England in Bangladesh, 2009-10 March 9, 2010

Injuries and conditions make for selection dilemma

  shares 12

A tour of Bangladesh was never intended to be this complicated. And yet, a spate of injuries, an absent skipper, a star player who cannot buy a run, and an unfamiliar surface that may lend itself to a two-spin attack has England's preparations for the first Test at Chittagong in a state of undeniable flux.

By the time the warm-up match at Chittagong had been concluded, the only players in the 17-man party who could safely be ruled out of contention were the reserve wicketkeeper, Steve Davies, and Graham Onions, whose back injury prevented him from bowling for yet another day. Luke Wright, who did not feature even after the match ceased to be first-class, is also way down the pecking order, along with Liam Plunkett, who was outflanked on the seam-bowling front by the squad's new additions, Tim Bresnan and Steven Finn.

However, every other player in the squad has a better-than-average chance of playing in the Test, including the senior seamer, Stuart Broad, whose injured back stood up to nine overs in the nets today - six at lunch, three at tea - and who will be given a sterner work-out on Wednesday, assuming he comes through the night with no adverse reaction.

"These are the sorts of things that made the job interesting and challenging," said England's coach, Andy Flower. "Sometimes it pans out that selection is really simple. In this instance I don't think it is, because of injury and because conditions are a little different to what we're used to."

On a peculiar day made memorable by some pie-chucking of the highest order from Alastair Cook and Michael Carberry, there were undoubted winners and losers in the England camp, and while Kevin Pietersen's continued travails emerged as the main talking point once again, Flower confirmed that there was no scenario in which he could possibly be left out, despite a tally of 69 runs in seven innings.

Instead, the man who appeared to have dropped the baton was Carberry, who had the chance to claim the vacancy left by Andrew Strauss at the top of the order, but who followed up his first-innings 5 with a punchy but insubstantial 35 from 28 balls. Afterwards, Flower was typically cagey about the permutations of England's selection, but implied that Jonathan Trott, who impressed with a century on the second day of the match, was also being earmarked to go in alongside Cook.

The biggest winner of the day was the 20-year-old Middlesex seamer, Finn, who did not arrive in Bangladesh until the eve of the warm-up match, yet showed no ill-effects whatsoever as he bagged three wickets in 18 overs across the two innings, including a beauty to remove Bangladesh's star performer, Raqibul Hasan, in a hostile burst on the third morning. Though he had initially been called up as cover for the injuries to Broad and Onions, Flower confirmed he would not be stood down again, regardless of how the senior bowlers progressed.

"I thought both Finn and Bresnan bowled really well in the first hour today, on a pitch that wasn't doing a hell of a lot, so they are obviously strong contenders for the first Test," Flower added. "I thought Finn was very impressive over the last three days. I don't know how raw he is, but he's obviously young. And he showed a lot of skill in what he did. He bowled a nice line, and he's got that pace and bounce that all captains are looking for."

As for Kevin Pietersen, his discomfort with the conditions has scarcely eased following a more free-flowing, if familiarly brief, innings this afternoon. He finished up with 20 from 22 balls, having been greeted inevitably by the left-arm spin of Mehrab Hossain Jr (whom he drilled through the covers for four in his only over). He is doubtless well aware that the Bangladeshi selectors have named no fewer than three left-armers in their 14-man squad, including Shakib and Abdur Razzak, who between them claimed his wicket in each of the three ODIs.

Flower, however, continued with the familiar party line when quizzed on KP's form, even as the man went through his paces in the nets behind him. "I thought he looked quite good out there in the middle today," he said. "He batted really nicely against the seam, and played straight, batted aggressively against the spin and looked good, and it was a pity he didn't spend three hours out there, instead of half-an-hour.

"Like most world-class players he does spend a lot of time in the nets, and a lot of hard work and thought is going into his game. I still expect good things from him in this Test match."

Possible England team 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Jonathan Trott, 3 Ian Bell, 4 Kevin Pietersen, 5 Paul Collingwood, 6 Matt Prior (wk), 7 Stuart Broad, 8 Tim Bresnan, 9 Graeme Swann, 10 James Tredwell, 11 Steven Finn.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo. Go to http://twitter.com/miller_cricket to follow him on Twitter through the England tour of Bangladesh.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY topeleven on | March 10, 2010, 15:41 GMT

    I think KP should play more inside out shots rather than playing across the line. Also he should not bend to much and should try to pick the ball from the hand of the bowler.

  • POSTED BY topeleven on | March 10, 2010, 15:38 GMT

    I think problem with KP is he is too much of a leg side player. His height and the way in which he tries to bend are all the things he has to adjust. MostlyEngland don't play spinners well. They don't read the bowler from his hand. If KP tries to play inside out he can score well. Also left armers don't spin the ball that much as they are mostly finger spinners. Also they bowl lots of arm balls. Kp should play more on the off side rather than the leg side.

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:44 GMT

    and Bell back at 3????????????????? haven't we been here before? wake up Flower

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:41 GMT

    Pretty excited by young Finn, will be interesting to see how he goes if selected, he will add a nice balance to our "samey" attack. My only gripe is still with the selection of two off spinners - can't see the point/classic England. Still frustrated by the shambolic treatment of Adil Rashid - one bad over of 20/20 and he's axed from all squads when this was the perfect tour to impress his undoubted skills

  • POSTED BY on | March 10, 2010, 11:22 GMT

    He should start switch-hitting when a left-arm spinner comes on

  • POSTED BY Lees_Legends on | March 10, 2010, 10:10 GMT

    Alistair Cook 5-0-111-0. pure class

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 19:59 GMT

    This English Team is really strong.... and they can beat any team in the world anywhere.... Hope Bangladesh team will not disappoint us....

  • POSTED BY Ed_Lamb on | March 9, 2010, 18:49 GMT

    I'm a fan of the first comment re Carberry - you can't base selection on one match...they needed to know prior to the tour what their batting line up would be for the 1st Test whether they played 6 batsman (including Prior) or 7 batsmen. Carberry is the specialist opener and Trott is the number 3. If we choose to play 5 bowlers, drop Bell.

    Agree that Broad shouldn't play unless absolutely fit, but not that Luke Wright should be blooded - it still escapes me what he's doing in the Test squad, wholehearted ODI performer though he is. Bresnan needs to be the Broad back up come the Ashes and he's likely to play this Test either way.

  • POSTED BY Kula_Bowls_Inswing on | March 9, 2010, 17:27 GMT

    I think Carberry should play. The team's strategy in SA was to go for 6 batsmenand Carberry was the next in line and England had a better than expected series. Plus, England have struggled with the number 3 position for a while & if Trott is the long-term prospect there, then he should bat there against Bangladesh, where he can boost his confidence and gain experince. Maybe they still want Bell as a long-term number 3, but it would still make sense to giver Caberry some experience against a team weaker than England (no disrespect) so that we have a reserve opener if Strauss or Cook is ever missing.

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 15:52 GMT

    yes i agree, if broad is not 100% dont rush him, and finn should be given his debut

  • POSTED BY topeleven on | March 10, 2010, 15:41 GMT

    I think KP should play more inside out shots rather than playing across the line. Also he should not bend to much and should try to pick the ball from the hand of the bowler.

  • POSTED BY topeleven on | March 10, 2010, 15:38 GMT

    I think problem with KP is he is too much of a leg side player. His height and the way in which he tries to bend are all the things he has to adjust. MostlyEngland don't play spinners well. They don't read the bowler from his hand. If KP tries to play inside out he can score well. Also left armers don't spin the ball that much as they are mostly finger spinners. Also they bowl lots of arm balls. Kp should play more on the off side rather than the leg side.

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:44 GMT

    and Bell back at 3????????????????? haven't we been here before? wake up Flower

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:41 GMT

    Pretty excited by young Finn, will be interesting to see how he goes if selected, he will add a nice balance to our "samey" attack. My only gripe is still with the selection of two off spinners - can't see the point/classic England. Still frustrated by the shambolic treatment of Adil Rashid - one bad over of 20/20 and he's axed from all squads when this was the perfect tour to impress his undoubted skills

  • POSTED BY on | March 10, 2010, 11:22 GMT

    He should start switch-hitting when a left-arm spinner comes on

  • POSTED BY Lees_Legends on | March 10, 2010, 10:10 GMT

    Alistair Cook 5-0-111-0. pure class

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 19:59 GMT

    This English Team is really strong.... and they can beat any team in the world anywhere.... Hope Bangladesh team will not disappoint us....

  • POSTED BY Ed_Lamb on | March 9, 2010, 18:49 GMT

    I'm a fan of the first comment re Carberry - you can't base selection on one match...they needed to know prior to the tour what their batting line up would be for the 1st Test whether they played 6 batsman (including Prior) or 7 batsmen. Carberry is the specialist opener and Trott is the number 3. If we choose to play 5 bowlers, drop Bell.

    Agree that Broad shouldn't play unless absolutely fit, but not that Luke Wright should be blooded - it still escapes me what he's doing in the Test squad, wholehearted ODI performer though he is. Bresnan needs to be the Broad back up come the Ashes and he's likely to play this Test either way.

  • POSTED BY Kula_Bowls_Inswing on | March 9, 2010, 17:27 GMT

    I think Carberry should play. The team's strategy in SA was to go for 6 batsmenand Carberry was the next in line and England had a better than expected series. Plus, England have struggled with the number 3 position for a while & if Trott is the long-term prospect there, then he should bat there against Bangladesh, where he can boost his confidence and gain experince. Maybe they still want Bell as a long-term number 3, but it would still make sense to giver Caberry some experience against a team weaker than England (no disrespect) so that we have a reserve opener if Strauss or Cook is ever missing.

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 15:52 GMT

    yes i agree, if broad is not 100% dont rush him, and finn should be given his debut

  • POSTED BY Waikato_FC on | March 9, 2010, 15:22 GMT

    Still disagree with the man himself, Morgan is DEFINITELY ready for test cricket, so him and Finny in the side, and if there are any other bowler injuries, Tim Murtagh! Spot any bias here? Considering Kevin is being given a few overs perhaps he will play as the second spinner, rather than Treadwell (despite how impressive his figures in the warmup were), if England bowled first and Kevin picked up a wicket or two it would be his confidence a world of good, plus bring his bowling average down under 100!

  • POSTED BY Tigg on | March 9, 2010, 13:32 GMT

    Unless 100% completely fit I would rest broad for the first test and include, probably, Luke Wright in the all rounder roll he has for Sussex.

    England need to start testing potentials for the big series of 2010 (for us at least) which is the Ashes, and having an allrounder does add balance. Playing him against the relatively (when compared to the Aussies) weak side of Bangladesh should give him a nice introduction to test cricket. He has a fairly good (and improving) record in First Class (much better than his List A).

    If nothing else our batting order (especially with Swann, Bresnan and Tredwell at 8, 9, 10) should be strong enough to see us through the match.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY Tigg on | March 9, 2010, 13:32 GMT

    Unless 100% completely fit I would rest broad for the first test and include, probably, Luke Wright in the all rounder roll he has for Sussex.

    England need to start testing potentials for the big series of 2010 (for us at least) which is the Ashes, and having an allrounder does add balance. Playing him against the relatively (when compared to the Aussies) weak side of Bangladesh should give him a nice introduction to test cricket. He has a fairly good (and improving) record in First Class (much better than his List A).

    If nothing else our batting order (especially with Swann, Bresnan and Tredwell at 8, 9, 10) should be strong enough to see us through the match.

  • POSTED BY Waikato_FC on | March 9, 2010, 15:22 GMT

    Still disagree with the man himself, Morgan is DEFINITELY ready for test cricket, so him and Finny in the side, and if there are any other bowler injuries, Tim Murtagh! Spot any bias here? Considering Kevin is being given a few overs perhaps he will play as the second spinner, rather than Treadwell (despite how impressive his figures in the warmup were), if England bowled first and Kevin picked up a wicket or two it would be his confidence a world of good, plus bring his bowling average down under 100!

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 15:52 GMT

    yes i agree, if broad is not 100% dont rush him, and finn should be given his debut

  • POSTED BY Kula_Bowls_Inswing on | March 9, 2010, 17:27 GMT

    I think Carberry should play. The team's strategy in SA was to go for 6 batsmenand Carberry was the next in line and England had a better than expected series. Plus, England have struggled with the number 3 position for a while & if Trott is the long-term prospect there, then he should bat there against Bangladesh, where he can boost his confidence and gain experince. Maybe they still want Bell as a long-term number 3, but it would still make sense to giver Caberry some experience against a team weaker than England (no disrespect) so that we have a reserve opener if Strauss or Cook is ever missing.

  • POSTED BY Ed_Lamb on | March 9, 2010, 18:49 GMT

    I'm a fan of the first comment re Carberry - you can't base selection on one match...they needed to know prior to the tour what their batting line up would be for the 1st Test whether they played 6 batsman (including Prior) or 7 batsmen. Carberry is the specialist opener and Trott is the number 3. If we choose to play 5 bowlers, drop Bell.

    Agree that Broad shouldn't play unless absolutely fit, but not that Luke Wright should be blooded - it still escapes me what he's doing in the Test squad, wholehearted ODI performer though he is. Bresnan needs to be the Broad back up come the Ashes and he's likely to play this Test either way.

  • POSTED BY on | March 9, 2010, 19:59 GMT

    This English Team is really strong.... and they can beat any team in the world anywhere.... Hope Bangladesh team will not disappoint us....

  • POSTED BY Lees_Legends on | March 10, 2010, 10:10 GMT

    Alistair Cook 5-0-111-0. pure class

  • POSTED BY on | March 10, 2010, 11:22 GMT

    He should start switch-hitting when a left-arm spinner comes on

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:41 GMT

    Pretty excited by young Finn, will be interesting to see how he goes if selected, he will add a nice balance to our "samey" attack. My only gripe is still with the selection of two off spinners - can't see the point/classic England. Still frustrated by the shambolic treatment of Adil Rashid - one bad over of 20/20 and he's axed from all squads when this was the perfect tour to impress his undoubted skills

  • POSTED BY Funkleberry on | March 10, 2010, 14:44 GMT

    and Bell back at 3????????????????? haven't we been here before? wake up Flower