South Africa v Sri Lanka, 2nd ODI, Durban February 1, 2017

Miller and du Plessis hundreds set up thumping victory


South Africa 307 for 6 (Miller 117*, du Plessis 105) beat Sri Lanka 186 (Chandimal 36)
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Faf du Plessis made his seventh ODI hundred © AFP

Faf du Plessis' velvet-smooth 105, and David Miller's mature, unbeaten 117 - replete with finishing fireworks - sent South Africa to an imposing 307 that Sri Lanka would always struggle to chase, and in the end, fell a whopping 121 runs short of.

The batting was the basis of South Africa's dominance, but the bowling was disciplined as well, and the fielding was not short of sublime. Sri Lanka's openers fell to two spectacular catches - du Plessis leaping, right arm outstretched above head, to end Niroshan Dickwella's promising stay, and AB de Villiers sprinting back from mid-off to snaffle a tough overhead chance soon after.

JP Duminy's rapid run out of Asela Gunaratne rounded off the fielding performance, while Imran Tahir and co. refused to allow the opposition to ever get a feel for the chase. They were all out for 186 in the 38th over. Eight batsmen got into double figures but the highest score of the innings was Dinesh Chandimal's 36.

Sri Lanka's mistakes would be familiar to recent followers of their cricket. The chance to have South Africa 118 for 5 was spurned when du Plessis was dropped on 63 - that fifth wicket partnership going on to account for 117 and form the thorax of South Africa's innings. The bowling lacked penetration through the death overs - which has often been the case since Lasith Malinga's decline - and the batsmen produced a string of briefly encouraging but largely inconsequential innings. There was not a fifty partnership in the response.

It is also possible Sri Lanka erred in bowling first on what appeared a good batting track ahead of the match. Perhaps they might have reasoned that their only wins on tour - in the T20s - had come when chasing a score.

Du Plessis came to the crease in the fourth over of South Africa's innings, and was both secure and productive, seeing his team through early wobbles when Sri Lanka's beefed-up spin attack appeared ready to take control of the match.

It was the frill-free back foot punch that eventually took him to triple figures, but it had defined the early stages of du Plessis' innings as well, as he leant back to punish short deliveries from the spinners through the cover region - though plenty of runs came square of the leg side as well. In between the boundaries were a non-stop tick-tock of singles and twos. Where other batsmen in the top order were inert against spin early in their innings, du Plessis always seemed in control of the pace of his progress.

His sole mistake came on 63: reaching for a flighted Lakshan Sandakan stock ball, du Plessis sent a low edge to Dhananjaya de Silva at slip. The chance was grassed, and the partnership went on to flourish for more than 22 overs. Sandakan would have a half-chance off Miller go down as well, and seemed, in general, the best bowler in the attack - his big turn causing batsmen issues, even if his lack of control allowed them to get off strike easily as well.

While du Plessis' innings rarely waivered from a strike rate of around 90, Miller advanced more in spurts through the first half of his knock. Happy at first to work the ball around with his partner, he ventured big shots whenever his scoring rate began to lag: it was consecutive straight sixes of Dhananjaya de Silva that sped him from 39 off 52 balls to 51 off 54.

A diet of runs into the outfield sustained him after reaching that half century, but it wasn't long before the death overs coaxed him into a destructive mood again. He cracked Suranga Lakmal to the deep cover fence in the 44th over, smoked Kulasekara over long-on two overs later, then having completed his fourth ODI hundred off the first ball of the final over, exploded spectacularly in the last five balls to launch South Africa beyond 300. He hit two straight sixes off two wayward Kulasekara deliveries - the second of which sent the ball bouncing down the road - and finished the innings with a four behind square on the offside to boot. His last 18 balls yielded three sixes and 36 runs.

Briefly, there was hope for the Sri Lanka chase. Dickwella hit enterprising boundaries off the South Africa seamers, and Upul Tharanga - having re-promoted himself to the top of the innings - progressed smartly despite suffering two blows to the helmet. But when both were out to excellent catches off the bowling of Wayne Parnell, the run rate climbed, and wickets began to fall with regularity.

Kusal Mendis chipped an Andile Phehlukwayo ball to short cover, Dhananjaya de Silva was stumped after being dragged out of his crease by Tahir, Asela Gunaratne was run out for the second time in as many matches, and Chandimal was caught behind driving ambitiously as well. Beyond the 45-run opening stand, there was really no meaningful fight from the Sri Lanka batsmen, though they did at least go down swinging, rather than in a meek heap. At Chandimal's dismissal, the score was 132 for 6 in the 26th over, and hopes of victory were all but extinguished.

South Africa's bowlers shared the wickets around. Tahir and Parnell took two apiece, and Duminy had two lower middle-order batsmen holing out off his bowling as well. Rabada, Morris and Phehlukwayo all finished with one scalp.

Andrew Fidel Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's Sri Lanka correspondent. @andrewffernando

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Samantha-PW on February 5, 2017, 12:10 GMT

    Winning and losing is all part of the game, but as an avid cricket fan since the early 80s of the Sri Lanka team, I can confidently say that the current team is the worst by far, what is sad is the lack of a fight in them and the inability to think on their feet. Shot selection is appalling. Can't they score a mere 225- 225 just to keep the bowlers in the game. Chandimal is a huge liability, Angelo is quite reliable and the only one that warrants a place in the team, but a poor captain. What has happened to the fielding? Being a team boasting of youngsters is this acceptable. Whilst this team does not have a Sanga, Mahela, Dilshan or a Sanath nor a Vass, Murali, Malinga or a Herath, can't they just not make numbers, but put up a honorable performance....

  • mrd1911 on February 3, 2017, 8:47 GMT

    What's your point SLMaster? SA has lost lots of matches because of rain. It's part of the game of cricket.

  • Sitaram on February 3, 2017, 7:14 GMT

    @Rehan Jayasuriya: will it be as flat as SL got??

  • Cricinfouser on February 3, 2017, 5:35 GMT

    Wow UTFan comparing UT to mahela. Really mate? You comparing the 31 year old failure who cant have a position in team unless someone fails, one of the worst fielder, useless captain, to one of the best batsmen, best captain, one of the best fielder, one of the best brain in the game? And a world failure batsmen, a curse to Sri Lankan team, to a world cup final centurion, a caprain who took Sri Lankan team to world cup final, a man who battled with administration for the sri lankan team. And comparing one of the best personals in Sri Lankan cricket, a man who widely accepted around the world, to a player who caught screwing some other players spouse. Really mate?

  • RAJSOMA on February 3, 2017, 5:30 GMT

    @Rajcan...Pls do not compare UT to Mahela. Just go thru Stats of both & then say what you like. Mahela was master tech in Captaincy n his ability to bat. I think due to him SL won most of the games as captain and a player. UT was only good during the England series long time back... He pops up close to WC or any tours from nowhere....How come others are forgotten for good. I think politically he got some connection .Lets see if he does anything in the next vital game .

  • forward_diffence on February 3, 2017, 4:21 GMT

    @Rajcan what a comment mate. Are you trying to compare one of the greatest captains of all time with UT? Are you trying to compare the skill levels of Mahela and UT? Scoring 13 hundreds is not a fact to be a great player. The impact a player can have for a cause of the match is the most important thing. Mahela and KJ are impact players. And Mahela is a big match player. Even though he doesn't score even a run, you can't even think to compare him with the UT due to the knowledge he precess for the team.Most of the time if Mahela scores 50+, the team will end up in a victory. But the way UT play can't take the team to a victory...

  • SLMaster on February 2, 2017, 21:42 GMT

    @Bazza_SAF, you didn't read my point. I am in support of SL youngsters. They need experience. Yes, SA won the first of two test and don't forget SA survived 2nd due to rain - with SL needing 2 wickets to win in the 2nd test.

  • rajcan on February 2, 2017, 21:06 GMT

    People complain about UT, please wake up, Mahela wasn't a good batsmen in ODI or test out side of Asia, His average is always boosted by scoring centuries and doubles in his favorite grounds in SL and Asia. There was a time, SL fans were so frustrated with Mahela and questioning why should he be playing ODI? There was a poll conducted by Island Cricket in 2009, 79% wanted Mahela to be dropped. See the link below, If you want to assess a batsman, you need to check many things. Not only average. One who completely fails outside of Asia could have very good average by scoring truck load of runs in Asia. So, players should be selected based on condition, UT is well suited for playing outside of Asia, his record prove itself. He doesn't have more single digit scores outside of Asia as Mahela and everyone's great KJP has. The fact KJP has more single digit scores in SL too.

  • Bazza_SAF on February 2, 2017, 20:08 GMT

    @SL master... Ummm last time SA visited SL they won and that was with a few of your and worlds greatest players ever in Sanga and Jayawardene. Stick with your youngsters and support them. SA has just thrashed Aus in both Tests and ODIs so they are plAying some good cricket at the moment!

  • Waqas.Norway on February 2, 2017, 19:17 GMT

    Congrats South Africa for another win.

  • No featured comments at the moment.