Warner's 178 slots in at No. 5
An analysis of performances in the World Cup after the first 26 matches of the World Cup

This analysis will be done at suitable points during the World Cup 2015 so that the readers can see the way the Performance tables evolve. As more matches get played the top performance mosaic changes and readers can identify with what happened in the past few days. The qualifying bar for inclusion moves higher as more matches get played.
Pakistan had an easy win over UAE. However they must be concerned at their inability to dismiss an average batting team in 50 overs. Australia broke a number of records on their way to a win which was close to being called a win by two innings and a few runs. Bangladesh's well-crafted win, which keeps them in the hunt, completed the trio of matches.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 579 | 2015 | 3616 | AB de Villiers | South Africa | Win | 162* | 66 |
2 | 572 | 2015 | 3612 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 |
3 | 460 | 2015 | 3615 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 |
4 | 460 | 2015 | 3610 | S Dhawan | India | Saf | 137 | 146 |
5 | 448 | 2015 | 3623 | DA Warner | Australia | Afg | 178 | 133 |
6 | 442 | 2015 | 3624 | KJ Coetzer | Scotland | Bng | 156 | 134 |
7 | 396 | 2015 | 3601 | DA Miller | South Africa | Zim | 138* | 92 |
8 | 389 | 2015 | 3613 | Shaiman Anwar | U.A.E. | Ire | 106 | 83 |
9 | 386 | 2015 | 3600 | JWA Taylor | England | Aus | 98* | 90 |
10 | 382 | 2015 | 3621 | HM Amla | South Africa | Ire | 159 | 128 |
David Warner's huge innings of 178 garnered 448 rating pts and came in comfortably in the fifth position in the Batting performance table. This innings slotted between Shikhar Dhawan's and Kyle Coetzer's hundreds. Coetzer's big hundred, with 442 rating pts, came into the table in the sixth position. It would have come in higher if Scotland had won. The only fifty still remaining in the top-10 is James Taylor's 98. It is understandable. Even Glenn Maxwell's 88 in under 40 balls was way off the cut-off.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 670 | 2015 | 3617 | MA Starc | Australia | Nzl | 9.0 - 0 - 28 - 6 |
2 | 603 | 2015 | 3607 | TG Southee | New Zealand | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 7 |
3 | 487 | 2015 | 3617 | TA Boult | New Zealand | Aus | 10.0 - 3 - 27 - 5 |
4 | 444 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 9.0 - 0 - 33 - 5 |
5 | 429 | 2015 | 3602 | Sohail Khan | Pakistan | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 55 - 5 |
6 | 358 | 2015 | 3616 | Imran Tahir | South Africa | Win | 10.0 - 2 - 45 - 5 |
7 | 352 | 2015 | 3620 | Mohammad Irfan | Pakistan | Zim | 10.0 - 2 - 30 - 4 |
8 | 324 | 2015 | 3608 | JE Taylor | West Indies | Pak | 7.0 - 1 - 15 - 3 |
9 | 319 | 2015 | 3621 | KJ Abbott | South Africa | Ire | 8.0 - 0 - 21 - 4 |
10 | 307 | 2015 | 3600 | ST Finn | England | Aus | 10.0 - 0 - 71 - 5 |
No bowling performance was good enough to get into the top-10 of the Bowling performance table.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 700 | 2015 | 3612 | CH Gayle | West Indies | Zim | 215 | 147 | 6.0-0-35-2 |
2 | 579 | 2015 | 3615 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Bng | 161* | 146 | 8.0-0-35-2 |
3 | 496 | 2015 | 3600 | MR Marsh | Australia | Eng | 23 | 20 | 9.0-0-33-5 |
4 | 446 | 2015 | 3620 | Wahab Riaz | Pakistan | Zim | 54* | 46 | 9.4-1-45-4 |
5 | 435 | 2015 | 3611 | MM Ali | England | Sco | 128 | 107 | 10.0-0-47-2 |
6 | 353 | 2015 | 3608 | AD Russell | West Indies | Pak | 42* | 13 | 8.0-2-33-3 |
7 | 300 | 2015 | 3614 | RD Berrington | Scotland | Afg | 25 | 46 | 10.0-0-40-4 |
8 | 299 | 2015 | 3606 | SC Williams | Zimbabwe | Uae | 76* | 65 | 8.0-0-43-2 |
9 | 297 | 2015 | 3613 | Amjad Javed | U.A.E. | Ire | 42 | 35 | 10.0-0-60-3 |
10 | 281 | 2015 | 3599 | CJ Anderson | New Zealand | Slk | 75 | 46 | 3.1-0-18-2 |
If Maxwell had captured another wicket, his all-round performance would have got into the top-10. As it is the Player performance table also remains untouched.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 721 | 2015 | 3616 | South Africa | 408 for 5 in 50.0 | Win | 151 for 10 in 33.1 |
2 | 714 | 2015 | 3607 | New Zealand | 125 for 2 in 12.2 | Eng | 123 for 10 in 33.2 |
3 | 691 | 2015 | 3610 | India | 307 for 7 in 50.0 | Saf | 177 for 10 in 40.2 |
4 | 688 | 2015 | 3623 | Australia | 417 for 6 in 50.0 | Afg | 142 for 10 in 37.3 |
5 | 678 | 2015 | 3621 | South Africa | 411 for 4 in 50.0 | Ire | 210 for 10 in 45.0 |
6 | 665 | 2015 | 3608 | West Indies | 310 for 6 in 50.0 | Pak | 160 for 10 in 39.0 |
7 | 665 | 2015 | 3618 | India | 104 for 1 in 18.5 | Uae | 102 for 10 in 31.3 |
8 | 645 | 2015 | 3619 | Sri Lanka | 312 for 1 in 47.2 | Eng | 309 for 6 in 50.0 |
9 | 640 | 2015 | 3605 | Bangladesh | 267 for 10 in 50.0 | Afg | 162 for 10 in 42.5 |
10 | 626 | 2015 | 3615 | Sri Lanka | 332 for 1 in 50.0 | Bng | 240 for 10 in 47.0 |
Finally the Team performance table. Australia's 275-run win secured 688 rating pts and got into the fourth position. Unfortunately Afghanistan's batting was rated average. Otherwise this sort of win would have crossed 700 rating pts. Bangladesh's win fetched only 608 rating pts and missed the cut-off since their bowling was very poor. By now it would be clear to everyone that all departments should work well for teams to get high rating pts.
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems
Read in App
Elevate your reading experience on ESPNcricinfo App.