Australia v Sri Lanka, 4th ODI, Sydney

Warner reprimanded for showing dissent

ESPNcricinfo staff

January 21, 2013

Comments: 24 | Text size: A | A

David Warner, the Australia batsman, has received an official reprimand after pleading guilty to a Level 1 breach of the ICC Code of Conduct during the Sydney ODI against Sri Lanka on Sunday.

Warner had stood his ground after being given out lbw in the 29th over, before eventually leaving while shaking his head. Replays showed Warner had got an inside edge to a Thisara Perera delivery before it struck him on the pad. The lone review available to Australia had already been used unsuccessfully by Michael Clarke earlier.

Warner was found to have breached Article 2.1.3 of the Code which relates to "showing dissent at an umpire's decision during an international match".

Warner admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by the match referee, Javagal Srinath, and there was no need for a formal hearing. The charge had been laid by the on-field umpires Marais Erasmus and Paul Reiffel, third umpire Richard Kettleborough and fourth umpire John Ward.

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (January 23, 2013, 12:52 GMT)

There was a Great Sri Lanka, Atapattu who called back Symonds after seeing whata howler the umpires had made, guess this has disapeared from Sri Lankan Cricket. Jayawardenen could have earnt Greatness

Posted by HOMEBREW on (January 22, 2013, 23:59 GMT)

I feel the umpire should also be reprimanded and fined for such an backyard decission or dropped from international matches. Even a weekend grade umpire would've seen that inside edge. In the NRL if a referee makes a few mistakes he's dropped to lower grade, maybe the same thing should happen to cricket umpire's? At the end of the day the TV umpire should have the last say on "Howlers". If the umpire can check for a no-ball surely the TV umpire can relay a message to field umpires that they made a mistake and re-call the batsman. Reading all of the comments on here everyone seems to forget that there is an amount of money on the game from all over the world for all sorts of things ie: next over runs, how many will the batsman make?, next 5 over runs and so on and so on. Could this also be an influence?

Posted by Someguy on (January 22, 2013, 12:10 GMT)

Really, the DRS is a bit of a joke. It is there to get rid of the "howlers", but is being used by people in desperation. I think players should still be able to refer, but in the case of blatant mistakes, and I'm not talking about mistakes that take 5 minutes to identify, but mistakes that are clear in the first couple of replays, the 3rd umpire should have the power to reverse it.

Both Warner and Henriques LBW's were clear on the first replay that there was a big inside edge before it hit the pad. This is what DRS is meant to stop, not an a plumb LBW that hit 1mm outside the line.

Posted by Someguy on (January 22, 2013, 12:03 GMT)

@Tumbarumbar - You can't really blame specific players for referring 50/50 LBW decisions. They usually ask the non-striker what they think and make a decision between them. I doubt that ask their mate what they think and if he says "I reckon you're out" they just refer it anyway.

Posted by Basher_2013 on (January 22, 2013, 1:26 GMT)

come on guys! everybody can make mistake, so we should not talk a lot more about this. Therefore, they should really stickly follow the code of conduct, and they also need to update many of the laws that would really make sence.

Posted by K.H.Dushmantha on (January 21, 2013, 17:58 GMT)

I strongly feel that umpires, match offiicals, refree must have panelty system for their wrong doing too. Base on umpires decisions may not enough 1 review and it is better to get right decision by DRS involve 4 umpires + match refree + what ever availble resource even field umpire given wrong decision.

Posted by sparklight on (January 21, 2013, 16:43 GMT)

@OptimusPrimal - Welcome to the New WO. How it feels to be in the other side.

Posted by OptimusPrimal on (January 21, 2013, 13:01 GMT)

How come I didn't see any reprimands against Gautham Ghambir and Virat Kohli during the recently concluded Pak/India series? They did much more than stand their ground. Arguing with umpires over wides, lbws etc. If Warner deserved a level 1 reprimand then Ghambir and Kohli definitely deserve something harsher.

Posted by Tumbarumbar on (January 21, 2013, 12:38 GMT)

If Warner received a reprimand shouldn't Erasmus receive one; not for the decision but for throwing his head back then shaking it in dismay while Riefel patted him on the back while they watched the replay? There wasn't a great deal of difference between his body language and Warmers!

The big problem, and we have seen it a number of times this year is that Michael Clarke and (since he has rejoined the team) Phil Hughes, are habitual uses of the review system for 50/50 LBW calls. In fact world wide I'd bet captains use the DRS for themselves more than anyone

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
ESPNcricinfo staffClose
Related Links
Players/Officials: David Warner
Series/Tournaments: Sri Lanka tour of Australia
Teams: Australia
Tour Results
Australia v Sri Lanka at Melbourne - Jan 28, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 2 runs (D/L method)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Sydney - Jan 26, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 5 wickets (with 7 balls remaining)
Australia v Sri Lanka at Hobart - Jan 23, 2013
Australia won by 32 runs
Australia v Sri Lanka at Sydney - Jan 20, 2013
No result
Australia v Sri Lanka at Brisbane - Jan 18, 2013
Sri Lanka won by 4 wickets (with 180 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!