New Zealand v South Africa, 1st Test, Dunedin, 5th day

Rain has final say in compelling Test

Andrew Fernando

March 11, 2012

Comments: 16 | Text size: A | A

South Africa 238 (Amla 62, Smith 53, Martin 4-56) and 435 for 5 dec (Smith 115, Kallis 113, Rudolph 105*) drew with New Zealand 273 (McCullum 48, Philander 4-72) and 137 for 2 (McCullum 58*, Taylor 48*)
Scorecard

The final day of the first Test promised to be an intriguing one, with South Africa needing eight wickets to win and New Zealand 264 runs, but 14 hours of incessant rain in Dunedin made play impossible and the match was called a draw just after 2pm.

Brendon McCullum was unbeaten on 58, having had an 84-run partnership with Ross Taylor, that put New Zealand in the hunt for a series lead. Graeme Smith was named Man of the match for his 115 in the second innings.

The teams now head to Hamilton for the second Test of the three-match series, which begins on Thursday.

Read about the fourth day's action here.

Andrew Fernando writes for The Pigeon and has a column here

RSS Feeds: Andrew Fidel Fernando

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by YorkshirePudding on (March 12, 2012, 15:10 GMT)

@JG2704, you have to remember this is the only sport that India are any good at, so its natural they would have an obsession with whos number one (some may say unhealthy obsession), even more so when it was thier former colonial masters that knocked them off that perch.

Posted by JG2704 on (March 12, 2012, 11:17 GMT)

@rahulcricket007 on (March 11 2012, 06:18 AM GMT) as aracer on (March 11 2012, 16:05 PM GMT) puts it , you seem more interested in England/SA's battle for number 1 than you do the state of Indian cricket where the country which is supposed to be the modern home of cricket is no higher that 3 in any of the formats.Most of us England fans don't go on about being number 1 - it actually seems more of an issue to folk like you.Admittedly 3-0 ww in UAE vs Pak is not form befitting a number 1 side but luckily we had a gimme series last summer so we built up some valuable extra points .BTW unlucky on SA but we all have tests where weather has both helped and hindered our sides. SA will give us a very tough series and there's no need to trashtalk a quality side like them. PS also well played NZ who (unlikely though it may be) could still have won.

Posted by zn264 on (March 12, 2012, 9:32 GMT)

SA were just lucky it rained!

Posted by YorkshirePudding on (March 12, 2012, 8:38 GMT)

@winchester666, have you seent he schedules lately back to back tests, with only 3-4 days rest if you had an extra day then you would see players dropping like flies. Personally I agree with you an extra day is required but that means they need to drop out the back to back tests, and go back to having a "rest" weekend between the tests where tourists would play a 3 day FC game, often giving junior players a chance to have experience conditions, and out of form players work on thier batting/bowling.

Posted by aracer on (March 11, 2012, 16:05 GMT)

@rahulcricket007 - maybe you should worry about when India are going to drop to 4th, and then 5th in the rankings, rather than about which of SA or England are number 1. What is this obsession the India fans have with England losing the number 1 ranking?

Posted by shovwar on (March 11, 2012, 10:30 GMT)

NZ will always keep a test match in Dunedin to ensure that they can atleast draw one game and save a whitewash by a stronger team.

Posted by Adnan143 on (March 11, 2012, 9:41 GMT)

now it is confirmed that SA is the international team with most badluck, nature doesn't want them to be on top in any form, Congratulation to ENG for top ranking prize on 1st poaitiion prize money

Posted by Lermy on (March 11, 2012, 7:05 GMT)

Surprising test on a dead wicket. The SA bowlers looked almost as impotent as NZs in the end. SA will have to lift their performance about 200% if they are to dispatch lowly NZ as everyone expects they should. Meanwhile if NZ pick some players who can play test cricket instead of converted one day players like Rob Nicols, they can only strengthen their line up. Why they haven't picked bowlers like Andy McKay who can bowl just as quick as the SA attack is a complete mystery. NZ selectors move in mysterious ways... ...I just hope they don't replace one insipid medium pacer like Southee, with another like Arnel.

Posted by Dudley_Dawson on (March 11, 2012, 6:57 GMT)

Right, cause NZ is the only country that has rain affected matches...

Posted by bystorm on (March 11, 2012, 6:47 GMT)

What planet does Graeme Smith live on? So the the forecast for the last day of the test was always rain, and SA batted at 3 per over the entire test and set NZ 400 - a sporting declaration? What part of SA batted too slow and too long to win the game if they wanted to be Test No. 1, don't they understand. Just the usual ponderous robotic SA approach, and somehow surprised that they didn't get to win the game? Healthy collect at the TAB for a draw already in my account - NZ have never lost a test in Dunedin. Of course, SA will win the next two, but who cares, they won't be No. 1....

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew Fidel FernandoClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v South Africa at Wellington - Mar 23-27, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Hamilton - Mar 15-17, 2012
South Africa won by 9 wickets
New Zealand v South Africa at Dunedin - Mar 7-11, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Auckland - Mar 3, 2012
South Africa won by 5 wickets (with 40 balls remaining)
New Zealand v South Africa at Napier - Feb 29, 2012
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 70 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days