Mumbai Indians v Yorkshire, Group B, CLT20, Cape Town October 17, 2012

Yorkshire vie for piece of Indian pudding


Match facts

October 18, 2012
Start time 1730 (1530 GMT)

Big Picture

Teams from Australia, South Africa and New Zealand have already humbled their illustrious IPL rivals, and that could be the inspiration Yorkshire - the only English team in the competition - need to score another upset when they take on the blue and flashy-gold festooned Mumbai Indians. At stake are first points for both teams and a chance to stay close to the two table toppers - Sydney Sixers and Lions.

Yorkshire, the runners up from England's T20 competition, came into the main group stage the hard way, unlike the No. 4 IPL side, scoring solid wins over Uva Next and Trinidad & Tobago, before being blown away by the Sydney Sixers pace attack in their first group match. Mumbai Indians do not pose a threat with their bowling in these conditions, except perhaps through Lasith Malinga, who the batsmen will need to be careful against. Yorkshire don't posses any internationally known batsmen, but as Gary Ballance showed against T&T, they do have the skill to surprise any team. They have lost their big name - the South African David Miller - to first-class commitments, so a lot will also depend on Joe Root, who hasn't fired in the tournament yet, to give Ballance support.

The fate of the match could be determined by how Mumbai's strong batting performs. They have innings-builders and big-hitters all the way down to No. 8. In their last game, the tactic to send Mitchell Johnson up the order backfired but the rest of the batsmen still put up a competitive 157 on the board. Sachin Tendulkar scored a scratchy 24-ball 16 and would be desperate for some runs to ward-off the cloud of criticism that has engulfed him lately and push Mumbai Indians to a safer position.

Watch out for...

The experienced Ryan Sidebottom is the leader of the Yorkshire bowling attack and he showed his worth in the crucial qualifying match against T&T in which he picked up three wickets for 13. Knowing that Mumbai Indians struggled against the left-arm bowlers - Dirk Nannes and Sohail Tanvir - in the last match, his form will be crucial. Sidebottom still bowls with pace and his accurate yorkers can test the best.

Harbhajan Singh had a bad start to the tournament. Not only did he appear short of ideas when Quinton de Kock and Neil McKenzie took control in the previous match, but his insipid bowling was dealt with easily. Harbhajan, though, led Mumbai Indians to the Champions League title last year with some fighting performances and his resurgence will be crucial if Mumbai want to impose themselves with the ball.

Stats and trivia

  • Sachin Tendulkar's strike-rate of 119.70 for Mumbai Indians is the second-lowest in their top-order, above only Dinesh Karthik's 115.76. But Tendulkar is the only batsman to score more than 2000 runs for the team.


"It's good for cricket. The Mumbai Indians and Chennai Super Kings are dominant when they play in their home conditions. Having a tournament here gives a chance to everyone and there are no favourites."
Mumbai Indians captain Harbhajan Singh says the tournament being played in South Africa gives the teams a level playing field

Devashish Fuloria is a sub-editor with ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Vetric karthick on October 18, 2012, 16:17 GMT

    karthik strike rate is 128 in T20s.....

  • Chetan on October 18, 2012, 15:06 GMT

    MI should go with 2 changes - Yadav & Munaf for Sachin & Dhawal. They have no other Indian options. Dhawal looks a little raw & Sachin - we all know he is useless in limited overs cricket now - worse he clearly does not play for the team....His slower than others 100 was the primary reason why Bangladesh managed to beat India in the Asia Cup...Even in T20 cricket, he is clearly unable to cross the run-a-ball strike-rate since ages, but selfishly refuses to retire (he gets money, the hell with his team, MI). I am sure most T20 teams in the world would love to have SRT in the MI team - there is then one batsman who gives MI's batsmen pressure for sure - if he makes runs, he consumes so many balls that there is scoring rate pressure for guys behind him. Else he donates his wicket to a mediocre bowler & encourages the bowler to bowl better at guys who follow him. Height of selfishness, refuses to move lower into the batting line-up.

  • Syed Ahsin Ali on October 18, 2012, 14:59 GMT

    why munaf patel is not in playing 11. he is far better than kulkarni. Rayadu should be at no. 3.

  • Tushar on October 18, 2012, 14:54 GMT

    Everybody says their bowling is weak... But their biggest problem is the opening pair, i'v seen so many openers for mumbai in the last two seasons and still no settled opening pair. If their openers give them a good start, they are capable of making scores that even the worst of bowling attack would be able to defend... Their batting order is haphazard. I feel in mumbai, there are better indian players than foreign. Sachin, rohit, rayadu, kartik need to be in top 5, pollard can be sent in only if there are two or three overs left. And sachin should come in at no.3, he's the anchor in the line-up, openers should be explosive, not subdued...!!!

  • Sanjay on October 18, 2012, 14:49 GMT

    It's time MI take a call on Pollard. What is his actual role in the team? Either utilize him by promoting him up the order so he can make an impact with the bat or not play him at all. Using him as a bowling all-rounder only exposes the complete lack of intelligence in the MI coaching staff.

  • Ashok on October 18, 2012, 13:16 GMT

    Mumbai's bowling is very poor with Harbhajan like a Non-playing captain. In the last match Kulkarni & Harbhajan very the 2 worst bowlers. Mumbai needs to replace grossly over rated Pollard with perrera or Franklin. They are both good economical seamers & can bat with more contributions than Pollard.It is strange that the current line up of an established IPL team is totally unsettled both is batting & bowling. Harbhajan's captaincy in the last match was irrational with questionable tactics. His field placing was bizarre. If they play like in the last match with losers body language, then Mumbai will lose even to a weak Yorkshire team. Mumbai needs to win the last 3 matches to advance. They need to play with greater intensity & show that they have the winning spirit.

  • subra on October 18, 2012, 12:31 GMT

    It will be an interesting match.I still feel Mumbai may struggle as they did in their last match.Sachin may not be able to score much and the opening pair might waste so many balls and final pressure will be on middle order.The Mumbali bowlers willl again struggle to contain -so i feel this is again going in favour of Yorkshire than to MI. The present Indian teams have so far under prepared and not doing a good job to their experience.

  • Sachin on October 18, 2012, 10:52 GMT

    Mumbai Indians should change there personnel in next auction. Mumbai needs good attacking opener as well as solid middle order batsmen to have solid batting order. and Rayudu at 3 and Rohit at 4 is better than Rohit at 3 and Rayudu at 6/7. Mumbai Batting order should be Smith, Sachin, Rayudu, Rohit, Pollard, Kartik, Surya, Perera, Bhajji, Malinga, Ojha.

  • Dummy4 on October 18, 2012, 9:00 GMT

    ipl teams up for one more loss. and i reiterate not largely because of the foreign players, but the rest-not good enough.

  • James on October 18, 2012, 8:31 GMT

    Agree with satish619chandar. Rayudu is the key to Mumbai batting. Actually they have so many Indian batsmen, that they should ideally not play any foreign professional batsman. Instead they should go for Malinga, and the three allrounders Smith, Pollard and Perera/Johnson. These four along with Ojha and Harbajan should be able to bowl 20 overs. The good thing about Rohit Sharma is that he is/used to be- a good finisher. Even if he comes in a bit late he should be able to adjust and find the boundaries. SK Yadav needs to be included somehow, and Rayudu should be in within the first five overs. Because of the ICL stigma is he not playing for India, but othewise he gas been in better touch than anyone else for the past three years.

  • No featured comments at the moment.