Sri Lanka v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Colombo, 5th day

All-round New Zealand level series with big win

The Report by Kanishkaa Balachandran

November 29, 2012

Comments: 146 | Text size: A | A

New Zealand 412 (Taylor 142, Williamson 135, Herath 6-103) and 194 for 9 dec (Taylor 74) beat Sri Lanka 227 (Samaraweera 76, Mathews 47, Southee 5-62, Boult 4-42) and 195 (Mathews 84, Southee 3-58, Boult 3-33) by 167 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Angelo Mathews pushes it to the off side, Sri Lanka v New Zealand, 2nd Test, Colombo, 5th day, November 29, 2012
Angelo Mathews made a resilient 84 but ran out of partners © Associated Press
Enlarge

New Zealand shrugged off five consecutive defeats with one of their most memorable victories in recent times, squaring the two-Test series with a 167-win at the P Sara Oval. Hammered in under three days in Galle, New Zealand stretched the hosts in Colombo by holding the edge over all five days and rounded things off just after tea, despite a resilient 84 by Angelo Mathews.

It was New Zealand's first Test win in Sri Lanka since 1998, and in a remarkable coincidence, that victory at the R Premadasa Stadium was also by the same margin. This win drew parallels with their inspiring win at Hobart a year ago. On both occasions, New Zealand were hammered in the first Test, but stunned the hosts by showing the resolve to fight back. While the Hobart Test was anybody's game till the final moments, this Test was dominated by the visitors and coming into the final day, the only realistic outcomes were a New Zealand win and a draw.

New Zealand's penetrative seam attack - one of the positives to come out of an otherwise horror of a year - set it up by getting the top four the previous evening. The twin failures of the top order were responsible for Sri Lanka's struggle through the Test. It meant that Sri Lanka were left with only one option - to play for a draw. They had to derive inspiration from Faf du Plessis' marathon effort at the Adelaide Oval earlier this week to deny Australia.

Mathews was the only batsman who looked like emulating du Plessis, but lacked support to help him last the distance. Thilan Samaraweera's early departure, due to a communication breakdown early in the morning, only made the task tougher for Mathews. Dropping the ball towards short cover, Samaraweera set off for a non-existent single and was three-fourths down the pitch but Mathews wasn't interested. Jeetan Patel threw the ball to the wicketkeeper, who broke the stumps before a deflated Samaraweera could make his ground.

The wicket put Mathews' survival skills to test. With the seamers swinging it towards the pads, the captain Ross Taylor set unconventional fields for Mathews, placing a silly mid-on and two fielders close at short midwicket on one occasion. Only five boundaries were scored in the morning session, with the focus more on wearing the bowlers down.

The afternoon session was dominated by spin, with a spinner operating from one end for the entire duration. Tim Southee bowled round the wicket with a packed on side field, with a short leg, backward short leg and short square leg to create some opportunities. Doug Bracewell, for a short period, bowled short of a length to Mathews with the wicketkeeper up to the stumps.

The Prasanna Jayawardene-Mathews stand frustrated New Zealand for 35.3 overs. New Zealand tried hard to create chances, placing fielders around the batsman when the spinners were on. The breakthrough after lunch came via Todd Astle, who generated good drift with his leg breaks. The one that got Jayawardene was one that drifted away and bounced more, clipping the shoulder of the bat. Suraj Randiv lasted only 11 deliveries, when he edged Trent Boult to second slip.

Nuwan Kulasekara joined Mathews to add 46. Astle bowled loopy full tosses, that were clubbed over deep midwicket by Kulasekara and Mathews too used his feet to Patel and smashed a six over long-on.

New Zealand were waiting to get hold of the second new ball to unleash their seamers. They would have been anxious to get quick breakthroughs and avoid a last-minute scramble for wickets, keeping the weather in mind. Poor light had curtailed play in the final session in the first four days, but Sri Lanka couldn't stick around long enough for any divine intervention.

Boult got the breakthrough straight after tea when he had Kulasekara fending to Kane Williamson who took a low catch at gully. Williamson, who plucked a brilliant catch in the same position on the fourth day, took another stunner when he took one inches off the ground to get rid of Shaminda Eranga. The third umpire studied several replays before giving it out. Boult rounded off the match when he had Mathews edging to Martin Guptill at second slip, giving New Zealand their second* Test win in 2012.

*6:52GMT, November 30: The report had previously said this was New Zealand's first win in 2012. This has been corrected.

Kanishkaa Balachandran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Kanishkaa Balachandran

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Narbavi on (December 2, 2012, 9:56 GMT)

@Htc-Android: I agree that they haven't won many in these last few years but at the same time you should also know that it took sri lanka 3 years to win a test series now, isn't it?

Posted by   on (December 2, 2012, 9:54 GMT)

@lukecannon-ENG- Epic comment man. lol. so true.

Posted by Sinhaya on (December 2, 2012, 2:52 GMT)

@bravetigersmustwin, haha anyway India's lowest ODI total 54 has been against Sri Lanka in Sharjah which is one of the flattest tracks on earth. Sanath Jayasuriya scored 189 that day must be the worse batsman in the history of cricket right?? As per your link India has been dismissed many times for double digit scores so stop gloating.

Posted by Htc-Android on (December 1, 2012, 19:16 GMT)

@Narbavi can you tell me how many test matches did NZ and WI won in the past 4 or 5 years. we are much better team than these two teams.

Posted by Narbavi on (December 1, 2012, 10:11 GMT)

Sinhaya always comes up with excuses, he says india beat newzealand due to umpiring decisions, he says india beat lanka because of lanka's negative mindset, now he says australia beat lanka in lanka's own backyard because of underestimation!! Wow!! Brilliant stuff mate!!

Posted by bravetigersmustwin on (December 1, 2012, 7:55 GMT)

@sinhaya ... SL is the lowest after Zim and CAN only .... refer this http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283987.html

Posted by Raj2000 on (December 1, 2012, 2:57 GMT)

SL lost the match because of the following:

1. Poor team selection. Thisara Perera should've played instead of Randiv. 2. SL depended too much on Herath and Randiv and didn't give Samaraweera or Dilshan a chance to bowl. NOT utilizing your spinners on a spin friendly track??? Tell me they didn't deserve to lose! 3. They gambled on winning the toss. The winning formula on SL grounds is bat first, put up big total and make the other team bat on a worn out tracks. They lost the toss, NZ took advantage, batted well and turned the table on SL.

Posted by cjscanada on (November 30, 2012, 14:55 GMT)

Congrats NZ good all-around performance! Well played SL too, do not despair. I like this Angello, He is a fighter. This is not the first time, he played his heart out. I think he should only bat and occasionally bowl as you do not want to loose him to injury. Sameera too is good. Can someone tell me what happened to Chandimal? He should be in the team unless he is injured. I do not think SL fans should despair with this loss, they are a good team. I am astounded to see the reactions to a few negative comments. Is it worth even responding to irrational comments? A word for all those who mentioned Australia had great pitches and the SC had boring pitches. Last six games played in BD, SL andIND had results. Australia 2 on 2 draws with high scores. Am I missing something?

Posted by Sinhaya on (November 30, 2012, 14:22 GMT)

@maddy20, haha forgot how this NZ side last beat Australia in a test match in Hobart this time last year to level the series 1-1?? Yeah I remember you saying we will get a 3-0 thrashing in South Africa this time last year but we won a test match there indeed much to your frustration. I know Australia is tough but we will do our best and show character. We have time to freshen up. We must improve our batting and we will somehow justify giving us the marquee tests. Aussies are no doubt great and tough and we underestimated them last year in our shores and hope it does not happen this time.

Posted by RAJ18 on (November 30, 2012, 13:56 GMT)

Mahela says he is dissapointed,how helarious,Is this the side that we are taking to down under.Aussies will make mince meat out of us.First drop useless Randiv & Para,get Upul to Partner Dilly,in tests, after all he is the reg opener in ODIs.Kule won't do for Tests in Aus.@ 121Km/h.We will get bouncy true surfaces, and seamers must avg at least 135Km/h.Rev swing plays a huge part.Seamers should be at least for tests,Eranga,Wela,Thisara,spinners Herath,Mendis(if fit) or else, J Mendis, the leggie can be groomed for tests, with his batting add. adv for S.L.Mathews must perform as the V.C, or otherwise should be dropped.Mr.Ashantha, pls don't take any passengers to AUS.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Kanishkaa BalachandranClose
Tour Results
Sri Lanka v New Zealand at Colombo (PSS) - Nov 25-29, 2012
New Zealand won by 167 runs
Sri Lanka v New Zealand at Galle - Nov 17-19, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 10 wickets
Sri Lanka v New Zealand at Hambantota - Nov 12, 2012
No result
Sri Lanka v New Zealand at Hambantota - Nov 10, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets (with 34 balls remaining) (D/L method)
Sri Lanka v New Zealand at Pallekele - Nov 6, 2012
Sri Lanka won by 7 wickets (with 11 balls remaining) (D/L method)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!