South Africa v New Zealand, 2nd Twenty20, East London December 23, 2012

Guptill century gives NZ last-ball win


New Zealand 169 for 2 (Guptill 101*) beat South Africa 165 for 5 (Du Plessis 63, Davids 55) by eight wickets (D/L method)
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Captain, dethroned unceremoniously, pulls out of a big tour. Inexperienced side, with four debutants, gets rolled over in the opening game. You would have expected New Zealand to collectively scrap after that, you would have expected them to compete. What you wouldn't have expected was a solo riposte so dominating and so explosive that it turned New Zealand around from an eight-wicket loss to an eight-wicket win within a couple of days.

In hindsight, it probably helped that Martin Guptill was not scarred by the thrashing New Zealand received in Durban, having missed that game with a stomach bug. He came out a fiercely determined man in East London. Nothing could stop him tonight. He had the power, he had the timing, he had the focus. And even fate was on his side. A couple of catches went down, by Robin Peterson, with Guptill on 62 and 89, a couple of close leg-before shouts were not given, he was caught off a no-ball. And Guptill continued clubbing six after six.

He needed to find the boundary off the last ball of the game, to take his side to victory. He did, swatting Rory Kleinveldt to the cover rope. And also moved from 97 to 101, becoming only the second man after Richard Levi to make a hundred while chasing in a Twenty20 international.

Guptill's assault was so thorough it needed his partners to just hang around at the other end, which they managed to do. He had partnerships of 76 and 73 with Rob Nicol and Brendon McCullum, their contributions being 25 and 17. New Zealand were handed an asking-rate of just under nine, and throughout the innings, Guptill never allowed it to go over 11 - it touched that mark only for the final over. Whenever it did threaten to escalate, a Guptill six was always around the corner.

Guptill began by cutting and punching Kleinveldt for successive boundaries. Soon, he was launching Morne Morkel for six and thumping the spinners, who found it difficult with some dew around. He was particularly severe on the debutant left-arm spinner Aaron Phangiso, who he carted for three sixes and two fours. Guptill's strategy was simple - he mostly slog-swept and swung down the ground, adjusting to sweep or hitting straighter when needed to. He was able to sustain that hitting for 69 deliveries, with the final stroke bringing an exultant release of emotion.

South Africa had posted what seemed to be a challenging score. Henry Davids and Faf du Plessis reached half-centuries on either side of a 52-minute interruption due to one of the floodlight towers conking off. The break reduced the match to 19 overs per side, and raised the target for New Zealand to 169.

McCullum had chosen to bat in Durban, and New Zealand had self-destructed their way to 86. This time he put South Africa in, but to New Zealand's dismay, the hosts' batting followed the same pattern it had in Durban. Levi had his eleventh failure in 13 international innings, after being dropped on 2, but Davids and du Plessis were hardly bothered.

Davids, dropped by James Franklin on 36, dominated the 68-run partnership with du Plessis, who did the same during his 79-run stand with David Miller. Davids may be turning 33 next month, but in his second international game, he displayed an uncomplicated, fresh approach as he looked to hit mostly down the ground.

Nathan McCullum was the only bowler to tie the batsmen own as he flighted the ball and also varied his pace greatly. It took a spectacular catch to remove Davids as Jimmy Neesham sprinted back several yards from mid-off, dived full-length, caught the lofted ball and managed to stop himself before the rope to complete the stunner.

Du Plessis took over now, slamming boundaries through his favoured extra cover. Miller, too, began powering the fast bowlers for boundaries over extra cover, before the South African charge was halted by the floodlight failure in the 17th over. There had been issues with one of the towers in the previous international match played at the venue as well, in January this year against Sri Lanka. Both du Plessis and Miller carried on in the same vein on resumption, before Guptill took over for the night.

Abhishek Purohit is an editorial assistant at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • TheRisingTeam on December 26, 2012, 15:13 GMT

    New minnows New Zealand are clearly declining in Cricket. They were lucky to win the last match when that floodlight failure happened because South Africa were set for a massive score only to lose momentum.

  • Min2000 on December 26, 2012, 3:08 GMT

    If young players like Guptill and Williamson can live up to their potential, backed up by Ryder, Taylor, McCullum & Watling, NZ's test batting woes could become a thing of the past. Well done guys -- great win.

  • SeanoN on December 25, 2012, 14:54 GMT

    Honestly as a SA supporter I am annoyed by our selections including our relegation of T20 to second division by moving Domingo into the role of coach... We have other more talented and capable players to select from yet we put these mismatched club level idiots together to play for the Proteas...

    Maclaren is like Benkenstein, not sure how to take a chance in the national side properly. Phangiso is an emotional selection. Throw out that rubbish. Berhadien is average and has a good innings every 8 innings or so... Kleinveldt for me is lucky to be there against the likes of Hardus Viljoen and the unlucky Morris. Miller's role needs to be defined. Tell him that he is the 6 hitter and mould him into Klusener. He has the shot selection. Levi's fun in the sun is up. Send him back to franchise cricket to tighten up his technique.

  • SurlyCynic on December 25, 2012, 9:19 GMT

    Neuen: The D/L score has to be adjusted up because the team batting second know the innings has been reduced and can plan accordingly. Imagine you keep wickets in hand to go big in the last 5 overs, then a (longer) power failure stops the innings in the 15th over. You miss out on the slog at the end. The team batting second would know from the start they only have to bat for 15 overs so can go big from over 10. So it's fair to bump the score up a bit, only by 4 in this case as only 1 over was lost.

  • dummy4fb on December 25, 2012, 8:28 GMT

    Petersen dropp an easy catch , Guptil makes a century and Mclaren bowls a no ball and the rain change the game that is the summary..but the Black caps are still not that good... sorry again Faf was brilliant with the bat...fielding let us down and Mclaren is not on his game but I believe he is still better than Parnell...

  • Neuen on December 25, 2012, 8:00 GMT

    Clearly this shows D/L is a fail in T20. 169 to win when the opposition scored only 165 in same amount of overs? Cmon ICC you gotta be kidding me.

  • dummy4fb on December 24, 2012, 19:02 GMT

    People getting cut over the loss need to chill. No ones saying NZ is better than SA. Clearly the world of cricket knows this is true.

    One can only hope to imagine what a fully fit and equipped NZ side could do though. Guptill, McCullum, Ryder, Taylor, Williamson, Nicol, Brownlie, Vettori, Bracewell, Southee and Wagner/Bolt

    Bowling obviously to open up with Southee/ what ever left hand pacer is picked followed by Bracewell and vettori and Ryder, Nicol and Williamson with a bit of part time (Test match team of course).

  • Noggin-ball on December 24, 2012, 15:37 GMT

    Martin took a gutpill and got the runs!

  • Supa_SAFFA on December 24, 2012, 13:00 GMT

    The conditions definitely counted against South Africa. New Zealand may have been found wanting if a few wayward deliveries could have been re-taken with a dry ball. But that's life. SA just has to suck it up and pray that Guptil's knock was a Levi-ish once-off.

  • dummy4fb on December 24, 2012, 12:21 GMT

    Simply one of the best innings you will see in T20.

  • No featured comments at the moment.