Australia v England, 4th Test, Melbourne, 2nd day December 27, 2013

England bloody Australia at last


Australia 9 for 164 (Rogers 61, Broad 3-30) trail England 255 (Pietersen 71, Johnson 5-63) by 91 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Jarrod Kimber's Ashes Report: England's Best Day

Belatedly, England drew Australian blood at the MCG. The claret was literal in the case of Chris Rogers, stunned by a blow to the side of the helmet from Stuart Broad, and figurative for all Australia's batsmen, who demonstrated familiar frailty as they batted second for the first time in the four Tests and lurched to 9 for 164, still 91 behind, at the close.

The tourists' success in cornering Australia intrigued a crowd of 78, 346, who were earlier thrilled by another burst of terrifying pace from Mitchell Johnson. His incisions have usually been followed by staunch batting, but on the sort of hard-fought day not glimpsed since the very first day of the series in Brisbane, Australia faltered in a manner to warm the hearts of the South Africa team due to host them in February and March, while also leaving the selectors with a few inconvenient worries that cannot be obscured by the glow of Ashes success.

Rogers was a lonely beacon of defiance for much of the day, his 61 occupying 222 minutes and absorbing the aforementioned blow to the head. The early wickets of David Warner and Shane Watson, each man out trying to force the pace, had a constricting effect on Australia, and it was not until Brad Haddin intervened with his familiar mix of bold strokes and good fortune that runs flowed with any sort of freedom.

Wickets did too, however, as James Anderson and Broad enjoyed a new flowering of their prolific pace-bowling partnership, taking advantage of a slow pitch that offered up tricky variations in pace and bounce and rendered driving particularly risky.

Warner had fallen to a presumptuous pull shot at Anderson and Watson edged an attempted drive off Ben Stokes to leave the hosts in wobbly territory. Runs were hard to come by while the odd ball did not bounce as expected. One such delivery from Broad clattered into the side of Rogers' helmet after not rising above his evasive action, causing a delay as the shaken batsman's cut face was treated by medical staff.

Soon afterwards, Michael Clarke shouldered arms to Anderson and had his off stump knocked back. Steven Smith resisted for a time before skewering a slips catch held well at an awkward height by Ian Bell and Rogers' rearguard was ended when he finally lost patience and spooned a lofted drive attempt into the ring field on the off side.

Even in a summer where he has made a lot of his own luck, Haddin was fortunate to escape an lbw verdict when his speculative referral of a Monty Panesar shout had the ball sliding past leg stump by a millimetre, according to Hawkeye.

George Bailey continued a series that veers from the handy to the indifferent, given out on DRS review for what Real-Time Snicko suggested to be a thin edge. Johnson was dropped by Anderson at cover then held by him at midwicket, before Ryan Harris and Peter Siddle were each caught in front of the wicket as the shadows grew long. Haddin will require a spectacular batting shift from the No. 11, Nathan Lyon, to get Australia close.

Such thoughts had seemed outlandish in the morning while Johnson tormented England's lower order in what has become a familiar and grisly ritual to round them up for another mediocre first-innings total. Starting off with two wickets in his first over, including that of a panicked Kevin Pietersen, Johnson then crashed through Broad for figures of 5 for 63, all those wickets taken at a cost of 18 runs in nine overs after Clarke handed him the second new ball with England a relatively well-placed 4 for 201 late on Boxing Day.

Pietersen had slapped the first ball of the morning from Harris to the boundary over point, suggesting entertainment was in the offing. Johnson had other ideas however, and his first delivery lifted sharply on a hapless Tim Bresnan, looping off the shoulder of a bat raised in self preservation and being well held by Bailey running back from square leg.

After Broad took a leg bye, Johnson went after Pietersen, who seemed intent on destruction one way or another. A short ball had him pulling out of a swing to leg at the last minute, before a fuller, faster delivery, perhaps with a hint of inswing, rushed through Pietersen's brazen attempt to mow over midwicket. Two wickets in the over had the MCG in morning tumult.

Broad took two boundaries from Harris' next over, a flirty outside edge and a more assured glide through the covers, before the same bowler dropped a difficult return chance from a leading edge, having made excellent ground to reach it. Johnson then intervened once more, pinning Broad lbw with a yorker that struck the same foot he had badly bruised with another lbw verdict in Perth. Broad's consideration of a review brought mirth but little else.

Anderson and Monty Panesar then held up the Australians briefly, the latter's determination putting some of his better batting counterparts to some shame. He was struck an eye-watering blow to the groin by Siddle before being bowled by Lyon when offering no shot. Australia had wrapped up the innings in less than an hour, but their batsmen would not find the going to be anywhere near as easy.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • dummy4fb on December 28, 2013, 19:55 GMT

    These comments are yesterday's news. As one commenter said where was the intensity when Australia was nine wickets down? England doesn't deserve to win a single match because they've played passive cricket from Day 1 of the whole Ashes series. Cook has captained the side poorly being more about containment rather than chasing wickets. I can understand that when the top order is batting, but when you get down to 6-for why doesn't he put the pressure on them to make mistakes and be heading back to the pavilion. It's ludicrous, it's schoolboy stuff, and that's why England is in the position it's in. One final point: Mitchell Johnson has been the difference and should get man of the series.

  • dummy4fb on December 28, 2013, 0:22 GMT

    Unless England scores more than 350, they will lose this match, hence 5-0.

  • nlpdave on December 27, 2013, 23:55 GMT

    Broad back to medium pace, why? Where is the intensity and intent, no third slip until Lyon nicks one through there. The lead slowly being given away. England again playing in first gear.

  • espncricinfomobile on December 27, 2013, 23:47 GMT

    Eng will be won dis game0

  • thiruven on December 27, 2013, 22:31 GMT

    Chris Rogers and George Bailey are letting the batting line up down. Occupying the crease without rotating strike has led OZ to a poor run-rate. The days for both Rogers and Bailey are over especially they have limited strokes to play this game. Bailey will fit into one day squad. White, Lynn, Phil Hughes are ready and good replacements.

  • Chris_P on December 27, 2013, 22:17 GMT

    @ScottStevo . Agree with you there re: @jmcilhinney response. All of a sudden the smugness returns. Wonder how the scores would have looked had NCN taken that catch. I have said it before though, I never really felt England was as bad as many made out, let's not forget this side beat India in their own backyard & did it with real grit. I also think we aren't quite where may people have us, IMHO, we still got plenty of boxes to be ticked, thankfully, pace bowling depth isn't one of them, nor wicket-keepers & if they use SOK as the next man after Lyon, spin is bowling stocks too.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge-Needs-A-Hug on December 27, 2013, 22:14 GMT

    It makes me want to wrap you in cotton wool, you people who continue to think batsman 'bailing' out their team is some kind of miracle. It's their job to make runs so it's no surprise when they do. At least not to me. Australia bat deep so it could be a long first session tomorrow for England, and for you miracle lovers.

  • anton1234 on December 27, 2013, 22:07 GMT

    Does anyone know the overall record of tests won by by teams batting last. I hope it's pretty high, because I don't want a scenario where a team essentially gains a big advantage batting first, and therefore the toss becomes really crucial. For example, in the current test in Durban, SA have nullified the toss and should now go on to post 500.

    I still wouldn't rule Australia out in this match. If they can get to within 50 of England and then bowl them out for 200 odd, a target of 250-270 is gettable.

  • dummy4fb on December 27, 2013, 22:00 GMT

    A decent day for England, certainly their best of the series, but, again, following a poor start. I thought they were going to be about 100 short of a decent total, but Haddin is still in, and he's proved to be one of the bigger obstacles to remove. England will still need a reasonable effort to take the game away from Australia.

  • Shaggy076 on December 27, 2013, 21:54 GMT

    Tim Jervos when you win one-day of cricket out of 16 the other 15 days would be the norm. It's simple mathematics.

  • No featured comments at the moment.