Pakistan's batting at Galle scaled new heights
Pakistan has won the Test series against Sri Lanka with an emphasis that would suggest a no-contest
Omar Kureishi
28-Jun-2000
Pakistan has won the Test series against Sri Lanka with an emphasis
that would suggest a no-contest. Not so long ago, it was the other way
round when Sri Lanka toured Pakistan. In both instances, the homeadvantage was nullified. This could be a healthy sign or simply mean
that the local authorities are incompetent. For some perverted reason
it has always been considered perfectly kosher for the home team to
"fix" the wickets to suit their strength.
The Sri Lankans must have been delighted, as well as surprised when
they discovered wickets in Pakistan to be spinner-friendly, more
specifically Muralitharan friendly.
The Pakistanis were equally delighted and no doubt equally surprised
to play on wickets that helped the seamers and conditions in Galle
that allowed the Pakistan bowlers to get prodigious reverse swing.
Muralitharan looked dangerous and bowled superbly as did Arshad Khan
but it was the Pakistan fast bowlers who wreaked havoc and for good
measure Abdur Razzaq getting a hat trick.
But it was Wasim and Waqar who gave sleepless nights to the Sri Lankan
batsmen. When a partnership had to be broken up, more often than not,
it would be one of these bowlers who would carry out the execution.
But it was Pakistan's batting at Galle that scaled new heights. What
we saw was a run-feast and even the mighty Muralitharan was reduced to
a trundler. Obviously Pakistan had a game-plan against him and it
seemed to be a simple one. Not allow him to dominate, to take the
attack to him. It goes to Muralitharan's credit that he stuck to his
task manfully and still got wickets but he was not allowed to cast his
magical spell.
Saeed Anwar, Inzamamul Haq, Younis Khan and Wasim Akram got hundreds
each, different in their own way. Since one is not judging a beauty
contest there is no requirement to pick which was the best hundred.
But for sheer pugnaciousness, Wasim Akram's innings stands out in a
class of its own.
I had hinted in my column last week that Wasim Akram was starting to
take his batting seriously. He has never been a "slogger" but someone
who is a clean hitter of the ball with genuine cricket shots. There is
nothing slapdash about his batting and he does not create "hilarious"
moments.
At Galle, he paced his innings to perfection and having watched
cricket for so many years with a "professional" eye I had a gutfeeling that he meant serious business when he came in to bat. He
gives the impression, not so much as someone who is enjoying his
cricket, which he must be doing, but as someone who is proving that
not only is he still the world's best bowler but he is no mug with the
bat. Indeed he is a genuine all-rounder, equal to, if not better than
other all-rounders, a vanishing breed of cricketers.
It is not for me to say whether Sri Lankan cricket is having any
problems. Jayasuriya's own form is disappointing and I am wondering
whether he's beginning to feelthe pressure of captaincy. He was out in
both innings at Galle playing loose shots as if his mind was
elsewhere. The one who looked calm and collected and "indestructible"
was Arjuna Ranatunga.
The Sri Lankan Board may have acted in haste in sacking him. He has
been Sri Lanka's most successful captain and if he is good enough to
be in the team, which he obviously is, then Sri Lanka should not have
wasted his vast experience and demoted him to a foot-soldier. It goes
to his credit that he is giving hundred per cent. Kaluwitharna too is
going through a miserably lean patch and thereare reports that he may
be axed.
There is no other player who does more to lift the Sri Lankan team
than this pocket-battleship. With the series already lost, it might
not be a bad idea to get him to open the innings in the Kandy Test
match. Who knows, he might strike form? What Sri Lanka must avoid
doing, at all costs, is to start making wholesale changes. This is the
mistake that Pakistan made and which allowed Sri Lanka to beat
Pakistan both in the one-day and Test series.
When senior players go through a lean patch, it is invariably assumed
that they are over the hill. Luckily for Pakistan good sense prevailed
otherwise Inzamamul Haq, Waqar Yunus and even Wasim Akram would be
cooling their heels and watching the cricket on television.
The Australians can be quite ruthless in discarding players but they
are also capable of withstanding pressure. They kept Mark Taylor on as
captain and they did not yield to the temptation to drop Mark Waugh
despite repeated failures. It's a matter of judgement and the personal
likes and dislikes of experts should be left for comments on
television where they add to the entertainment.
Tony Greig for example has brought a new dimension to expertise. He
will give a batsman out. No question about that one, he will say. On
seeing the replay, he will say no question that was missing leg-stump.
That's what makes him a good expert. He can be right and wrong at the
same time, a gift not available to lesser experts.