Australia A v England XI, Hobart, 2nd day November 18, 2010

Bell dominates Australia A with unbeaten century

  shares 36

England XI 5 for 335 (Bell 121*, Collingwood 74*) lead Australia A 230 by 105 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Ian Bell sounded an ominous Ashes warning for Australia with a dominant century on a rain-affected second day in Hobart. Paul Collingwood and Alastair Cook also looked in promising touch and posted half-centuries against an Australia A attack that included the Test squad member Steven Smith, who took the brunt of Bell's aggression and finished with 0 for 57 from ten overs.

The only slight concerns for England ahead of next Thursday's first Test surround the form of Jonathan Trott and Kevin Pietersen, who are averaging in the low 30s so far on the trip. But Bell quickly focused attention on the positives in the England camp, having come to the crease at a wobbly 5 for 137.

While Ricky Ponting got himself out hooking for 27 in Sydney, where Shane Watson and Simon Katich also struggled on a difficult pitch, Bell was thriving in the cool and damp England-like conditions at Bellerive Oval. He combined with Collingwood (74 not out) for an unbeaten 198-run partnership and finished the day on 121 from 158 balls.

Bell made a conscious decision to attack Smith, an aggressive bowler who likes to give the ball plenty of air, and he advanced to drive Smith over his head for four from his second delivery. That began a string of three consecutive boundaries in Smith's first over, as Bell danced down the pitch and treated the bowler with disdain.

In all, Bell managed eight fours and a six off Smith, including the cover-driven boundary that brought up his hundred off 113 deliveries and made him the third centurion of England's tour. He was also comfortable against the fast men, and a magnificent square-driven boundary off Clint McKay was another highlight.

At the other end, Collingwood did what he does best - compiled unobtrusively. However, he also took his opportunities when the bowlers erred, and he pulled a six onto the hill under the scoreboard when Smith dragged down an attempted flipper, and it took him only 78 deliveries to reach his half-century.

Collingwood and Bell wrested all the momentum from Australia A, after three quick wickets shortly before tea caused a few worries in the England dressing room. For much of the second session England cruised thanks to an 87-run partnership from Cook and Trott, until the departure of Cook, who on 60 unsuccessfully tried to clear mid-on off the left-arm spin of Steve O'Keefe, sparked a mini-collapse from the middle order.

Trott is the only England specialist batsman who has not posted a half-century in any of their warm-up matches, although he looked composed for most of his 41. But he was undone by a bouncer, when he miscued an attempted pull off Mark Cameron and was caught at mid-off, leaving him with a tour average of 30.

Pietersen did manage to pass fifty against Western Australia in the tour opener, but his average of 32.75 is also well below expectations after he inexplicably failed to deal with a straight ball from O'Keefe. Pietersen had been warming up on the boundary while Cook and Trott were still together, keen for some time in the middle, but his innings ended on 5 when he played inside a delivery that straightened just enough.

O'Keefe is not in the Test squad, but it was the sort of dismissal that can't hurt the Test aspirations of his fellow left-armer Xavier Doherty, who is a similar style of bowler. The only breakthrough in the morning session came when the nightwatchman Monty Panesar (13) top-edged a hook off Clint McKay and was taken at fine leg by Cameron.

Only 7.2 overs were bowled before lunch, as the intermittent rain in Hobart proved a nuisance for both teams. Bell ended up a much bigger nuisance for Australia A.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on November 18, 2010, 23:54 GMT

    for everyone doubting australians bowling depth on the basis of the bowlers in this game remember that all these guys are outside the top 5 quicks in the country (johnson, hilfenhaus, bollinger, siddle and harris) and in my opinion behing guys like ben cutting and luke feldman

  • hamir.p on November 18, 2010, 22:58 GMT

    Come on seagrip, you aren't seriously suggesting Andrew McDonald is a better bowler than Hilfenhaus? McDonald is a 2nd or 3rd change bowler. Shane Watson's first class average will the ball is pretty handy too, better than McDonald and Hilfenhaus - next you'll be telling me he's a front line strike bowler too!! LOL

    First class records do not tell the full story. Otherwise Ramprakash and Hick would have been the best English batsmen of their generation, and Trescothick, Vaughan, Collingwood would barely have got a game. Anyone can do a stats search on cricinfo, selectors are there to look past them and make judgements on the potential for quality at the highest level and mental ability.

  • Biggus on November 18, 2010, 22:46 GMT

    @phoenixsteve-England's performances in the lead up matches have been excellent overall. When the tourists first landed I would have said Aus were mild favourites to win. Now I'm not so sure. I've not yet made any particularly bold predictions about the outcome of this series and I'm not about to start now, but Eng has the lead in the morale stakes and may be the first side from there in recent times that while giving the obligatory "Yes I think we can win" stuff to the media, actually believes it, and I wouldn't underestimate that as a factor. I don't think there's a lot of difference between the sides on paper so victory will likely go to the mentally stronger team. Colly has a big role to play here-he's the most under-rated player in the side and if the rest of the team can harness his "They'll never take me alive" attitude they will be hard to beat. Yet 'there's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip', and the chemistry of a test series is a fickle mistress. We ain't dead just yet

  • seagrip on November 18, 2010, 17:06 GMT

    Interesting comparison of a few of australia's likely bowlers (Hilf and Siddle) in first class cricket: Siddle vs Clint McKay, Batting: Clint McKay wins - 4 runs per innings better over career, Bowling: Clint McKay wins - 2.35 runs per wicket better over career. Hilfenahus vs Andrew McDonald, Batting: Andrew McDonald wins - 28 per innings better over career, Bowling: Andrew McDonald wins - 0.05 runs per wicket better over career. You could perform equally alarming comparisons against the likes of Callum Ferguson in the squad ahead of Phil Hughes/Jacques. And Marcus North too!! Get the selectors OUT!

  • phoenixsteve on November 18, 2010, 16:19 GMT

    I have just read through reader comments and everyone seems to be recognising Bells performance ..... and of course Collys. It's a good thing and I note that even Biggus has wound his neck in! The Ashes banter is part of cricket but one thing is for sure..... Australia may be down at the moment - but DO NOT take them for granted! Like an injured animal they could still BITE and nothing would give the Aussie nation more satisfaction! As the proverb says....." ÿou do not poke a sleeping bear" . Hope they stay sleeping 'til February though..... COME ON ENGLAND!

  • Crazy_Cricket_Fan on November 18, 2010, 15:53 GMT

    this is exactly what hpnd in india too..aus bowling attack hasn't been able to create chances for wickets..eng were some 140/5..and no wicket after that??...some serious work required by aus bowling dept..

  • charliecoffee on November 18, 2010, 14:41 GMT

    This will be Ian Bell's "time" and I'd be shocked if he's not one of the top run scorers in the series this time. Many forget that he was in the wilderness not that long ago and he is a completely different player this time around. Once he's in he has that much time and talent that only the very best bowling worries him - did anyone notice how he climbed into Smith each time he came on today? Getting KP out will not be the climax this time around. If Strauss and or Bell get in, neither of them will be happy with 50's or 60's anymore and I just don't see any of the other bowlers creating the type of sustained pressure that McGrath, Clark and Warne did last time around. In 10 days time we'll be 1-0 up with Aussie media calling for wholesale changes - I only regret changing my mind about being there to watch it at the Gabba, as it will be fun!

  • SettingSun on November 18, 2010, 14:34 GMT

    @Stouffer - I would push Bell up the order, but to 5 with Colly dropping to six because I think that Colly bats better with the lower middle order and tail. Of course, it won't happen, but I think it's the only change I would make.

  • landl47 on November 18, 2010, 14:32 GMT

    OK, forget the England-Australia banter (which I thoroughlyl enjoy!). I don't know whether this match is all that significant, since it's not being played in the same conditions or against the same opposition as the tests. I just enjoyed watching Ian Bell bat. That was a truly exhilarating hundred, beautiful strokes all round the wicket. The Australian bowling was pretty good, especially Steve O'Keefe who looks like an excellent all-round cricketer to me. Steve Smith bowled better than his figures show and the fast men all gave great effort (they're Aussies, right?). The fielding was also first-class. It was just Bell's day and anyone who didn't enjoy watching him shouldn't call themselves a cricket fan. BTW, I completely disagree that Bell should come in earlier. At #6 he's able to turn the game around, as he did yesterday. Sobers, the best bat I ever saw, usually batted #6 for West Indies. If it was good enough for him, it's fine for Bell.

  • AlTh on November 18, 2010, 14:08 GMT

    Australia are the victims of their own success...most of the England top order cut their teeth (painfully!) in test cricket against the likes of Warne & McGrath. Is it any surprise that Bell is able to get after Steve Smith given the last leggie he faced on Australian soil?

  • on November 18, 2010, 23:54 GMT

    for everyone doubting australians bowling depth on the basis of the bowlers in this game remember that all these guys are outside the top 5 quicks in the country (johnson, hilfenhaus, bollinger, siddle and harris) and in my opinion behing guys like ben cutting and luke feldman

  • hamir.p on November 18, 2010, 22:58 GMT

    Come on seagrip, you aren't seriously suggesting Andrew McDonald is a better bowler than Hilfenhaus? McDonald is a 2nd or 3rd change bowler. Shane Watson's first class average will the ball is pretty handy too, better than McDonald and Hilfenhaus - next you'll be telling me he's a front line strike bowler too!! LOL

    First class records do not tell the full story. Otherwise Ramprakash and Hick would have been the best English batsmen of their generation, and Trescothick, Vaughan, Collingwood would barely have got a game. Anyone can do a stats search on cricinfo, selectors are there to look past them and make judgements on the potential for quality at the highest level and mental ability.

  • Biggus on November 18, 2010, 22:46 GMT

    @phoenixsteve-England's performances in the lead up matches have been excellent overall. When the tourists first landed I would have said Aus were mild favourites to win. Now I'm not so sure. I've not yet made any particularly bold predictions about the outcome of this series and I'm not about to start now, but Eng has the lead in the morale stakes and may be the first side from there in recent times that while giving the obligatory "Yes I think we can win" stuff to the media, actually believes it, and I wouldn't underestimate that as a factor. I don't think there's a lot of difference between the sides on paper so victory will likely go to the mentally stronger team. Colly has a big role to play here-he's the most under-rated player in the side and if the rest of the team can harness his "They'll never take me alive" attitude they will be hard to beat. Yet 'there's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip', and the chemistry of a test series is a fickle mistress. We ain't dead just yet

  • seagrip on November 18, 2010, 17:06 GMT

    Interesting comparison of a few of australia's likely bowlers (Hilf and Siddle) in first class cricket: Siddle vs Clint McKay, Batting: Clint McKay wins - 4 runs per innings better over career, Bowling: Clint McKay wins - 2.35 runs per wicket better over career. Hilfenahus vs Andrew McDonald, Batting: Andrew McDonald wins - 28 per innings better over career, Bowling: Andrew McDonald wins - 0.05 runs per wicket better over career. You could perform equally alarming comparisons against the likes of Callum Ferguson in the squad ahead of Phil Hughes/Jacques. And Marcus North too!! Get the selectors OUT!

  • phoenixsteve on November 18, 2010, 16:19 GMT

    I have just read through reader comments and everyone seems to be recognising Bells performance ..... and of course Collys. It's a good thing and I note that even Biggus has wound his neck in! The Ashes banter is part of cricket but one thing is for sure..... Australia may be down at the moment - but DO NOT take them for granted! Like an injured animal they could still BITE and nothing would give the Aussie nation more satisfaction! As the proverb says....." ÿou do not poke a sleeping bear" . Hope they stay sleeping 'til February though..... COME ON ENGLAND!

  • Crazy_Cricket_Fan on November 18, 2010, 15:53 GMT

    this is exactly what hpnd in india too..aus bowling attack hasn't been able to create chances for wickets..eng were some 140/5..and no wicket after that??...some serious work required by aus bowling dept..

  • charliecoffee on November 18, 2010, 14:41 GMT

    This will be Ian Bell's "time" and I'd be shocked if he's not one of the top run scorers in the series this time. Many forget that he was in the wilderness not that long ago and he is a completely different player this time around. Once he's in he has that much time and talent that only the very best bowling worries him - did anyone notice how he climbed into Smith each time he came on today? Getting KP out will not be the climax this time around. If Strauss and or Bell get in, neither of them will be happy with 50's or 60's anymore and I just don't see any of the other bowlers creating the type of sustained pressure that McGrath, Clark and Warne did last time around. In 10 days time we'll be 1-0 up with Aussie media calling for wholesale changes - I only regret changing my mind about being there to watch it at the Gabba, as it will be fun!

  • SettingSun on November 18, 2010, 14:34 GMT

    @Stouffer - I would push Bell up the order, but to 5 with Colly dropping to six because I think that Colly bats better with the lower middle order and tail. Of course, it won't happen, but I think it's the only change I would make.

  • landl47 on November 18, 2010, 14:32 GMT

    OK, forget the England-Australia banter (which I thoroughlyl enjoy!). I don't know whether this match is all that significant, since it's not being played in the same conditions or against the same opposition as the tests. I just enjoyed watching Ian Bell bat. That was a truly exhilarating hundred, beautiful strokes all round the wicket. The Australian bowling was pretty good, especially Steve O'Keefe who looks like an excellent all-round cricketer to me. Steve Smith bowled better than his figures show and the fast men all gave great effort (they're Aussies, right?). The fielding was also first-class. It was just Bell's day and anyone who didn't enjoy watching him shouldn't call themselves a cricket fan. BTW, I completely disagree that Bell should come in earlier. At #6 he's able to turn the game around, as he did yesterday. Sobers, the best bat I ever saw, usually batted #6 for West Indies. If it was good enough for him, it's fine for Bell.

  • AlTh on November 18, 2010, 14:08 GMT

    Australia are the victims of their own success...most of the England top order cut their teeth (painfully!) in test cricket against the likes of Warne & McGrath. Is it any surprise that Bell is able to get after Steve Smith given the last leggie he faced on Australian soil?

  • Hall0 on November 18, 2010, 13:58 GMT

    I run sarcasm lessons at my local community centre. Richie89 and 5wombats - do you want me to enrol you onto the beginners course?

  • Herbet on November 18, 2010, 13:26 GMT

    This game has been lovely too see. Not because England are winning, thats a handy bonus, but as a showcase of Australia's alarming lack of strength. If O'Keefe is supposed to be an International class spinner then so am I, he looks like a really bad Paul Harris with an even rounder action. Peter George has an action that makes Steve Harmison look like Michael Holding and this McKay fella is medium pace. Lets not leave out Steve Smith either, he reminds me of a slightly better batting version of Chris Schofield. So many of the Aussies A'rs are incredibly inexperienced as well, and what are batsmen with First Class Average's in the 30's doing representing Australia? Incrediblie. Long gone are the days when players of the class of Brad Hodge and even Mike Hussey had to play out careers in County Cricket. Everbody laughed at England in 06/07 but how many Aussies were worried at the average age of that side? They should have been.

  • Biggus on November 18, 2010, 13:20 GMT

    Well, hi to all the English supporters. There's no way I'm going to get into a slanging match with you as it's not my style. All this talk is cheap. I will be officially worried if we lose the first test. If we win it I hope all you fine fellows will be good enough to drop in again to say hello.

  • 2.14istherunrate on November 18, 2010, 13:13 GMT

    O'Keefe is a joke bowler. Yuvraj is a joke bowler. If KP had been getting out to Vettori or Benn it might be believable. It's a case of an elephant being traumatised by an ant. The method of playing out in front of his pad,as he evolved against Warne-whose boots O'Keefe really is niot fit to lick- does not works against the spinless phantoms. He needs to play orthodoxly-ie bat and pad close together- against these jokers as insurance against the occasional turner, which undid him this time.

  • Stouffer on November 18, 2010, 12:40 GMT

    Surely with the form that he's showing at the moment, Bell has to come in at 4 and KP at 5 (assuming that the management keep faith with him). Bell at 6 could be wasted when he seems to be in great form.

  • WilliamFranklin on November 18, 2010, 12:37 GMT

    Where have all the aussies on cricinfo gone?!

    You have to say Australia's build-up has not gone well. Their best 'spinner' really is Marcus North.

  • dogbear on November 18, 2010, 12:30 GMT

    @souwesterly....."I simply can't understand why the England team are playing in Hobart" I'd assume the fixtures are organised by Cricket Australia, and given that you can see why they'd send England there. More like Manchester than Brisbane, and subsequently (they would hope) no acclimatisation. I reckon that is one of the most compelling reasons for ENG to send the bowlers to Brisbane early, so match drawn there I'd say.

  • tomphillips on November 18, 2010, 12:23 GMT

    CricketingStargazer was clearly being sarcastic no need for everyone to get their knickers in a twist over his comment

  • chad_reid on November 18, 2010, 12:04 GMT

    good to see smith getting hammered always overrated this performance shows how overrated his bowling is and is not ready to play test cricket yet as for steve okeefe he shud be in the ashes squad he is a better all rounder than him and plus he can bowl i just hope hauritz gets dropped soon before aus realize their chances of regaining the ashes are gone still though eng are favorites

  • SettingSun on November 18, 2010, 11:56 GMT

    @5wombats - oh dear, went straight over your head, didn't it?

  • allblue on November 18, 2010, 11:48 GMT

    @Stargazer: I think it is traditional on internet forums to add the [sarcasm] tags [/sarcasm] because there is a whole wide humourless world out there who may not get it, however unsubtle it might be! Oh dear! From an England perspective this tour so far is like a blissful drifty Sunday morning dream - surely we are going to wake up soon! Preparation could hardly have gone better, with everyone, even the second string attack, all performing. Meanwhile the Aussie batsmen are all struggling, bar Johnson it seems, but then this has been the Year of the Number Eight in Test cricket! It does seem strange to be playing this game in Hobart, but apparently we can expect non-traditional Aussie wickets on the east of the country this tour, so a final practise on a surface with a bit of nip has actually worked out well. Oh well, seven days, still plenty of time to wake up...

  • dawsonmox on November 18, 2010, 11:43 GMT

    Just wondering if Cameron White is basically ordered by Cricket Australia to bowl Steve Smith. Fanatsic cricket by O'Keefe against KP. McKay, nice tight bowling. I really hope White bowls and gets wickets and then in second innings makes a big score. BARMY ARMY!!!!

  • on November 18, 2010, 11:39 GMT

    Collingwood and Bell ,the two englsih players have always been underrated yet extremely dangerous .they possess fantastic technique and their runnng between the wickets is even better .when they are on song there is nobody to stop either of them .i still remember the first finals of the CB series 2007 in Melbourne where these two forged a match winning partnership when England were reeling at one stage perhaps 15 for 3 .KP is a dangerous player by any stretch of imagination but boy watch out for these two in the forthcoming ashes series .Cheers England

  • CricketingStargazer on November 18, 2010, 11:25 GMT

    Oh dear!!! Irony detectors are not working today! Sorry guys. Has no one read the comments from Australian fans over the last few days???

  • phoenixsteve on November 18, 2010, 11:21 GMT

    Congratulations to Ian Bell and all his supporters! What a great start? Of course it's not the main event yet BUT we have heard from Aussie supporters that WA, SA and now probbably Aus A are rubbish...... Soon we'll be hearing how great NZ are - when they run out of Australia! My dad always used to tell me that the Aussies are terrible losers...... so maybe this series will give them a chance to hone thier skills? So far the Aussies look ripe for the picking.... COME ON ENGLAND!

  • SettingSun on November 18, 2010, 10:50 GMT

    Wow, how average are Australia's back up bowlers? McKay is completely innocuous, George's bowling action is all over the place, and Cameron is nowhere near as quick as made out. As for Steven Smith, he's nowhere near a test standard bowler yet. Fallow times in Aus!

  • JosRoberts on November 18, 2010, 10:34 GMT

    Careful Stargazer, sarcasm may not go down to well. Still, it's nice to see the Aussie A team Sherminated.

  • 5wombats on November 18, 2010, 10:11 GMT

    @CricketingStargazer - what game are you watching? What planet are you on? If anyone is creaming century after century around the country it's the Englnad Batsmen in Perth, Adelaide and Hobart. Read the scoreboard mate.

  • Richie89 on November 18, 2010, 9:41 GMT

    Shambolic batting. ? we're over 1 hundred runs ahead with 5 wickets remaining , on what was a spicey wicket that the majority of batsman have struggled on,and quite a number of the oppo are pushing for tests places (not such a weak oppo) what about that is shambolic? Clearly haven't a clue what your talking about keep your pesemistic views to yourself in future . . . Come on England!!!

    p.s what name the aussies that have hit century after century because i think you mite be mistaken there aswell x

  • nzcricket174 on November 18, 2010, 9:39 GMT

    Pieterson & Collingwood will be targets in the middle order. Pieterson for his lack of form and Collingwood because of..well his technique more than anything. Remember, Collingwood was never meant to be a test batsmen.

  • on November 18, 2010, 9:15 GMT

    I hope you are being ironic CricketingStargazer; otherwise I want some of what you are on.

    This tour is very strange. As England fans we are used to all sorts of nasty surprises when our beloved team tours Australia, but this time even the weather is in England's favour as the rain is making Australian wickets play like Old Trafford.

  • WilliamFranklin on November 18, 2010, 9:09 GMT

    Some great stuff from after yesterday's play "lets see how England do on this wicket' etc. There's your answer.

  • souwesterly on November 18, 2010, 9:02 GMT

    I simply can't understand why the England team are playing in Hobart - when their next match is in Brisbane. Hobart is like Manchester on a bad day - Brisbane will be 20C hotter and the wicket will be baked hard. So how can this match be a good warm-up for the First Test unless it's aimed at "making life easy" for the players before they have to face the harsh reality of a proper Aussie wicket. Much as I try to support the English team, I'll have my disguise ready next week to cover my blushes as disarray takes over.

  • RAVI_BOPARA on November 18, 2010, 8:47 GMT

    OH DEAR GUYS ENGLAND GOING TO WIN THE ASHES 5-0 AND IT WILL BE GREAT!!!

  • Chris_Howard on November 18, 2010, 8:30 GMT

    Why isn't O'Keefe in the Aussie squad?? Runs and wickets. Which is what he always does.

  • CricketingStargazer on November 18, 2010, 8:22 GMT

    Another shambolic England batting effort against weak opposition while the likely Australian Test XI creams century after century around the country. Is it worth us turning up at Brisbane?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • CricketingStargazer on November 18, 2010, 8:22 GMT

    Another shambolic England batting effort against weak opposition while the likely Australian Test XI creams century after century around the country. Is it worth us turning up at Brisbane?

  • Chris_Howard on November 18, 2010, 8:30 GMT

    Why isn't O'Keefe in the Aussie squad?? Runs and wickets. Which is what he always does.

  • RAVI_BOPARA on November 18, 2010, 8:47 GMT

    OH DEAR GUYS ENGLAND GOING TO WIN THE ASHES 5-0 AND IT WILL BE GREAT!!!

  • souwesterly on November 18, 2010, 9:02 GMT

    I simply can't understand why the England team are playing in Hobart - when their next match is in Brisbane. Hobart is like Manchester on a bad day - Brisbane will be 20C hotter and the wicket will be baked hard. So how can this match be a good warm-up for the First Test unless it's aimed at "making life easy" for the players before they have to face the harsh reality of a proper Aussie wicket. Much as I try to support the English team, I'll have my disguise ready next week to cover my blushes as disarray takes over.

  • WilliamFranklin on November 18, 2010, 9:09 GMT

    Some great stuff from after yesterday's play "lets see how England do on this wicket' etc. There's your answer.

  • on November 18, 2010, 9:15 GMT

    I hope you are being ironic CricketingStargazer; otherwise I want some of what you are on.

    This tour is very strange. As England fans we are used to all sorts of nasty surprises when our beloved team tours Australia, but this time even the weather is in England's favour as the rain is making Australian wickets play like Old Trafford.

  • nzcricket174 on November 18, 2010, 9:39 GMT

    Pieterson & Collingwood will be targets in the middle order. Pieterson for his lack of form and Collingwood because of..well his technique more than anything. Remember, Collingwood was never meant to be a test batsmen.

  • Richie89 on November 18, 2010, 9:41 GMT

    Shambolic batting. ? we're over 1 hundred runs ahead with 5 wickets remaining , on what was a spicey wicket that the majority of batsman have struggled on,and quite a number of the oppo are pushing for tests places (not such a weak oppo) what about that is shambolic? Clearly haven't a clue what your talking about keep your pesemistic views to yourself in future . . . Come on England!!!

    p.s what name the aussies that have hit century after century because i think you mite be mistaken there aswell x

  • 5wombats on November 18, 2010, 10:11 GMT

    @CricketingStargazer - what game are you watching? What planet are you on? If anyone is creaming century after century around the country it's the Englnad Batsmen in Perth, Adelaide and Hobart. Read the scoreboard mate.

  • JosRoberts on November 18, 2010, 10:34 GMT

    Careful Stargazer, sarcasm may not go down to well. Still, it's nice to see the Aussie A team Sherminated.