A moral stand on Zimbabwe

The ECB has suspended all bilateral agreements with the Zimbabwe board and cancelled England's tour to Zimbabwe next summer and the Guardian's Andy Bull welcomes the decision for sport and politics are inseparable, so the government's stance on Zimbabwe is the least one should expect.

It is a damning indictment of the previous regime's handling of the issue that the letter from Andy Burnham to the ECB stating that England should not be playing cricket against Zimbabwe should seem to be so refreshingly direct an approach. That clarity of thought and action is the very least we should expect from a government which has been so keen to use sporting success for its own political advancement. Having been repeatedly shafted by the government's wavering over the years, it's childishly satisfying that one England player urinated in the garden of No10 Downing Street, while another called Blair a wally during their drunken post-Ashes party.

In the Times Mike Atherton criticises the ECB for taking the decision to suspend ties with Zimbabwe only after being assured there would be no financial penalties.

After receiving Burnham’s letter, the ECB released a statement stating its concern over the “lack of human rights in Zimbabwe”. Only now, after years of human rights abuses, has the ECB found the courage to speak. It appears that it is fine to be moral, as long as it does not cost you money.

Atherton has another piece in the same paper, this one about his embarrassment at a photo of him taken with Robert Mugabe:

Why should I be embarrassed about a 12-year-old photograph? Partly, I think, because of my slightly deferential body language. For someone who has never been impressed by status, power or money, it’s puzzling to see that I’m not quite bowing, but nearly.

Also read Sambit Bal's piece in cricinfo.com urging the ICC to end years of indifference by suspending Zimbabwe's Full-Member status.