Warwickshire v Surrey, Edgbaston, 2nd day

Solanki's masterclass comes too late

Jon Culley at Edgbaston

September 18, 2013

Comments: 4 | Text size: A | A

Surrey 400 for 5 (Solanki 162, Davies 103, Amla 77) v Warwickshire
Scorecard


Vikram Solanki drives on his way to 69, Surrey v Warwickshire, County Championship, Division One, Guildford, 3rd day, June, 7, 2013
Vikram Solanki showed some of his best touches during a dominant, elegant innings © PA Photos
Enlarge

Days like these have been rare for Surrey this season, which goes a long way, of course, to explaining why they are on the brink of relegation. Vikram Solanki's second hundred for Surrey is the first in the Championship by any of the county's batsmen since Ricky Ponting's 169 against Nottinghamshire at The Oval in July.

Unless Rory Burns or Steven Davies has an exceptionally good match at Derby next week, when Surrey's return to Division Two will almost certainly be confirmed, Solanki is likely to be the only batsman close to 1,000 first-class runs.

His brilliant 162, of which 106 runs came in boundaries, confirmed, even at 37, that the ability to play a high-class innings is still with him. Amid all the criticisms aimed in Surrey's direction in the analysis of their current state, his signing did not escape attention. It was was by some commentators to represent the wrong approach, a player close to the end of his career signed on a expensive contract, barring the way, it was supposed, of some home-grown talent with much more cricket ahead of him.

"People are entirely entitled to their opinion," he said. "I pride myself at trying to work as hard as I can at my game and trying to do my best for the team I'm involved with. I've thoroughly enjoyed being part of the group and I hope they have enjoyed having me around."

It was an answer typical of Solanki's natural modesty and diplomacy. Indeed, asked if his form was close to his best, he suggested he could have done better, drawing attention instead to occasions when he disappointed himself.

"I'm pleased with the way I played today," he said. "I've worked hard in the last two weeks in particular to make sure I'm moving well enough and I was pretty pleased with the way I moved today.

"I'd like to hope that the ability is still there to deliver runs at this level but I would have dearly liked to have made far more runs than I have, and it is not for the lack of trying.

"I recall a number of occasions when a partnership at a particular time would have been just what we needed and I missed an opportunity. So while I'm happy with how I've played today, and while there were another couple of knocks I was quite pleased with, I look back at some of those other games with disappointment."

He cannot be the only one reflecting with similar frustration. Surrey's collective batting malaise has been such that before this match they had not managed maximum batting points once. Indeed, in the last two dismal defeats against Middlesex and Somerset they did not take any at all.

Rankin ankle problem played down

  • Warwickshire say that ankle soreness reported by fast bowler Boyd Rankin when he returned from England duty in the one-day series against Australia is not thought to be a symptom of a serious problem, even though he was not fit enough to play in this game.
  • Rankin, who represented Ireland in two World Cups, switched allegiance to England this summer and emerged with credit from the series against Australia, in which he troubled the batsmen with his pace and bounce and took five wickets at 21.20. He is thought to a contender for a place in the Ashes squad due to be named next week.

"That says it all about our season," Solanki added. "There is no question that we are very disappointed with the way we have played in Championship cricket, although we can be proud of the fact that we played well in the Twenty20 and only fell at the last hurdle, in the final."

In a manner of speaking, Surrey's failure to turn the season around is vindication for Chris Adams, who was sacked in June. Under Adams, who was team director, Surrey were promoted in 2011, when they also won the CB40, but the tragedy of Tom Maynard blighted the 2012 season and Adams was sent on his way after completing five years at the helm, along with first-team coach Ian Salisbury. Fearful even then that they would go down, Surrey's chief executive Richard Gould - the son of a football manager - announced that the club "had decided it was time to make a change in order to progress further."

Alec Stewart has been in charge on a temporary basis ever since, with no sign yet of a permanent successor to Adams. If there was much wrong about what he was doing, his removal has clearly not proved to be the solution. How different might the season have been, one can speculate, had Graeme Smith not suffered his season-ending injury after only two matches as captain, denying Adams the experience and stature on the field he hoped would bring unity and purpose to an undeniably talented group of players.

Their performance so far in this match, against the side that won the title last year, only underlines the point. Hashim Amla's 77 might be seen as counting for little, in that he has appeared only as a desperate last throw of the dice, but Davies showed his quality too with his second hundred of the season. Thanks to his partnership with Solanki, which added 182 in 40.3 overs, the 400 was reached in the 98th over.

Solanki's 162, which began with Surrey 18 for 2 in the 11th over, ended in the 93rd, when he attempted to guide a ball from Chris Woakes towards the third-man boundary and instead deflected it into his stumps via a bottom edge. He had hit 25 fours and one six, over long-off, against the spinner, Jeetan Patel.

Davies, similarly displaying a touch of class not revealed often enough this year, completed his second hundred of the season before pulling a ball from Maurice Chambers to the midwicket boundary, where Ateeq Javid took the catch. Amla had become a third victim of the innings for Keith Barker when he drove loosely amid the general desire for quick runs and was caught at slip.

RSS Feeds: Jon Culley

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by guildfordbat on (September 19, 2013, 9:32 GMT)

Potler is spot on when he writes that ''Stewart can only play the lamentable hand Adams dealt him.'' We were left with an imbalanced and unsuitable squad. Yes, there were some promising youngsters. However, too many had already been kept out of the team and denied first class experience for too long by past their sell by date underachievers on long and expensive contracts. Add to that, not nearly enough players ''at the right age'', an over abundance of seam bowlers and so few batsmen that we have regularly had to supplement the second eleven with trialists.

Whilst there might seem to be a case that Adams should have been left in place - for this season at least - to see off what he had started, he had lost too many supporters, members and committee people for that to be feasible. If Richard Gould is to be criticised, it should be for not pulling the plug earlier.

Posted by Cyril_Knight on (September 19, 2013, 9:15 GMT)

Agree with both posters below, if anything Surrey's disgusting performances highlight Adams' failures. But Stewart and the coaching team must also face some criticism, they have not achieved any of the goals they were set.

Avoid relegation - failure Batsman progress and build responsible innings - failure Meaker, Dernbach and Tremlett to form fearsome bowling unit - failure Players to play positive cricket - failure

I said when Stewart was appointed that relegation was inevitable. The old Surrey cliques are still holding the club back. The Chief Executive must be held responsible, he is incompetent and has brought a small club mentality to the biggest club. Why a proper coach was not appointed is one of many questions he needs to answer.

Posted by brusselslion on (September 19, 2013, 8:33 GMT)

Nice day at the office but too little too late for Surrey.

"Surrey's failure to turn the season around is vindication for Chris Adams.." Err, how exactly? We were a rudderless ship with Adams in charge. The fact that we still are, does not mean that it was wrong to get rid of him.

"Davies, similarly displaying a touch of class not revealed often enough this year.." Picked on the wrong batsman there, Mr. Culley (any one of the others would have been a better choice). Davies averages 43, which is decent enough for a WK, and has been pretty consistent all season.

Posted by potler on (September 18, 2013, 20:17 GMT)

Vindication for Chris Adams? He released Chris Jordan and Michael Carberry- wonder how they got on. Laurie Evans and Matt Spriegel are currently fulfilling their promise at other counties whilst geriatric journeyman grow rich failing week after week. Stewart can only play the lamentable hand Adams dealt him. I can't imagine Amla cried all the way to the bank after his pair against Somerset, but Surrey desperately need to clear out the expensive woeful imports and rebuild.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
County Results
Glamorgan v Gloucs at Cardiff - Sep 24-27, 2013
Glamorgan won by 8 wickets
Kent v Lancashire at Canterbury - Sep 24-27, 2013
Kent won by 2 wickets
Notts v Somerset at Nottingham - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Surrey v Yorkshire at The Oval - Sep 24-27, 2013
Match drawn
Sussex v Durham at Hove - Sep 24-27, 2013
Sussex won by 6 wickets
All recent results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days