Victoria v NSW, Sheffield Shield, Melbourne November 9, 2013

Warner adds another fifty in rain-affected draw

23

New South Wales 353 and 0 for 94 (Warner 51*) drew with Victoria 236 and 4 for 356 (Rogers 117, Handscomb 94, White 70*, Quiney 56)
Scorecard

David Warner is confident he has put his disappointing Ashes tour behind him, and his scores for New South Wales over the past few weeks suggest he is on the right track ahead of the rematch. Warner finished the Sheffield Shield match against Victoria at the MCG with an unbeaten 51 in New South Wales' second innings to add to his 104 from the first innings as the rain-affected game petered out to a draw.

From his altercation with Joe Root in a pub during the Champions Trophy and his subsequent suspension to his below-par batting during the Ashes, Warner was one of the major underperformers on Australia's tour. But his work with his batting coach Trent Woodhill since returning home has helped Warner to three Ryobi Cup tons and a Shield hundred over the past few weeks, and given a little more time he might well have driven the Blues to victory over Victoria.

"I was going through a pretty bad rough patch. England didn't help with all the stuff that went on over there," Warner said. "That's in the past. I've got myself back into shape and I'm playing cricket the way I want to play. For me [it was important] to go back to the drawing board and see how I made all those runs before I made my debut.

"I looked at a few videos. Me and my batting coach Trent Woodhill came up with a solution and at the moment it's working. It's good to be on the phone with him and the advantage of me being at home is to be able to work with him. He has put a lot of time and effort in with me and I thank him for his patience because I'm probably not the easiest to work with. He has done a lot for me and I can't thank him enough."

Warner raced to 51 from 45 balls, including five fours and a six, alongside Nic Maddinson (36 not out) as New South Wales reached 0 for 94 in their unlikely chase of 240 before both sides agreed to call the match off. Importantly for the national team, Warner was not the only Test player to find form during this game - Steven Smith scored a hundred on the second day and Warner's opening partner Chris Rogers completed his 63rd first-class century on the final morning.

"It's good to get out there and score runs and it's good to see Chris Rogers scoring runs as well," Warner said. "We know the type of player he is and we always talk about it. He's a person who has a lot of character, someone who just grinds it out and scores big runs. We can't get him out as well."

Rogers began the day on 96 and brought up triple figures before a rain delay interrupted proceedings, and he finished with 117 when he was caught off the bowling of Nathan Lyon. Although neither Lyon nor Fawad Ahmed was outstanding during the course of the match, Lyon at least kept things tight and picked up three wickets for the game, while Ahmed managed 1 for 114 over both innings in a match that was attended by national selector John Inverarity.

Peter Handscomb missed out on the chance for a century when he was lbw to Steve O'Keefe for 94 and Cameron White continued his strong start to the season with an unbeaten 70 before the Victorians declared on 4 for 356. Doug Bollinger struggled with an abdominal problem on the final day but the New South Wales coach Trevor Bayliss said keeping Bollinger off the field for most of the day was "precautionary".

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Meety on November 11, 2013, 20:59 GMT

    @Jo Langford - OMG! Lets sack Clarke - he yawned during a game. Lets charge him under the ICC rules of conduct. Well we can do it when I find out what breach he has undertaken. As for conspiracys - Shield matches often have agreements between captains for outcomes. The outcome of this match was that Warner got a valuable 2nd dig & Maddinson got some runs. No dramas!

  • on November 10, 2013, 8:37 GMT

    @ Mitty 2 .... it's called probability .... when you stay in the game you always have a chance of winning .... when you give up the probability of winning is zero.

    In the same situation in a Sheffield Shield Final do you think that Clarke would have declared or given Warner a license to swing and swing hard??

    Ps. There are more than two players in the NSW Team that can swing the willow and they had 10 wickets.

  • Mitty2 on November 10, 2013, 7:09 GMT

    And on this game @Joseph Langford, it was certain to be a draw, you can drop every man on the fence in FC cricket as you know... Not even Maddinson and Warner could do that.

  • on November 10, 2013, 6:12 GMT

    @ Macker60 .... do you really think that there was any contest for Test Team?? It was decided weeks ago when the TV Advertisements were produced!!!

    An interesting point is that while everyone has been concerned about the batting and bowling line up, I haven't heard a breathe about the wicketkeeping position. It appears that Haddin is a shoe-in. This is despite the fact that his recent form indicates a depreciating contribution with the bat and that he has had not played a FC red ball game since August, the last test match in England.

    Hartley has been playing brilliantly, yet Haddin doesn't even have to play a Shield match to be assured of his place in the Australian Team.

    The benefits of being born in NSW.

  • on November 10, 2013, 5:34 GMT

    @ Bruce .... what do you think I inferred when I wrote "conspiracy"??

    But the question is, if this agreement was made, as you inferred were other agreements made during the course of the match that made Clarke so disinterested in the match that he was caught yawning on the grounds during the 3rd Day's play??

    It can be expected that if Wade was looking at forcing a result then there would have been an appreciable increase in the run rate in the later overs and a declaration made before tea, making the openers start twice. Both did not occur. So what happened at lunch?? Was an agreement sought and, if it was sought, why was it agreed to and who were the winners and losers??

    Was an agreement sought to prevent Cameron White from scoring a century and pressing for test selection?? He did win the MOTS in the Ryobi Cup.

    Did Wade agree to this hypothetical agreement for the benefit of himself or the Victorian Team and fellow teammates??

    Winners/Losers?? You can write this part!!

  • on November 10, 2013, 4:37 GMT

    @ Mitty .... I have been criticising Clarke for years and with the recent comments from Hussey and Ponting, the public infighting, out-fighting, tour selections, manipulations, player management, player mismanagement

    I don't remember the Kulesakra incident but I vividly recall my pointing out of a possible flaw in Clarke's technique which resulted in him being cheaply dismissed by Sri Lanka ..... on each occasion he was bowled. I also remember copping a bit of a bashing from other commenters and responded by saying that if I could see this possible flaw then I was sure that England, with all their resources could identify it and take advantage of this possible flaw.

    And what exactly happened in England?? Maybe someone saw what I saw because in the 2013 Ashes Series, Michael Clarke was dismissed on eight occasions .... he was bowled four times and was LBW once.

  • Macker60 on November 10, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    You Know I think we have missed the Point that Over the Last 2 Weeks 4 of Australia Test Batsmen have Scored runs in Aus, the other 2 are coming of good 50 batting deck, which equals a confident top 6 batting line up, Warner, Rogers. Watson, Clarke, Smith Bailey/Faulkner. Problem may arise if Watson injury go on,Even so they can throw Bailey down and bring Faulkner. Yes there are a few other out there but let be realistic about this. The only major change to the Aussie team that played in the last test match will be due to injuries or type of wicket. If the Gabba is green Bailey will play as Aust will not need the extra bowler, They will drop a Spinner, If dry then Faulkner in. And MJ will Play as he Knows the Gabba quite well.

  • Kernas on November 9, 2013, 23:41 GMT

    I don't think Wade thought through his declaration at all. Why bat as slowly as they did and then declare with only one team a chance to win ..NSW. He could easily have made it a game with both teams a chance to win by scoring a lot faster (they had most of the team to bat), and give themselves a chance while NSW was going for the runs. Clarke is the best, most attacking, cleverly innovative on field captain Australia have had since Mark Taylor.

  • on November 9, 2013, 23:41 GMT

    @joseph Langford - Clarke must have agreed with the Vics on the early declaration so they could get some batting in, on the proviso they didn't take the outright. 240 off 35 was too sporting, and calling the match with 150 off 16, a standard 20-20 target, means it was agreed. But as you think Clarke is a bad "pathetic" captain, you apparently can't think, so i guess this doesn't make sense to you!!

  • Mitty2 on November 9, 2013, 20:37 GMT

    @xtrafalgarz, I give it two-three years. Maddison's supremely talented. As a matter of interest in three years (assume that Clarke, Haddin, Rogers have retired and Watson injured) I'm thinking the top 6 will be: Hughes Warner Doolan Burns Smith and Lynn as I'm not convinced Khawaja's test quality with Maddinson and Silk easily replacing Hughes or Lynn and Handscomb being a back up. In reality as a Vic fan I wish Wade would give up the gloves to allow Handscomb keep as he's one of, if not the most talented wicket/keeper batsman in Aus.

  • Meety on November 11, 2013, 20:59 GMT

    @Jo Langford - OMG! Lets sack Clarke - he yawned during a game. Lets charge him under the ICC rules of conduct. Well we can do it when I find out what breach he has undertaken. As for conspiracys - Shield matches often have agreements between captains for outcomes. The outcome of this match was that Warner got a valuable 2nd dig & Maddinson got some runs. No dramas!

  • on November 10, 2013, 8:37 GMT

    @ Mitty 2 .... it's called probability .... when you stay in the game you always have a chance of winning .... when you give up the probability of winning is zero.

    In the same situation in a Sheffield Shield Final do you think that Clarke would have declared or given Warner a license to swing and swing hard??

    Ps. There are more than two players in the NSW Team that can swing the willow and they had 10 wickets.

  • Mitty2 on November 10, 2013, 7:09 GMT

    And on this game @Joseph Langford, it was certain to be a draw, you can drop every man on the fence in FC cricket as you know... Not even Maddinson and Warner could do that.

  • on November 10, 2013, 6:12 GMT

    @ Macker60 .... do you really think that there was any contest for Test Team?? It was decided weeks ago when the TV Advertisements were produced!!!

    An interesting point is that while everyone has been concerned about the batting and bowling line up, I haven't heard a breathe about the wicketkeeping position. It appears that Haddin is a shoe-in. This is despite the fact that his recent form indicates a depreciating contribution with the bat and that he has had not played a FC red ball game since August, the last test match in England.

    Hartley has been playing brilliantly, yet Haddin doesn't even have to play a Shield match to be assured of his place in the Australian Team.

    The benefits of being born in NSW.

  • on November 10, 2013, 5:34 GMT

    @ Bruce .... what do you think I inferred when I wrote "conspiracy"??

    But the question is, if this agreement was made, as you inferred were other agreements made during the course of the match that made Clarke so disinterested in the match that he was caught yawning on the grounds during the 3rd Day's play??

    It can be expected that if Wade was looking at forcing a result then there would have been an appreciable increase in the run rate in the later overs and a declaration made before tea, making the openers start twice. Both did not occur. So what happened at lunch?? Was an agreement sought and, if it was sought, why was it agreed to and who were the winners and losers??

    Was an agreement sought to prevent Cameron White from scoring a century and pressing for test selection?? He did win the MOTS in the Ryobi Cup.

    Did Wade agree to this hypothetical agreement for the benefit of himself or the Victorian Team and fellow teammates??

    Winners/Losers?? You can write this part!!

  • on November 10, 2013, 4:37 GMT

    @ Mitty .... I have been criticising Clarke for years and with the recent comments from Hussey and Ponting, the public infighting, out-fighting, tour selections, manipulations, player management, player mismanagement

    I don't remember the Kulesakra incident but I vividly recall my pointing out of a possible flaw in Clarke's technique which resulted in him being cheaply dismissed by Sri Lanka ..... on each occasion he was bowled. I also remember copping a bit of a bashing from other commenters and responded by saying that if I could see this possible flaw then I was sure that England, with all their resources could identify it and take advantage of this possible flaw.

    And what exactly happened in England?? Maybe someone saw what I saw because in the 2013 Ashes Series, Michael Clarke was dismissed on eight occasions .... he was bowled four times and was LBW once.

  • Macker60 on November 10, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    You Know I think we have missed the Point that Over the Last 2 Weeks 4 of Australia Test Batsmen have Scored runs in Aus, the other 2 are coming of good 50 batting deck, which equals a confident top 6 batting line up, Warner, Rogers. Watson, Clarke, Smith Bailey/Faulkner. Problem may arise if Watson injury go on,Even so they can throw Bailey down and bring Faulkner. Yes there are a few other out there but let be realistic about this. The only major change to the Aussie team that played in the last test match will be due to injuries or type of wicket. If the Gabba is green Bailey will play as Aust will not need the extra bowler, They will drop a Spinner, If dry then Faulkner in. And MJ will Play as he Knows the Gabba quite well.

  • Kernas on November 9, 2013, 23:41 GMT

    I don't think Wade thought through his declaration at all. Why bat as slowly as they did and then declare with only one team a chance to win ..NSW. He could easily have made it a game with both teams a chance to win by scoring a lot faster (they had most of the team to bat), and give themselves a chance while NSW was going for the runs. Clarke is the best, most attacking, cleverly innovative on field captain Australia have had since Mark Taylor.

  • on November 9, 2013, 23:41 GMT

    @joseph Langford - Clarke must have agreed with the Vics on the early declaration so they could get some batting in, on the proviso they didn't take the outright. 240 off 35 was too sporting, and calling the match with 150 off 16, a standard 20-20 target, means it was agreed. But as you think Clarke is a bad "pathetic" captain, you apparently can't think, so i guess this doesn't make sense to you!!

  • Mitty2 on November 9, 2013, 20:37 GMT

    @xtrafalgarz, I give it two-three years. Maddison's supremely talented. As a matter of interest in three years (assume that Clarke, Haddin, Rogers have retired and Watson injured) I'm thinking the top 6 will be: Hughes Warner Doolan Burns Smith and Lynn as I'm not convinced Khawaja's test quality with Maddinson and Silk easily replacing Hughes or Lynn and Handscomb being a back up. In reality as a Vic fan I wish Wade would give up the gloves to allow Handscomb keep as he's one of, if not the most talented wicket/keeper batsman in Aus.

  • Mitty2 on November 9, 2013, 20:31 GMT

    Yes @dunger.bob, meety, where have you been!?

    @Jo Langford, some of your comments on NSW have been pretty funny, but I remember all the way back to last year when you were still criticising Clarke (I think over the Kulesakra game and you were bagging his technique) and as a further point, from Qld, only Burns, Hartley, Cutting and Lynn are test potentials (excluding Harris) and I'd say only Cutting is warranting of a test spot from that list as burns and Lynn need to develop more

  • Bonehead_maz on November 9, 2013, 20:13 GMT

    Finch bowled twice in two balls - ouch

  • on November 9, 2013, 20:11 GMT

    I am constantly amazed by uninformed comments on this forum. Hughes opeing - you have to be kidding? There is no doubt that Rogers and Warner will be the openers and if Watson is fit he'll bat and three followed by Clarke, Smith and probably Bailey. Maddinson is a great player and as a supporter of anyone from the Sutherland Shire, I am a big fan. But his time is a couple of good Shield seasons away.

  • on November 9, 2013, 13:42 GMT

    @ Meety .... I am not against NSW. You are confusing my desire to have the best Australian players in the Australian Team (and Australia A Team) with a blatant bias towards the selection of a team that consists principally of NSW Players.

    I would actually find it extremely regrettable if the NSW Team toiled through summer to finish 2pts short of a finals birth and look back on an opportunity lost during the second game of the season.

  • Big_Maxy_Walker on November 9, 2013, 13:38 GMT

    O'Keefe outbowls Lyon once again, and given all the right handers in the England side should be in there for the Ashes or at least at Sydney and Adelaide

  • on November 9, 2013, 13:16 GMT

    @ Meety .... I love cricket. I support cricket.

    I do not "whinge", I usually present a series of facts from which I draw a conclusion. In recent times these conclusions differ, often significantly differ, from decisions made by cricket administrators, that presented by writers and some commenters. But you will have to admit that in recent times the teams selected have been substandard, our training program that is wrecking our young bowlers is disastrous and the leadership has been inadequate. If you are content with recent results, then I will allow you to be content ... but because of my passion for Australian Cricket, I am disquieted.

    Today at the MCG we witnessed two unbelievable captaining decisions. The first was by Wade, denying his batsmen time in the middle and possibly gifting NSW 4pts, and the second was Clarke choosing not to attack the target with 10-wickets in hand.

    The later was incredulous, but if you support this decision please provide us all a convincing argument.

  • cricketsubh on November 9, 2013, 12:30 GMT

    warner find his from he should open with rogers great news for aus warner is a match winner .if i am a aus selector i try madison and doolan in this series if they score runs in ashes gud new for aus in future .

  • dunger.bob on November 9, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I bet the selection panel breathed a sigh of relief when Rogers picked up where he left off. I'm not so sure what they've got in mind for Warner though. I don't think he'll play in Brisbane because they want Hughes to be the other opener. For that to happen though, Hughes needs a few soon.

    @ Meety: Haven't seen you around for a while. Welcome back.

  • xtrafalgarx on November 9, 2013, 11:25 GMT

    Ms.Cricket: I will never read a comment with this name again. Absolutley no knowledge of the game of cricket. Maddinson is no where near ready test cricket selection, a swing and a miss for every shot isn't good enough. He needs 5 years at the very least. Warner was the first to score runs on the same track that Clarke, Quiney, White, Rogers had initially failed to get runs on!

  • Meety on November 9, 2013, 10:46 GMT

    @Jo Langford - do u get any pleasure out of watching cricket? I don't think you do - all you do is whinge. Also the anti-NSW/Clarke is quite boring - we all know you don't want to see NSW in the final!

  • Macker60 on November 9, 2013, 10:42 GMT

    Ms Cricket I would not Call Siddle Hasting and even Boland Mediocre Bolwers, As for blooding nrew Batsmen Why don't we have a Little Faith in the one we have, Remember, Warner still young in terms of Batsmen. And Has a better average than some of our greats at the same age, But alas we all suffer from short memories

  • on November 9, 2013, 10:18 GMT

    All the making of a huge conspiracy theory on the back of more pathetic Captaincy by Clarke!!! Why wouldn't he go for the outright victory??

    I hope that NSW miss out on the Sheffield Shield Final by two points on the ladder!!!

  • Ms.Cricket on November 9, 2013, 9:55 GMT

    It's a pity that the short sighted Australian selectors will again pick Warner for scoring runs on flat pitches against mediocre attacks rather than give new players like Doolan and Maddisnson a go.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Ms.Cricket on November 9, 2013, 9:55 GMT

    It's a pity that the short sighted Australian selectors will again pick Warner for scoring runs on flat pitches against mediocre attacks rather than give new players like Doolan and Maddisnson a go.

  • on November 9, 2013, 10:18 GMT

    All the making of a huge conspiracy theory on the back of more pathetic Captaincy by Clarke!!! Why wouldn't he go for the outright victory??

    I hope that NSW miss out on the Sheffield Shield Final by two points on the ladder!!!

  • Macker60 on November 9, 2013, 10:42 GMT

    Ms Cricket I would not Call Siddle Hasting and even Boland Mediocre Bolwers, As for blooding nrew Batsmen Why don't we have a Little Faith in the one we have, Remember, Warner still young in terms of Batsmen. And Has a better average than some of our greats at the same age, But alas we all suffer from short memories

  • Meety on November 9, 2013, 10:46 GMT

    @Jo Langford - do u get any pleasure out of watching cricket? I don't think you do - all you do is whinge. Also the anti-NSW/Clarke is quite boring - we all know you don't want to see NSW in the final!

  • xtrafalgarx on November 9, 2013, 11:25 GMT

    Ms.Cricket: I will never read a comment with this name again. Absolutley no knowledge of the game of cricket. Maddinson is no where near ready test cricket selection, a swing and a miss for every shot isn't good enough. He needs 5 years at the very least. Warner was the first to score runs on the same track that Clarke, Quiney, White, Rogers had initially failed to get runs on!

  • dunger.bob on November 9, 2013, 11:55 GMT

    I bet the selection panel breathed a sigh of relief when Rogers picked up where he left off. I'm not so sure what they've got in mind for Warner though. I don't think he'll play in Brisbane because they want Hughes to be the other opener. For that to happen though, Hughes needs a few soon.

    @ Meety: Haven't seen you around for a while. Welcome back.

  • cricketsubh on November 9, 2013, 12:30 GMT

    warner find his from he should open with rogers great news for aus warner is a match winner .if i am a aus selector i try madison and doolan in this series if they score runs in ashes gud new for aus in future .

  • on November 9, 2013, 13:16 GMT

    @ Meety .... I love cricket. I support cricket.

    I do not "whinge", I usually present a series of facts from which I draw a conclusion. In recent times these conclusions differ, often significantly differ, from decisions made by cricket administrators, that presented by writers and some commenters. But you will have to admit that in recent times the teams selected have been substandard, our training program that is wrecking our young bowlers is disastrous and the leadership has been inadequate. If you are content with recent results, then I will allow you to be content ... but because of my passion for Australian Cricket, I am disquieted.

    Today at the MCG we witnessed two unbelievable captaining decisions. The first was by Wade, denying his batsmen time in the middle and possibly gifting NSW 4pts, and the second was Clarke choosing not to attack the target with 10-wickets in hand.

    The later was incredulous, but if you support this decision please provide us all a convincing argument.

  • Big_Maxy_Walker on November 9, 2013, 13:38 GMT

    O'Keefe outbowls Lyon once again, and given all the right handers in the England side should be in there for the Ashes or at least at Sydney and Adelaide

  • on November 9, 2013, 13:42 GMT

    @ Meety .... I am not against NSW. You are confusing my desire to have the best Australian players in the Australian Team (and Australia A Team) with a blatant bias towards the selection of a team that consists principally of NSW Players.

    I would actually find it extremely regrettable if the NSW Team toiled through summer to finish 2pts short of a finals birth and look back on an opportunity lost during the second game of the season.