|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
July 19, 2012
Zimbabwe A 83 for 2 (Sibanda 43*) beat Sri Lanka A 81 (Chigumbura 6-24) by eight wickets
The early wicket was provided by Tendai Chatara, who took 2 for 27, and Zimbabwe kept taking wickets thereon as Chigumbura destroyed the middle order. Vusi Sibanda and Craig Ervine ensured Zimbabwe did not slip after a couple of wickets in their chase, and reached the target in the 19th over.
A 25-run opening stand turned out to be the highest partnership of Sri Lanka's innings, after which they lost seven wickets for 27 runs. Allrounder Sachithra Serasinghe tried to lead a recovery through a 24-run partnership for the eighth wicket with No. 8 Kanishka Alvitigala, but Alvitigala was trapped lbw by Chigumbura for 10. Left-arm fast bowler Brian Vitori, who claimed five for 37 in his previous match against Sri Lanka A, took the final two wickets.
Sri Lanka began well with the ball by reducing Zimbabwe to 19 for 2 in the fifth over, but Sibanda and Ervine put on 64 runs to achieve the target safely. The win was Zimbabwe's second in the tournament, and meant that Sri Lanka lost all four of their matches in the tri-series.
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
|Comments have now been closed for this article
In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?
Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one
As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence
Mohammed Shami bowls a few really good balls, but they are interspersed with far too many loose ones, an inconsistency that is unacceptable in Test cricket
Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things
A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers
To consider banning it in the wake of Phillip Hughes' death may be knee-jerk, but to refuse to consider the pros and cons of a ban is unwise