 runs. Over the period of his career, only Sachin Tendulkar scored more runs against Australia than Laxman.

Going into his final series, Laxman averaged 55.58 against them in 25 Tests, and needed only 171 runs in eight innings to ensure that his overall average against them stayed over 50. However, so desperate was his form on that tour that he scored only 155 in eight innings, which means despite several outstanding knocks against over his career, his average against Australia is marginally below 50.

Top run-scorers versus Australia in Tests since 1998
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Sachin Tendulkar 29 3060 61.20 9/ 15
VVS Laxman 29 2434 49.67 6/ 12
Rahul Dravid 32 2126 38.65 2/ 13
Virender Sehwag 21 1794 43.75 3/ 10
Brian Lara 17 1786 55.81 7/ 4
Jacques Kallis 22 1557 42.08 3/ 9

Second-innings first
Laxman was one of the few batsmen who averaged more in the second innings (48.88) than in the first (44.25). In fact, his overall second-innings numbers stack up favourably against the best: among batsmen who've scored 3000-plus runs in second innings, only six have a higher average. Tendulkar (4546 runs at 44.13) and Dravid (4183 runs at 41.83) both have lower averages than Laxman. Among other top batting names, Ricky Ponting averages 42.81 in second innings, and Brian Lara 38.18. (Click here for the full list.)

Highest averages in the 2nd innings in Tests (Qual: 3000 runs)
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Jacques Kallis 107 4532 58.85 11/ 26
Alan Border 111 4371 54.63 11/ 24
Kumar Sangakkara 79 3700 53.62 12/ 15
Matthew Hayden 81 3472 51.82 11/ 13
Sunil Gavaskar 90 3963 51.46 11/ 22
Geoff Boycott 85 3319 51.06 9/ 17
VVS Laxman 91 3471 48.88 5/ 23
Desmond Haynes 86 3030 48.87 9/ 12

His best period, against the best teams
As mentioned earlier, Laxman's inability to cash in on his opportunities against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe hurt his overall batting stats. Excluding his first 16 Tests and his last series, and considering stats against the top teams only, Laxman's average of 51.72 is marginally better than those of Dravid (51.24) and Tendulkar (50.04) over the same period (January 2000 to November 2011).

Overall, Laxman averaged more than 40 in both Australia and South Africa, unlike Dravid, who averaged only 29.71 in 11 Tests in South Africa. Laxman's problem, though, was England. While Dravid excelled there, England never saw the best of Laxman: in 11 Tests there, he had a highest of 74, and an average of 34.47.

Best averages against the top 8 teams, between Jan 2000 and Nov 2011 (Qual: 6000 runs)
Batsman Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Jacques Kallis 105 9339 58.36 32/ 42
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 88 6943 54.24 21/ 36
Kumar Sangakkara 87 7755 54.23 23/ 32
Ricky Ponting 116 9846 53.51 31/ 43
Virender Sehwag 85 7628 52.60 22/ 27
VVS Laxman 105 7603 51.72 16/ 49
Rahul Dravid 111 9019 51.24 25/ 40

The middle-order rock
One of the disappointing aspects which is often mentioned about Laxman's Test career is his lack of hundreds - he managed only 17 in 134 Tests, an average of one every almost eight Tests. However, one of the reasons for that is also his position in the batting line-up - 74 innings at No.5, and 67 at six. That often meant he was batting with the tail, and didn't always have the freedom to bat as he normally would with a top-order batsman. His overall stats at those positions, though, are outstanding: his aggregate of 5637 is the third-highest by any batsman in those two positions in Tests, and he averaged almost 50 at those slots too.

Top run-scorers at positions 5 and 6 in Tests
Batsman Innings Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Steve Waugh 221 9919 54.50 30/ 45
Shivnarine Chanderpaul 168 7912 57.33 21/ 46
VVS Laxman 141 5637 48.59 11/ 37
Allan Border 133 5627 52.10 15/ 32
Michael Clarke 106 5422 57.07 19/ 19
Mohammad Azharuddin 126 5340 45.25 19/ 17
Sourav Ganguly 146 5165 38.54 10/ 29
Clive Lloyd 119 5163 47.36 14/ 27

King of spin
Laxman was pretty good against all types of bowling, but he was best against spinners. Shane Warne was famously at the receiving end in the 2001 series, but he also handled Muttiah Muralitharan very competently. In 496 balls from him, Laxman scored 240 runs and was dismissed just twice. Daniel Vettori kept the runs in check against him (159 runs from 522 balls), but dismissed him just twice. The one spinner who dominated him was Sri Lanka's Ajantha Mendis, who dismissed him seven times conceding just 166 runs (average 23.71). The only other bowler who dismissed Laxman seven times in Tests was Brett Lee, but while Lee took 12 Tests for dismissals, Mendis achieved it in only six. (Click here for the list of bowlers who dismissed Laxman most often in Tests.)

Overall since June 2001, Laxman averaged 58 versus spin and 44.78 against pace and medium pace.

Laxman against pace and spin since June 2001
Bowler type Balls Runs Dismissals Average Run rate
Pace/ Medium pace 8815 4434 99 44.78 3.01
Spin 6002# 2842# 49 58.00 2.84
Mixed* 316 168 0 - 3.18
* Bowlers like Andrew Symonds, who bowl a combination of medium pace and spin

The VVS-Eden love affair
Laxman's stand-out innings at the ground was obviously his 281 against Australia in 2001, but even apart from that he had several memorable performances at the Eden Gardens. Way back in 1998, he almost scored his maiden century there (against Australia, who else), scoring 95. Overall, in 15 Test innings there, he scored five hundreds and three fifties, and averaged 110.63. In his last three Test innings in Kolkata, Laxman notched up three unbeaten hundreds: 112 against Pakistan, 143 against South Africa, and 176 against West Indies.

Indian batsmen generally don't get the opportunity to play too many Tests at a single ground, due to the high number of Test grounds in India, but Laxman is one of only two Indians to score 1000-plus runs at a ground; Gavaskar is the only other. Laxman's aggregate of 1217 in Kolkata is also the highest by an Indian at a venue. The other ground which was especially kind to Laxman was Sydney: in four Tests he scored three hundreds, and averaged 78.42. (Click here for Laxman's venue-wise stats.)

Most Test runs by an Indian batsman at a venue
Batsman Venue Tests Runs Average 100s/ 50s
VVS Laxman Eden Gardens, Kolkata 10 1217 110.63 5/ 3
Sunil Gavaskar Wankhede Stadium, Mumbai 11 1122 56.10 5/ 3
Sunil Gavaskar MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chennai 12 1018 59.88 3/ 3
Rahul Dravid Eden Gardens, Kolkata 9 962 68.71 4/ 3
Sachin Tendulkar MA Chidambaram Stadium, Chennai 9 876 87.60 5/ 1
Mohammad Azharuddin Eden Gardens, Kolkata 7 860 107.50 5/ 2

The partners
Being an integral part of a middle-order that played together over such a long period meant Laxman played plenty of times with Dravid, Tendulkar and Ganguly, and forged some very meaningful partnerships with them. His stands with Dravid are, of course, legendary: they are one of seven pairs - and the only Indians - to put together two or more triple-century partnerships, and the only ones to do so against Australia. With Tendulkar, Laxman was involved in nine century partnerships, the highest being 353 in Sydney in 2004.

What isn't so well known is his partnership with MS Dhoni. Most of their productive stands came in home Tests, but they're the only pair to put together two double-century stands for the last four wickets - they did so against South Africa (unbeaten 259-run stand in 2010) and West Indies (224 in 2011), both in Kolkata. The Laxman-Dhoni combination is the third-most prolific, in terms of partnership runs, for the sixth and seventh wickets in Tests.

Laxman's most productive partnerships
Partner Innings Runs Ave stand 100/ 50 stands
Rahul Dravid 86 4065 51.45 12/ 14
Sachin Tendulkar 73 3523 51.05 9/ 19
Sourav Ganguly 41 1681 43.10 5/ 7
MS Dhoni 27 1361 56.70 3/ 8

Beyond the batting
Apart from all his batting exploits, there was also Laxman the catcher, who was a huge asset in the slips and close to the bat against the spinners. His 135 catches is the second-best for an Indian, next only to Dravid's 209. Almost 20% of his catches came off one bowler: c VVS Laxman b Anil Kumble was a dismissal mode that happened 26 times in Tests. In Mohali against England in 2001, he snared four catches in the first innings - only three Indian fielders have taken more catches in an innings.

Laxman in ODIs
Laxman's international career was mostly about Test cricket, but he also played 86 ODIs, and was unlucky to miss out on the 2003 World Cup. As in Tests, Australia were his favourite ODI opponents as well: four of his six hundreds came against them, and three in Australia. His best year in ODIs was by far 2004, when he scored four centuries in 24 innings, including three in the VB Series in Australia. In fact, Laxman is one of only four batsmen to score three centuries in an ODI series in Australia - Mark Waugh, Graeme Hick and David Gower are the others. Laxman may not fit into that group as an ODI batsman, but he does in another way: along with Gower and Waugh, he will walk into any shortlist of the most elegant and classy batsmen to play the game.

# 03:35 GMT, Aug 19: The numbers for balls and runs against spin had been wrongly interchanged

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by kalyanbk on (August 21, 2012, 23:36 GMT)

One missing stat is how many tests has Laxman helped India win. That is the most relevant stat as opposed to numbers. He is one of the few test match winners that India had produced. He not only bailed the team out often but also went on to win games.

Posted by Dravid_Pujara_Gravitas_Atheist on (August 21, 2012, 6:12 GMT)

There are somethings you don't measure by numbers. VVS' batting for India is one such thing apart from the joy a child experiences when hugged by a Mother. The joy that VVS gave you when he took India across the line cannot be measured by any damn/damned numbers. But unfortunately all those innings finally end up in numbers and the numbers may come out as a whole as 48 or 45 or 51 etc etc.....VVS' gift to fans is way above any number could possibly calculate - 'the joy of winning'. Now, how can any mathematician calculate that 'joy of winning' for us? With due respect, let's not waste our energies by trying to dig deep into his numbers. Bidding my tearful farewell to the humblest and under-rated winner among Indian Batsmen. I wish him all the best in his future endeavours. Please hang around Lacchanna. Indian Cricket needs your balanced views.

Posted by   on (August 21, 2012, 1:23 GMT)

What a player, true matchwinner. Indian test fans will miss his treats. Ability to get going no matter the match situation makes him a legend. Kolkata 2001 will remain the best innings by an indian, but who can forgot his match winning knocks at P Sara, KingsMead and Mohali under pressure and backpain.

The selectors were late to recognize his potential in late 90's, but once they did there was no looking back. I'm test cricket fan more than any other format due to him and Dravid.

Posted by Milind_Jadhav on (August 20, 2012, 18:17 GMT)

Perhaps a dumb question but can anyone enlighten why only the period 2000 to 2011 was chosen? Similarly, why just project the second innings scores? It would have been useful to see the performances of all those who had qualifying runs 90's as also the first innings scores! The article is incomplete without this data. Before people start drawing parallels it is important to bear in mind that SRT played very little from 2003 to 2006.

Posted by cricket-india on (August 20, 2012, 15:16 GMT)

well...vvs does not have records that cannot be equalled or broken;what he does have are records that can never be matched.

Posted by rajat_magic on (August 20, 2012, 12:21 GMT)

There is an error in the stats attributed to Sachin under the "against top 8 teams" in the Jan 2000 to Nov 2011 period. Assuming "top 8" means excluding Zim and Bangladesh, then Sachin's average during this period against those teams is 52.35 - not 50.04 as suggested in the article.

This is collaborated by a search on Cricinfo's own "statsguru".

Posted by   on (August 20, 2012, 12:10 GMT)

RD28: All those words about Laxman is still true. But you cannot deny that he is now way past his prime. Indian people are way too sentimental. His efforts need to be recognized when he retires but it is also desperately true that Indian Cricket needs to look ahead and there is no better time than blooding a few youngsters against an easier opponent like NZ than against top teams like England, Australia. Laxman has nothing to prove and nothing more to achieve. His inner voice should have spoken to him a bit earlier :-)

Posted by cricconnossieur on (August 20, 2012, 11:45 GMT)

In this age of too-much cricket, another reason to give watching a cricket match a miss-the retirement of Laxman !

Posted by RD28 on (August 20, 2012, 8:51 GMT)

All these accolades --Great batsman , Hard to replace , Great void , Great Human being kind of tributes paid by Dhoni, Gangully , players and Other commentators make me realize that People are Idolized or Spoken Good about only after their death and Cricketers are only Missed after their Retirement, Lakshman you deserved a better farewell we can realize how much the same people might have hurt you for you to walk away with out talking what you deserve

Posted by   on (August 20, 2012, 7:58 GMT)

One of the finest....classy,responsible,SIMPLY-TOO GOOD,Life without this Great and Dravid??????

Posted by cricconnossieur on (August 20, 2012, 6:31 GMT)

Great stats put up, thanks. The fact that he is the same bracket as Lara, Tendulkar, Dravid and Kallis , should shut everyone up including the experts panel of CRICINFO that have not included him in the all-time great Indian XI. More than all the stats and what mattered most to do a die-hard cricket fan like me was the grace he brought to the game. How can one ever quantify that ?! How can you teach or coach any youngster 'aesthetics' and 'grace'?! This the exact reason why it rankles even more that the " experts" and the 'students' of the game have left him out of the all-time XI ! One can understand why the IPL-watching public does not need him ! Sehwag calls him the 'saibaba' of the team. Sharda Ugra got it right in her article-only a man of such high principles would have refused the low-hanging fruit of a farewell test at home , against a lowly NZ side, with the prospect of crossing 9000 run mark. But is it surprising l when the same player turned down the 'icon' status in IPL ?

Posted by   on (August 20, 2012, 6:18 GMT)

Statistically he may not be that great, but the way he bats is always a treat to watch. The way he use to roll his wrist to hit a ball 3 stump outside the off stump towards the mid wicket really produced a chill in the bone. If you want to really compare Laxman compare his best 10 innings with any other contemporary batsman's best 10 innings (of his era)

Posted by Jack_Tka on (August 20, 2012, 6:00 GMT)

Thanks for providing the statistics in detail. As pointed out by Rajesh, i believe that Laxman's batting position has hurt his average the most. It somehow maintained by the arrival of Dhoni with whom he was able to provide decent partnerships. Overall, he was a man which a team needs when in crisis as shown in the his second innings avg. Hats off to him...

Posted by   on (August 20, 2012, 5:16 GMT)

VVS has been the lynchpin of the famed Indian batting line up. He scirpted glorious wins and the above analysis proves that VVS and Rahul are noway inferior to Sachin. In fact even Sachin has not won as many matches for India as much as VVS. His laidback languid approach deprived him of the superstar status. For me he is the most invaluable player India has produced after Dravid. He always put team over self and won test matches from seemingly lost positions. He scored against tough teams in difficult situations and has been the difference betwen a possible defeat and scratching an improbable victory

Posted by   on (August 20, 2012, 4:23 GMT)

Top-class against top sides

Posted by Badgerofdoom on (August 20, 2012, 1:50 GMT)

Laxman was a treat to watch and a real luxury for Indian coming in at no. 5 or 6. Also he showed some real character by retiring at the right time for the team as the NZ series would be best suited for giving experience to young batsmen. Well played VVS, all the best for the future!

Posted by cricketfannik on (August 20, 2012, 0:48 GMT)

VVS has taken retierment under pressure i guess as he was training so hard from past couple of months. anyways it will be big hole for indian test team, these youngsters who are coming in dont have quality they are good in t20 or odis but expecting them to score a 100 in Durban, Lords or Perth pitches will be touch its all on Sehwag and Sachin to handle the pressure. as i stated previouslyits a big mistake by indian board Laxman is 37 and still could have played 2 years. NZ, AUS did same mistake too many quality players retired at same time and now look at their team getting beaten by Eng also 4-0 in an Odi which is unbelievable couldnt beat WI in WI in odis plus 41 allout in test match in SA.and NZ i dont need to say anything Astle, Macmillan, Cairns, harris,styris all gone at same time now look at their side.same with aus hayden, langer,gili,warne, mcgrath.Dravid and laxman at same time too bad.ind just filled dada's spot after 3 years trying raina badri pujara yuvi kohli.ind decline

Posted by Raj2000 on (August 20, 2012, 0:41 GMT)

Vangipurappu Venkata Sai Laxman is a class act, no doubt. He ranks among one of the greatest batsman of his time. Everyone thinks he's at his best against the Ausies but the truth is he is underestimated. Initially by his opponents but mostly by the ICC. For some reason they always seemed to think he wasn't as good as he was. He hardly ever received the recognition and respect that Tendulkar and Dravid did, despite the fact he richly deserved it. In my opinion, ICC should learn a lesson for the future.

Posted by Number_5 on (August 19, 2012, 22:11 GMT)

Sad to see VVS go. He was one of those rare batsman who made the game look very very special when he was at his fluent best. From down under, thanks for all the memories and hope retirement goes well.

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 19:33 GMT)

the author is right when he says that laxman did not inflate his average with high scores against lower end teams, like dravid did - but an equally good candidate candidate in that category is Ganguly.

I would ask all readers to see their averages against - A - england, Aus, Pak and SA and B - sri lanka, zimbawae, bangla, windies and new zealand

you shall see that dravid's average against the weaker sides is 11 (ELEVEN) more than his overall, tendulkars is 6 more than his overall ave, ganguly's is 2 more and laxman's is LESS !!

for only the toughest 4 teams (sa, eng, aus and pak) the averages are within 5 of each other.

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 19:02 GMT)

Wow some good stats about VVS who will be badly missed..for me he was india's best ever test match winning batsman..The number of test match winning knocks played by other 4 batting gr8ts Dravid,Sachin, Gavaskar & Sehwag does not even total upto what VVS alone has achieved-51 v SA 1996, epic 281 v Aus 2001,148 & crucial 32 V Aus 2003,69 v Aus at mumbai horror pitch 2004,73 v Aus Perth win 2007,96 v SA durban win,73no v Aus 2010 1 wkt win, 103no v SL 2010 plus his intimidating record v Aus-one of best test teams ever had been mind blowing really..in fact I struggle to find many test match winning knocks from Sachin or Sunny.Dravid & Sehwag hv had a few.but none matches VVS...VVS did struggle in Eng & NZ seaming pitches due to his limited footwork(same with Sehwag) where Dravid,sunny revelled.however he was v good in other nations esp Aus...a truly gifted player.he easily walks in my Indian all time XI..although we hv a few capable batsman to take his spot but I forsee tough times ahead

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 18:43 GMT)

The knocks against Minnows is also important. If not we may also loose to ZIm or Bang... That is why we have won very less matches in Zim compared to others.

Posted by drewkatski on (August 19, 2012, 18:10 GMT)

Please, he wasn't that good.

Posted by mytendulkar on (August 19, 2012, 16:23 GMT)

"Being an integral part of a middle-order that played together over such a long period meant Laxman played plenty of times with Dravid, Laxman and Ganguly, and forged some very meaningful partnerships with them."

Correction: it is Dravid, tendulkar and ganguly

Nevertheless, a good read. VVS is already up there in the pantheon of greats. Respect.

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 16:02 GMT)

InsideHedge - your comment is spot on.

Posted by ElBeeDubya on (August 19, 2012, 15:47 GMT)

The relatively overall average of VVS makes many to rate him a notch below Tendulkar and Dravid. A closer examination, especially the important stat excluding minnows between 2000 and 2011, shows that he actually belongs in the same class and LAXMAN is indeed one of the MODERN GREATS. Let me also be the first one to point out that the lack of a particular player's name from that list. (Who could that be??)

Posted by sujith90 on (August 19, 2012, 15:19 GMT)

There is an error in the 'Laxman against pace and spin since June 2001' the spin balls and runs are flipped around.

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 15:08 GMT)

Tendulkar had the worst period of his career between 2003-06 as injuries almost finished him. So, yeah the 2000s weren't as good for him...

Posted by sasimyname on (August 19, 2012, 14:40 GMT)

With a run rate of 2.84, he probably faced 12842 balls of spin to score the 2842 runs!

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 14:04 GMT)

We are going to miss very very special Laxman on feilld again.he was really treat to watch with willow in his hand.First Saurav then dravid now Laxman it is almost impossible to find their replacements.We salute you for all your heroics that gave us immense plasure and joy. Thank you very much VVS

Posted by 158notout on (August 19, 2012, 13:13 GMT)

Wow, this is an amazing statistical history of a great batsman who will be sorely missed. it is hard to find which is the most impressive stat here but personally I like the fact that VVS at Eden is the highest number of runs scored by an Indian at one ground.

As an England fan I was excited to see VVS last summer at Edgbaston but unfortunately he missed out. He did however brush past me whilst making his way from the nets to the pavilion. I didn't have a chance to utter any words of gratitude or encouragement and now I wish I had.

Posted by InsideHedge on (August 19, 2012, 12:03 GMT)

Clearly S Rajesh was fawning while writing this article. Everyone knows VVS was a super bat, there's no need to try so hard to make the point.

Posted by   on (August 19, 2012, 12:02 GMT)

Rajesh, a better display would have been that you show his record against likes of Australia, South Africa, Pakistan, England and West Indies in their own backyard.

Posted by shaileshij on (August 19, 2012, 11:52 GMT)

against spin in 2842 he scored 6002 runs..more lyk 2.5 runs a ball ?? is there any error

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

    'As you get older, you come to appreciate the tough times'

Jimmy Adams talks about the West Indian love for fast bowling, batting with Lara, and living a dream for nine years

    Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Numbers Game: Only 15 times has a player achieved 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Bhuvneshwar could be the 16th

    Time to pension off the seniors?

Rob Smyth: If England are going to win nothing, history suggests it might be worth their while to win nothing with kids

'Smith's record in India is an aberration'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Graeme Smith's terrific record in different conditions

Losing to India

Nicholas Hogg: An Englishman discovers cricket fervour in India and realises he can't quite win a game against Indians even back home

News | Features Last 7 days

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

News | Features Last 7 days