More runs and wickets than ever before
The key numbers from the 2010 IPL
Cricinfo picks out some of the key stats from the 45-day third edition of the IPL.
More runs and more wickets than ever before
The IPL this year had one more match than in the first two editions (for the third place), but in terms of runs and wickets, the stats for this year were way ahead: the aggregate of 18,864 runs is 993 runs more than the tally in 2008, while 23 more wickets fell this year than in 2009. That's mainly because, unlike in the last two years, not a single game was rained out or shortened: the closest we came to a disruption was the bomb blast in Bangalore, despite which a full 20-over game was played that day.
The run rate, though, dropped slightly this year compared to 2008, but it was still much more than the 2009 edition which was moved to South Africa. The marginal drop in run rate was largely due to the slower pitches and more difficult batting conditions in the last two weeks. In the first 41 matches of the IPL, teams scored at an average run rate of 8.40 runs per over; in the last 19 games, it dropped significantly to 7.50. That was also the reason why the sixes tally fell short of 600 this year - there were only 159 of them in the last 19 matches an average of 8.37 per game; in the first 41 games, the average was 10.39 per match.
Year | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s |
2008 | 17,931 | 689 | 26.02 | 8.30 | 1703/ 623 |
2009 | 16,320 | 697 | 23.41 | 7.48 | 1317/ 506 |
2010 | 18,864 | 720 | 26.20 | 8.12 | 1708/ 585 |
Batting and bowling stats for each team
Mumbai Indians were the dominant team throughout the IPL, and their domination is reflected in their stats: the difference between their batting run rate and bowling economy rate is 0.80, which is the highest of all teams. Chennai Super Kings improved their numbers considerably towards the end of the tournament, which is why the difference in their rates is a respectable 0.39 despite winning only nine out of 16 matches. Royal Challengers Bangalore are the only other team with a difference of more than 0.20, but the stats for the fourth semi-finalist, Deccan Chargers, is quite poor. They finished with a difference of -0.41, some of which was due to their meek finish to the tournament, when they were walloped by Bangalore in the third-place playoff.
The two teams with the worst difference are Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab, the sides which finished at the bottom of the table. What's more surprising, though, is that their numbers are that much poorer than Deccan's.
Team | Bat average | Run rate | Bowl average | Run rate | Diff in average | Diff in run rate |
Chennai Super Kings | 29.82 | 8.33 | 24.57 | 7.94 | 5.25 | 0.39 |
Mumbai Indians | 27.10 | 8.63 | 23.93 | 7.83 | 3.17 | 0.80 |
Royal Challengers Bangalore | 27.91 | 8.16 | 26.71 | 7.95 | 1.20 | 0.21 |
Deccan Chargers | 21.00 | 7.62 | 24.33 | 8.03 | -3.33 | -0.41 |
Delhi Daredevils | 24.48 | 7.92 | 22.56 | 7.85 | 1.92 | 0.07 |
Kolkata Knight Riders | 30.19 | 7.87 | 30.02 | 8.19 | 0.17 | -0.32 |
Rajasthans Royals | 23.18 | 8.13 | 28.15 | 8.59 | -4.97 | -0.46 |
Kings XI Punjab | 28.47 | 8.26 | 32.39 | 8.73 | -3.92 | -0.47 |
Comparing every stage
The overall Powerplay stats in 2010 were a touch better than those in 2008 - the run rate was marginally higher, at 7.89. That's thanks largely to Delhi Daredevils (run rate 8.53), Mumbai (8.35), and Punjab (8.02), the only teams with a rate of more than eight.
Year | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s |
2008 | 5358 | 176 | 30.44 | 7.70 | 691/ 135 |
2009 | 4933 | 187 | 26.37 | 7.22 | 554/ 156 |
2010 | 5682 | 176 | 32.28 | 7.89 | 746/ 123 |
In the middle overs teams were slightly slower than in 2008, with Rajasthan (8.13) the only team to manage a run rate of more than eight. Surprisingly Mumbai (7.14) and Delhi (7.16) were the teams with the slowest run rates.
Year | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s |
2008 | 7099 | 224 | 31.69 | 7.87 | 557/ 241 |
2009 | 6027 | 220 | 27.39 | 6.72 | 387/ 148 |
2010 | 7217 | 254 | 28.41 | 7.54 | 513/ 211 |
The last six overs too saw a marginal drop in scoring rate compared to 2008 (though they were all higher than the 2009 numbers). Mumbai were the standout team, scoring at 10.97 runs per over, while Bangalore (9.74) and Chennai (9.68) were the others to score at more than nine-and-a-half.
Year | Runs | Wickets | Average | Run rate | 4s/ 6s |
2008 | 5474 | 289 | 18.94 | 9.75 | 455/ 247 |
2009 | 5360 | 290 | 18.48 | 8.91 | 376/ 202 |
2010 | 5965 | 290 | 20.56 | 9.24 | 449/ 251 |
The Ashwin and Bollinger factor
The presence of Doug Bollinger, and the decision to open the attack with him and R Ashwin, made a huge difference to Chennai's fortunes. They had won only three out of eight games till then, but won six out of eight after he came in. The biggest difference was in their bowling in the first six overs: in the first eight matches they were clueless, neither taking wickets nor keeping runs in check - they economy rate of 8.39 was the second-worst at that point.
Once Bollinger and Ashwin took the new ball, though, Chennai's fortunes changes completely, and they became the best bowling team in the Powerplays, taking 13 wickets at an excellent economy rate of 6.35.
Matches | Wickets | Average | Econ rate | |
Without Bollinger | 8 | 10 | 40.30 | 8.39 |
With Bollinger | 8 | 13 | 23.46 | 6.35 |
Both bowlers were equally effective in the first six, which allowed Chennai to choke the runs and force batsmen into errors. Ashwin and Bollinger both managed economy rates of less than five, which is exceptional in this format.
Bowler | Balls | Runs conceded | Wickets | Average | Econ rate |
R Ashwin | 114 | 89 | 6 | 14.83 | 4.68 |
Doug Bollinger | 114 | 94 | 6 | 15.67 | 4.94 |
The best in the Powerplays
The table below shows the top batsmen in the powerplay overs in IPL 2010. Sachin Tendulkar, who was the top run getter in the tournament, amassed more than 300 runs at an exceptional average. Virender Sehwag scored at the quickest rate while Adam Gilchrist, who otherwise had a poor IPL, hit the most sixes.
Batsman | Runs scored | Strike rate | Average | 4s | 6s |
Sachin Tendulkar | 327 | 8.24 | 109.00 | 55 | 0 |
Jacques Kallis | 274 | 6.68 | 45.66 | 42 | 3 |
Adam Gilchrist | 249 | 9.22 | 19.15 | 29 | 13 |
M Vijay | 241 | 8.65 | 48.20 | 23 | 11 |
Virender Sehwag | 240 | 9.35 | 26.66 | 38 | 7 |
Matthew Hayden | 237 | 6.93 | 23.70 | 30 | 9 |
Michael Lumb | 225 | 8.88 | 45.00 | 37 | 5 |
Sourav Ganguly | 219 | 6.73 | 73.00 | 35 | 5 |
Naman Ojha | 208 | 7.47 | 26.00 | 30 | 5 |
Chaminda Vaas was extremely economical and also picked up eight wickets during the Powerplays. The other revelations were Bollinger and Ashwin, who played crucial roles in Chennai's success.
Bowler | Balls bowled | Economy rate | Wickets taken | Average |
Chaminda Vaas | 90 | 4.86 | 8 | 9.12 |
Ryan Harris | 96 | 4.87 | 5 | 15.60 |
Doug Bollinger | 114 | 4.94 | 6 | 15.66 |
R Ashwin | 132 | 5.00 | 7 | 15.71 |
Dirk Nannes | 102 | 5.17 | 3 | 29.33 |
Shane Bond | 90 | 6.26 | 4 | 23.50 |
Lasith Malinga | 120 | 6.65 | 6 | 22.16 |
Praveen Kumar | 168 | 7.25 | 4 | 50.75 |
Dale Steyn | 162 | 7.33 | 6 | 33.00 |
Zaheer Khan | 144 | 7.45 | 4 | 44.75 |
The best finishers
Keiron Pollard scored the most runs in the last six overs, at an average of more than 13 per over. In terms of strike rate, though, he was pipped to the post by Robin Uthappa, who had a strike rate of nearly 14 runs per over.
Batsman | Runs | Balls | Dismissals | Average | Runs per over |
Keiron Pollard | 234 | 107 | 9 | 26.00 | 13.12 |
Virat Kohli | 186 | 110 | 8 | 23.25 | 10.14 |
S Badrinath | 178 | 127 | 7 | 25.42 | 8.40 |
Irfan Pathan | 174 | 91 | 4 | 43.50 | 11.47 |
Rohit Sharma | 163 | 105 | 7 | 23.28 | 9.31 |
Albie Morkel | 147 | 90 | 6 | 24.50 | 9.80 |
Angelo Mathews | 144 | 93 | 4 | 36.00 | 9.29 |
Robin Uthappa | 143 | 62 | 4 | 35.75 | 13.83 |
Among the bowlers Anil Kumble was outstanding with an economy rate of 6.36, which was one run better than his nearest competitor, Lasith Malinga of Mumbai. Dale Steyn and Muttiah Muralitharan were impressive too, but Zaheer Khan was the only bowler to take ten wickets during the last six overs.
Bowler | Balls bowled | Runs conceded | Wickets | Average | Econ rate |
Anil Kumble | 98 | 104 | 7 | 14.85 | 6.36 |
Lasith Malinga | 114 | 140 | 8 | 17.50 | 7.36 |
Dale Steyn | 90 | 113 | 6 | 18.83 | 7.53 |
Muttiah Muralitharan | 90 | 118 | 7 | 16.85 | 7.86 |
Zaheer Khan | 116 | 164 | 10 | 16.40 | 8.48 |
More numbers
97 - The number of sixes struck by Chennai, the highest in the tournament. Deccan and Bangalore conceded the most sixes - 85 each.
27 - The number of sixes struck by Robin Uthappa, which is one more than Murali Vijay's tally. Pragyan Ojha conceded the highest number of sixes - 17.
23 - The number of run-outs effected by Delhi, the highest in the tournament and one more than Chennai. Rajasthan's batsmen were run out most often - 34 times.
72 - The number of wides bowled by Bangalore, which is the highest. The two bowlers leading in this regard are also from Bangalore - Steyn (28) and Praveen (18).
185.71 - Kieron Pollard's strike rate, which is the highest among batsmen who've scored more than 100 runs. Uthappa is next at 171.55.
S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo
With inputs from Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan.
Read in App
Elevate your reading experience on ESPNcricinfo App.