Kent v South Africans, Canterbury, 2nd day July 14, 2012

SA at ease despite short build-up

13

South Africa's batting line-up will have the equivalent of little more than two days of cricket before the first Test at The Oval next week. Wet weather has dampened their preparations for the series, which they need to win to earn the No.1 ranking, but the team management remain confident that the players will be ready.

"I think even if we were here for a month, we'd still struggle to get in a lot of preparation time," Russell Domingo, the assistant coach said. "We knew this was going to happen but guys were saying, 'We are mentally ready to play,' after our camp in Switzerland."

When rain ended the second day's play of the tour match in Kent after 22 overs, the South Africans had faced only 35 overs in the match to added to the 76.3 overs they had in Taunton. Even if they manage a full day in the middle on Sunday it will be little more than 200 overs before facing James Anderson and Stuart Broad.

Some of those who have made it to the crease have not made full use of their opportunities either. Graeme Smith made 21 to follow the 10 he scored against Somerset, and has faced 57 deliveries across the two innings, while Alvrio Petersen, who missed the first warm-up match with a foot injury, also fell for 21 against Kent. Before this tour started Smith had not batted in a competitive situation since March, as he spent the off-season recovering from ankle surgery. Petersen at least has his stint in the County Championship with Essex to fall back on.

These two men will face the first wave of attack from the English bowlers, who have all played over the last fortnight albeit in the one-day format, but Domingo was unconcerned about their lack of crease time. "There is just something about England and the way Graeme hits the ball in the nets, he really looks in good technical shape," Domingo said. "Alviro has got two hundreds from his last four Test so he will take a lot of confidence from that. He batted for quite long in this innings and that's as much as we could have hoped for."

Apart from Hashim Amla, who scored a half-century against Somerset and is undefeated on 36 in this match, South Africa's middle order is also short of practice. Importantly though, JP Duminy, who is expected to come in at No.7 in the first Test after Mark Boucher withdrawal scored 53 in Taunton and looked comfortable against the short ball and spin - two types of bowling he has struggled against in the past - albeit against bowling of lower quality than he will face next week.

Duminy's second coming as a Test player was completed with his century in Wellington, earning him a place in the squad to play England ahead of Ashwell Prince, and Domingo believes the depth he brings will be important. "Having JP in the side is a good boost," he said. "He adds a lot of depth and a lot of stability to our middle order which could be important considering how easily conditions change in England. With the ball swinging around and teams likely to lose two or three wickets in a cluster, depth in batting order is going to be very important."

Although Domingo would not confirm a Test XI, the team that South Africa are using in Kent is expected to be the same as the one they will field in the first Test. If that is the case specialist wicketkeeper Thami Tsolekile, who replaced Boucher, will be on the sidelines bu Domingo said the team management have been transparent with Tsolekile as possible.

"Initially when the squad was selected, Boucher was first-choice and AB de Villiers was the back-up keeper so that is the order of procession," Domingo said. "I think Thami is very comfortable knowing that he is probably back up to AB for his Test series. He probably expected that before he got here and I think he knows where he stands. It's important for players to know where they stand."

De Villiers has accepted the role of gloveman but admitted that he will have to monitor the state of his back. At the 2011 World Cup, he could not keep in five of South Africa's seven matches but has since done the job in limited-overs cricket.

South Africa's bowlers have had two decent run outs so far and key players showed important improvements against Kent. Morne Morkel recovered from a poor showing in Taunton with a much more disciplined performance, taking 3 for 49 in 18 overs, and of particular interest was Imran Tahir's bowling against the tail on the opening day.

He picked up four wickets, which Domingo said reward for all the efforts Tahir has put in during training. "It's refreshing seeing that type of spin bowler as an option for South Africa," he said. "Graeme is learning how to deal with him, when to bowl him and who to bowl him to."

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on July 15, 2012, 15:58 GMT

    Preparation against mediocre first class teams has never been much preparation at all. Those games are essentially a lose-lose situation. The only thing that could have made a difference would be a series against weaker opposition prior to this series, and since that option wasn't available I don't blame SA management at all for trying to keep the tour as short as possible. SA would've been rusty, regardless. To be honest, the only two things I'm concerned about right now are our openers holding up and AB's back not caving in.

  • mahjut on July 15, 2012, 13:41 GMT

    Ajmal is probably a better bowler than Tahir but it's very hard to say - one has had a good test year (after a few oters in tests) but, although good, is behind the other over years of FC cricket. I don't think Tahir will be the difference in this tour but he should play a part ... very unlikely it'll be one-sided (SA just are not prepared enough to dominate it in that way;)) but it should be a good un.

  • on July 15, 2012, 10:30 GMT

    @SurlyCynic, where did you get these stats from, as I would be interested in looking at them.

  • on July 15, 2012, 9:47 GMT

    imran tahir will play a vital role because english batsman is not good against top quality of spin just like we saw in past against australia,pakistan,india,sri lanka

  • JG2704 on July 15, 2012, 8:10 GMT

    @jimmy2s on (July 14 2012, 16:08 PM GMT) No one handled themselves well against spin in UAE inc Prior. The other thing is that Ajmel and co were far higher quality than Tahir and Eng have not struggled like that against spin in home conditions. Would seem strange to do that when you have the quality of Steyn and Philander in your ranks

  • on July 15, 2012, 7:15 GMT

    England are currently the best in all forms of cricket.

  • djdrastic on July 15, 2012, 7:13 GMT

    OK , so we know the weather is terrible but we still come out to England knowing we would get the absolute bare minimum preparation.

    I might remind you we are playing a team who has absolutely dominated the last two touring teams.

    Well done SA Management. Really stupendous.

  • starlite on July 15, 2012, 5:34 GMT

    @Aussiesfalling...This series is going to be anything but one-sided. England may very well take the series, but to say that they will march to victory as if on a Sunday's stroll in the park is laughable! Whatever the outcome, Andrew Strauss and co. are going to know that they were in a fight!

  • SurlyCynic on July 14, 2012, 18:35 GMT

    Tahir has a good record against South African and Irish batsmen so should do well in this series.

  • landl47 on July 14, 2012, 17:41 GMT

    Coming in having played very little cricket is a big disadvantage, as England found against Pakistan. By the time they got their eyes in (and won the ODI series 4-0) the tests were over. It's a great pity this wretched Summer looks set to interfere with this series as well. @Jimmy2s: cling to that thought. Forget Mishra's 0-170 in the last test of last Summer (a game in which Swann took 9-208), the Australian spinners taking 5 wickets in the entire 2010/11 series at over 120 runs per wicket, or how ineffective Shillingford and Narine were for the WI in England after bamboozling Australia. If the wickets in England are like wickets in the subcontinent, then maybe England will struggle against Tahir. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke.

  • on July 15, 2012, 15:58 GMT

    Preparation against mediocre first class teams has never been much preparation at all. Those games are essentially a lose-lose situation. The only thing that could have made a difference would be a series against weaker opposition prior to this series, and since that option wasn't available I don't blame SA management at all for trying to keep the tour as short as possible. SA would've been rusty, regardless. To be honest, the only two things I'm concerned about right now are our openers holding up and AB's back not caving in.

  • mahjut on July 15, 2012, 13:41 GMT

    Ajmal is probably a better bowler than Tahir but it's very hard to say - one has had a good test year (after a few oters in tests) but, although good, is behind the other over years of FC cricket. I don't think Tahir will be the difference in this tour but he should play a part ... very unlikely it'll be one-sided (SA just are not prepared enough to dominate it in that way;)) but it should be a good un.

  • on July 15, 2012, 10:30 GMT

    @SurlyCynic, where did you get these stats from, as I would be interested in looking at them.

  • on July 15, 2012, 9:47 GMT

    imran tahir will play a vital role because english batsman is not good against top quality of spin just like we saw in past against australia,pakistan,india,sri lanka

  • JG2704 on July 15, 2012, 8:10 GMT

    @jimmy2s on (July 14 2012, 16:08 PM GMT) No one handled themselves well against spin in UAE inc Prior. The other thing is that Ajmel and co were far higher quality than Tahir and Eng have not struggled like that against spin in home conditions. Would seem strange to do that when you have the quality of Steyn and Philander in your ranks

  • on July 15, 2012, 7:15 GMT

    England are currently the best in all forms of cricket.

  • djdrastic on July 15, 2012, 7:13 GMT

    OK , so we know the weather is terrible but we still come out to England knowing we would get the absolute bare minimum preparation.

    I might remind you we are playing a team who has absolutely dominated the last two touring teams.

    Well done SA Management. Really stupendous.

  • starlite on July 15, 2012, 5:34 GMT

    @Aussiesfalling...This series is going to be anything but one-sided. England may very well take the series, but to say that they will march to victory as if on a Sunday's stroll in the park is laughable! Whatever the outcome, Andrew Strauss and co. are going to know that they were in a fight!

  • SurlyCynic on July 14, 2012, 18:35 GMT

    Tahir has a good record against South African and Irish batsmen so should do well in this series.

  • landl47 on July 14, 2012, 17:41 GMT

    Coming in having played very little cricket is a big disadvantage, as England found against Pakistan. By the time they got their eyes in (and won the ODI series 4-0) the tests were over. It's a great pity this wretched Summer looks set to interfere with this series as well. @Jimmy2s: cling to that thought. Forget Mishra's 0-170 in the last test of last Summer (a game in which Swann took 9-208), the Australian spinners taking 5 wickets in the entire 2010/11 series at over 120 runs per wicket, or how ineffective Shillingford and Narine were for the WI in England after bamboozling Australia. If the wickets in England are like wickets in the subcontinent, then maybe England will struggle against Tahir. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke.

  • Aussiesfalling on July 14, 2012, 17:34 GMT

    South Africa ought not to blame the weather and should've turned up a couple of weeks earlier which they could have done. They look more underprepared than even India. Thankfully this series will be only 3 Tests long as it looks like being just as one-sided.

  • RakeshGPradhan on July 14, 2012, 17:18 GMT

    If england cant take advantage of an undercooked SA then they dont deserve to be No . 1

    England already had a work out against Windies and Australia as well as resting some of their key players.... added to that the retirement of boucher and injury to back up De lange the english have everything in their favour as well as the british weather ensuring that the SA dont get into their rhythm early on... On the other hand the moist conditions might just suit Steyn, Philander, Morkel x2 and Kallis

  • wrenx on July 14, 2012, 16:08 GMT

    Seeing how hopeless they are against Pakistani spinners,Smith ought to bowl Tahir against England's #1 to #11. Maybe leave out Prior, he's the only one who's handled himself well against spin.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • wrenx on July 14, 2012, 16:08 GMT

    Seeing how hopeless they are against Pakistani spinners,Smith ought to bowl Tahir against England's #1 to #11. Maybe leave out Prior, he's the only one who's handled himself well against spin.

  • RakeshGPradhan on July 14, 2012, 17:18 GMT

    If england cant take advantage of an undercooked SA then they dont deserve to be No . 1

    England already had a work out against Windies and Australia as well as resting some of their key players.... added to that the retirement of boucher and injury to back up De lange the english have everything in their favour as well as the british weather ensuring that the SA dont get into their rhythm early on... On the other hand the moist conditions might just suit Steyn, Philander, Morkel x2 and Kallis

  • Aussiesfalling on July 14, 2012, 17:34 GMT

    South Africa ought not to blame the weather and should've turned up a couple of weeks earlier which they could have done. They look more underprepared than even India. Thankfully this series will be only 3 Tests long as it looks like being just as one-sided.

  • landl47 on July 14, 2012, 17:41 GMT

    Coming in having played very little cricket is a big disadvantage, as England found against Pakistan. By the time they got their eyes in (and won the ODI series 4-0) the tests were over. It's a great pity this wretched Summer looks set to interfere with this series as well. @Jimmy2s: cling to that thought. Forget Mishra's 0-170 in the last test of last Summer (a game in which Swann took 9-208), the Australian spinners taking 5 wickets in the entire 2010/11 series at over 120 runs per wicket, or how ineffective Shillingford and Narine were for the WI in England after bamboozling Australia. If the wickets in England are like wickets in the subcontinent, then maybe England will struggle against Tahir. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke.

  • SurlyCynic on July 14, 2012, 18:35 GMT

    Tahir has a good record against South African and Irish batsmen so should do well in this series.

  • starlite on July 15, 2012, 5:34 GMT

    @Aussiesfalling...This series is going to be anything but one-sided. England may very well take the series, but to say that they will march to victory as if on a Sunday's stroll in the park is laughable! Whatever the outcome, Andrew Strauss and co. are going to know that they were in a fight!

  • djdrastic on July 15, 2012, 7:13 GMT

    OK , so we know the weather is terrible but we still come out to England knowing we would get the absolute bare minimum preparation.

    I might remind you we are playing a team who has absolutely dominated the last two touring teams.

    Well done SA Management. Really stupendous.

  • on July 15, 2012, 7:15 GMT

    England are currently the best in all forms of cricket.

  • JG2704 on July 15, 2012, 8:10 GMT

    @jimmy2s on (July 14 2012, 16:08 PM GMT) No one handled themselves well against spin in UAE inc Prior. The other thing is that Ajmel and co were far higher quality than Tahir and Eng have not struggled like that against spin in home conditions. Would seem strange to do that when you have the quality of Steyn and Philander in your ranks

  • on July 15, 2012, 9:47 GMT

    imran tahir will play a vital role because english batsman is not good against top quality of spin just like we saw in past against australia,pakistan,india,sri lanka