Spot-fixing controversy January 7, 2011

ICC makes its case against suspended players

12

The ICC has finished making its case against the three Pakistani players facing charges of spot-fixing on the second day of the anti-corruption hearing, with three key witnesses having been heard through the session. The way is now paved for Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir to begin their defence on Saturday.

Proceedings on the day were dominated by the presentation of more evidence by the ICC and the examination of all prosecution witnesses who attended the hearing in person or via teleconference. Pakistan's T20 and ODI captain, Shahid Afridi, and their coach, Waqar Younis, appeared via teleconference though there was confusion initially over whether the former had appeared.

The pair had given statements to investigators when they were in Dubai for the series against South Africa in October-November last year. In the statements, which were leaked in to media in Pakistan, Younis is said to have questioned Amir about the no-ball during a break in play and expressed his surprise at such a large front-foot transgression.

Afridi was questioned, it is believed, among other things, about the World T20 where he was captain of a side that included the three players. Part of the supporting evidence is linked to the tournament, held in the Caribbean before Pakistan's tour of England.

The most significant witness is likely to have been Mazhar Mahmood, the News of the World reporter who carried out the sting operation and put together the story. There has been much speculation about his presence from the start of proceedings; the investigative reporter maintains a notoriously low-key profile and is not easily recognized in public. ESPNcricinfo understands he has been present at the hearings over both days so far, and the ICC is said to be relying extensively on the evidence the newspaper gathered in their operation.

The next two days are now expected to produce significant developments as the players begin in earnest the process of defending themselves. The three have pleaded not guilty to the charges and will be examined first by their own lawyers before the ICC's lawyers cross-examine them.

Indications from the players' opening statements are that each has adopted a separate line of defence and that is expected to become more distinct - though not necessarily as divergent as has been assumed - over the next two days.

The proceedings of the first two days have been of a cagey, tight nature - though apparently cordial - and not perhaps as conclusive as might be imagined. Even to some involved in the hearing, it has been difficult to conclude how it has gone so far. There is an acknowledgment that each player's perspective on how things have gone will be different; one is believed to see things as going to plan so far and content with the workings of the tribunal.

Outwardly at least the players have looked upbeat on entry and exit from the Qatar Financial Centre tower. All three were dressed in jacket and trousers on the first day and though Asif and Amir maintained that on Friday, Butt had loosened up sartorially a little. And having ignored the media entirely on Thursday, Asif and Butt even acknowledged the presence of some today if only to indicate, understandably, that they couldn't comment.

Osman Samiuddin is Pakistan editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • wicked.wizard on January 10, 2011, 19:49 GMT

    Until and unless players from all countries receive incomes which do not depend on the nationality but on field performances corruption can not be gotten rid of. If pakistani cricketers also recieved crore's from ipl 2 which i am sure the 3 accused would have, such incidents allegations would never appear.#

  • on January 10, 2011, 13:46 GMT

    i hope the recommendations take opposite direction. They recommend that there is so much money in cricket so the star players CAN NOT be paid peanuts, if they are paid hugely under their fame and star value, they will be asily tempted. All boards must adapt similar player compensation practices to avod such issues. It issues code of wages & compensation for players, and a code for compensation and wages poorer boards, so that they avoid all that. I hope the case of Indian bookies approaching watson, cronje, dilshan and pakistanis is also evaluated. I hope amir is spared for he is too young and can be easily misguided.

  • khurramsch on January 8, 2011, 18:22 GMT

    agree with u fellows it should be made public.

  • on January 8, 2011, 13:22 GMT

    Quit the damn drama already and publicly update of the proceedings.

  • DavidNorman99 on January 8, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    According to the Ashes radio commentary in the UK, the proceedings are not public for legal reasons, as they could affect the UK Police investigation into the incident. So if the proceedings are made public, it won't be until after the police investigation is concluded.

  • Asif_Iqbal on January 8, 2011, 11:00 GMT

    The case presented by ICC is v.weak they might punish the player on the basis of evdience they provide but if players go to court then ICC can not prove thier case on the basis of video and voice recording . So this a very tricky position and I hope the descisson must be free for any influnce and fair to prove the same in the court as well

  • h4hamid on January 8, 2011, 9:53 GMT

    Agreed on the idea that ICC should make proceedings public so that all know are they guilty or not ... The most important part is that they should remain same standard for all.

  • on January 8, 2011, 5:36 GMT

    simple punishment if thy found gouty LIFE BAN. but keep in mind mazar majeed also said fixing Sydney test but ICC clear it. .....

  • dr_salman on January 8, 2011, 2:58 GMT

    ya i also think that other players who have been named should also be investigated and tried...no matter where they r from !!

  • Something_Witty on January 8, 2011, 1:23 GMT

    I just hope that they make an example of these three. Amir's age and incredibly prowess with the ball should not be a factor. Match fixers have no place in cricket.

  • wicked.wizard on January 10, 2011, 19:49 GMT

    Until and unless players from all countries receive incomes which do not depend on the nationality but on field performances corruption can not be gotten rid of. If pakistani cricketers also recieved crore's from ipl 2 which i am sure the 3 accused would have, such incidents allegations would never appear.#

  • on January 10, 2011, 13:46 GMT

    i hope the recommendations take opposite direction. They recommend that there is so much money in cricket so the star players CAN NOT be paid peanuts, if they are paid hugely under their fame and star value, they will be asily tempted. All boards must adapt similar player compensation practices to avod such issues. It issues code of wages & compensation for players, and a code for compensation and wages poorer boards, so that they avoid all that. I hope the case of Indian bookies approaching watson, cronje, dilshan and pakistanis is also evaluated. I hope amir is spared for he is too young and can be easily misguided.

  • khurramsch on January 8, 2011, 18:22 GMT

    agree with u fellows it should be made public.

  • on January 8, 2011, 13:22 GMT

    Quit the damn drama already and publicly update of the proceedings.

  • DavidNorman99 on January 8, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    According to the Ashes radio commentary in the UK, the proceedings are not public for legal reasons, as they could affect the UK Police investigation into the incident. So if the proceedings are made public, it won't be until after the police investigation is concluded.

  • Asif_Iqbal on January 8, 2011, 11:00 GMT

    The case presented by ICC is v.weak they might punish the player on the basis of evdience they provide but if players go to court then ICC can not prove thier case on the basis of video and voice recording . So this a very tricky position and I hope the descisson must be free for any influnce and fair to prove the same in the court as well

  • h4hamid on January 8, 2011, 9:53 GMT

    Agreed on the idea that ICC should make proceedings public so that all know are they guilty or not ... The most important part is that they should remain same standard for all.

  • on January 8, 2011, 5:36 GMT

    simple punishment if thy found gouty LIFE BAN. but keep in mind mazar majeed also said fixing Sydney test but ICC clear it. .....

  • dr_salman on January 8, 2011, 2:58 GMT

    ya i also think that other players who have been named should also be investigated and tried...no matter where they r from !!

  • Something_Witty on January 8, 2011, 1:23 GMT

    I just hope that they make an example of these three. Amir's age and incredibly prowess with the ball should not be a factor. Match fixers have no place in cricket.

  • NewYorkCricket on January 7, 2011, 21:10 GMT

    Whatever ICC does, it should make sure that all evidence is made public. The 3 players have denied everything so far and will do that in the future. They have to make sure, they leave no doubt. Secondly they need to go after other players who are involved, but not mentioned in the NOTW report. Does not matter where they come from.

  • bumsonseats on January 7, 2011, 20:38 GMT

    its nice to see cricinfo has finally made the space for readers to make their own feelings on this episode. whenever cricinfo has written anything about this matter, we have not had the chance to make comment . the reason iv no idea. dpk

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • bumsonseats on January 7, 2011, 20:38 GMT

    its nice to see cricinfo has finally made the space for readers to make their own feelings on this episode. whenever cricinfo has written anything about this matter, we have not had the chance to make comment . the reason iv no idea. dpk

  • NewYorkCricket on January 7, 2011, 21:10 GMT

    Whatever ICC does, it should make sure that all evidence is made public. The 3 players have denied everything so far and will do that in the future. They have to make sure, they leave no doubt. Secondly they need to go after other players who are involved, but not mentioned in the NOTW report. Does not matter where they come from.

  • Something_Witty on January 8, 2011, 1:23 GMT

    I just hope that they make an example of these three. Amir's age and incredibly prowess with the ball should not be a factor. Match fixers have no place in cricket.

  • dr_salman on January 8, 2011, 2:58 GMT

    ya i also think that other players who have been named should also be investigated and tried...no matter where they r from !!

  • on January 8, 2011, 5:36 GMT

    simple punishment if thy found gouty LIFE BAN. but keep in mind mazar majeed also said fixing Sydney test but ICC clear it. .....

  • h4hamid on January 8, 2011, 9:53 GMT

    Agreed on the idea that ICC should make proceedings public so that all know are they guilty or not ... The most important part is that they should remain same standard for all.

  • Asif_Iqbal on January 8, 2011, 11:00 GMT

    The case presented by ICC is v.weak they might punish the player on the basis of evdience they provide but if players go to court then ICC can not prove thier case on the basis of video and voice recording . So this a very tricky position and I hope the descisson must be free for any influnce and fair to prove the same in the court as well

  • DavidNorman99 on January 8, 2011, 12:04 GMT

    According to the Ashes radio commentary in the UK, the proceedings are not public for legal reasons, as they could affect the UK Police investigation into the incident. So if the proceedings are made public, it won't be until after the police investigation is concluded.

  • on January 8, 2011, 13:22 GMT

    Quit the damn drama already and publicly update of the proceedings.

  • khurramsch on January 8, 2011, 18:22 GMT

    agree with u fellows it should be made public.