Champions League T20 2011

Malinga solves Mumbai Indians' problems

Though they couldn't bat, couldn't field and conceded byes generously, MI finished with the biggest prize at franchise-level Twenty20

Nitin Sundar

October 10, 2011

Comments: 71 | Text size: A | A

Lasith Malinga celebrates an early wicket, Chennai Super Kings v Mumbai Indians, CLT20, Chennai, September 24, 2011
Lasith Malinga won Mumbai Indians matches with both bat and ball © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

By the end of the Champions League, the Mumbai Indians post-match press conferences at the MA Chidambaram became as predictable as Groundhog Day. Harbhajan Singh would field questions on how his side had managed yet another unlikely win, overcoming their latest top-order funk and club-class fielding display. Lasith Malinga - Man of the Match against Chennai Super Kings and Somerset, and Player of the Tournament after the final - would sit aloof by Harbhajan's side, fiddling with his mobile phone, his bronze curls and all-pervasive tattoos saying more than he could ever convey in words.

One tattoo on Malinga's forearm spoke louder than all his other elements of bling. "Destiny says it all", it proclaimed sagely. Harbhajan might have curtailed his long, rambling explanations, and just pointed at it.

There was little surrounding the Mumbai Indians' campaign that suggested they could go all the way. They came into the tournament with the lowest billing among the IPL sides, without their captain, icon and best batsman, and several other first-choice players. Their stand-in skipper was going through his worst season at the highest level, and had to deal with his own exclusion from the Indian side midway through the tournament.

They invited ridicule by picking a side without Mumbai-ites, and with very few Indians, and then convincing the organisers to change the rules to provide them an injury handicap. They were further embarrassed when one of the injured players turned up elsewhere, sprightly enough to hit a match-winning 191 a week after being declared unfit for the Mumbai squad. Apart from becoming a PR-disaster, the fifth overseas player contributed little on the field, with Andrew Symonds enduring the tournament without quite figuring which end of the bat to hold. In a tournament where three centuries were hit, and four batsmen made over 200 runs, MI's highest run-getter managed 123.

The Super Kings could have beaten them, but MS Dhoni somehow clanged a simple stumping that would have closed the game, on a day when he effected four other dismissals. T&T should have beaten them, but Daren Ganga was somehow convinced to spread his field to a No. 11 batsman with two to defend off the last ball, before Denesh Ramdin somehow missed a run-out you would have backed most toddlers to pull off.

Two wins and a rain-out put Mumbai Indians unexpectedly in pole position, before their poor cricket caught up with them in the fourth, against New South Wales. Just when it seemed they would be pipped on the points table, T&T defeated the Cobras to leave MI's passage to the semi-finals unhindered. It seemed like one of the scripts for which the city is famous.

MI lifted their game marginally in the semi-final and final, but the fielding remained apologetic, and Ambati Rayudu's part-time wicket-keeping appalling. With 22 runs to defend in two overs against Somerset, Harbhajan tossed the ball to James Franklin, who isn't an end-overs first-choice option even for New Zealand. And it worked. MI's batting spluttered colossally in the final, as they subsided from 105 for 4 in the 14th over to 139 all out. RCB had the game in the bag once Tillakaratne Dilshan powered them to 38 for 0 in four overs, but almost inevitably MI found the escape route once again.

While fortune favoured them right through, Harbhajan did his bit with attractive captaincy and attacking bowling. Pollard contributed little with bat and ball, but remained electric on the field. Aiden Blizzard and Franklin, too, chipped in, but the real heroes for Mumbai were their unheralded Indians. At different stages in the tournament, Yuzvendra Chahal, Sarul Kanwar, Suryakumar Yadav, Abu Nechim and R Sathish raised their game. Malinga, quite simply, did everything else.

The imbalance between bat and ball in Twenty20s stems largely from the fact that a bowler is reduced to a mere four overs in the format. That didn't seem to affect Malinga, who had stumps in the cross-hairs every time he ran in, and routinely produced howitzers masquerading as yorkers. He took Mumbai's deficiencies in the field completely out of the equation: of his ten victims, eight were bowled and two were lbw. He also did his bit to alleviate MI's batting woes: he clouted more sixes, and finished with a higher batting average and strike-rate, than anyone else in his team.

And so it was, that though they couldn't bat, couldn't field and conceded byes generously, MI finished with the biggest prize at franchise-level Twenty20. Their triumph flies in the face of conventional Twenty20 logic; it came in a format made for batsmen, and where games are won and lost by fielding, without looking the part in either department. How do you explain that? Perhaps Malinga's tattoo was right. Destiny did say it all.

Nitin Sundar is a sub-editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Nitin Sundar

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Outswinger1978 on (October 12, 2011, 18:03 GMT)

Excellent article. Surprised to note that this lad is a Sub-Editor. His writing skills and cricket perception merits a designation of Assistant Editor. Is Sambit Bal listening!!!

Posted by JG2704 on (October 11, 2011, 20:10 GMT)

@randikaayya - I'm not a Man U fan but please get your facts right. They produce or develop plenty of great footballers. Maybe Man City might be a better example these days or Real Madrid even better still. @RANDYOZ - Re "England: A team still rife with jealousy (as well as South Africans) about Australia's superior record in every facet of the game" - May I ask who exactly sounds jealous of who in your comments?

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 16:29 GMT)

@Sheldon Almeida- what planet are u in? to everyone it was obvious why and how India won. @Randikaayya- why are u jealous of United? @raj606: wake up man

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 13:20 GMT)

Mumbai won b coz sachin wasnt there. sachin was the reason that mumbai always failed. now no sachin mumbai rocks. sachin never a match winner. not as a batter nor as a captain. he plays for him self. he plays for collect runs. THATS THE UGLY TRUTH

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 12:53 GMT)

feels lyk......Mali is a IND Bowler...... he he what a joke......

Posted by rakon_me on (October 11, 2011, 12:32 GMT)

@jonathanjoseph..overall malinga has played 19 odis in his career against india and took 20 wickets at an economy of 5.7 and sl just won 6 of those encounters..thats enough to show his record agianst india...

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 12:32 GMT)

mumbai won because tendulkar didnt play

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 12:24 GMT)

Man of the match of the finals should go to the Umpire who was blind to give Chris Gayle out when he was playing a forward short, that to being more than 6 feet tall!

Posted by   on (October 11, 2011, 12:02 GMT)

MI won the championship, so if they played horrible cricket...what does it say of the other teams ?

This article sounds a bit negative when in fact every player in MI played a important role in one or the other match. And that's why they won, they didn't all play brilliant at once, but neither did they all fail at once. Everybody chipped in and that's why they have the trophy.

Posted by A_PROUD_INDIAN on (October 11, 2011, 11:51 GMT)

Well Nitin, you surely not a MI fan. Honestly you only managed to highlight the negatives. Look buddy, Chennai & TnT played fantastic cricket but at critical moments they lost the plot. Was it Malinga's mistake that Dhoni missed the stumping? Was it Chahal's fault that Ganga couldn't think & Ramdin made a mess of a simple run-out? MI deserve the title.... no Sachin.... most of the first choice players injured.... most teams would have choked under this.... but they tried to make the best use wht they had, 'If Life Gives you a Lemon; Make a Lemonade. Dont fret for a Mango'.... And Nitin did you manage to see the Final.... Bowling was fantastic & Fielding was Great.... But cant blame you or other for feeling a bit negative.... After all, from 100 odd meters, the game looks really simple

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Nitin SundarClose
Nitin Sundar Social media manager Nitin spent his formative years perfecting the art of landing the googly, before blossoming into a book-cricket specialist. More excellence followed in the underarm version of the game before, like the majority of India's misguided youth, he started taking studies seriously. After four forgettable years of electrical engineering, followed by a rigorous MBA and 16 months in the strategy consulting industry, he began to ponder life's more profound issues. Such as the angle made by Brian Lara's bat with the horizontal at the peak of his back-lift. A move to ESPNcricinfo followed and Nitin is now a prolific nurdler in office cricket, with a questionable technique against the short ball.
Tournament Results
RCB v Mum Indians at Chennai - Oct 9, 2011
Mum Indians won by 31 runs
Mum Indians v Somerset at Chennai - Oct 8, 2011
Mum Indians won by 10 runs
RCB v NSW at Bangalore - Oct 7, 2011
RCB won by 6 wickets (with 9 balls remaining)
RCB v South Aust at Bangalore - Oct 5, 2011
RCB won by 2 wickets (with 0 balls remaining)
Somerset v Warriors at Bangalore - Oct 5, 2011
Somerset won by 12 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days