Zimbabwe v Australia, Tri-series, Harare August 31, 2014

Australia reminded they are mortal

Australia thought victory over Zimbabwe was a sure thing but they were courting trouble by underestimating their opponents
26

There was no other reason to have left Mitchell Johnson out of the side
There was no other reason to have left Mitchell Johnson out of the side © AFP

In the early hours of a Tuesday morning in 1983, Australia's prime minister Bob Hawke famously told the country that "any boss who sacks anyone for not turning up today is a bum". Australia II had just won the America's Cup. It was one of the nation's most defining moments of the 1980s, the end of New York Yacht Club's 132-year hold on the trophy.

If that seems a lifetime ago - or more - consider that it was also in 1983 that Zimbabwe last beat Australia in a one-day international. Until today. Any boss who sacks anyone for not turning up to work in Australia today will have other reasons. They might not even believe Australia were currently playing a series, such is the dominance of other sports at this time of year.

Michael Clarke and his men won't mind a bit if this loss, and their subsequent plummet from No.1 in the ODI world to No.4, is buried under the weight of AFL and NRL news in the sports pages. But for the players, coaches and selectors it will serve as a timely reminder that you can be too clever for your own good. It is courting trouble to underestimate your opponents. Better to be reminded of that now than in a World Cup.

Trevor Hohns, the selector on duty, looked a lonely figure as Australia slid towards defeat, sitting in an empty bank of chairs in front of the change rooms. He quit as Australia's chairman of selectors in April 2006, after the team had just won a Test series in South Africa 3-0. Now, on his first tour having been reinstated to the selection panel, he has picked a team that lost to Zimbabwe.

Australia thought victory over Zimbabwe was a sure thing. They won't admit that. But there is no other reason to have left Mitchell Johnson out of the side. There are occasions when fast bowlers need a break, but two matches into a one-day series after a long winter's break is not one of them. They wanted to see other options. Now they've seen them, don't expect Johnson to rest again any time soon.

Not that Mitchell Starc, Mitchell Marsh, Ben Cutting and James Faulkner had much to work with on a Harare pitch that held the ball up more than a clay tennis court. Johnson has shown at venues like Adelaide that he can still make batsmen hop on slow surfaces, and Zimbabwe's batsmen must have breathed easier when they discovered he wasn't playing. There was nothing there for the rest of the seamers.

This loss will teach Australia some lessons but will ultimately cost them little. For Zimbabwe, it will make heroes of men like Elton Chigumbura and Prosper Utseya, and will boost the team and their fans immeasurably

All the more reason, you would think, to have chosen Steven Smith. That Australia resorted to two gentle overs from Aaron Finch shows how much they missed an extra spinner. Nathan Lyon couldn't do it all, though he nearly did enough. Just as importantly, Smith is Australia's best player of spin besides Clarke. This match proved again that spin-heavy attacks on spin-friendly surfaces will always trouble Australia. Always.

A Clarke-less Australia on spinning pitches doesn't bear thinking about, hence the decision to send him home after the Zimbabwe loss to be assessed after re-injuring the hamstring that kept him out of the first two games. Australia's next engagements, including two Tests, are against Pakistan in the UAE in October. Getting right for that series must be his only focus.

No doubt Clarke was extremely disappointed to lead Australia to their first ODI loss to Zimbabwe in 31 years. But by the end of the summer, or the end of the World Cup, or the end of next year's Ashes tour of England, he will view it with more perspective. It might be the loss that reminds his men, until today the No.1-ranked ODI side and until recently No.1 in Tests, that they are mortal. That's no bad thing.

Maybe he will even recognise that Australia's loss was good for cricket. In fact it was great for cricket. There are only ten ICC full members and two have been floundering for years. A win like this for Zimbabwe, in front of loyal and passionate home fans, can only strengthen cricket in Zimbabwe, and that in turn can only be a positive for world cricket.

To see the looks of joyous disbelief from the fans at the ground in Harare was to witness that greatest of sporting stories, the broken drought. This loss will teach Australia some lessons but, unless Clarke aggravated his hamstring even more by returning to the field late in the game, will ultimately cost them little. For Zimbabwe, it will make heroes of men like Elton Chigumbura and Prosper Utseya, and will boost the team and their fans immeasurably.

No doubt they celebrated like it was 1983. Any boss who sacks anyone for not turning up to work in Zimbabwe on Monday is a bum.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. @brydoncoverdale

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • din7 on September 1, 2014, 13:38 GMT

    dont see too mcuh in to this game....being an all time australia fan from india i dont mind this loss....yes smith shld have been played considerin zimbabwe have spin tracks and he plays spin well, also the way he has transformed himself proving me wrong he isnt that bad to find a place in this side with no watson, warner.....dont see too much into johnson resting its not necessary he shld be played in evry match considerin test vs pak and world cup...he shld be rested enough to not pick any injury...so ok aus lost this game so be it they arent goin to win all of them, minnows do win one a while...thats ok, anyhow this win isnt goin to do zimababwe any good either, its just a oneoff victory as bangladesh also do!

  • CricketChat on September 1, 2014, 12:16 GMT

    Aussies were probably testing bench strength against a team that was repeated thrashed by SA. It wasn't like were badly beaten. They had Zim on the mat at 150 odd for 7. It was some once in a blue moon, extraordinarily bold batting batting by Zim that saw them lose the match that can happen to any top team once in a while. No need to push the panic button yet.

  • patg on September 1, 2014, 11:50 GMT

    Don't forget that Australia is another team. A good team. Good teams also lose matches. It does not mean Zimbabwe is better than Australia. That is part of the game. I don't understand why people are crying about it so much. What is the big deal ? Do you think Australia is unbeatable ? Give me a break.

  • Desert on September 1, 2014, 11:46 GMT

    As a huge SA fan I went ballistic when they only scored 230 against ZIM, but at least they were able to defend it. I think the pitches prepared are very difficult and the Zim spinners are not that bad.

    But the rest of the games against Oz is going to be VERY difficult

  • Front-Foot_lunge on September 1, 2014, 8:25 GMT

    As an England fan, I can't help draw comparisons to ours travails and Australia's loss here. Where's most people see this results as a blip, and Australia will learn, learn about preparation, team selection, attitude, etc.

    When England lose, to minnows (repeatedly), like Bangladesh, Holland and Ireland, our team implodes. We seem unable to pull ourselves up from the tail-spin a defeat like this brings. We will not learn anything or move the team or the teams attitude forward. It's almost like the English cricket in the 90's is the benchmark where we as fans set the team to perform. Anything above that dire measure, is a blip.

  • social_monster09 on September 1, 2014, 7:18 GMT

    I am very much disappointed by this type of performance by the Aussies. Wrong team selection, wrong shot selection, pathetic fielding, Clarke's hamstring & obviously bad decision after winning the toss to bat first on such a dry wicket which looks like 5th day pitch of India. (A shameful offense). But I am worried for SA because now all frustration & anger of Oz players will outburst on SA tomorrow. Poor Africans. I beg to Boof to select a proper squad for tomorrow's match because it will be a S.Final for Oz's. Squad is as follows:- 1.Finch 2.Hughes/March 3.Bailey 4.Smith 5.Maxwell 6.Haddin 7.Faulkner 8.Cutting 9.Mitch 10.Starc 11.Lyon

  • JM_RSA on September 1, 2014, 6:54 GMT

    I hear a lot of Aus fans saying that they are thankfull there are no spinning decks in Aus. Problem is that with a competition of 6 weeks, the last 2 weeks the wickets will be slower and will turn. So if Aus wants to win they definately have to play spin better. Looks like only 2 batters know how to play spin in Aus (Maxwell and Clarke).

  • abstractCricFan on September 1, 2014, 5:45 GMT

    I'm not too sure as to how Smith doesn't command an place in the playing 11 naturally irrespective of the fact that this was a slow surface ..Surely he has done enough in the past 18 months to boost his credentials

  • on September 1, 2014, 5:43 GMT

    great victory this win will boost Zimbabwe team further wins.I can say 2015 world cup any body's game .

  • mandi on September 1, 2014, 3:22 GMT

    utseya wins it for zim,he is a great workhorse cricketer.

  • din7 on September 1, 2014, 13:38 GMT

    dont see too mcuh in to this game....being an all time australia fan from india i dont mind this loss....yes smith shld have been played considerin zimbabwe have spin tracks and he plays spin well, also the way he has transformed himself proving me wrong he isnt that bad to find a place in this side with no watson, warner.....dont see too much into johnson resting its not necessary he shld be played in evry match considerin test vs pak and world cup...he shld be rested enough to not pick any injury...so ok aus lost this game so be it they arent goin to win all of them, minnows do win one a while...thats ok, anyhow this win isnt goin to do zimababwe any good either, its just a oneoff victory as bangladesh also do!

  • CricketChat on September 1, 2014, 12:16 GMT

    Aussies were probably testing bench strength against a team that was repeated thrashed by SA. It wasn't like were badly beaten. They had Zim on the mat at 150 odd for 7. It was some once in a blue moon, extraordinarily bold batting batting by Zim that saw them lose the match that can happen to any top team once in a while. No need to push the panic button yet.

  • patg on September 1, 2014, 11:50 GMT

    Don't forget that Australia is another team. A good team. Good teams also lose matches. It does not mean Zimbabwe is better than Australia. That is part of the game. I don't understand why people are crying about it so much. What is the big deal ? Do you think Australia is unbeatable ? Give me a break.

  • Desert on September 1, 2014, 11:46 GMT

    As a huge SA fan I went ballistic when they only scored 230 against ZIM, but at least they were able to defend it. I think the pitches prepared are very difficult and the Zim spinners are not that bad.

    But the rest of the games against Oz is going to be VERY difficult

  • Front-Foot_lunge on September 1, 2014, 8:25 GMT

    As an England fan, I can't help draw comparisons to ours travails and Australia's loss here. Where's most people see this results as a blip, and Australia will learn, learn about preparation, team selection, attitude, etc.

    When England lose, to minnows (repeatedly), like Bangladesh, Holland and Ireland, our team implodes. We seem unable to pull ourselves up from the tail-spin a defeat like this brings. We will not learn anything or move the team or the teams attitude forward. It's almost like the English cricket in the 90's is the benchmark where we as fans set the team to perform. Anything above that dire measure, is a blip.

  • social_monster09 on September 1, 2014, 7:18 GMT

    I am very much disappointed by this type of performance by the Aussies. Wrong team selection, wrong shot selection, pathetic fielding, Clarke's hamstring & obviously bad decision after winning the toss to bat first on such a dry wicket which looks like 5th day pitch of India. (A shameful offense). But I am worried for SA because now all frustration & anger of Oz players will outburst on SA tomorrow. Poor Africans. I beg to Boof to select a proper squad for tomorrow's match because it will be a S.Final for Oz's. Squad is as follows:- 1.Finch 2.Hughes/March 3.Bailey 4.Smith 5.Maxwell 6.Haddin 7.Faulkner 8.Cutting 9.Mitch 10.Starc 11.Lyon

  • JM_RSA on September 1, 2014, 6:54 GMT

    I hear a lot of Aus fans saying that they are thankfull there are no spinning decks in Aus. Problem is that with a competition of 6 weeks, the last 2 weeks the wickets will be slower and will turn. So if Aus wants to win they definately have to play spin better. Looks like only 2 batters know how to play spin in Aus (Maxwell and Clarke).

  • abstractCricFan on September 1, 2014, 5:45 GMT

    I'm not too sure as to how Smith doesn't command an place in the playing 11 naturally irrespective of the fact that this was a slow surface ..Surely he has done enough in the past 18 months to boost his credentials

  • on September 1, 2014, 5:43 GMT

    great victory this win will boost Zimbabwe team further wins.I can say 2015 world cup any body's game .

  • mandi on September 1, 2014, 3:22 GMT

    utseya wins it for zim,he is a great workhorse cricketer.

  • on September 1, 2014, 2:05 GMT

    keep it up.....zimbabwe ..it waz a spectacular win

  • Old_Legend on September 1, 2014, 1:36 GMT

    Very well played by Zimbabwe. A Big Congratulation. I hope that it will be a big wake up call for Zim Cricket. i also hope that sponsor will come and support it.

  • xtrafalgarx on September 1, 2014, 1:12 GMT

    @Cricketstargazer: That's a myth. The great Australian sides worked hard to win every time. That's why they were better, they didn't just turn up and expect to win. They fact that they tried their hardest all the time, that's why they were the best. They didn't rest on their laurels.

  • and1son on August 31, 2014, 23:00 GMT

    as a die-hard Zim fan, it's good to win. For Aus it means they need to work on spin batting. As for overreaction, Aus is still a formidable side for any team batting to no9 or no10. Plus the WC is in Aus where express pace conditions help which makes them and SA favorites

  • ygkd on August 31, 2014, 21:49 GMT

    The absence of spinning decks Down Under will be a blessing for the Australian team during the World cup. Barring Clarke, Australia can't play spin, partly because of the absence of spinning decks in Australia...... Anyway, well done Zimbabwe. The better team on the day won.

  • VivGilchrist on August 31, 2014, 21:48 GMT

    The team was already not at full strength without Warner, Watson, and Harris. To rest MJ and not play Smith was a touch of arrogance. What it has done is show that Hughes is not ready to play v Pak on turning tracks, and that Faulkner is not the player he was before his injury. In fact, he has been terrible, to the point of being a liability since his return. A little hiccup now is better than a stumble later on though.

  • Jagger on August 31, 2014, 21:26 GMT

    A pointless exercise made even more pointless by a world cup just around the corner. We have had some passengers in this team for a long time, now. Half of these won't even play in it with any luck. Message to selectors: Pick real cricketers, not T20 players.

  • Peterincanada on August 31, 2014, 21:22 GMT

    I don't think anyone should begrudge Zim and particularly Utseya his day in the sun. Two days ago he got a five for in a losing cause. Today he came in with Oz on top and if he had fallen cheaply it would surely have meant another loss. He has been a good servant of the game without getting a lot in return. Well played.

  • on August 31, 2014, 21:12 GMT

    Every time this happens journalists use the power of hindsight to talk about complacency. Had Australia won (as they do about 95% of the time against Zimbabwe) the same author would present a different narrative after the event (probably something about Australia being fortunate to have so many options going into the World Cup). Cricket perhaps more so than other sports has an element of uncertainty due to the fact that each batsman no matter how good only gets one chance. It's what makes the game worth watching. Don't trivialise the victory by the weaker team as being the result of complacency from the stronger one.

  • Chris_P on August 31, 2014, 20:15 GMT

    Beaten by the better team on the day. Simple. It happens, it will happen again, it will happen to all teams, the sooner everyone realizes it occurs the better. The most certain thing about this game is the glorious uncertainty.

  • on August 31, 2014, 19:56 GMT

    @CricketingStargazer - a reminder that Australia also beat South Afriica 2-1 on their own turf in the test series so you are a little off the mark there. This team is missing Dave Warner, Ryan Harris and, of course, Steve Smith should have played as the Zimbabwe spinners would not have troubled him. Strange selection.

  • mahjut on August 31, 2014, 19:46 GMT

    I think the lesson they are mortal must have been learned pretty much as soon as they lost the undeserved #1 test spot. If not at that point then surely after having 320+ chased down with such consummate ease only some days ago! ? If Warner's purple patch does not extend any further they're in real trouble and a #4 spot in the test rankings a far more realistic ranking

  • mahjut on August 31, 2014, 19:37 GMT

    Sorry, leaving Mitch out was not anything to do with this. He's not proven anything on show pitches at all (maybe this alluded to Adelaide game but I don't think so) ... leaving Smith out however was being odd. ..

  • on August 31, 2014, 19:18 GMT

    A reminder to the Austrailian coaching staff and selectors TO PICK THE BEST TEAM EVERY TIME. Make playing for your country a hard one it's not a bloody testing ground. We deserved to lose.

  • EnglishCricket on August 31, 2014, 18:01 GMT

    Now I understand why Australia avoids playing the minnows if they can. They deserved to lose to Zimbabwe and to be honest they have played below par thus far in this triangular series.

  • CricketingStargazer on August 31, 2014, 17:52 GMT

    I think that possibly, after last winter, the side convinced itself that it was a little better than it is really. The great Australian sides of the past could win a game like this without really trying; this side though is nowhere near that good and overrated its win last winter.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • CricketingStargazer on August 31, 2014, 17:52 GMT

    I think that possibly, after last winter, the side convinced itself that it was a little better than it is really. The great Australian sides of the past could win a game like this without really trying; this side though is nowhere near that good and overrated its win last winter.

  • EnglishCricket on August 31, 2014, 18:01 GMT

    Now I understand why Australia avoids playing the minnows if they can. They deserved to lose to Zimbabwe and to be honest they have played below par thus far in this triangular series.

  • on August 31, 2014, 19:18 GMT

    A reminder to the Austrailian coaching staff and selectors TO PICK THE BEST TEAM EVERY TIME. Make playing for your country a hard one it's not a bloody testing ground. We deserved to lose.

  • mahjut on August 31, 2014, 19:37 GMT

    Sorry, leaving Mitch out was not anything to do with this. He's not proven anything on show pitches at all (maybe this alluded to Adelaide game but I don't think so) ... leaving Smith out however was being odd. ..

  • mahjut on August 31, 2014, 19:46 GMT

    I think the lesson they are mortal must have been learned pretty much as soon as they lost the undeserved #1 test spot. If not at that point then surely after having 320+ chased down with such consummate ease only some days ago! ? If Warner's purple patch does not extend any further they're in real trouble and a #4 spot in the test rankings a far more realistic ranking

  • on August 31, 2014, 19:56 GMT

    @CricketingStargazer - a reminder that Australia also beat South Afriica 2-1 on their own turf in the test series so you are a little off the mark there. This team is missing Dave Warner, Ryan Harris and, of course, Steve Smith should have played as the Zimbabwe spinners would not have troubled him. Strange selection.

  • Chris_P on August 31, 2014, 20:15 GMT

    Beaten by the better team on the day. Simple. It happens, it will happen again, it will happen to all teams, the sooner everyone realizes it occurs the better. The most certain thing about this game is the glorious uncertainty.

  • on August 31, 2014, 21:12 GMT

    Every time this happens journalists use the power of hindsight to talk about complacency. Had Australia won (as they do about 95% of the time against Zimbabwe) the same author would present a different narrative after the event (probably something about Australia being fortunate to have so many options going into the World Cup). Cricket perhaps more so than other sports has an element of uncertainty due to the fact that each batsman no matter how good only gets one chance. It's what makes the game worth watching. Don't trivialise the victory by the weaker team as being the result of complacency from the stronger one.

  • Peterincanada on August 31, 2014, 21:22 GMT

    I don't think anyone should begrudge Zim and particularly Utseya his day in the sun. Two days ago he got a five for in a losing cause. Today he came in with Oz on top and if he had fallen cheaply it would surely have meant another loss. He has been a good servant of the game without getting a lot in return. Well played.

  • Jagger on August 31, 2014, 21:26 GMT

    A pointless exercise made even more pointless by a world cup just around the corner. We have had some passengers in this team for a long time, now. Half of these won't even play in it with any luck. Message to selectors: Pick real cricketers, not T20 players.