Sri Lanka v Australia, 1st ODI, Pallekele August 10, 2011

'Calm' Johnson enjoys tough conditions

ESPNcricinfo staff
13

Mitchell Johnson is rapidly becoming Australia's subcontinent specialist, after his six-wicket haul set up Australia's victory in the first ODI in Pallekele. Sri Lanka's batsmen struggled to handle Johnson, who has also proved himself dangerous man in India, where of foreign bowlers only Muttiah Muralitharan has more one-day wickets than Johnson.

In his third ODI in Sri Lanka, the other two having come during this year's World Cup, Johnson struck in his first over when Mahela Jayawardene flashed at a fullish ball outside off stump and edged behind. The key wicket of Kumar Sangakkara followed when he prodded a slower ball to short cover, and it was the best possible start Johnson could have hoped for in his 100th ODI.

"You know it's always going to be a challenge in these conditions," Johnson said after the game. "It's always hot, the wickets are always pretty flat and slow. You get yourself up for these challenges. I felt pretty calm today. I was a bit nervous through those Twenty20 games and I think that got the little jitters out. It was my hundredth game today, [which was] pretty exciting for me.

"[The pitch] looked a little slower, a little drier [than in the two Twenty20 losses]. It didn't get dewy tonight I don't think. I didn't mind bowling on it. I got the ball to tail a bit away from the right-handers, which is always handy."

Johnson's 6 for 31 placed him fourth on Australia's all-time list of best figures in a one-day international, behind only the seven-wicket hauls from Glenn McGrath and Andy Bichel at the 2003 World Cup, and a six-for from Gary Gilmour in 1975. It was a fine effort given that Johnson was the sixth bowler used, the only time in his hundred games he had been that far down the bowling list.

"It's exciting to be ranked against those guys," he said. "But to be able to go out there and do what we needed for the team [was the main thing]. I didn't know if I was getting a bowl today. But that was what was needed at the time. Sri Lanka got off to a very good start with the new ball and the spinners came on and slowed things up a bit. It gave me an opportunity to use my skills. In the end, the result that we won the game was the more pleasing thing."

The captain, Michael Clarke, used his spinners to make the initial breakthroughs after Sri Lanka's openers put together a good partnership, and he rotated his bowlers well throughout the innings. Clarke said keeping Johnson up his sleeve had been a conscious plan, and the idea paid off.

"I was just trying to get the ball a little bit older and he could use his strength, which is pace, and also he could use his angle to take the ball across the right-handers," Clarke said. "He bowled beautifully. I thought he really executed his skill very well today and we looked after him in the field. The boys fielded really well today, we hung on to our catches, which is great to see because we've been training really hard."

Australia's batsmen had little trouble chasing 192 and they had some valuable time in the middle to get used to the mystery spin of Ajantha Mendis, who could play a major role throughout the series. Clarke said learning how to handle Mendis would be an ongoing process, but he was confident they could avoid the kind of capitulation that took place in the second Twenty20, when Mendis took six wickets.

"He's a very good bowler and especially in conditions like this, where there's enough spin for him," Clarke said. "All of our batters know we're going to be facing a lot of spin throughout this one-day series and into the Test series, and we saw it in the Twenty20 as well.

"We have to continue to practice, continue to look at a lot of footage, because a lot of their bowlers have so many different variations that it takes some time to adjust and get used to it. I think what we did really well today was we allowed ourselves a little bit of extra time to get used to the variations of the bowlers and then have the courage to play our way and play our shots."

The series continues with matches in Hambantota on Sunday and Tuesday, before the teams head to Colombo for the final two one-dayers.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on August 12, 2011, 18:32 GMT

    slingers allways hae more chances than others and with his pace we (SRI Lanka ) will face lot more troubles.

  • Graduated_Cheetah on August 12, 2011, 12:08 GMT

    Well, this time Mitch's bowling did pay off but this is rarely the case. In most of the matches, he would come out with very few wickets while conceding lots of runs. Australia need to look for a better pace bowler. Mitch is not the antidote to the absence of quality players like McGrath, Gillespie and even Andy Bichel. Please Aussies, do not rely too much on Mitch the Bitch. You have already conceded the World Cup due to his Lack of Performance.

  • Mcgrath-Dravid-Flintoff on August 12, 2011, 9:02 GMT

    Mitch is still a great ODI bowler. hope as a test bowler he comes good now

  • RandyOZ on August 12, 2011, 3:47 GMT

    @dsig3, boris, I can see your point, but disagree with it. The fact is you need to have a lineup that is not all the same type bowlers. We can produce a heap of bowlers like hastings, siddle, etc. I put them all in the same boat. You need to mix up a bowling line up (apart from having a spinner) and Mitch is the type of guy who has to so-called x-factor capable of taking wickets. YES, he has had his slumps, but when he had that breakout year, he didnt lose us any matches as some are suggesting. He can get back to that form, it's a mental thing with Mitch.

  • Meety on August 12, 2011, 1:26 GMT

    Just on MJ the test bowler, (again I know he has on a number of occassions not met mine & other peoples expectations), actually has BETTER stats than Brett Lee in terms of average, economy, & (wickets per match). Lee has a marginally superior S/R. MJ has better stats than J Anderson (slightly worse economy), Zaheer (same economy), AND S Broad (slightly worse economy, MJs S/R is 10 balls per wicket better though). -- -- -- Perception is a funny thing - for a bloke who seems to be a reasonable human, he does cop a fair bit of grief when he doesn't get it right. I suppose its the problem when coming on the scene after the Great Metronome in McGrath! Nothing is going to be as precise!

  • boris6491 on August 11, 2011, 12:19 GMT

    Not trying to criticise Johnson or take away the gloss from his performance, but in all honesty, he probably got 2 wickets from good bowling. The rest could be all attributed to poor batting. @Andrew: I tend to agree with dsig3, on his day he has been destructive, but he hasn't been able to even bowl tidily when it's not his day. He can be quite awful, maybe not to the extent of losing games for the team, but certainly putting them at a disadvantage when he sprays them all over and/or doesn't get the ball to do much. He's a complete confidence bowler, if he can get a wicket or two, he lifts. If someone targets him even a bit, his shoulders droop and he goes from bad to worse. That needs to change. If he could get even half the discipline in his bowling that a similar type of shock bowler, Brett Lee has, he could be considerably better. Hopefully that will come with experience.

  • andrew-schulz on August 11, 2011, 11:51 GMT

    Actually dsig3, would you care to give us a list of which games Mitchell Johnson has actually lost for Australia? Especially with the white ball, as this is the context we are speaking in.

  • on August 11, 2011, 9:40 GMT

    Good on ya Mitch. O'keefe should be in this side. Maybe Paine as well, although Haddin will now come out and smack a quick 100 next. Would prefer to see Hastings in then bollywood, smith needs to start contributing either with bat or ball

  • jonesy2 on August 11, 2011, 8:51 GMT

    the thing is, if mitch played to his full potential every game he played it would get boring because australia would win every single match and johnson would be the greatest player since shane keith warne, so therefore he keeps it inconsistent just to give everyone respect.

  • Trickz on August 11, 2011, 7:06 GMT

    thanks 4 that meety,interesting

  • on August 12, 2011, 18:32 GMT

    slingers allways hae more chances than others and with his pace we (SRI Lanka ) will face lot more troubles.

  • Graduated_Cheetah on August 12, 2011, 12:08 GMT

    Well, this time Mitch's bowling did pay off but this is rarely the case. In most of the matches, he would come out with very few wickets while conceding lots of runs. Australia need to look for a better pace bowler. Mitch is not the antidote to the absence of quality players like McGrath, Gillespie and even Andy Bichel. Please Aussies, do not rely too much on Mitch the Bitch. You have already conceded the World Cup due to his Lack of Performance.

  • Mcgrath-Dravid-Flintoff on August 12, 2011, 9:02 GMT

    Mitch is still a great ODI bowler. hope as a test bowler he comes good now

  • RandyOZ on August 12, 2011, 3:47 GMT

    @dsig3, boris, I can see your point, but disagree with it. The fact is you need to have a lineup that is not all the same type bowlers. We can produce a heap of bowlers like hastings, siddle, etc. I put them all in the same boat. You need to mix up a bowling line up (apart from having a spinner) and Mitch is the type of guy who has to so-called x-factor capable of taking wickets. YES, he has had his slumps, but when he had that breakout year, he didnt lose us any matches as some are suggesting. He can get back to that form, it's a mental thing with Mitch.

  • Meety on August 12, 2011, 1:26 GMT

    Just on MJ the test bowler, (again I know he has on a number of occassions not met mine & other peoples expectations), actually has BETTER stats than Brett Lee in terms of average, economy, & (wickets per match). Lee has a marginally superior S/R. MJ has better stats than J Anderson (slightly worse economy), Zaheer (same economy), AND S Broad (slightly worse economy, MJs S/R is 10 balls per wicket better though). -- -- -- Perception is a funny thing - for a bloke who seems to be a reasonable human, he does cop a fair bit of grief when he doesn't get it right. I suppose its the problem when coming on the scene after the Great Metronome in McGrath! Nothing is going to be as precise!

  • boris6491 on August 11, 2011, 12:19 GMT

    Not trying to criticise Johnson or take away the gloss from his performance, but in all honesty, he probably got 2 wickets from good bowling. The rest could be all attributed to poor batting. @Andrew: I tend to agree with dsig3, on his day he has been destructive, but he hasn't been able to even bowl tidily when it's not his day. He can be quite awful, maybe not to the extent of losing games for the team, but certainly putting them at a disadvantage when he sprays them all over and/or doesn't get the ball to do much. He's a complete confidence bowler, if he can get a wicket or two, he lifts. If someone targets him even a bit, his shoulders droop and he goes from bad to worse. That needs to change. If he could get even half the discipline in his bowling that a similar type of shock bowler, Brett Lee has, he could be considerably better. Hopefully that will come with experience.

  • andrew-schulz on August 11, 2011, 11:51 GMT

    Actually dsig3, would you care to give us a list of which games Mitchell Johnson has actually lost for Australia? Especially with the white ball, as this is the context we are speaking in.

  • on August 11, 2011, 9:40 GMT

    Good on ya Mitch. O'keefe should be in this side. Maybe Paine as well, although Haddin will now come out and smack a quick 100 next. Would prefer to see Hastings in then bollywood, smith needs to start contributing either with bat or ball

  • jonesy2 on August 11, 2011, 8:51 GMT

    the thing is, if mitch played to his full potential every game he played it would get boring because australia would win every single match and johnson would be the greatest player since shane keith warne, so therefore he keeps it inconsistent just to give everyone respect.

  • Trickz on August 11, 2011, 7:06 GMT

    thanks 4 that meety,interesting

  • popcorn on August 11, 2011, 6:51 GMT

    Mitch is brilliant.He is the X factor in the Australian Team.

  • dsig3 on August 11, 2011, 6:09 GMT

    I propose that Mitch only be selected if we are playing in the subcontinent. Throughout his inconsistent career he consistently performs there. I know he has won games for us in other countries, but for every game he wins off his own back he is a liability for the next 3. I like his presence and his batting and fielding, but he will bowl some absolute rubbish. If he had McGrath and Gillespie to back him up he could get away with it like Lee but not any more. The ultimate X factor, can win a game for you, as he has done in Perth, or he can just as easily lose it, do we need that in our developing test team?

  • Meety on August 11, 2011, 4:00 GMT

    Good onya Mitch! Other than S Smith, the most maligned Ozzy cricketer ever! Interestingly he has taken the same amount of wickets as Richard Hadlee, in 15 games less, with a S/R 8 balls better!

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Meety on August 11, 2011, 4:00 GMT

    Good onya Mitch! Other than S Smith, the most maligned Ozzy cricketer ever! Interestingly he has taken the same amount of wickets as Richard Hadlee, in 15 games less, with a S/R 8 balls better!

  • dsig3 on August 11, 2011, 6:09 GMT

    I propose that Mitch only be selected if we are playing in the subcontinent. Throughout his inconsistent career he consistently performs there. I know he has won games for us in other countries, but for every game he wins off his own back he is a liability for the next 3. I like his presence and his batting and fielding, but he will bowl some absolute rubbish. If he had McGrath and Gillespie to back him up he could get away with it like Lee but not any more. The ultimate X factor, can win a game for you, as he has done in Perth, or he can just as easily lose it, do we need that in our developing test team?

  • popcorn on August 11, 2011, 6:51 GMT

    Mitch is brilliant.He is the X factor in the Australian Team.

  • Trickz on August 11, 2011, 7:06 GMT

    thanks 4 that meety,interesting

  • jonesy2 on August 11, 2011, 8:51 GMT

    the thing is, if mitch played to his full potential every game he played it would get boring because australia would win every single match and johnson would be the greatest player since shane keith warne, so therefore he keeps it inconsistent just to give everyone respect.

  • on August 11, 2011, 9:40 GMT

    Good on ya Mitch. O'keefe should be in this side. Maybe Paine as well, although Haddin will now come out and smack a quick 100 next. Would prefer to see Hastings in then bollywood, smith needs to start contributing either with bat or ball

  • andrew-schulz on August 11, 2011, 11:51 GMT

    Actually dsig3, would you care to give us a list of which games Mitchell Johnson has actually lost for Australia? Especially with the white ball, as this is the context we are speaking in.

  • boris6491 on August 11, 2011, 12:19 GMT

    Not trying to criticise Johnson or take away the gloss from his performance, but in all honesty, he probably got 2 wickets from good bowling. The rest could be all attributed to poor batting. @Andrew: I tend to agree with dsig3, on his day he has been destructive, but he hasn't been able to even bowl tidily when it's not his day. He can be quite awful, maybe not to the extent of losing games for the team, but certainly putting them at a disadvantage when he sprays them all over and/or doesn't get the ball to do much. He's a complete confidence bowler, if he can get a wicket or two, he lifts. If someone targets him even a bit, his shoulders droop and he goes from bad to worse. That needs to change. If he could get even half the discipline in his bowling that a similar type of shock bowler, Brett Lee has, he could be considerably better. Hopefully that will come with experience.

  • Meety on August 12, 2011, 1:26 GMT

    Just on MJ the test bowler, (again I know he has on a number of occassions not met mine & other peoples expectations), actually has BETTER stats than Brett Lee in terms of average, economy, & (wickets per match). Lee has a marginally superior S/R. MJ has better stats than J Anderson (slightly worse economy), Zaheer (same economy), AND S Broad (slightly worse economy, MJs S/R is 10 balls per wicket better though). -- -- -- Perception is a funny thing - for a bloke who seems to be a reasonable human, he does cop a fair bit of grief when he doesn't get it right. I suppose its the problem when coming on the scene after the Great Metronome in McGrath! Nothing is going to be as precise!

  • RandyOZ on August 12, 2011, 3:47 GMT

    @dsig3, boris, I can see your point, but disagree with it. The fact is you need to have a lineup that is not all the same type bowlers. We can produce a heap of bowlers like hastings, siddle, etc. I put them all in the same boat. You need to mix up a bowling line up (apart from having a spinner) and Mitch is the type of guy who has to so-called x-factor capable of taking wickets. YES, he has had his slumps, but when he had that breakout year, he didnt lose us any matches as some are suggesting. He can get back to that form, it's a mental thing with Mitch.