|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Siddhartha Vaidyanathan in Melbourne
December 26, 2007
Sourav Ganguly became the seventh Indian to play a 100 Tests as India kicked off their series against Australia in Melbourne on Boxing Day. He was the third fastest Indian to reach the mark, though at 35 years and 170 days, he was also the oldest.
Ganguly was honoured with a silver plaque, presented to him by the secretary of the Indian board, Niranjan Shah, once the national anthems were done with. Anil Kumble, the Indian captain who has also played 100 Tests, joined him for a photo shoot a few minutes later.
Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar, standing either side of Ganguly when the national anthems were played out, are the other members of this side to reach the 100-Test mark. Interestingly Dravid, who made his debut alongside Gangluly in the Lord's Test of 1996, was the quickest Indian to reach the landmark.
Kapil Dev, Sunil Gavaskar and Dilip Vengsarkar, the current chairman of selectors, are the other Indians to have achieved the feat. All seven members of the 100-Tests club have also led India in Tests.
Siddhartha Vaidyanathan is an assistant editor at CricinfoFeeds: Siddhartha Vaidyanathan
© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?
Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one
As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence
In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire
Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things
A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers
To consider banning it in the wake of Phillip Hughes' death may be knee-jerk, but to refuse to consider the pros and cons of a ban is unwise