West Indies cricket November 8, 2009

Bravo's blinder

This photo is a good example of the most common way to photograph cricket action, sitting quite straight of the wicket, slightly to the left

Hamish Blair / © Getty Images

Firstly, thanks to everyone who has taken the time to read my opening blog and an even bigger thanks to those who have also posted a comment. It's great to hear everyone's thoughts!

The photo I have chosen for this post was taken in November 2005, at the Adelaide Test during West Indies' tour of Australia. Despite already being two Tests down and going on to eventually lose the third and final Test, Dwayne Bravo had a very good match, contributing almost 100 runs and taking six first-innings wickets. This photo was the fifth and from my view of things, the most spectacular of those wickets. Having dismissed Adam Gilchrist earlier in the same over, Bravo was bowling to Shane Warne, who pushed the ball back on the up, but well to Bravo's left. Looking at replays I think it probably would have landed about another pitch width left of the playing strip. Bravo took a couple of quick steps to change direction and then dived full length to pull off a remarkable caught and bowled.

This photo is a good example of the most common way to photograph cricket action, sitting quite straight of the wicket, slightly to the left. To put it into fielding terms, sitting at a straight long-off or very fine leg (depending which end the bowler is coming from), watching a right-handed batsman.

I use Canon cameras and for cricket I generally use a 500mm lens for the action out in the middle. This photo was actually taken using a 600mm lens, as the Adelaide Oval is an unusual shape. It has quite short boundaries square of the wicket and very long ones straight. This means a slightly bigger lens is needed when sitting straight.

I shoot most deliveries, by staying focused on the batsman. The advantage of the working from this fairly straight position is that a right-arm bowler bowling over the wicket will run into frame on their follow through. This makes it easier to switch focus to them for a reaction to the batsman, whether that's an appeal, a celebration of a wicket, a catch or something else.

That's the idea, but in practice it doesn't always work out as planned! There are so many variables that can change. A left-handed batsman facing at the near end means the slip fielders can obscure the view. Bowlers coming around the wicket (or left-handers coming over) will change the angles and not run as nicely into frame on their follow through. A spin bowler's follow through is not as far as a fast bowler's. The list goes on!

So when it does all come together, it is all the more satisfying! For this photo, I started focusing on Warne. As he played the shot, Bravo ran into the left of my frame on his follow through. As the ball was headed in his direction I switched focus to him, just in time to photograph the dive and catch. What I like about it is that not only can you see Bravo taking the catch, you can also see Warne to the right. The photo tells the whole story of the moment; Shane Warne caught and bowled by Dwayne Bravo. It is also nice to take a photo like this because, as mentioned, there are so many variables that could have gone wrong.

Hamish Blair is a Melbourne-based photographer for Getty Images

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • fanedlive on May 25, 2010, 16:28 GMT

    this was one of the most spectacular that i have ever seen.thumbs up 2 u 4 a truly brilliant photo.the best

  • fanedlive on January 7, 2010, 6:22 GMT

    Absolutely brilliant sports photography! The challenge in cricket photography is that it is such a lethargic game that you need extra attention ..Anything can happen in a second that you have to traverse 100 yards sometimes with the ball at almost 100 miles per hour! Truly magnificent photo!

  • fanedlive on November 26, 2009, 12:54 GMT

    i have seen this picture from atleast four or five different angles on internet....but yours is THE BEST......

  • fanedlive on November 15, 2009, 17:07 GMT

    I can just imagine the pure joy you must have felt after seeing the results of this snap. Awesome!

  • fanedlive on November 12, 2009, 10:06 GMT

    Hamish, I heard Jim Maxwell on radio say that you always wear a pink shirt at the cricket, is this true? I'd love to know so I can say g'day when you are walking past. James

  • fanedlive on November 12, 2009, 10:03 GMT

    It would be great to take photos like this of your own, but unfortunately Cricket Australia have imposed rules of what cameras you can take into grounds. In CA's "conditions of entry" banned items include cameras with a "total-focal strength of greater than 200mm" What this means is that any camera allowed into the ground will be struggling to take decent pics of the players in the middle. Panasonic make a camera with a focal strength of exactly 200mm, so that's your best option if you want to have no hassles from security saying you can't bring a camera in. Back in '05 when the WI were last here I was singled out in a crowd for having a "professional camera" when in reality it was a $600 Panasonic 5MP normal consumer camera. Heads up people, if you are off to the cricket this season, be sure what your camera is before taking it and avoid the disappointment I went through, although I'm not sure how well it's policed, last test (2008) I was at there were high zoom SLRs everywhere...

  • fanedlive on November 11, 2009, 9:57 GMT

    Brilliant Shot!!!

  • fanedlive on November 10, 2009, 7:47 GMT

    Awesome Photo....Nice to get an insight into this kind of work....keep it going...

  • fanedlive on November 10, 2009, 0:00 GMT

    Amazing photo. Thanks for the insight into your work.

  • fanedlive on November 9, 2009, 18:03 GMT

    From one photographer to another...Absolutely Wickid Shot!!!

  • No featured comments at the moment.