New Zealand v South Africa, 2nd Test, Hamilton

Which of Arnel, Gillespie and Ellis will it be?

Ross Taylor and New Zealand continue to mull over their best XI for the Hamilton Test

Firdose Moonda in Hamilton

March 14, 2012

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Brent Arnel picked up two wickets before tea, 1st Test, Hamilton, 2nd day, January 8, 2011
Seddon Park is Brent Arnel's home ground and he tops the list of available bowlers from the Plunket Shield © Getty Images
Enlarge

Twenty wickets. It does not even sound like that many, does it? Compared to the number a bowler can collect over a career, 20 wickets is nothing but for every Test match, it's all that matters. For New Zealand, finding the formula that will combine to cause 20 opposition wickets to fall is their biggest conundrum ahead of the second Test.

The first decisive step they took in that direction happened when they axed Tim Southee from the squad. That was the easy part. The swing bowler bled runs, had a few too many words to say about it and struggled with his action. The difficult part is deciding who will replace him, not because New Zealand are awash with options but because they have to find the exact fit, the person who will complete the puzzle perfectly, to enable them to take 20 wickets.

Brent Arnel appears the leading contender. Seddon Park is his home ground, he has been around the Test squad for a while and he tops the list of available bowlers from the Plunket Shield. Only Neil Wagner, who has yet to become eligible for the New Zealand team, has more wickets in the first-class competition. If the new selection policy is as scientific as Kim Littlejohn has made it out to be, Arnel would be the automatic pick.

"He [Arnel] knows this wicket pretty well," Ross Taylor, the New Zealand captain, said. "He's been a form bowler and [this is] probably is the best he's bowled for a few years. He bowls wicket to wicket and can hurry players up. He's little quicker than people think."

Another wicket-taker is Mark Gillespie. Despite a long absence from the New Zealand side, having last played a Test in 2008, Gillespie is seen as naturally attacking. His record against South Africa - a five-for in the only match he has played against them - can hardly come into contention, because of how long ago it was and how much both sides have changed since then.

"He is just a wicket-taker," Taylor said. "He's an aggressive bowler. He's probably not going to go for two or three runs an over but will pick up wickets. We need 20 wickets, so he'll be big part [of the plan] if he does play. He talks a big game and bowls pretty well in the nets. It has been a while [since he last played for New Zealand] and when he was in the side, at his peak, he was one of the best bowlers in the world and took a lot of wickets."

At the same time, Taylor hinted that Gillespie may fall victim to the wider plan despite his wicket-taking ability. "Twenty wickets is the key, but we've got to be consistent in our selections," he said. "I'm not saying he's an automatic selection, we will be talking about him."

The other candidate is Andrew Ellis, who has yet to play a Test for New Zealand. Although his scalps do not number anywhere near the other two (12 wickets in the Plunket Shield compared with 32 and 30), he brings in the important value addition of being able to bolster the batting line-up. "He'd come in and bat at eight. He's more a 'pick up a couple of wickets and block up an end' type of a bowler in the longer version," Taylor said. "That is a consideration and if he does come in, the balance of the side is pretty good."

With New Zealand only going in with five specialist batsmen, Taylor has appeared concerned about the lack of depth in the line-up. He emphasised that more responsibility has to be taken by the batsmen. "With batting, we've still got get out and bat four sessions," Taylor said. "We didn't do that in Dunedin.

"With ball, it will be little easier to swing it than in Dunedin with all the wind. With the amount of cricket that has been played here, the block [surface] is quite abrasive so reverse swing will come into it."

With some suggestions that the ball will seam more, others - like Taylor's - that it will swing, the only thing the Hamilton strip is not being predicted to do is offer turn. For that reason, Tarun Nethula will have to wait to make his Test debut. The legspinner seems consigned to the drinks cart with Rob Nicol being talked about as the possible second tweaker.

"With the cricket that's coming up [for New Zealand], Rob brings a spin element into it as well," Taylor said. "Two games in Caribbean, and India and Sri Lanka … [for a] second spinner, if don't decide to go with Nethula, Rob comes into it. He opens batting and [doubles up] as a second spinner. We have a lot of options."

Edited by Nikita Bastian

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Greatest_Game on (March 14, 2012, 22:25 GMT)

Pity that Wagner is not yet eligible. Best way for the Black Caps to stop the Saffers might well be to….well….pick yet another Saffer! (It worked for England - they got to be no. 1!) Apart from Wagner, NZ has Elliot, Grandhomme (Zim) Van Wyk already capped and, the three Cachopas, Munro and Jarvis (Zim,) still waiting to get out there and play mind games with the Saffers (Tahir - SA's spin import - would of course be be immune!) Go Black Caps

Posted by   on (March 14, 2012, 20:37 GMT)

Jimmy Franklin is the most talented cricketer currently in NZ ask Sachin.

Posted by Venkat_Gowrishankar on (March 14, 2012, 16:17 GMT)

Why not Grant Elliot?.. Where is he?

Posted by yetigoat on (March 14, 2012, 15:20 GMT)

I would go for Franklin, bat at 6, bowl some left arm medium. South Africa will be licking there lips at the prospect of smashing Arnel around Seddon Park

Posted by Dr_Van_Nostrand on (March 14, 2012, 12:38 GMT)

Ellis won't score runs or take wickets. He's rubbish. Pick Arnel, or Nethula if we're being positive.

Posted by   on (March 14, 2012, 12:37 GMT)

if your going on the attack it has to be mark gillespie an attacking bowler!!!

Posted by Tigg on (March 14, 2012, 12:15 GMT)

If it looks a really good bowling wicket then i'd go with Ellis. Martin, Bracewell, Vettori and Boult can handle the majority of wicket taking in that case. If not Arnel has to play.

Posted by SixFourOut on (March 14, 2012, 12:00 GMT)

Why not pick Frankin whot will give you batting depth, but also a left hand bowling change up?

Ellis wont score runs and meh to his bowling, Arnle and Gillespie are hasbeens

Posted by stickywicketnick on (March 14, 2012, 9:51 GMT)

Please, please don't pick Ellis! If you can't work out if he's a batsman that bowls or a bowler that bats, he isn't really an 'allrounder'. If they wanted to boost the batting they should've picked Franklin, a player who is a far better batsmen than Ellis as his average of 74 in 4 dayers this season shows.

If we want 20 wicket we need to pick attacking bowlers. After Neil Wagner Mark Gillespie is New Zealand's best strike bowler in domestic cricket at the moment. Brent Arnel isn't a wicket taker and if there is no movement you may as well have picked an extra batsmen as his bowling will be laughable to the SA batsmen.

Posted by mikehol on (March 14, 2012, 8:59 GMT)

If Ellis plays I don't even think i'll watch the game Hamilton is generally super flat picking an "all rounder" who is especially weak in the bowling aspects of all round is an insult to every other test eligible player in New Zealand. Either you trust the batsmen to do the job or you drop them and pick ones you think can you do not slash the bowling stocks just to compensate.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v South Africa at Wellington - Mar 23-27, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Hamilton - Mar 15-17, 2012
South Africa won by 9 wickets
New Zealand v South Africa at Dunedin - Mar 7-11, 2012
Match drawn
New Zealand v South Africa at Auckland - Mar 3, 2012
South Africa won by 5 wickets (with 40 balls remaining)
New Zealand v South Africa at Napier - Feb 29, 2012
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 70 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!