Consistency provides a path to success
ESPNcricinfo's statistical analysis showed consistency of team selection proved a factor in being successful in the County Championship in 2012

Such was Surrey's traumatic season in 2011 as they tried to come to terms with the sad death of their England Lions batsman, Tom Maynard, it is no surprise to find that the turmoil is reflected in ESPNcricinfo's statistical study of the 2011 county season.
Surrey averaged nearly three team changes per game in the County Championship - by far the least consistent team selection among all the 18 first-class counties - as they pulled off a late-season recovery that avoided the threat of relegation.
Their captain, Rory Hamilton-Brown, took a period of compassionate leave after the death of Maynard, a close friend, in a dawn incident on the London underground, and he has since joined Sussex in an attempt to stabilise his life and his career.
Surrey also used as many as 24 players - a high also equalled by Somerset who, despite the disruption, managed to finish runners-up in Division One.
Warwickshire, as so often happens with Championship-winning sides, were one of the most settled teams in the country but consistent selection did not help Worcestershire, merely emphasising the lack of quality in their squad, as they headed inexorably towards relegation.
The statistics gathered by Neville Scott, a county cricket reporter and analyst, have consistently revealed Derbyshire's, well, consistency. They averaged fewer changes per match than any other county, their matches were quite evenly-fought, they had a sturdy reliance upon homegrown players and it even rained upon them less than most.
All that added up to promotion and another tilt at Division One for one of county cricket's most unfashionable counties.
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Warwickshire | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.40 |
Somerset | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.87 |
Middlesex | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.53 |
Sussex | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1.33 |
Nottinghamshire | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4.5 | 3 | 2.23 |
Durham | 1 | A | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1.75 |
Surrey | 2 | 2 | A | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2.71 |
Lancashire | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.47 |
Worcestershire | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.33 |
Average | ||||||||||||||||
Derbyshire | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 |
Yorkshire | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1.80 |
Kent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.97 |
Hampshire | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1.47 |
Essex | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.93 |
Glamorgan | 1 | 2 | A | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.79 |
Leicestershire | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.00 |
Northamptonshire | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1.80 |
Gloucestershire | 1 | 2 | A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2.00 |
The next table provides a further breakdown of team make-ups, looking at the number of matches played by each cricketer.
Players used in 2012 Championship | |||||||
County | Total | 13-16 games | 9-12 games | 5-8 games | 14 games | Debuts | <10 |
1 Warwickshire | 19 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3 |
2 Somerset | 24 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
3 Middlesex | 19 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
4 Sussex | 18 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
5 Nottinghamshire | 20 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
6 Durham | 21 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
7 Surrey | 24 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
8 Lancashire | 19 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
9 Worcestershire | 22 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
10 Derbyshire | 17 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
11 Yorkshire | 21 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 3 |
12 Kent | 18 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
13 Hampshire | 18 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
14 Essex | 22 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
15 Glamorgan | 19 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
16 Leicestershire | 22 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
17 Northamptonshire | 20 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
18 Gloucestershire | 21 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
Championship debutants excludes those with first-class experience abroad. <10 = number of players, including debutants, with fewer than ten competitive first-class appearance hitherto. Five players appeared for two different sides, one of them (Richard Johnson) after fewer than ten Championship games. Of 359 players, 79 (70 British-raised) had appeared in fewer than ten Championship or overseas first-class matches pre 2011. Of these, only 25 (23 British-raised) were debutants. Note that Durham. Surrey, Glamorgan and Gloucestershire each had one match abandoned - therefore no team was officially declared. These four sides played only 15, not 16, matches.
Read in App
Elevate your reading experience on ESPNcricinfo App.