Bangladesh v Australia, 3rd ODI, Mirpur

Hussey hundred sets up Australia's clean-sweep

The Report by Brydon Coverdale

April 13, 2011

Comments: 79 | Text size: A | A

Australia 361 for 8 (Hussey 108, Watson 72, Razzak 3-58, Mortaza 3-80) beat Bangladesh 295 for 6 (Kayes 93, Mahmudullah 68*, Nafees 60, Johnson 3-67) by 66 runs
Scorecard and ball by-ball details


Michael Hussey celebrates his 86-ball ton, Bangladesh v Australia, 3rd ODI, Mirpur, April 13, 2011
Michael Hussey made 108, his first ODI century in four years © Associated Press
Enlarge

Michael Clarke will fly out of Bangladesh with a clean-sweep to his name in his first series as Australia's full-time captain, but it didn't come without a few jitters in the final match. Michael Hussey's century and another Shane Watson blitz set Australia on the path to their fourth-highest ODI total of all time, and while the final margin of 66 runs may appear comfortable, Bangladesh put up a feisty chase.

The hosts needed 362 for victory, which even their most ardent fans must have felt was unachievable after they managed only 210 and 229 in the first two matches. But Imrul Kayes and his top-order colleagues gave the Mirpur crowd something to cheer about, pushing the score to 179 for 1 with 20 overs remaining, and Clarke was scratching his head for an answer.

It came in the form of the debutant fast bowler James Pattinson, who picked up his first wicket for his country - not the same country his brother Darren represented - when Kayes edged behind for 93, and the required run-rate crept into unrealistic territory. If only, the Bangladeshis must have been thinking, we'd batted like this earlier in the series. If only we'd kept Australia to something more gettable.

The chase fizzled out as Shahriar Nafees skied a catch off a Mitchell Johnson slower ball for 60, and then Shane Watson collected two wickets in an over. Mahmudullah made a late half-century, although by then the game was decided.

But at least there was a pursuit, not just a surrender. That much was apparent from the first over, which brought Bangladesh ten runs as Tamim flicked Johnson through midwicket for four and slashed him over third man for six. But Tamim (32 off 17 balls) couldn't keep out a Johnson yorker, and it was left to Kayes to maintain the tempo.

He did that admirably. The Australians had rested Brett Lee and the attack was missing some bite, the medium-pacer John Hastings having shared the new ball with Johnson. Kayes was rarely troubled by the bowling and he played some classy drives and cuts, finding the gaps and trying to avoid the type of risks taken by Tamim.

However, Kayes showed that he could also clear the boundary, with a well-judged slap over midwicket off Watson. The occasional gamble was necessary, given the enormous target and the fact that Nafees at the other end, while sticking around and turning over the strike, wasn't exactly peppering the boundary.

But just when Kayes looked set to post his second ODI century, he fell. It was an anticlimax for the crowd, who knew Bangladesh had let themselves down earlier in the day, when Australia rocketed to 80 for 0 from eight overs thanks to Watson's second demolition of the week.

Half an hour into the match, if the horse hadn't bolted it had at least noticed that the gate was open, and thanks to Hussey's third one-day international century, Australia rode to the relative safety of 300-plus and then galloped further ahead. In 768 one-day matches across four decades, only three times had Australia scored more than their 361 for 8.

There was 368 against Sri Lanka in Sydney five years ago and 377 against South Africa in the 2007 World Cup, both of which were, not surprisingly, winning totals. There was also the small matter of 434, which was chased down in Johannesburg in 2006, and Clarke was relieved Bangladesh didn't have the depth in batting of that South African unit.

The Australians themselves relied on three strong partnerships. First it was Watson and Ricky Ponting, opening for just the third time in his ODI career, who launched the innings with a 110-run stand. Then Hussey and Clarke (47) combined for an 89-run partnership that negotiated the middle overs, and a 70-run effort from Johnson and Hussey put the finishing touches on the total.

Hussey was lbw in the final over for 108, ending his first ODI century in four years and showing that even at 35, he still has something to offer this limited-overs outfit. There were a couple of sixes but it was a typical Hussey knock, as he found the gaps and the boundaries, and ran hard when the ball couldn't be properly dispatched.

He was overshadowed during his partnership with Johnson (41 off 24 balls), who lifted consecutive sixes over long-off from the bowling of Mashrafe Mortaza. It was a forgettable day for Mortaza, who took three wickets but haemorrhaged 80 runs from his nine overs. The only bowler who could hold his head up was Abdur Razzak, who collected 3 for 58.

It was Razzak who pegged things back after the early carnage, as he beat Watson in the air and turned a ball past his attempted sweep to rattle the stumps. Ponting (47) also fell to Razzak, lbw while trying to sweep. The Australians had been on top since the first over, when Watson pulled and punched through the off side for a pair of boundaries off Shafiul Islam, and he followed with four fours in Shafiul's next over.

Watson's half-century came from 25 balls, and he finished with 72 from 40 deliveries. Not that everything worked out for Australia, whose young batsmen were notable failures. Steven Smith was promoted to No. 4, but didn't take his chance, and popped a return catch to Suhrawadi Shuvo for 5, while Callum Ferguson spooned a catch to mid-off for 3 and Tim Paine was lbw trying to reverse-sweep for 7.

Today, it didn't matter. The old guard ensured a clean-sweep, and Australia can now enjoy their winter hibernation.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by trialsofteval on (April 16, 2011, 14:47 GMT)

Bangladesh just does not have the staying power . it is like watching SriLanka grow up before winning the WC2006 .. But with Bangla it is taking practically forever.. but again SL took 5 world cups to win the cup, it has been only 4 so far for Bangladesh.. interestingly its been 9 for england and 6 for SouthAfrica go figure..

That is not the only yardstick,

Lets not forget Ban blanked out Kiwis, 5-0

Posted by   on (April 15, 2011, 14:25 GMT)

Seeing Watson making 185 if some one feels that his achievement is small since he did against an ordinary bowling attack,..what would he think to see against best bowling attack of Australia , Bangladesh has scored almost 300 runs

Posted by Meety on (April 15, 2011, 10:52 GMT)

@missionbegins2011 - mate are you serious "...IND won the first WC within 12 years of ODI's inception..."???????? Mate what about the 50yrs of Test exposure prior????? Mate your thinking is totally warped & bias. @star_boy - the Bangas domestic scene has grown from nothing to something that is competitive. They are scouting outside the capital far better then ever before. I think they need to improve their pitches as there is an over supply of off-spinners (left arm particularly). The problem the Bangas have currently is there is a big difference in ability of their top players & their least talented players. Once they even that up a bit they will improve their results.

Posted by Samdanh on (April 15, 2011, 7:16 GMT)

Bangladesh showed intention to not to lose wickets rather than making any attempt to win. So, ultimately it did not help them anyway. They still lost by 66 runs. It was like the way Kenya plaed against Australia in the World cup encounter. In both cases the sides strived to retain wickets and not be all out in 50 overs rather than striving to win. And in both cases it was their last match in tournament or series respectively and all that they wanted was to keep some pride intact by losing but not by losing all wickets. It did not matter to Aus anyway as they won both matches comfortably. Immediately after the match was over the article read "179 for 1 with 30 overs remaining" which has since been corrected to "20 overs remaining" The original and glaring error betrayed a surprising eagerness of the author to show Aus in as much poor light as possible. Expect writers here to demonstrate neutrality and a balanced perspective in their reports

Posted by star_boy on (April 15, 2011, 6:51 GMT)

I think Bangladesh can improve more if they build a strong domestic cricketing structure which would groom youngsters more than only competing against top cricketing teams. I am not sure if such a structure already exists, but there is no altermative to grooming a player right from his young days. If such an environment exists, there would be an automatic flow of good players into the team.

Posted by Sam_k14 on (April 15, 2011, 4:41 GMT)

Te ICC should stop arranging these meaningless series. I could have predicted the result of this series even before it began. What a waste of time!!

Posted by FrenchCricketFan on (April 14, 2011, 16:40 GMT)

Being aussi supporter this series meant nothing to me right from the beginning because the real test for australia is against good teams , not a weak team like ban. Ban, their batting although most inconsistent, is sometimes capable of puting up a good fight. But their balling always get hammerd against good teams, too expansive. I think if they can atleast find some economical ballers (forget wicket taking baller) they would be competitive against big teams. This last game for example, if they could restrict aus within 300 , this game would have been competitive.

Posted by Farhad-Shamsi on (April 14, 2011, 16:00 GMT)

Our Indian friends constantly remind us that we are not in the same league as them. Everyone knows that. Yes, we don't have 37 year old Tendu, or 32 year old Zaheer, or 32 year old Sehwag. Our players are 22 or 23, some 26-28. Siddons is right -- Stick with this team, by next WC they will be a much stronger team. They will not be content with just honorable defeat against big teams, but will really be competing against them. This Aussies series was great confidence building experience for BAN. Good series for Aussies also, as the leadership torch has been passed to a younger generation. They got a good meaure of their strengths, and where they need to improve. Thanks to Aussies for coming and playing in BD. Aussies will win the next WC in their home ground. Very good luck to them.

Posted by Afridynamite on (April 14, 2011, 15:19 GMT)

@enigma agree with you Bangladesh & Zim dont deserve test status. ICC is diluting cricket standards.

Posted by Itteza on (April 14, 2011, 14:42 GMT)

Great People talk about IDEA !!!!!! Average people always COMPARE and SMALL people always COMPLAINTS !!!!

U C.... hearted INDIAN. BD lost to AUSTRALIA !!! Makes U happy !!! @ Abhinav and some IND!! Do you know how to Thank or appreciate or ever got appreciated by anyone!!!!!!!! What is your problem??????????? Congrats to AUSSIE and BANGLADESH for great ODI's

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
Tour Results
Bangladesh v Australia at Dhaka - Apr 13, 2011
Australia won by 66 runs
Bangladesh v Australia at Dhaka - Apr 11, 2011
Australia won by 9 wickets (with 144 balls remaining)
Bangladesh v Australia at Dhaka - Apr 9, 2011
Australia won by 60 runs
BCB XI v Australians at Fatullah - Apr 7, 2011
Australians won by 90 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!