Australia v Pakistan, World T20, Group 2, Mirpur

Pakistan hold on in high-voltage game

The Report by Brydon Coverdale

March 23, 2014

Comments: 400 | Text size: A | A

Pakistan 191 for 5 (Umar Akmal 94) beat Australia 175 (Maxwell 74, Finch 65) by 16 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Crowe: Australia don't have the spin game for this tournament

If ever proof was needed that Pakistan are world cricket's most mercurial side, take this match as exhibit A. Bilawal Bhatti's first over cost 30 runs, Pakistan dropped two catches in three balls, they conceded an 18-ball half-century to Glenn Maxwell and in their own innings stumbled to 25 for 2 in their fifth over. Oh, and they won. Comfortably, in the end. So relaxed was Mohammad Hafeez by the end that he trusted Bhatti with the final over, with Australia needing 23. They managed six.

This really was a split personality of a game. The fielding from both sides was poor, as was some of the bowling. But the striking from Umar Akmal and Maxwell was breathtaking, and a couple of wonderful overs from two of Pakistan's spinners, Zulfiqar Babar and Saeed Ajmal, meant more than Bhatti's dirty 30-run over. Perhaps the most important feature of the match was the lopsided nature of Australia's scorecard; nobody but Maxwell and Aaron Finch reached double figures.

Smart stats

  • Umar Akmal's 94 is the second-highest score by a Pakistan batsman in Twenty20 internationals. Ahmed Shehzad had made an unbeaten 98 against Zimbabwe in August last year.
  • In his last ten T20I innings, Umar has scored 337 runs at an average of 42.12 and a strike rate of 138.68, the best among Pakistan batsmen during this period.
  • Glenn Maxwell got to his half-century in 18 balls, which is the fourth-fastest in Twenty20 internationals. Only Yuvraj Singh, Paul Stirling and Stephan Myburgh have scored a half-century in fewer balls.
  • Maxwell's strike rate of 224.24 is the fourth-highest for an Australian batsman who's faced at least 25 balls in an innings.
  • The No. 4 batsmen from both teams were the top-scorers, and totalled 168 runs in the match, the highest by No. 4 batsmen in a T20I; the previous-highest was 164, by Ricky Ponting (98 not out) and Scott Styris (66) in the first ever T20I, in 2005.
  • Bilawal Bhatti went for 30 runs in the eighth over of the innings, the fourth-most expensive over in Twenty20 internationals. Stuart Broad (36 v India, 2007), Izatullah Dawlatzai (32 v England, 2012) and Wayne Parnell (32 v England, 2012) are the only bowlers to concede more runs in an over.

And yet while they were at the crease together, Australia rocketed into favouritism. Chasing 192, they had come together at 8 for 2 at the end of the first over, after Babar's quicker ball rattled David Warner's stumps and his turner caught the edge of Shane Watson's bat on the way through to Kamran Akmal. But from there, Maxwell and Finch lifted Australia to 126 for 2 in the 12th over, a position from which they could have and should have won.

Had Maxwell stayed there they would have. As he struck six after six with conventional strokeplay, it was hard to work out why he had tried to reverse-sweep Hafeez from the first ball of his innings. Nerves, perhaps. But when he stood still and played the ball on its merits, he was almost impossible to stop. He clubbed Hafeez over midwicket and square leg for two sixes in an over and struck another as Shahid Afridi leaked 15 in his first over.

Afridi seemed Scrooge-like compared to Bhatti, who was thumped for two consecutive sixes that brought Maxwell his half-century, the equal fastest in a T20 international by an Australia player. The record was set by David Warner, who struck an 18-ball fifty against West Indies in 2009-10 at the SCG, where the Arizona Diamondbacks and the LA Dodgers are playing Major League Baseball this week. Some of Maxwell's strikes belonged there.

He was put down on 70 by Ajmal in the deep - two balls earlier Kamran had failed to glove Finch's edge behind off Ajmal's doosra - but on 74 Maxwell fell when he picked out deep midwicket off the bowling of Afridi. And magically, the runs dried up. The rest of the Australians struggled to force the pace against Pakistan's spin; George Bailey was bowled by Afridi for 4 off nine balls and after Brad Hodge was well caught in the deep by Ajmal off Umar Gul, Ajmal got rid of the other main danger, Finch.

Australia needed 31 off the final three overs when Ajmal was given his last over, and it was a brilliant one. Finch, settled but still a little scratchy, was bowled by an Ajmal straight ball for 65 off 54 balls, and the over brought one run and one wicket. And, more or less, one Pakistan victory. Because 30 off two overs was too much for Australia's lower order; Gul and Bhatti picked up wickets and there was a run out, and Australia were bowled out from the last ball for 175.

It meant that Umar Akmal's batting had not been in vain. That Pakistan reached 191 for 5 was a remarkable effort given that they were struggling at 25 for 2 in the fifth over. But the Akmal brothers combined to give Bailey a headache for the next three quarters of an hour.

They scored at 11.29 during their 96-run partnership and although Kamran has an excellent record against Australia it was Umar who really did the damage this time. Powerful through and over midwicket, especially during an 18-run over from part-time spinner Finch, who was twice dispatched dismissively over deep midwicket, Umar was also able to rocket the ball down the ground straight back past the bowler Nathan Coulter-Nile.

Kamran struck four fours during his run-a-ball 31 but the partnership ended when he tried to lift a cut over deep point off Coulter-Nile but was well taken by Warner running around on the boundary. Coulter-Nile picked up a second wicket when he yorked Sohaib Maqsood for 5, but Umar remained at the crease and seemed destined to become the first Pakistan batsman to reach a century in a Twenty20 international.

That was not to be. In the final over of the innings, on 94 from 53 balls, he tried to clear the long-on boundary off Mitchell Starc and was caught in the deep by Maxwell. A quick unbeaten 20 from Afridi helped Pakistan to 191 for 5, but the Australians were left wondering what could have been had they been a little less sloppy in the field.

Umar had been dropped on 22 when he lifted Coulter-Nile to deep square leg and Brad Hogg put down a catch that was coming to him at pace, but should have been taken comfortably. Afridi was also put down by Hodge at point and Kamran was grassed by Doug Bollinger at short fine leg, although the umpire called a no-ball against the bowler Shane Watson in any case.

Bollinger's first international for two and a half years had started more promisingly - he struck in the second over of the match when Ahmed Shehzad top-edged a pull and was caught by Bollinger himself. When Hafeez played on off Watson in the fifth over, Australia could dream of a small chase. In their dreams.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ScottStevo on (March 27, 2014, 19:02 GMT)

Sorry, Jagger, but in limited overs cricket S Watson is just about the first name on the team sheet. He should only EVER bat 1, 2 or 3. That's a weird sample selection, mate. As Homer J Simpson once said, "You can use statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that!" Explain to me how Watson isn't good enough when he averages 47 in his last 8 tests? He averages 38 from his last 4 ODIs and 2 of those innings were ducks! He averages 42 from his last 9 ODIs! He averages 32 @130SR from his last 14 T20Is. Looking at those stats, what are you complaining about?!

Posted by Jagger on (March 27, 2014, 13:01 GMT)

I thought it was clear, but just in case there remains any confusion - no I do not like Watson the cricketer with a pea heart at all - No, I have not missed a series in 30+ years I even flew from Shanghai to Hong Kong specially to watch Oz v SL on the Downunder bar's telly - No one more disappointing? Not with his talent there hasn't been - Never said drop him from limited overs cricket, only from tests, but in any form of cricket he should NOT be batting in the top 3. In fact, make it the top 5.

Perhaps you should help me by explaining why he averages 14.37 across the most recent 2 Tests, 2 ODI's and 3 T20i's for his past 8 international innings for me (he got another start in the prior innings and failed once again to go on with it), I am very interested to see how you can reconcile that record rather than what happened 5 years ago. Before he chose IPL over his country.

Posted by ScottStevo on (March 27, 2014, 12:17 GMT)

@Jagger, obviously you missed when he was the player of the tournament in a previous edition of the T20WC and he single handedly won us every single game by destroying spinners and pacers alike. It's plain to see you don't like the bloke, and I agree that he's been disappointing as his talents appear wasted, though a lot of what you're stating is purely your opinion of Watson. I've seen him build beautiful innings, especially in 09 when we threw him to the lions after Hughes was dropped. Also, you've got that completely wrong as in ODI's early wickets are ALWAYS what teams are looking for. It's a little difficult to be bowling economically when you're in powerplay. Also, you can't replace Watson with a batsman, especially so in limited overs cricket. If he's the most disappointing player you've seen in a baggy green, I'm thinking you aren't old enough to have witnessed some of our sides back in the day when we were truly poor!

Posted by Jagger on (March 27, 2014, 11:45 GMT)

Yeah that wasn't the reason I was told and if it is as you explained I would be very, very surprised. I don't regard him as a middle order batsman either - 6, 7 or 8. Your stats are all based upon facing pace bowling at the top of the order. He won't get that in T20 on the Indian subcontinent anymore. Pakistan opened with 2 spinners and got him in the first over. Breathtakingly predictable. I just think he is more suited batting at the death vs pace. He could do a lot of damage with a clear head and a licence to throw the bat. He stuffs around too much when he bats higher. Both Maddinson and Lynn would be better. Watching him trying to build an innings is painful to watch. That pad is a target. Furthermore, opening the batting in one day cricket is the best place to build up an average. Most of the time they're not even trying to get you out but to stop you scoring. No, I stand by everything I said about Watson. He's the most disappointing player I've seen in a Baggy Green.

Posted by ious on (March 27, 2014, 3:40 GMT)

It is good thing that Umar Akmal is in great form and this thing will helpful for Pakistan in the next matches but Hafeez has to play a positive cricket!!Congrates and best of luck team PAKISTAN!

Posted by Meety on (March 27, 2014, 0:53 GMT)

@ScottStevo on (March 25, 2014, 9:01 GMT) - I agree, there is nothing to suggest (bar a few lusty innings in Tests this summer), that Watto is anything but a top order batsmen in the short forms. @Jagger on (March 25, 2014, 7:00 GMT) - the reality with Watto is that he got a run at the top of the order because Oz's middle order was way too strong (2009) for him to slot in. Watto has been a long time under achiever, but a large share of that is due to injuries disrupting his career, coupled with (IMO) an overeagerness to slot him straight back into the side before he has got his eye back in FC cricket. His ODI stats make him one of the best allrounders ever, & that was achieved by batting at the top of the order coupled with good economical medium pace. He has done nothing in short forms in the middle of the order.As an opener he averages near 45 - with a S/R of 90, he has barely batted 25 times below #3 out of 150 innings.

Posted by Jagger on (March 26, 2014, 2:52 GMT)

When Watson fails at 1, 2 or 3, the whole team is like a punctured tyre. Then what happens next is Maxwell thinks he can happily tonk away because he's done enough when he hasn't and it permeates through. I think Watson is a cancer in the team. George needs to grip him but he can't because he can least afford any bad blood against him. That's why he's useless too. Clarke gripped him and look what happened. Mickey Arthur lost his job and Clarke, not Watson, got hammered in the press. I see the senior blokes making faces and shaking their heads when Watson and Maxwell are dismissed. So much talent, so little heart.

When he was younger everyone said give him time to bloom. Well, he bloomed for about 5 minutes and that was in the IPL.

Posted by FahadSiyal on (March 25, 2014, 9:20 GMT)

well done Pakistan i love t20 world cup

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
Related Links
Tournament Results
India v Sri Lanka at Dhaka - Apr 6, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 13 balls remaining)
India v South Africa at Dhaka - Apr 4, 2014
India won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
Sri Lanka v West Indies at Dhaka - Apr 3, 2014
Sri Lanka won by 27 runs (D/L method)
Pakistan v West Indies at Dhaka - Apr 1, 2014
West Indies won by 84 runs
Bangladesh v Australia at Dhaka - Apr 1, 2014
Australia won by 7 wickets (with 15 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days