The Ashes 2010-11 December 11, 2010

Collingwood shines on dreary day

17

Victoria 2 for 216 dec and 6 for 278 (Carters 68, McKay 58*, Collingwood 3-19) lead England XI 2 for 184 dec (Strauss 66, Bell 60*) by 310 runs
Scorecard

Paul Collingwood enlivened an insufferably dull day of cricket with three wickets in five overs, before Andrew Strauss scalped the first-innings centurion, Michael Hill, for 4 with his rarely seen left-arm chinaman bowling, as England's pace bowlers aborted their attempts to impress the selectors ahead of the Perth Test, and left Monty Panesar and the declaration bowlers to get through their day's work on a dreadfully slow pitch.

By the close, Victoria had reached 2 for 278 in their second innings, a lead of 310 following England's lunchtime declaration on 2 for 184. With Chris Tremlett, Ajmal Shahzad and Tim Bresnan thwarted by the conditions, the only wicket to fall in the afternoon session was Aaron Finch, who set Victoria's tempo with 45 from 74 balls, before miscuing a lofted drive at Panesar and holing out to mid-off.

Thereafter, England were held up by a pair of debutants, the 20-year-old Ryan Carters, who made 68, and the 18-year-old Alex Keath, who turned his back on an AFL contract with Gold Coast to concentrate on a career in cricket. He started uncertainly as Bresnan and Shahzad probed his defences with a hint of reverse swing, but grew in confidence as the afternoon wore on and the sting went out of England's efforts.

It was left to Collingwood's offcutters to make England's long-awaited breakthrough, as Carters stepped across his stumps to be bowled behind his legs, and two overs later he added a second courtesy of a smart one-handed catch by Alastair Cook at silly mid-off, as Matthew Wade drove airily back down the ground. Cook had been off the field apparently nursing a sore back, but his mobility seemed not in the slightest bit impaired.

Panesar, who had bowled tidily but without assistance from the pitch, then added a second as John Hastings swung across the line and top-edged a sweep to Collingwood, running round from slip, who then denied Keath a fifty on debut with a slow, ballooning bouncer that was scuffed through to the keeper. The session then degenerated into farce with the introduction of Strauss and Eoin Morgan, who has yet to bat on this tour, but has now bowled three overs for 37.

The highlight of England's day, however, was Strauss's third first-class victim, as Hill was adjudged lbw, a touch unluckily it appeared, to a back-of-the-hand delivery that appeared to pitch outside the line of leg stump. Either way, he joined elite company, with Kevin Pietersen and Stephen Fleming the only two other batsmen to succumb to his assortment of long-hops. It was left to Jayde Herrick and Clint McKay to climb into the offerings, with Strauss conceding 51 runs in four overs, and McKay posting 58 not out, his highest first-class score.

"We want to make a competitive game tomorrow, so in order for that to happen we had to allow Victoria to get enough runs to make it competitive tomorrow," explained Ian Bell at the close of play. "That was really the idea behind it."

In the morning session, England's batsmen continued where they had left off in the Brisbane and Adelaide Tests, with Strauss making a boundary-laden 66, and Bell unbeaten at lunch on 60, his fifth consecutive fifty-plus score of the tour.

Strauss, who resumed on 17 not out, offered a chance on 40 when he snicked Herrick to Cameron White at first slip, who shelled a regulation catch, but was otherwise watertight as he brought up his fifty from 79 balls with a sweep off the left-arm spinner Jon Holland. It was Holland who ended his stay via a chip to midwicket.

By that stage, however, Bell was fully into his stride, and he posted his fifty with a sweetly timed cover drive off Hastings. Collingwood, whose opportunities on the tour to date have been limited, cracked Holland for a big six into the Members' stand to go to the interval on 29 not out, as England moved to within 32 runs of Victoria's first-innings 2 for 216 before declaring.

Despite the unhelpful nature of the wicket, Bell reckoned that England would be more than content with the work-out that their bowlers had got, especially with the prospect of a livelier surface at the WACA next week.

"It's always nice to get a couple of wickets, but I think it's been a hard wicket for the bowlers," said Bell. "Let's be fair, it's so slow out there, but they've toiled away and it's reverse swung, which is good to see because those sorts of skills which might come in at some point at the WACA.

"They've worked hard, and to be honest with you, it's great going into Perth that all three of them had a good work-out in batting friendly conditions. It's much better that than a green seamer where they've all taken five-for and bowled a couple of good balls but a couple of bad balls as well. They've generally gone at two an over all game and that's exactly what we want going into a Test match."

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Dax75 on December 12, 2010, 1:44 GMT

    @ tjsimonsen Ok no dramas. I doubt KP would have batted anyway, Collingwood needed the hitout more, Trott may have. As it stands England are 4-78 at the ground now, With Cook, Davies, Collingwood and Morgan all out.

  • Puffin on December 12, 2010, 1:26 GMT

    Kind of amusing to see Collingwood outdoing the contenders for no 2 England opening bowler. It's clear how much depends on Anderson and Swann, and erm, Strauss and Collingwood (huh?)

  • Morgasm on December 11, 2010, 17:47 GMT

    At the end of the day Marcio, England are 1-0 up and Australia need to take 20 wickets twice (bear in mind that they've only managed 16 in the first two matches). I really hope the Australians discover how to accept defeat gracefully after this series.

  • tjsimonsen on December 11, 2010, 17:28 GMT

    @Dax75. That is exactly what I meant! Trott and Pietersen were rested, and the batting still looked pretty composed. Sure there was a minor blip from Cook, but given his performances in the series so far, who can blame him if he doesn't take this match quite a seriously?

  • Trickstar on December 11, 2010, 17:18 GMT

    @Marcio What are you whining about, those so called roads, that England batted on they still managed to get 20 wickets, so they weren't that much of roads were they.If you'd of actually followed the game, instead of just coming here, you'd know it was drop in pitch,which are the worst pitches to play on if your a bowler and the victoria side have been saying the same, that the pitch was actually flatter than any seen on the first 2 tests.England can only play who have been put in front of them and by the sound of it, somebody else likes telling a bit of spin, don't you?

  • Dax75 on December 11, 2010, 16:59 GMT

    @ tjsimonsen, what do you mean 2 of the top batsmen missing? KP and Trott? The batting did ok today as the 4 people who batted were Cook, Strauss, Collingwood and Bell. All 4 doing well in the last test, well Strauss aside.I dont understand why you would mention that? Obviously Morgan is going to not get a game, Would have been good to see him get a hit today, he was padded up before the declaration at lunch. I was at the game and thought it was a pretty good days cricket, Obviously the author thought otherwise.

  • lucy82 on December 11, 2010, 14:15 GMT

    jonesy2 maybe England should play all their reserves in the next test to make it more fair on Australia then huh?

  • allblue on December 11, 2010, 13:30 GMT

    One of the big benefits of the County Championship moving from three to four day cricket has been the near extinction of 'declaration bowling', an abomination in my view. So it is a shame that it has reared its ugly head here, was the curator under instructions to produce a wicket as unlike the WACA as possible for this match? All we've learned is that the batsmen are in good nick (which we knew already) and that Prior needs gloves to catch, which is neither here nor there. As for the bowling, I suspect that Flower knew who would play at Perth as soon as the medics told him about Broad's injury, so the chance for Morgan and Davies to have a bat second dig is about the only worthwhile thing to come from a pretty pointless exercise.

  • Marcio on December 11, 2010, 13:09 GMT

    Knew this was written by a Pom after the 1st para. Talk about "spin". Two innings where England's two terrifying possible test replacements for Broad could manage just one wicket between them, causing no problems for guys making their debuts, and we are supposed to think this wasn't really serious. Oh, and the pitch was flat, unlike the carpark pitches that England batted on recently, where Australia's bowlers were the real problem. But of course, "England's batsmen continued where they left of from Adelaide". Spin it again Sam, spin it just like you spun it before." Eng. better hope Anderson makes it back from the UK on time, that's all I can say.

  • meswaine on December 11, 2010, 11:26 GMT

    @dpkirkup - it's to ensure a result of some sort as it's only 3 days old (no idea why). It would be pointless for both teams if they only batted once each and drew the game. Comedy effort from Strauss and Morgan - can't believe the former got a wicket too, marvellous. Good practice for England to chase down a total. England are struggling no more than Victoria - only 4 wickets taken in both first innings, clearly not for bowling on.

  • Dax75 on December 12, 2010, 1:44 GMT

    @ tjsimonsen Ok no dramas. I doubt KP would have batted anyway, Collingwood needed the hitout more, Trott may have. As it stands England are 4-78 at the ground now, With Cook, Davies, Collingwood and Morgan all out.

  • Puffin on December 12, 2010, 1:26 GMT

    Kind of amusing to see Collingwood outdoing the contenders for no 2 England opening bowler. It's clear how much depends on Anderson and Swann, and erm, Strauss and Collingwood (huh?)

  • Morgasm on December 11, 2010, 17:47 GMT

    At the end of the day Marcio, England are 1-0 up and Australia need to take 20 wickets twice (bear in mind that they've only managed 16 in the first two matches). I really hope the Australians discover how to accept defeat gracefully after this series.

  • tjsimonsen on December 11, 2010, 17:28 GMT

    @Dax75. That is exactly what I meant! Trott and Pietersen were rested, and the batting still looked pretty composed. Sure there was a minor blip from Cook, but given his performances in the series so far, who can blame him if he doesn't take this match quite a seriously?

  • Trickstar on December 11, 2010, 17:18 GMT

    @Marcio What are you whining about, those so called roads, that England batted on they still managed to get 20 wickets, so they weren't that much of roads were they.If you'd of actually followed the game, instead of just coming here, you'd know it was drop in pitch,which are the worst pitches to play on if your a bowler and the victoria side have been saying the same, that the pitch was actually flatter than any seen on the first 2 tests.England can only play who have been put in front of them and by the sound of it, somebody else likes telling a bit of spin, don't you?

  • Dax75 on December 11, 2010, 16:59 GMT

    @ tjsimonsen, what do you mean 2 of the top batsmen missing? KP and Trott? The batting did ok today as the 4 people who batted were Cook, Strauss, Collingwood and Bell. All 4 doing well in the last test, well Strauss aside.I dont understand why you would mention that? Obviously Morgan is going to not get a game, Would have been good to see him get a hit today, he was padded up before the declaration at lunch. I was at the game and thought it was a pretty good days cricket, Obviously the author thought otherwise.

  • lucy82 on December 11, 2010, 14:15 GMT

    jonesy2 maybe England should play all their reserves in the next test to make it more fair on Australia then huh?

  • allblue on December 11, 2010, 13:30 GMT

    One of the big benefits of the County Championship moving from three to four day cricket has been the near extinction of 'declaration bowling', an abomination in my view. So it is a shame that it has reared its ugly head here, was the curator under instructions to produce a wicket as unlike the WACA as possible for this match? All we've learned is that the batsmen are in good nick (which we knew already) and that Prior needs gloves to catch, which is neither here nor there. As for the bowling, I suspect that Flower knew who would play at Perth as soon as the medics told him about Broad's injury, so the chance for Morgan and Davies to have a bat second dig is about the only worthwhile thing to come from a pretty pointless exercise.

  • Marcio on December 11, 2010, 13:09 GMT

    Knew this was written by a Pom after the 1st para. Talk about "spin". Two innings where England's two terrifying possible test replacements for Broad could manage just one wicket between them, causing no problems for guys making their debuts, and we are supposed to think this wasn't really serious. Oh, and the pitch was flat, unlike the carpark pitches that England batted on recently, where Australia's bowlers were the real problem. But of course, "England's batsmen continued where they left of from Adelaide". Spin it again Sam, spin it just like you spun it before." Eng. better hope Anderson makes it back from the UK on time, that's all I can say.

  • meswaine on December 11, 2010, 11:26 GMT

    @dpkirkup - it's to ensure a result of some sort as it's only 3 days old (no idea why). It would be pointless for both teams if they only batted once each and drew the game. Comedy effort from Strauss and Morgan - can't believe the former got a wicket too, marvellous. Good practice for England to chase down a total. England are struggling no more than Victoria - only 4 wickets taken in both first innings, clearly not for bowling on.

  • Truemans_Ghost on December 11, 2010, 10:51 GMT

    Something witty, I could have sworn you said last week that England only had one decent bowler so they are showing improvement. That was enough to get 20 wickets on a flat track so I assume you think England should be optomistic.

  • chunk1324 on December 11, 2010, 10:44 GMT

    jonesy you gotta be living in some kind dream world surely? time to wake up AUSTRALIA ARNT VERY GOOD get used to it

  • tjsimonsen on December 11, 2010, 10:10 GMT

    @jonesy2: I think struggling is a pretty hard word in these circumstances. Yes, the insipid performance of the 2nd string bowling attack will be a case for concern. But the batting seems to be doing pretty well (without two of the leading batsmen one might add). And after all, it's not the Poms who will have to take 20 wickets twice it take the Ashes.

  • bumsonseats on December 11, 2010, 9:46 GMT

    i find this a very strange match. win the toss declare 216 for 2 (why).england bat and score 184 for 2 declared (why). the victoria bat again and what i suppose is there best batters dont bat. the english captain who iv never heard bowl and morgan also (why) so that you can have a run chase ?. england could lose a run chase before the 3rd test england loose aussies are now world beaters again. england win so what. in a match that was to give the none players a game. as i said a very strange game. dpk

  • nzcricket174 on December 11, 2010, 9:34 GMT

    Michael Hill and Australia should hope that he turns out anything like Stephen Fleming or KP.

  • jonesy2 on December 11, 2010, 8:09 GMT

    hahaha the world makes sense again, england struggling

  • Something_Witty on December 11, 2010, 7:53 GMT

    Hope the pitch is livelier than this for the test match. Although having only two half-decent bowlers probably doesn't help England very much.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Something_Witty on December 11, 2010, 7:53 GMT

    Hope the pitch is livelier than this for the test match. Although having only two half-decent bowlers probably doesn't help England very much.

  • jonesy2 on December 11, 2010, 8:09 GMT

    hahaha the world makes sense again, england struggling

  • nzcricket174 on December 11, 2010, 9:34 GMT

    Michael Hill and Australia should hope that he turns out anything like Stephen Fleming or KP.

  • bumsonseats on December 11, 2010, 9:46 GMT

    i find this a very strange match. win the toss declare 216 for 2 (why).england bat and score 184 for 2 declared (why). the victoria bat again and what i suppose is there best batters dont bat. the english captain who iv never heard bowl and morgan also (why) so that you can have a run chase ?. england could lose a run chase before the 3rd test england loose aussies are now world beaters again. england win so what. in a match that was to give the none players a game. as i said a very strange game. dpk

  • tjsimonsen on December 11, 2010, 10:10 GMT

    @jonesy2: I think struggling is a pretty hard word in these circumstances. Yes, the insipid performance of the 2nd string bowling attack will be a case for concern. But the batting seems to be doing pretty well (without two of the leading batsmen one might add). And after all, it's not the Poms who will have to take 20 wickets twice it take the Ashes.

  • chunk1324 on December 11, 2010, 10:44 GMT

    jonesy you gotta be living in some kind dream world surely? time to wake up AUSTRALIA ARNT VERY GOOD get used to it

  • Truemans_Ghost on December 11, 2010, 10:51 GMT

    Something witty, I could have sworn you said last week that England only had one decent bowler so they are showing improvement. That was enough to get 20 wickets on a flat track so I assume you think England should be optomistic.

  • meswaine on December 11, 2010, 11:26 GMT

    @dpkirkup - it's to ensure a result of some sort as it's only 3 days old (no idea why). It would be pointless for both teams if they only batted once each and drew the game. Comedy effort from Strauss and Morgan - can't believe the former got a wicket too, marvellous. Good practice for England to chase down a total. England are struggling no more than Victoria - only 4 wickets taken in both first innings, clearly not for bowling on.

  • Marcio on December 11, 2010, 13:09 GMT

    Knew this was written by a Pom after the 1st para. Talk about "spin". Two innings where England's two terrifying possible test replacements for Broad could manage just one wicket between them, causing no problems for guys making their debuts, and we are supposed to think this wasn't really serious. Oh, and the pitch was flat, unlike the carpark pitches that England batted on recently, where Australia's bowlers were the real problem. But of course, "England's batsmen continued where they left of from Adelaide". Spin it again Sam, spin it just like you spun it before." Eng. better hope Anderson makes it back from the UK on time, that's all I can say.

  • allblue on December 11, 2010, 13:30 GMT

    One of the big benefits of the County Championship moving from three to four day cricket has been the near extinction of 'declaration bowling', an abomination in my view. So it is a shame that it has reared its ugly head here, was the curator under instructions to produce a wicket as unlike the WACA as possible for this match? All we've learned is that the batsmen are in good nick (which we knew already) and that Prior needs gloves to catch, which is neither here nor there. As for the bowling, I suspect that Flower knew who would play at Perth as soon as the medics told him about Broad's injury, so the chance for Morgan and Davies to have a bat second dig is about the only worthwhile thing to come from a pretty pointless exercise.