Zimbabwe v South Africa, Tri-series, Harare

Du Plessis' third century puts South Africa in final

The Report by Firdose Moonda

September 4, 2014

Comments: 33 | Text size: A | A

South Africa 271 for 6 (du Plessis 121, Duminy 51) beat Zimbabwe 208 (Taylor 79, Duminy 3-35) by 63 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details

Moonda: Miller's form concerning for SA

South Africa secured their place in the triangular series final against Australia thanks to a third century in the competition from Faf du Plessis, which formed the spine of a target too tall for Zimbabwe to chase. Du Plessis shared a 103-run stand with JP Duminy for the fifth wicket and led the final assault which helped South Africa take 61 runs off the last five overs to put a place in the final beyond Zimbabwe's reach.

The hosts had to reach the score in 25.2 overs to earn a bonus point and improve their run-rate enough to leapfrog South Africa but at a required run-rate of 10.83 to the over that was always going to be a tough ask. Zimbabwe have only managed over 200 once in the five ODIs they played before this one and, although they crossed the mark again this time, their batting let them down again. Aside from a welcome return to form for Brendan Taylor, who scored his first-half century in six innings, no one else managed to stay at the crease for longer than 41 minutes or score more than 29 runs.

This was the last of five ODIs played between South Africa and Zimbabwe over the past three weeks and it was a microcosm of all of them. Zimbabwe were disciplined in the field, after Elton Chigumbura asked South Africa to bat first. Their spinners enforced a stranglehold which kept South Africa quiet for most of the first 45 overs of their innings but, because they lacked the incisiveness to keep taking wickets, one batsman anchored and set up for a final assault. Du Plessis was that that man.

South Africa end 11-year wait

  • 3 Hundreds scored by Faf du Plessis in Zimbabwe, the most in ODIs by an overseas batsman. Nine batsmen have scored two each, including Sachin Tendulkar, Mohammad Yusuf and Chris Gayle. If du Plessis scores a hundred in the final, he will equal Brendan Taylor's record for the most ODI hundreds scored in Zimbabwe.
  • 11 Years since South Africa have played an ODI tournament final. The last final South Africa played was in 2003, when they lost against England in the NatWest series. South Africa played at least one final a year from 1994 to 2003, but haven't featured in one since.
  • 1 South African batsmen who have scored three hundreds in an ODI triangular or quadrangular - du Plessis is the first. David Gower, Graeme Hick, Mark Waugh, Saeed Anwar and VVS Laxman are the other batsmen to have achieved this.
  • 38 Number of overs, out of 50, bowled by Zimbabwe's spinners. It was the ninth time Zimbabwe's spinners had bowled as many overs, or more. They once bowled 42, against West Indies in 2010. The only team to have bowled more spin in an innings is Sri Lanka, whose spinners have bowled 43 overs four times and 44 overs three times.
  • 2 Number of times AB de Villiers has bowled in an ODI. The only previous time he bowled was for Africa XI against Asia XI in Chennai in 2007. He bowled two overs on both occasions.

As soon as the score moved beyond 220, Zimbabwe's chances of winning, not in the overs they needed to get to the final, but overall, were dimmed. Their opening partnership remains brittle, their middle-order soft and their tail brave but inadequate even against a South African attack that was a man short.

After a collapse against Australia in their previous match, South Africa chose to bulk up the batting by adding Rilee Rossouw to the XI and had to bench a bowler. Imran Tahir missed out to leave South Africa with just one specialist spinner in Aaron Phangiso. Had Zimbabwe found a partnership as stubborn as the du Plessis-Duminy one, South Africa may have been found wanting but poor shot selection and wavering temperament continue to stunt their progress.

They can look to South Africa's approach as inspiration. When the openers were dismissed in the first eight overs, there was no panic despite the inexperienced player at No.4. Rossouw had two first-ball ducks to his name before this and Zimbabwe could have got through him and into the middle order but he showed more composure this time, particularly against spin.

Rossouw used his feet fairly well, brought out the sweep and reverse sweep and left du Plessis to be the aggressor. For all Rossouw's caution, he could do nothing about the Sean Williams delivery that turned into him as he went back to cut and bowled him but he had acquitted himself well enough to show his promise.

De Villiers was run-out cheaply at the non-strikers' end to give Zimbabwe another chance to take control but Duminy denied them that. He played a Test-match style innings with du Plessis which focused on finding gaps and rotating strike rather than muscling through. They did not breach the boundary for nine overs, including during the Powerplay but importantly, did not lose a wicket in that period either to ensue the foundation was laid.

Du Plessis eventually broke the drought in the 43rd over when he creamed Malcolm Waller through the offside and then slammed Nyumbu for six over long-on. As his century approached, fatigue shrouded du Plessis but he knew he needed to provide impetus at the end. Duminy was equally aware of the task.

In one eventful Madziva over, Duminy swatted one to the square leg boundary and then recorded his first half-century of the series, then top-edged and was dismissed, du Plessis inside-edged a ball for four to register a hundred in 135 balls and hammered the bowler for six over long-off. South Africa had the freedom to hit out at the end and ended up with a comfortable score on a sluggish surface.

Zimbabwe had prepared for a speedy start by inserting Vusi Sibanda in at the top but in his haste he was run out. Sikandar Raza threatened for the umpteenth time and then thew it away while Hamilton Masakadza also got a start he should have turned into something more significant.

Taylor was the only one to demonstrate an understanding of the approach required on this pitch with a patient start and careful application of when to attack. Taylor was composed but with Phangiso and Duminy turning the ball and the fear factor of Dale Steyn, Zimbabwe's middle-order crumbled and with it, their chance to cause another upset.

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

RSS Feeds: Firdose Moonda

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Greatest_Game on (September 5, 2014, 17:36 GMT)

@ dunger.bob commented "These are not light weight teams there're up against. These are two of the toughest in the world and Zimbabwe has definitely exceeded my expectations."

Dead on Bob. Zim definitely punches way above the weight that the rankings suggest they would. The talent is there - they just need the financial support & training infrastructure to leapfrog a number of teams, and be real contenders.

I have to take issue with part of your comment: SA & Aus are not "two of the toughest," they are THE two toughest teams in the world. And, quite frankly, Zim are not far behind in "toughness." It is a southern hemisphere quality - the Kiwis are a nuggety bunch too.

Time for a "Southern Hemisphere Quadrangular." Let's have a tournament where men are men, and the sheep are nervous ;))))

Posted by Amol_Ind_SA on (September 5, 2014, 8:48 GMT)

Now SA must consider this as six golden opportunities to fine-tune their performances against a top team like AUS, just before the World-Cup. Every player with a potential should get a chance to prove himself in the next six matches vs AUS. To start with, SA has to win this final.

Posted by bablankalhan55_youtube on (September 5, 2014, 7:46 GMT)

Well played Faf..Kallis cant be replaced overnight..but Faf has been quite a replacement

Posted by PPL11 on (September 5, 2014, 7:16 GMT)

All i can Say is Well Played Zim, a bit more application in batting area could of achieved you much batter results, but at least they made both top sides run for their win.

Posted by xtrafalgarx on (September 5, 2014, 6:47 GMT)

@Diane Skinner: Smith's bowling isn't good enough to be relied upon. He is only bowled when we have nothing to lose or are completely out of options. If our frontline bowlers aren't cutting it, Smith won't.

Posted by   on (September 5, 2014, 6:22 GMT)

aus is going to have it's work cut out in the final..especially if the wicket is slow. All the more reason they should have given smith a couple of overs to see how he's going. our bowlers struggled to get zimbabwe out good luck with the saffas!

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (September 5, 2014, 5:48 GMT)

Did Faf not get a 98 in this series too? So he could already have 4 tons which is pretty amazing considering it's not been out and out batting conditions. Looking forward to the final so let's hope Australia can actually get Faf out for a change!

Posted by anver777 on (September 5, 2014, 4:31 GMT)

FAF is in dream form in this Tri-Series.... wish he continue the same form in the Final against AUS !!!! GOOD LUCK !!!!

Posted by gibbs.175 on (September 5, 2014, 4:31 GMT)

It was a good ,but SA lost last match to Aus ,that is not except able. So SA must win the finale against Aus to keep the head high and that wil be a good sign to make real preparation for the World Cup in Australia .......good luck .....come on D.Kock ....do it

Posted by xtrafalgarx on (September 5, 2014, 3:43 GMT)

Du Plessis is very, very interesting. I haven't rated him ever since he came into international cricket to be honest. His FC average was 36 after over 70/80 games with about 7 or 8 FC hundreds, so I assumed he was lucky all this time. But he has shown that he is very mentally strong and can bat all day without giving his wicket away as well as put the gas on when needed.

It goes to show that a lot of the game is played inbetween the ears, lets hope someone like Doolan who has a similar record to when Du Plessis started can do the same, even though he isn't as strong mentally from the looks of things.

Posted by TommytuckerSaffa on (September 5, 2014, 2:02 GMT)

@Forever Protea. I think you will have to find it in your heart to forgive those fans unless you can you explain such a remarkable turnaround? I have never seen a player respond to Public criticism so positively. Before this series he was avg 28, approaching 50 games and nowhere close to getting a ton. This in my book, is below average for someone of his ability. Then he just turns it on out of nowhere. I have never seen him play such aggressive and big shots off quality bowlers in an ODI before. Can a positional switch have such a dramatic effect on a player? I don't think so. I think he wanted to make a point that he is good enough to bat 3 and he wanted to book his flight in advance to Oz for the WC.

Posted by android_user on (September 5, 2014, 1:19 GMT)

How is the pitch like in finals , the same aus vs zim played , then it will be low scoring match?

Posted by dunger.bob on (September 4, 2014, 23:17 GMT)

Once again the Zims did pretty damn well. I don't know what they actually think of it all, but if I were them I would be taking a lot of encouragement from this. These are not light weight teams there're up against. These are two of the toughest in the world and Zimbabwe has definitely exceeded my expectations.

I also agree with @HatsforBats about Faf. .. I'll fess up, he's surprised me too. I honestly thought he'd struggle in one day cricket but he's completely convinced me now that he can play the LO stuff, and do it very well what's more. The reason I thought he'd struggle is simply because of his 'hang around' style in Test cricket. Now I suspect the truth is that he's good enough to adapt his game and play a more expansive role if that's what his teams needs. That, to me, is a sign of a very good player, so yes, all the kudos in the world to him.

Posted by Greatest_Game on (September 4, 2014, 20:37 GMT)

@ xtrafalgarx. That comparison was in response to @ Ahmad Uetian's repeated trashing of Amla. To test his assertions I cited Amla's record, & compared the stats of the batsmen he named. It was not my idea - I'm just tired of seeing Amla trashed by @ Ahmad Uetian.

For further understanding, I did a manual scan (error possible) of the cumulative averages of Amla, Tendulkar & Jayasuriya.

Tendulkar's ave moved above 30 after 26 inngs, & reached 40 after 108 inngs. It's highest was 45.34 after 315 inngs, on 18 Jan 2004.

It took 82 inngs for Jayasuriya's ave to reach 20. It 1st touched 30 after 219 inngs. It's highest was 33.26 after 377 inngs, 18 April, 2007.

Amla has batted in 91 inngs. His lowest ave was 25, it hit 50 after 9 inngs, & again after 14, & stayed above 50 after 24 inngs. It's highest was 61.13 after 34 inngs, 2 Nov, 2010. That may change, but @ Ahmad Uetian was talking about Amla NOW! How can he ave that high, that long, & not pierce the infield or play great strokes?

Posted by BellCurve on (September 4, 2014, 20:18 GMT)

So Taylor ends up as Zimbabwe's best batsman of the tournament. Funny that he was dropped just before the tournament. Why would any team drop their only star player?

Posted by xtrafalgarx on (September 4, 2014, 18:57 GMT)

@Greatest_Game: While I agree that Amla is a top batsman. Comparing averages at this stage is a little misleading. While Amla averages higher than most in ODI's, longevity has to be taken into consideration. Yes, Tendulkar averaged 44, which is lower than Amla's 54, but to average 44 over FIVE HUNDRED odd ODI games is something else. Bevan included, he played well over 200 games. Making his average all the more impressive. Amla is yet to reach these heights. If his average is still 54 after another 100 games then his numbers could be comparable to these guys, but until then..

Posted by Warm_Coffee on (September 4, 2014, 18:10 GMT)

I agree with Greatest_Game. Amla ODI record does not lie and is one of the greats.

Posted by   on (September 4, 2014, 17:51 GMT)

@hatsforbats if Faf your words I think he would feel extremely honored. Gracious comment. He has occasionally been the proverbial thorn in the Aussies side. Hopefully (from a saffas perspective) he can do it again.

Posted by Greatest_Game on (September 4, 2014, 17:34 GMT)

@ Ahmad Uetian writes, "I've repeatedly said on different forums that ... Only the great stroke players like Sachin or Jayasuria can take adv of field being close," & that Amla is unable to do so.

Amla was fastest to 2000, 3000, & 4000 ODI runs, has THE HIGHEST ODI BATTING AVERAGE EVER against full-member teams. (ten Doeschate's is higher only against weak associates.)

Amla is the ONLY opener in the top 10 ODI batting aves (10+ inngs) with a low 8% of average-boosting "not-out" inngs. Next highest is Michael Beven with 53.58 - not-out in 34% of inngs!

Tendulkar's ODI ave is 44.83 @ SR 86.23. Jayasuriya's is 32.36 @ SR 91.2. Amla's is 54.4 @ SR 89.57 - 10 above Satchin, 22 above Jayasuriya, scoring as quickly. All opened, but Amla DEFINITELY scores more, & scores runs through the close field. We KNOW that! We see him play!

As YOU wrote, you have made this claim many times, yet the stats clearly indicate that your analysis is faulty. Repeating it again & again will not change that.

Posted by proteasfire on (September 4, 2014, 16:44 GMT)

Expected result, but credit to Faf Du Plessis for supreme batting and Taylor for giving good fight. Zimbabwe did well in this tour. They didnt allow SA to dominate in the one off test, gave good fight through the ODIs and triangular series and won one against Australia. They would be pleased with their effort and will be hoping to play more games to establish themselves as challenging side. Time to watch out for the big final!!

Posted by SurlyCynic on (September 4, 2014, 16:04 GMT)

The game became a bit of a circus with AB bowling, brilliant sportsman who can do almost anything with any type of ball... except bowl. That's why we need a batting allrounder who can add a few overs of tight seam - someone like Wiese. Still, at least we didn't have a tail starting at 7 today.

Great to see Zim's best batsman back in the runs. He was in ZCFOutkast's sights for purging from the team, I guess Williams should now watch out as he didn't make runs today.

Posted by gimme-a-greentop on (September 4, 2014, 16:00 GMT)

@Tommy_Tanker - you just made that up completely to suit your purposes. Parnell got hit for ONE four by Taylor at the end, hardly a lower order batsman, and also hardly getting belted. He actually bowled with good control today, economy 4.5 or so overall. Not saying he wont get carted on another day, just pointed out a blantant fabrication.

Posted by CricketChat on (September 4, 2014, 15:55 GMT)

Zim should build a stronger batting unit. That's the only way they can compete against good teams. Simultaneous global tours by 2-3 Zim FC teams competing in Eng, SA, Aus, Ind, WI and SL could be a good way to build the core of a future team. Otherwise, it could another 15-20 yrs before Zim goes anywhere on international stage.

Posted by ForeverProtea on (September 4, 2014, 15:24 GMT)

I always find it incredible how fans can so easily call for someone's head, and then a game or three later they call the same guy a national hero.

Posted by HatsforBats on (September 4, 2014, 15:12 GMT)

Honestly, if VVS wasn't still living I would swear black & blue that Faf was his living reincarnation. He loves to punish us Aussies, but it's nice to see he can extend his gifts to other nations.

Posted by Tommy_Tanker on (September 4, 2014, 14:35 GMT)

Morkel and Parnell getting belted by Zim lower order batsman. Nothing changes. Thank God Rilee got some runs today, the threat of the lower order staying the same was looming.

Posted by   on (September 4, 2014, 13:57 GMT)

I read Rossouw's dismissal, looks like he got bowled by a delivery that cut back in sharply. Maybe they should opt for one more spinner instead of Parnell. Especially since we are getting what sounds like unplayable deliveries from the spinners.

Posted by CheerforUnderdogs on (September 4, 2014, 13:44 GMT)

Has He stroked the form too early... Imagine Faf failing in WC...

Posted by chitova on (September 4, 2014, 12:46 GMT)

Winning the match means more to us Zimbabwe than the final, shine Zimbabwe shine..

Posted by Biggus on (September 4, 2014, 12:03 GMT)

I feel better now, at least Du Plessis is doing it to Zim as well. He's very much gaining in stature internationally. Kudos.

Posted by   on (September 4, 2014, 9:26 GMT)

I've repeatedly said on different forums that the best form of attack is to frustrate batsman by block singles & for that have short mid wicket & short covers always in place for accumulators like Amla Dravid. Even Zim have done this to reap the rewards. Aus too did this to Amla he got frustrated & had no ans.

For all those who think playing new ball with field up is easly Amla now realizing playing through -ve single blocking fields vs new ball is the toughest challenge. Taking singles in spread fields is far easy that is why opening is difficult middle order batting easiest. Only the great stroke players like Sachin or Jayasuria can take adv of field being close.

Posted by AnSen1984 on (September 4, 2014, 7:38 GMT)

Vusimusi Sibanda is a fabulous cricketer! Once he gets going Zim is going to sail over the line thrashing the Proteas! Astute thinking from Brendan Taylor!

Posted by   on (September 4, 2014, 7:38 GMT)

Best f Luck Zimbabwe...but be honest you are out of contention ,better focus on a win ,defeating SA by big margin is out of equation but if Zim play well and wid little luck they can beat SA...

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Firdose MoondaClose
Tournament Results
Australia v South Africa at Harare - Sep 6, 2014
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 55 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v South Africa at Harare - Sep 4, 2014
South Africa won by 63 runs
Australia v South Africa at Harare - Sep 2, 2014
Australia won by 62 runs
Zimbabwe v Australia at Harare - Aug 31, 2014
Zimbabwe won by 3 wickets (with 12 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v South Africa at Harare - Aug 29, 2014
South Africa won by 61 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days