England v Australia, 4th Investec Ashes Test, Durham, 1st day

Lyon leads strong Australia display

The Report by Daniel Brettig

August 9, 2013

Comments: 196 | Text size: A | A

England 238 for 9 (Cook 51, Lyon 4-42) v Australia
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details


Nathan Lyon dented England's middle order, England v Australia, 4th Investec Ashes Test, Chester-le-Street, 1st day, August 9, 2013
Nathan Lyon removed England's Nos. 3 to 6 © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

As he wheeled away through 38 quite exemplary overs at Old Trafford for the reward of one wicket and the loss of the Ashes, Nathan Lyon must have wondered when fortune would deign to smile on him and Australia. The answer was not long in coming at Chester-le-Street, on a day when Lyon's remarkably incisive contribution was central to England's sharp decline from 149 for 2 to 238 for 9.

Alastair Cook's men may have the urn in their keeping but any sense of superiority is steadily eroding. They were guilty of profligacy at some times and paralysis at others, never finding the right gear for a pitch that was slow and nibbly but far from treacherous. Ian Bell in particular will curse his maddening choice of shot in the first over after tea, while Australia's seamers ensured the blows applied to English confidence in Manchester were followed up in Durham.

Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle and Shane Watson all contributed at various times, and Jackson Bird had a notable first day in Ashes matches, nagging away and capturing the prized wicket of Cook after England's captain had set himself for the kind of stony occupation he trademarked in Australia in 2010-11. But the major plaudits were reserved for Lyon, who won a significant battle with Kevin Pietersen and troubled every batsman with his flight, drop and changes of pace from around the wicket. His omission from the first two Tests of the series increasingly appears an error as grievous as that committed by Bell four balls into the evening session.

The early overs had lacked a certain energy, as Harris fought to relocate the rhythm and swing of Old Trafford, while Bird settled into a line and length that encouraged defensive dead bats but did not coax any edges into the Australian slips cordon. There was the merest hint of seam movement but the surface was otherwise slow, as was the outfield. Cook and Joe Root battled to find their timing, England's captain leaving plenty outside off stump while also coping with the full length Australia have forced him to deal with throughout the series.

Clarke again resorted to Watson before Peter Siddle, hoping for some new-ball movement, and after a somewhat wayward start it was the newly demoted allrounder - expected to bat at No. 6 in this match - who struck. Root was somewhat tardy getting forward to a ball sliding away from him, and the sound of the nick was clear to all except the umpire Tony Hill, who was soon crossing himself and raising his finger after Clarke's referral showed up a noise, a deflection and even a Hot Spot.

The wicket brought Trott to the crease, and he immediately showed signs of improved fluency after a poor third Test. His one boundary before the interval was an edge through the slips but there was also a more decisive flick through midwicket and a pair of confident strides out to drive. Clarke did not chance an over from Lyon during the morning, preferring to let his seamers push during a session that yielded them less than they might have hoped for.

Trott and Cook were largely unhurried and unfazed in the hour after lunch, and it was a shock to many when England's No. 3 squeezed a Lyon offbreak to short leg, where Usman Khawaja held a neat catch. Pietersen swung lustily at his very first ball and was fortunate to mistime it into the expanses beyond midwicket, but some better struck boundaries ensued and Lyon was withdrawn.

It was not until he returned that England were troubled again, a ball looped teasingly from around the wicket drawing an edge from Pietersen and a fine catch by Brad Haddin up to the stumps. If that wicket had altered proceedings, that of Cook's changed the complexion of the day completely, Bird finding just the right amount of seam movement to have the captain pinned in front of off stump with his bat never intended for use.

Cook had underestimated Bird's capacity to move the ball, and in the first over after tea Bell would pay for treating Lyon with contempt. Four balls into the evening, he advanced to drive at a flighted delivery, failing to get to the pitch and shelling a catch in the general vicinity of mid-off, where Harris clasped a sharp chance. It was a vainglorious stroke, and consigned Matt Prior and Jonny Bairstow to a major salvage task.

They started well enough, working the ball around, but as Clarke and his bowlers tightened up in response both batsmen were rendered near enough to shotless. Only 34 runs had been added in a union nearing 20 overs' duration when Prior was pinned in front of the stumps by Siddle. Aleem Dar declined the appeal, but Australia's referral showed the ball to be striking enough of leg stump for the decision to be overturned.

Bairstow fought desperately, denying his usual aggressive tendencies, but ultimately the pressure told. He went down on one knee to sweep Lyon from around the wicket and missed, Hill's finger was raised and Bairstow's anguished review showing the off break had straightened enough and would have clipped the top of the stumps. Stuart Broad soon followed, spooning Harris ineffectually to cover, and Graeme Swann picked out deep square leg.

Tim Bresnan and James Anderson played the day out comfortably, adding 24 from 20 balls. It was a sight that cheered the crowd but had to discomfort England, given their earlier wastefulness.

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Daniel Brettig

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by H_Z_O on (August 10, 2013, 18:42 GMT)

@Greatest_Game no offence to Philander, and I'm not suggesting Bird's better, but I would say that ball was better than anything I saw Philander bowl last year. Bird's not quite as consistent as Philander, who's a human metronome, but he's also a lot less experienced (in terms of First Class cricket, at least).

Of course, Philander offers a lot more with the bat than Bird too.

That said, this performance from Australia did remind me of the way South Africa's bowlers choked England's batsmen last year by applying consistent and unrelenting pressure. There were a few bad balls, but they were incredibly rare and while there might be question marks over Watson's batting, his role with the ball has been very similar to Kallis'. He hasn't taken many wickets, but the fourth seamer's primary job is to keep the pressure up and give the quicks a rest, and he's done that).

A fully fit Harris is the key, though. He elevates this Australian attack right up there with the South Africans.

Posted by whofriggincares on (August 10, 2013, 10:27 GMT)

@2nd slip I noticed you didn't mention Siddle and Harris in your analysis of the aussie attack. You are right Watson is no Philander but Harris compares favourably with him. The bowlers have once again done the job for us now it's over to the batsmen. I guess with their recent history you just never know what you will get. Hopefully we can post 350-400 and make it really hard for the English. I suppose England have done what they have to do and concentrated on winning the ashes but they won't get back to number 1 playing this type of cricket. We will see how good of a coach Flower is over the next 12 months and whether he will be able to make changes in game style too take them to the next level. With Cook captaining I doubt it.

Posted by ClippedThroughMid-Wicket on (August 10, 2013, 10:17 GMT)

bird is an incredibly good bowler, never mind jimmy, your laras and tendulkars would have struggled to bat some of the deliveries he sent down in that one over.

Posted by Shaggy076 on (August 10, 2013, 10:15 GMT)

I only managed to watch half the first days play, although Australia should be very happy to bowl England out for under 250, it is not going to be easy to get those runs. I dont think the pitch has been too difficult to stay in but the slowness of the surface has made scoring difficult. We will only find out how good it was after the Aussies bat.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Daniel BrettigClose
Daniel Brettig Assistant editor Daniel Brettig had been a journalist for eight years when he joined ESPNcricinfo, but his fascination with cricket dates back to the early 1990s, when his dad helped him sneak into the family lounge room to watch the end of day-night World Series matches well past bedtime. Unapologetically passionate about indie music and the South Australian Redbacks, Daniel's chief cricketing achievement was to dismiss Wisden Almanack editor Lawrence Booth in the 2010 Ashes press match in Perth - a rare Australian victory that summer.
Tour Results
England v Australia at Southampton - Sep 16, 2013
Australia won by 49 runs
England v Australia at Cardiff - Sep 14, 2013
England won by 3 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Birmingham - Sep 11, 2013
No result
England v Australia at Manchester - Sep 8, 2013
Australia won by 88 runs
England v Australia at Leeds - Sep 6, 2013
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!