Mumbai v Saurashtra, Ranji Trophy, final, 3rd day

Mumbai boss their way to No. 40

The Report by Siddarth Ravindran in Mumbai

January 28, 2013

Comments: 53 | Text size: A | A

Mumbai 355 (Jaffer 132, H Shah 55) beat Saurashtra 148 (Vasavada 55, Kulkarni 4-24) and 82 (Kulkarni 5-32, Agarkar 4-15) by an innings and 125 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Mumbai captain Ajit Agarkar receives the Ranji Trophy, Mumbai v Saurashtra, Ranji Trophy, final, 3rd day, January 28, 2013
Ajit Agarkar carved up Saurashtra's top order to put Mumbai well on their way to victory © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge
Related Links
Players/Officials: Ajit Agarkar | Dhawal Kulkarni
Series/Tournaments: Ranji Trophy | Indian Domestic Season
Teams: India

Before the Ranji Trophy final, the Mumbai captain Ajit Agarkar had talked about his side not having put together the perfect match this season. True to their reputation of being at their best when it matters, Mumbai delivered that perfect match on the biggest domestic stage to reclaim their familiar position as Ranji champions.

Agarkar and Dhawal Kulkarni were so devastating with the new ball that at one stage Saurashtra, who have built up a reputation for scoring big, were in so precarious a position that journalists scrambled to find the lowest totals in first-class history. They avoided those levels of ignominy but were still rolled over for a measly 82, handing Mumbai a handsome innings and 125-run victory.

Saurashtra had their best chance of a fightback when they had Mumbai six down on the second evening and only 89 ahead. They let that lead swell to 139 yesterday, and on third morning Hiken Shah strengthened Mumbai further with more than two hours of resistance.

Saurashtra needed a solid start if they were to pose any challenge, but their innings unravelled with unseemly haste. There was a poignant moment in the first over as Shitanshu Kotak, who waited two decades to play in a Ranji final, was caught-behind for a duck in what could be his final first-class game. He dejectedly walked past the trophy, which had been brought out and displayed on the boundary's edge, on his way to the dressing-room.

The other opener, Sagar Jogiyani, has also had a game to forget. He had fallen for 1 on the first day, muffed a chance to run out Wasim Jaffer on the second and rounded off the game with a duck on the third.

Agarkar and Kulkarni were getting the ball to move both ways, and maintained a tight line and length, but Saurashtra's batsmen looked so out of their depth that the persistent doubts over their ability to score outside the benign surfaces of Rajkot will not be swept away any time soon. Saurashtra coach Debu Mitra admitted after the match that his batsmen needed to spend more time on seaming tracks, and that they didn't have enough experience of difficult batting conditions.

Sachin Tendulkar on Mumbai's victory

  • "Wonderful feeling that we've won for the 40th time. Mumbai has shown again that we are a champion side, got some real good players, nice blend of seniors and youngsters and a beautiful combination. There were moments when the going got tough but that's when the team stuck together and performed brilliantly.
  • I feel especially happy for Ajit Agarkar who had a rough season last year, it was fairly difficult for him, all the more reason to be excited. He has led from the front, and led beautifully, performed when it mattered, and the team supported him along with the support staff.
  • It is a wonderful moment for Mumbai cricket, not just the players but also from the administrative side. It has been team work and I take this opportunity to congratulate everyone."

They fished at far too many deliveries that should have been left alone. Mumbai operated with four slips and two gullies for much of the first hour, and the catches duly arrived.

There was bounce as well for the new-ball bowlers, and it was one of those lifting deliveries that removed Rahul Dave, hit high on the bat as he edged to the cordon. Aarpit Vasavada, who provided much of Saurashtra's resistance in the first innings, got a rough lbw decision after being struck outside off. Jaydev Shah avoided a pair but was bowled through the gate for 6.

Agarkar had high praise for Kulkarni's bowling. "They probably don't have the depth of batting that we do," he said. "Little bit surprised (at how easy the victory was), Dhawal bowled exceptionally well, he could have had eight wickets if luck was on his side."

At 11 for 5, the game was effectively over. Never have Saurashtra missed Cheteshwar Pujara as badly as they did in this match. They may have been outclassed in the final but, still, that won't take the shine off Saurashtra's best season in nearly seven decades.

For Mumbai, another title is only a return to business as usual after missing out in the previous two seasons. If the 40th trophy wasn't enough to show their domestic dominance, it comes in a season when they have won the Under-25 and U-16 titles too, and are battling it out in the final of the U-19.

Siddarth Ravindran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Siddarth Ravindran

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Haleos on (January 30, 2013, 15:42 GMT)

@ fod-c8w - people like vish are frogs of the well. They think TN is the world and their mediocre players champions. Show in their performance. If not for N Srinivasan none of the TN players would make it to India team.

Posted by wolf777 on (January 29, 2013, 14:38 GMT)

If the rules called for Mumbai, then why in the world Nitin Desai had to 'request' BCCI to schedule the Finals at Wankehde? Home and away rules are for the league stage only anywhere you go. Once the tournament reaches the knockout stage, it is always the team with the better record gets to play at home when neutral venues are not used. Nohit Sharma and Jadeja were in the playing eleven and no problem with them not being released; however, Pujara and Rahne should have been release instead of warming the bench in a inconsequential game. Reluctance not to release Pujara with the kind of form he is in smells rats.

Posted by kevivnajar on (January 29, 2013, 14:21 GMT)

@ Rumy1 on (January 29 2013, 11:29 AM GMT) : Don't compare Jaffer with Rahane & Mukund.. They are just 22-23 yrs and have impressed a lot now only.

Jaffer is like how Badrinath is for chennai- always the unsung hero, and affected by DLTG (dravid laxman Tend ganguly) era which lasted 10 years. But he is too old to be brought into test team now. I agree that Gambir shd be thrown out. We need a young left hander to replace him in ODI & Tests. Yuvi must also be thrown back to domestic, even though he is picking up wickets here and there. his selection was more for emotional & out of compulsion. Ashwin must also be dropped for a series or two, to make him come back stronger. and we MUST stop picking piyush chawla again and again..

Posted by Rumy1 on (January 29, 2013, 11:29 GMT)

Congrats Mumbai!! On present form,Jaffer is certainly a better bet than both Sehwag and Gambhi- by miles. One poor series in Australia, and he was dropped forever. If one bad series is a reason to be dropped forever,then how about Gambhir? He has failed consistently with dismal averages over the last three years. If you look at Mukund, Gambhir, Rahane and Vijay they look bonnies in front of Jaffer given his far superior temperament, skills, technique, range of shots, composure, style, experience and record.Ganguly is right when he says Jaffer is one of the two best openers in the country today. And Jaffer is only 35 which means he has 3/4 years left to contribute to Indian cricket. Hope likes of Sandeep Patil, Saba Karim, Vikram Rathore, RS Hans and Roger Binny are listening and are willing to undo gross injustices done to Jaffer over such a long period of time. Come on selectors..think about the country and give Jaffer his due. Hope Sunny, Shastri, Ganguly and Sachin help.

Posted by baghels.a on (January 29, 2013, 8:11 GMT)

First of all congratulations to Mumbai on the Ranji Trophy final win !! i am not a Mumbai fan more of a Karnataka or Delhi fan but Mumbai showed pedigree by winning the title and also u-25, u-16 and in u-19 they are still in contention, but i fully agree with @balajeev,I went through all the squad lists and came to the conclusion that some of the better players were all busy playing u-25 CK Nayudu and u-19 Vinoo Mankad trophy, i find veterans such as Aakash Chopra,Mazumdar Bahutele,SS Dass,Badani still playing ?? really i am Sure with a 1.2 billion population and u-19 WC champions, there must be better youger players out there.There is a lot of talk regarding pitches,outright results,sheduling which is all fine but what about squad selection,there are one too many guest players past there prime and certain journeyman players who seem favorite of state associations.These states need to decide weather long term planning and success is more important or having nepotism in selection.

Posted by   on (January 29, 2013, 8:02 GMT)

We need to see consistancy from Jaffer,,, does he possess ability to face bowlers on all pitches??Against what teams he achieved this record,,,,Does Agarkar can fill void of Zaheer?? See what happened to Rahane,,,,failed in many matches. No doubt viru and gambhir are out of form and can not be considered for future matches,,,,Does BCCI has concrete plans to produce world class players??? Answer is no for these questions

Posted by binu.emiliya on (January 29, 2013, 7:55 GMT)

They should have release Pujara,Jadeja,Rohith & Rahane for the finals and for the replacement for thelast ODI should have been Raydu(Pujara),Jalaj Saxena( Raveendra Jadeja),Stuart Binny(Ajinkhya RAhane),Uthappa (Rohith)...

Posted by Aren789 on (January 29, 2013, 7:36 GMT)

Hats off to Mumbai!!! They have the self-confidence to overcome any obstacles. I thought they will lose against Services but Ajit Agarkar made sure that did not happen. When they were playing the round robin matches they were no way near their mark for knockout qualification and once they are qualified they are a different team. I want other teams also learn from their capabilities to make Ranji Trophy really interesting.

Posted by Paddy789 on (January 29, 2013, 6:58 GMT)

""W Jaffer" Can he open the ininings against Australia in the upcoming test series ? i think he should!

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Siddarth RavindranClose
Tournament Results
Mumbai v Saurashtra at Mumbai - Jan 26-28, 2013
Mumbai won by an innings and 125 runs
Services v Mumbai at Delhi - Jan 16-21, 2013
Match drawn (Mumbai won on 1st innings)
Saurashtra v Punjab at Rajkot - Jan 16-20, 2013
Saurashtra won by 229 runs
Jharkhand v Punjab at Jamshedpur - Jan 6-10, 2013
Match drawn (Punjab won on 1st innings)
Mumbai v Baroda at Mumbai - Jan 6-10, 2013
Match drawn (Mumbai won on 1st innings)
Saurashtra v Karnataka at Rajkot - Jan 6-10, 2013
Match drawn (Saurashtra won on 1st innings)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days