West Indies v New Zealand, 2nd T20, Dominica July 6, 2014

Fletcher, bowlers help WI draw level

15

West Indies 165 for 6 (Fletcher 62, Simmons 36) beat New Zealand 126 (Williamson 37, Cottrell 3-28) by 39 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

The stand of 66 between Andre Fletcher and Lendl Simmons set up West Indies' victory
The stand of 66 between Andre Fletcher and Lendl Simmons set up West Indies' victory © WICB

Following their demoralising Test series defeat, West Indies found solace in the format they relish the most by squaring the T20s 1-1 with an all-round performance in Roseau. West Indies were guilty of not putting enough runs on the board on Saturday, but they addressed that issue by posting a competitive 165 in an uninterrupted innings. Their bowlers choked New Zealand, with the spinners and medium-pacers proving difficult to hit. Never at any stage did New Zealand pose a threat and the lack of lasting partnerships led to their downfall.

Unlike on Saturday, when West Indies struggled to gain traction either side of a rain interruption, the batsmen found momentum via a solid second-wicket of stand of 66 between Andre Fletcher and Lendl Simmons and in the last five overs, when 56 were scored. Simmons described the pitch as one with tennis-ball bounce, with a few balls stopping on the batsmen, but West Indies saw through an edgy beginning and ensured they kept wickets intact for a late surge.

Fletcher was lucky to survive early in his innings when he set off for a single from the non-striker's end and was sent back by Simmons; Fletcher had given up but the bowler Trent Boult missed the mark. After that, Fletcher charged down the track to the seamers and targeted the straighter boundaries Simmons regularly shuffled across his stumps to target fine leg and third man.

Given how the batsmen struggled on Saturday, the pair showed greater intent to get on with it. Simmons moved across his stumps to Corey Anderson and scooped it for six over fine leg and in the same over, played a glorious extra cover drive. Anderson had the last laugh against Simmons when he caught him at long-on. Anderson caught the ball and threw it up as he back-pedalled outside the boundary but managed to jog back in and take it on the second attempt.

Boult came up with a more spectacular effort later in the innings when he had Pollard caught at deep midwicket. He plucked it one-handed, threw it up and caught the ball again with a full-length dive from outside the boundary. Those two postcard moments were the only takeaways for New Zealand in the match. Their slower bowlers, Ish Sodhi and Kane Williamson couldn't impose themselves in the manner in which Samuel Badree and Sunil Narine managed later on.

In the first ODI, West Indies managed only a paltry 6.80 in the last five overs but a day later, they cranked it up to 11.20. Fletcher sped towards his third T20 fifty with a scooped six over long-off. He was yorked by Boult for 62 but his exit didn't slow down West Indies as Darren Sammy and Andre Russell took the score past 160.

New Zealand decided to rotate the captaincy by putting Williamson in charge and although he top-scored, he failed to anchor the innings. Brendon McCullum swung his bat around but his soft dismissal increased the pressure on Williamson. New Zealand's other power hitters, Jimmy Neesham and Anderson didn't make an impact. Narine and Badree applied the stranglehold by not going for more than five an over.

New Zealand needed a massive 91 off the last ten but even at that stage, they still had three more Narine overs to contend with. They also had the awkward slower balls from Pollard to negotiate, and with every desperate swing and a miss from the middle and lower order, the asking rate climbed. Sheldon Cottrell, brought in for this game, got the in-form Neesham early to give West Indies the first advantage and there was no looking back.

Kanishkaa Balachandran is a senior sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on July 9, 2014, 0:57 GMT

    In the last 5 years Eng (61), Aus(59), Ind(48) Sri Lanka(44),NZ(43) and WI(41). SA(40) How does WI hope to make it into the top 4 test ranking ?

  • on July 8, 2014, 12:04 GMT

    Why isn't New Zealand putting Colin Munro in the squad? He has an impressive fc stats

  • Twinkie on July 7, 2014, 19:29 GMT

    Seriously? Are you people really excited about a T20 win over a second string New Zealand team? Though I'm happy they didn't lose it takes more than this to impress me. Our cricket is still losing ground not gaining!

  • on July 7, 2014, 18:21 GMT

    Sammy brings something to the team, something that makes everybody less tense and more together. Happy for the team that Fletcher made runs. If he can do it for WI at last, it would be a relief. Question: what is it that makes players like Roach, Taylor and Holder unsuitable for T20?

  • BlakeHoulihan on July 7, 2014, 14:40 GMT

    In T20Is when NZ are chasing a target of 160+ and McCullum gets out with a long way left in the chase, we almost always struggle. He's a bit up and down in other formats, but in T20Is he is an absolute gem. Taylor seems to be improving his T20 game after some indifferent form in the format over the past year or two. Will keep an eye on his progress in the CPL.

    Well played West Indies. Badree and Narine are incredibly good in this format. Also, Sammy is a good fella, he is always smiling no matter what the situation and it's great to see.

  • pt_pt on July 7, 2014, 6:30 GMT

    Obviously NZ selectors were not serious about this series by not picking the regular T20 plays, guptil, n mcullam etc, bit disappointing really....

  • on July 7, 2014, 6:20 GMT

    @Shane Bond. Ok cheers that makes sense then. Sorry just looked odd at first.

  • Antony_Lucas on July 7, 2014, 4:11 GMT

    NZ cannot really persist with treating Anederson and Neesham as full bowlers. They must be seen as half a bowler each (ie 2 overs expected), with more overs allotted based on level of success. Andersons lacklustre performance with the ball was hugely influential. That and a NZ captain again choosing to bat second again in favorable batting conditions. First innings runs against Badree and Narine are surely easier to get when batting first over second more than most of the time

  • on July 7, 2014, 3:33 GMT

    @Jamie Moneghan Actually NZC decided not to fly in the t20 squad which would have included Guptill, Nathan Mccullum, Mitchell Mcclenaghan and Colin Munro for a 2 match t20 series. So they just let Watling play the t20.

  • Starvybz on July 7, 2014, 2:35 GMT

    boult took a very good catch too bad the umpires didn't realise it wasn't legal

  • on July 9, 2014, 0:57 GMT

    In the last 5 years Eng (61), Aus(59), Ind(48) Sri Lanka(44),NZ(43) and WI(41). SA(40) How does WI hope to make it into the top 4 test ranking ?

  • on July 8, 2014, 12:04 GMT

    Why isn't New Zealand putting Colin Munro in the squad? He has an impressive fc stats

  • Twinkie on July 7, 2014, 19:29 GMT

    Seriously? Are you people really excited about a T20 win over a second string New Zealand team? Though I'm happy they didn't lose it takes more than this to impress me. Our cricket is still losing ground not gaining!

  • on July 7, 2014, 18:21 GMT

    Sammy brings something to the team, something that makes everybody less tense and more together. Happy for the team that Fletcher made runs. If he can do it for WI at last, it would be a relief. Question: what is it that makes players like Roach, Taylor and Holder unsuitable for T20?

  • BlakeHoulihan on July 7, 2014, 14:40 GMT

    In T20Is when NZ are chasing a target of 160+ and McCullum gets out with a long way left in the chase, we almost always struggle. He's a bit up and down in other formats, but in T20Is he is an absolute gem. Taylor seems to be improving his T20 game after some indifferent form in the format over the past year or two. Will keep an eye on his progress in the CPL.

    Well played West Indies. Badree and Narine are incredibly good in this format. Also, Sammy is a good fella, he is always smiling no matter what the situation and it's great to see.

  • pt_pt on July 7, 2014, 6:30 GMT

    Obviously NZ selectors were not serious about this series by not picking the regular T20 plays, guptil, n mcullam etc, bit disappointing really....

  • on July 7, 2014, 6:20 GMT

    @Shane Bond. Ok cheers that makes sense then. Sorry just looked odd at first.

  • Antony_Lucas on July 7, 2014, 4:11 GMT

    NZ cannot really persist with treating Anederson and Neesham as full bowlers. They must be seen as half a bowler each (ie 2 overs expected), with more overs allotted based on level of success. Andersons lacklustre performance with the ball was hugely influential. That and a NZ captain again choosing to bat second again in favorable batting conditions. First innings runs against Badree and Narine are surely easier to get when batting first over second more than most of the time

  • on July 7, 2014, 3:33 GMT

    @Jamie Moneghan Actually NZC decided not to fly in the t20 squad which would have included Guptill, Nathan Mccullum, Mitchell Mcclenaghan and Colin Munro for a 2 match t20 series. So they just let Watling play the t20.

  • Starvybz on July 7, 2014, 2:35 GMT

    boult took a very good catch too bad the umpires didn't realise it wasn't legal

  • iceaxe on July 7, 2014, 2:13 GMT

    Hoping for an NZ win, but WI obviously wanted it more. Well deserved, as they looked the better team. Would still have liked to see Chris Gayle play...

  • on July 7, 2014, 2:10 GMT

    I have always mentained that wi batsmen are good,but their problem is they lack batting technic,in other words a way of adjusting themselves at the wicket when the going get tough.They do not have a plan B.Everton weekes plan was to always try to stroke the ball along the ground and not upishly,the key was he stuck to his plan which made him afine player.wi battsmen must develop a method that they must stick with and nurture to be successful.I watched lil bravo's inning of a 107 in trinidad,and i wanted him to get areally big score but he wanted to hit every ball out off the ground which eventually brought his demise.west indies batsmen must be responsible, no matter how big a score they have at the wicket.

  • Samarian on July 6, 2014, 23:16 GMT

    Congratulations to the West Indies on the T20 win. Good teamwork. Good leadership in Darren Sammy . God performance by the man from the Spice Isle Andre Fletcher - your compatriots are proud of you.

  • Samarian on July 6, 2014, 21:43 GMT

    Congratulations to the WestIndies Team on their T20 win . Good teamwork. Good Team Leadership.

  • on July 6, 2014, 21:00 GMT

    This is just out of curiosity from a neutral to any NZ fan , but why is Watling in the T20 team if he is not keeping and he is batting at number 8? Is there not any other allrounders who be in that place?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • on July 6, 2014, 21:00 GMT

    This is just out of curiosity from a neutral to any NZ fan , but why is Watling in the T20 team if he is not keeping and he is batting at number 8? Is there not any other allrounders who be in that place?

  • Samarian on July 6, 2014, 21:43 GMT

    Congratulations to the WestIndies Team on their T20 win . Good teamwork. Good Team Leadership.

  • Samarian on July 6, 2014, 23:16 GMT

    Congratulations to the West Indies on the T20 win. Good teamwork. Good leadership in Darren Sammy . God performance by the man from the Spice Isle Andre Fletcher - your compatriots are proud of you.

  • on July 7, 2014, 2:10 GMT

    I have always mentained that wi batsmen are good,but their problem is they lack batting technic,in other words a way of adjusting themselves at the wicket when the going get tough.They do not have a plan B.Everton weekes plan was to always try to stroke the ball along the ground and not upishly,the key was he stuck to his plan which made him afine player.wi battsmen must develop a method that they must stick with and nurture to be successful.I watched lil bravo's inning of a 107 in trinidad,and i wanted him to get areally big score but he wanted to hit every ball out off the ground which eventually brought his demise.west indies batsmen must be responsible, no matter how big a score they have at the wicket.

  • iceaxe on July 7, 2014, 2:13 GMT

    Hoping for an NZ win, but WI obviously wanted it more. Well deserved, as they looked the better team. Would still have liked to see Chris Gayle play...

  • Starvybz on July 7, 2014, 2:35 GMT

    boult took a very good catch too bad the umpires didn't realise it wasn't legal

  • on July 7, 2014, 3:33 GMT

    @Jamie Moneghan Actually NZC decided not to fly in the t20 squad which would have included Guptill, Nathan Mccullum, Mitchell Mcclenaghan and Colin Munro for a 2 match t20 series. So they just let Watling play the t20.

  • Antony_Lucas on July 7, 2014, 4:11 GMT

    NZ cannot really persist with treating Anederson and Neesham as full bowlers. They must be seen as half a bowler each (ie 2 overs expected), with more overs allotted based on level of success. Andersons lacklustre performance with the ball was hugely influential. That and a NZ captain again choosing to bat second again in favorable batting conditions. First innings runs against Badree and Narine are surely easier to get when batting first over second more than most of the time

  • on July 7, 2014, 6:20 GMT

    @Shane Bond. Ok cheers that makes sense then. Sorry just looked odd at first.

  • pt_pt on July 7, 2014, 6:30 GMT

    Obviously NZ selectors were not serious about this series by not picking the regular T20 plays, guptil, n mcullam etc, bit disappointing really....