Guest Column Guest ColumnRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives

The problem isn't the India women's team, it's the board

The lack of a organised cricketing culture at the junior level has been a turn-off for corporates and colleges when it comes to hiring and admitting women players

Anupriya

August 20, 2014

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

It is difficult for the average woman cricketer to keep herself occupied, given how few domestic matches are played, and that age-group tournaments have been scrapped © Getty Images

The "other" Indian team recorded a landmark victory against England in their backyard against all odds on Saturday. India not only outbowled and outbatted England, they did it with little practice. Eight of the playing XI had never played a Test match before and the rest hadn't played one in the last eight years. All their international tours in the last two years had been restricted to the subcontinent. Therefore, to beat England on a greentop after having been brought up on flat tracks on the subcontinent is quite an achievement. India are yet to lose a Test in England.

It was a landmark win in more ways than one. While discussing the first day's play with a fellow cricketer, I spoke of the contrast between the England and Indian women's teams. He argued that the BCCI could not be blamed entirely for the current scenario and that the Indian team was underperforming. It was the oft-repeated argument: why will the board invest more money in women's cricket when the girls are just not able to perform? Never mind the logical fallacies there, an Indian win has hopefully put that argument to rest. There is simply no hiding for the BCCI now. It cannot justify India's absence from Tests anymore. The win proved that India is capable of beating the best. Clearly the team isn't the problem. The system is.

I argued last week that the Indian women's team's performances have dipped over the last few years and held the BCCI accountable for its role in the decline.

A factor in that decline is the lack of international matches. Before the Test in Wormsley, India last played a Test in 2006, the year the BCCI took control of Indian women's cricket. India hosted the World Cup in 2013 but did not play a single international in the two months leading up to the tournament.

As a woman cricketer who has played in every age-group level before and after the Women's Cricket Association of India's (WCAI) merger with the BCCI, let me explain the problems faced by aspiring cricketers in the country.

I first picked up the sport as an eight-year-old in school. I was glad to be offered the chance to learn the game, and lucky because not many schools offer cricket to girls; they are more likely to be offered basketball or athletics instead.

This is the first problem. Women's cricket in India has always been between a rock and a hard place. All other women's sports in India come under the ambit of the Indian government. While the Sports Authority of India might have its flaws, women athletes in sports other than cricket have a clear-cut authority and system to conform to.

Before the merger with the BCCI, women's cricket was managed by the WCAI, an independent board affiliated to the International Women's Cricket Council. Due to the BCCI's refusal to do anything with women's cricket, the women's game was always in a state of limbo, dependent on handouts to keep it running.

I grew up playing for my state at the Under-16 and U-19 levels - in abject conditions. But though lack of funds was a problem, lack of will wasn't. Inter-school and inter-university tournaments were organised with the encouragement of the WCAI.

In 2005, talk of a merger with the BCCI began and it filled me with hope. The days of begging for funds seemed to be over. The BCCI sprang into action after the ICC passed a directive that a member board stood to lose its membership if it did not merge with its respective women's board.

But despite the merger, the bad news kept trickling in for the women's game. The U-16 and inter-zone tournaments were scrapped. All wasn't gloomy, though. The concept of match fees and two-day matches was introduced. The two-day matches, in particular, were a source of great financial joy for the girls. Women's cricket in India, by and large, is a poor girl's sport. Very few from the middle or upper classes take it up, partly because the schools they study in don't offer it, and because women's cricket offers no career.

 
 
With the removal of the U-16 tournament especially, the vital supply line of grassroots cricket was cut off. They say "catch them young", but the BCCI certainly doesn't believe so
 

Under the WCAI, the main employers for the women players were Railways and Indian Airlines / Air India. An airline job particularly appealed to me because given my respectable educational qualifications, a Group C or D job in the Railways (such as a clerk, station master, ticket inspector, track inspector) would be a climb-down. However, after the BCCI merger, Indian Airlines stopped recruiting women cricketers citing technicalities.

The two-day format was removed the following year. I saw the number of matches I played per season come down from a minimum of at least 15, irrespective of my team's performance, to a maximum of 10 if my team did well.

With no U-16, U-25 and special trophies to play for, the number of girls dropping out of the system after the U-19 level increased. While we got better travel and accommodation, and had access to better infrastructure and coaching, the number of matches we played reduced drastically. This has had a long-term effect on the performance and standard of the Indian national team.


Jhulan Goswami prepares to send down a delivery, India v Pakistan, ACC Women's T20 Asia Cup, Guangzhou, October 28, 2012
Jhulan Goswami works for Air India, one of the main employers of women players © Andy Campbell/UTPMEDIA
Enlarge

With the removal of the U-16 tournament, especially, a vital supply line was cut off. Many of the top cricketers on the circuit today have been around before 2006; new young talent has been hard to come by. They say "catch them young", But the BCCI certainly doesn't believe so. The removal of age-group cricket like the U-16, three-day matches and inter-zone tournaments smacks of cost-cutting. It is worth remembering here that the BCCI continues to claim exemption from taxes and from demands for transparency, on the basis that it is a non-profit organisation. Cost-cutting shouldn't be on the agenda of a cash-rich organisation whose founding principle is the "promotion of cricket".

The second problem I faced as a woman cricketer was when I applied to colleges. The BCCI does not recognise university women's cricket. This means universities and colleges do not have an incentive to give preferential admission to cricketers or to form teams. So while the likes of St Stephen's College and Lady Shri Ram College offered sports like chess and judo under the women's sports quota, cricket was ignored. There are few decent colleges offering sports-quota seats for women's cricket. The financial incentive to play (Rs 1500-2500 per match) isn't enough to draw girls from all backgrounds, considering the number of matches you can realistically expect to play in a year is four.

There is no women's equivalent of the Corporate Trophy organised by the BCCI for male cricketers. Corporate houses don't have an incentive to form women's cricket teams either. And due to the BCCI's monopoly over Indian cricket, an independent initiative is unlikely to work. (Think the Indian Cricket League.) Therefore, the two main reasons that would encourage parents to let their child pursue a sport - a chance to study in a good college, or the prospect of securing a job - are eliminated in Indian women's cricket.

The allegations of sexual harassment by a U-19 cricketer against an Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association official in September 2013 brought the absence of protocols within the BCCI into the spotlight. How the matter was handled remains unknown as the BCCI's regulations regarding women's cricket are ambiguous to say the least There is a certain lack of awareness of one's rights, and girls who come from tribal or poor backgrounds are especially vulnerable at a young age. The issue of possible sexual harassment has been neglected by the BCCI. The absence of codified laws and regulations in such situations makes it difficult for girls to know who to approach and how. A clearly defined authority for women-specific issues with relevant jurisdiction is therefore a must for the board.

Until a while ago, a senior woman cricketer in India would play a maximum of 20 domestic games in an entire season. An U-19 cricketer would play an average of ten games per season, including 50-over and T20 formats. After much haggling with the BCCI, the women's wing was able to increase the number of domestic matches played. A state team is now assured at least eight one-dayers and four in T20 per season. It is perhaps testament to how bad things had become that this news was greeted with widespread joy among the women's cricket fraternity. After eight years of false promises, administrative indecision and pariah treatment, an increase of four matches in the annual season seems like deliverance to us.

Anupriya is a Delhi-based student who is a former state-level cricketer

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Nampally on (August 22, 2014, 21:14 GMT)

An interesting factual article, Anu! Any game is developed from school level upwards + there should be an Organiser with coaching in place. That is the basic minimum expected of BCCI. It is a remarkable feat for this Indian Women's team to beat England in Test in their own Kitchen! Batsmen like Raj is amongst the top 5 in World ranking. I would say it is just her raw talent,guts & determination to succeed that has carried her there against all Odds. It is remarkable that these Girls play for the love of the Game rather with little or no support from BCCI & with no central contract. BCCI cannot hide under excuses by not setting up the Women's Cricket from ground up as an organised sport. Indian Women showed how talented they are via a Test Win whilst their counterpart Men's team lost badly despite huge lucrative contracts. Democratic India demands Gender equality. BCCI, Pl. award central contracts to these Women NOW + Arrange for coaching, practice facilities + inter state Tourneys.

Posted by switchmitch on (August 21, 2014, 5:56 GMT)

Yes I understand Anu. It also shows why Indian Women's Cricket has gone on a downward spiral in the last 10 years. I do remember the team doing very well, when Diana was the Captain. And I was surprised to see the team go down so meekly last year. Now I understand the reason for this regression. Sad state of affairs indeed. Keep the articles coming...and someone from the board is bound to see them and decide to do something about it. This also is the right time to raise the voice against lack of support, with the team doing so well in alien conditions, against a top draw professional outfit...reasons for neglect could soon become uncomfortably impossible to justify...

Posted by anupriya91 on (August 20, 2014, 20:50 GMT)

@switchmitch they literally have no rationale. if you read the first part you'll get the entire picture. the BCCI didn't want us, and they just try and do the bare minimum required. They give excuses like "there is no need for test format because girls cant even play 40 overs. There is no need for under-16 because there are barely enough girls for under-19." ALL absurd given how before there was money and the infrastructure the BCCI offered, more state teams took part in under-16. Its all down to attitude. the profits argument is the most absurd. stop dodging taxes if you're a profit making body?

Posted by switchmitch on (August 20, 2014, 18:54 GMT)

This is tragic. I cannot fathom how the board decided to scrap age level tournaments. Such tournaments must be conducted, even if the endeavor incurs losses. That's what boards are for, aren't they? Development of the game....and even a financial loss is no excuse here because we are talking about the richest cricket board in the world....

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

Going for glory and falling just short

Anantha Narayanan: An anecdotal account of close finishes similar to the recent Adelaide Test

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Gilchrist's conscientious moment

In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days