England v SA, 3rd Investec Test, Lord's, 5th day August 20, 2012

Smith's South Africa come of age

The growth of Graeme Smith as captain can be seen reflected in his team as South Africa finally ended their wait to be crowned No. 1
33

Not many cricketers can say they have grown to be men as international cricketers. Some of them start as men already, some of them remain boys forever but very few of them make their most important developments as professional sportsmen. Graeme Smith is one of the few who has.

Sometimes you can see those phases at play all on the same day. When Matt Prior and Graeme Swann were engineering a classic, Smith's forehead was frazzled into a frown. He chewed the index finger on his right hand, as he so often does when thinking. He looked older and it was an age gained through the rigours of Test cricket.

Less than an hour later, when he took the low catch at first slip to remove Prior that left only fingernails on England's hold on No. 1, he charged like a young boy. There was victory in his eyes again. He watched as Vernon Philander's seam movement and Jacques Kallis hands finished England off and he held up that same finger that was being chewed earlier. He mouthed the magic words, "Number one".

"All I keep thinking is that it stuck in my left hand, that one catch, that's the one moment that I am most conscious of," Smith said, looking at his hand. "These three fingers managed to hang on to Matt Prior, who was playing unbelievably well."

It was as though a new chapter of Smith's life had opened in front of the Lord's pavilion: the life where he will be in charge of the best team in the world. Smith has waited a long time for that - longer than any other captain in world cricket.

When Smith took over as captain, the ICC has only just introduced a ranking system and South Africa were placed second. At the time, the early 2000s, no one but Australia could have been first anyway. South Africa stayed second for about 18 months before slipping into obscurity and then getting themselves back up. As far as they got, their ceiling sat at being second best, save for a few months in 2009 when a concoction of some good away form and other results combined to place them fleetingly on top.

Smith emerged as something of a prodigy on the tour to England in 2003, his first major assignment. His double-hundred at Lord's, his slaying of Nasser Hussain and the strength of his youth made South Africa a team that looked as though it could achieve more. As Smith became an adolescent captain, however, the South Africa team followed him into a period of indecision and uncertainty. Those years included series loses on the subcontinent, to Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka, a series defeat at home to England and more misery at the hands of Australia.

They may not have had the players capable of overcoming those situations but they also lacked the will and the drive. Only later, when the party years had ended and adulthood was calling, did the team and Smith start to change. Focus began under Mickey Arthur, under whom there was a push to mould a specific type of cricket side. The assembly line of allrounders was stopped and there was a move to specialists. The batting unit had the fat cut off and took on more muscle on top, meat in the middle. The bowling became a crop of genuine specialists with varied skills.

Results were steady and occasionally spectacular, with series wins in England and Australia and a strong record away from home. The team matured and Smith, the man, matured with them. He was more confident and as a result more thoughtful in his decision making. On that second trip to England, Smith scored runs when South Africa needed it but more importantly, he led South Africa the way they needed to be led.

Smith took charge of situations that would previously have gone without a shepherd, such as the fourth innings at Lord's in 2008. He showed players who had been in the squad for longer than him how to do the same and had an impact on younger players so that by the time South Africa went to Australia at the end of the year, AB de Villiers and JP Duminy were in a position to operate the same way.

The only reason South Africa could not firm their grasp on greatness then was because they lacked the same thing Smith did - an added element of creativity. They had some cricketing flaws, the uncertainty at No. 6, the lack of a third seamer and the inability to produce quality spinners. Their biggest flaw came from somewhere else, though, the place where a certain strain of mental toughness is found.

"In the last year, Smith has grown almost as much as he did in the eight before, under the guidance of Gary Kirsten's management team"

In the last year, that has changed. Smith has grown almost as much as he did in the eight before then, under the guidance of a new management team led by Gary Kirsten. From someone who reacted angrily to even the slightest hint of disagreement, such as during India's visit in 2010, when Smith grew more agitated every time he was asked about the opposition greats, he has become someone who could handle those things more delicately. These days, he considers issues before reacting and even if he is faced criticism, he is able to control his anger.

Smith was forced to change in the aftermath of the 2011 World Cup, when he did not return home with the squad but flew to Ireland to propose to his partner, Morgan Deane. A public outcry and calls for his head made him question his own position and he returned to South Africa determined to win back hearts and minds. He did it the way someone who has lived a life through cricket does. Centuries against Australia in both the Tests and ODIs went a long way to giving Smith his public credibility back and he accepted it graciously, not greedily.

He and Deane are now married and have a young daughter, who was born mid-series and the good wishes they received were an indication that Smith is one of the most popular sportspeople in the country. It has allowed him to come full circle and to realise the No. 1 dream in England with the support of a nation behind him. He acknowledged the role of the last 12 months in the wider context of what South Africa have achieved now. "It was a tough last year for me but to be the person that put South Africa in the space with so many different cricketing names is something I am definitely proud of," he said.

When England toured South Africa in 2009-10, the series was drawn 1-1. Popular sentiment was that South Africa were in a position to claim a 3-1 series victory, because the two draws came with England nine wickets down and fighting to survive. The word "deserve" was used to describe what South Africa should have done. It was a word that held no merit because as Smith has discovered, such a word can only be used when it is actually true.

"We felt we deserved to win the series," Smith said. "The way it finished was the perfect way for us because we have learned to win when things are tough and to come back when we are not ahead of the game. We had to win tough this time.

"There's a real sense of happiness and excitement now but there's also calmness that we have achieved where we wanted to go and that we can carry it on. We don't just have hope that we can carry on, there is belief that we can do it."

Firdose Moonda is ESPNcricinfo's South Africa correspondent

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Bradshaw28 on August 22, 2012, 12:49 GMT

    How many of you know that Smith replaced Kirsten as an Opener for Proteas when kirsten had 2 drop and come in at no 3 Smith and Gibbs opening for us. Now they rule the world together 1 on the pitch, one on the other side

  • Lara4life501 on August 21, 2012, 19:54 GMT

    @SamRoy-couldnt of said it better mate,win one test series against a very below average Australian side and what have they done since NOTHING ,even after Australia copped it from England, they still went AWAY to South Africa and drew the series 1-1,anyway well done South Africa no one deserves this more, you play exciting attractive cricket and have for a long time, I really cant understand why it hasnt happened sooner, you havent lost an away test series since 2006...and you still werent the number 1 side??? Just shows you just how accurate ICC rankings are...England being number 1 are testament to there inacurracy

  • Nadeem1976 on August 21, 2012, 17:10 GMT

    Excellent job SA. Great job Smith and Awesome Job Gary. This is really the deserving #1 team in the world. I hope SA stays at top of the world for at least year. Great job.

  • RohanMarkJay on August 21, 2012, 15:38 GMT

    South Africa have been excellent cricketers in the last 21 years, since re-admittance. They should have won a world cup or two in between. They are one nation that deserve this title more than anybody. They are now officially the best team in the world. England had a good run in the last 3 years, but they have been shown up by a better team. Of course to be fair England didn't play to their best because of of the field things. Even if they did, you feel South Africa this time had the team to win. England has had a bad 2012, they are still good cricketers. Wether they will become number 1 again remains to be seen. With this team SA, have the potential to be number1 for many years. I always felt England although good didn't have good enough cricketers to be number1 for long. Congratulations SA on becoming number one. A very great achievement indeed as good as winning the cricket world cup. This shows if anything the cricketing strength and standard that exists in that country.

  • on August 21, 2012, 14:28 GMT

    The Proteas drew the home 2009/2010 series against England for allowing Ntini to play on after his sell by date, obviously-as can be seen from his book- there were 'other' reasons that he was not overlooked. Had ntini not played, then to all extents and purposes the proteas would have realised a 3-1 drubbing of the tourists.

    South Africa have beaten Australia in 3 series [1965, 4-1, against Bobby Simpsons side, then 1970, 4-0 against Bill Lawrey, then under Smith 2009

  • SamRoy on August 21, 2012, 14:18 GMT

    @Front-Foot-Lunge Give me a break. How many proven greats does England have? One just one, Kevin Pietersen. How many proven greats does SA have? Three Kallis, Steyn and Smith. How many potential greats do England have? Again one, just one, Finn. (We still can't judge Bairstow after just one fine performance). How many potential greats do SA have? Again three: Amla, De Villiers and Philander. Any body even with a slight understanding of cricket would definitely say South Africa is far more talented than England. You guys have been dominated by SA in the last 3 test series (England were desperately lucky not to lose 3-1 in SA). The only advantage England have over SA is in lower order pinch-hitting and wicketkeeper-batsman who is currently the best in business. Though I know you guys like to gloat on Cook and Bell who are just bashers of bad bowling.

  • TimRichman on August 21, 2012, 13:17 GMT

    @Seether1. Excuse the lack of clarity. I was saying that South Africa's victory in Australia in 2008/9 was the first series win BY ANY TEAM IN THE WORLD in Australia since the early 1990s when the West Indies last won there. In other words, it was absolutely massive and a brilliant achievement. Moonda has glossed over it here like it was virtually meaningless.

    She also hasn't heeded the lesson of what came next; our almost immediate drop back down the ladder (because of inexplicable home form and a particularly quiet Test calendar in the next few years). Would be really nice to get some thoughtful, rational sports analysis rather than ra-ra sensationalism. The game itself was sensational enough; just focus on that if you're not going to do your homework.

  • Agila on August 21, 2012, 12:33 GMT

    Wonder when some of the English fans say the teams in this series are "closely" matched, Is loosing by "inninngs and 12 runs" and "by six wickets" close? Wake up gentlemen! Dont count on your victories on some injury ridden, depleted team 12months ago! Comeback to reality! I wouldnt be surprised if this English team meets the same fate in the ODI and T20s too. Dont tell the two teams are "closely matched" after the ODI series scoreline reads 3-0(or even 4-0) or the T20 soreline reading 2-0 or (3-0). I see that there is another thrashing awaiting, as English historically got battered anywhere in the sub-continent.

  • BigDataIsAHoax on August 21, 2012, 12:12 GMT

    @Front-foot-lunge: These two teams are anything but close. SA is way ahead of England. They are a team that can play under all conditions. Exactly why they annihilated England in the 1st test. England was an ordinary #1 and SA is the reigning extraordinary #1. The only way for SA is up and England is down. You are most welcome to India later this year!! Brace up for some spicy curry hospitality.

  • Sarthak1305 on August 21, 2012, 11:49 GMT

    For the first time since the test ranking was introduced we have a team which is liked by everyone and they deserve to be on the Top spot, they dont crib about the type of picth sub continent or otherwise, their bowlers take wickets on all tracks & their batsmen score runs on all kinds of pitches!!!! Kudos to the Saffers

  • Bradshaw28 on August 22, 2012, 12:49 GMT

    How many of you know that Smith replaced Kirsten as an Opener for Proteas when kirsten had 2 drop and come in at no 3 Smith and Gibbs opening for us. Now they rule the world together 1 on the pitch, one on the other side

  • Lara4life501 on August 21, 2012, 19:54 GMT

    @SamRoy-couldnt of said it better mate,win one test series against a very below average Australian side and what have they done since NOTHING ,even after Australia copped it from England, they still went AWAY to South Africa and drew the series 1-1,anyway well done South Africa no one deserves this more, you play exciting attractive cricket and have for a long time, I really cant understand why it hasnt happened sooner, you havent lost an away test series since 2006...and you still werent the number 1 side??? Just shows you just how accurate ICC rankings are...England being number 1 are testament to there inacurracy

  • Nadeem1976 on August 21, 2012, 17:10 GMT

    Excellent job SA. Great job Smith and Awesome Job Gary. This is really the deserving #1 team in the world. I hope SA stays at top of the world for at least year. Great job.

  • RohanMarkJay on August 21, 2012, 15:38 GMT

    South Africa have been excellent cricketers in the last 21 years, since re-admittance. They should have won a world cup or two in between. They are one nation that deserve this title more than anybody. They are now officially the best team in the world. England had a good run in the last 3 years, but they have been shown up by a better team. Of course to be fair England didn't play to their best because of of the field things. Even if they did, you feel South Africa this time had the team to win. England has had a bad 2012, they are still good cricketers. Wether they will become number 1 again remains to be seen. With this team SA, have the potential to be number1 for many years. I always felt England although good didn't have good enough cricketers to be number1 for long. Congratulations SA on becoming number one. A very great achievement indeed as good as winning the cricket world cup. This shows if anything the cricketing strength and standard that exists in that country.

  • on August 21, 2012, 14:28 GMT

    The Proteas drew the home 2009/2010 series against England for allowing Ntini to play on after his sell by date, obviously-as can be seen from his book- there were 'other' reasons that he was not overlooked. Had ntini not played, then to all extents and purposes the proteas would have realised a 3-1 drubbing of the tourists.

    South Africa have beaten Australia in 3 series [1965, 4-1, against Bobby Simpsons side, then 1970, 4-0 against Bill Lawrey, then under Smith 2009

  • SamRoy on August 21, 2012, 14:18 GMT

    @Front-Foot-Lunge Give me a break. How many proven greats does England have? One just one, Kevin Pietersen. How many proven greats does SA have? Three Kallis, Steyn and Smith. How many potential greats do England have? Again one, just one, Finn. (We still can't judge Bairstow after just one fine performance). How many potential greats do SA have? Again three: Amla, De Villiers and Philander. Any body even with a slight understanding of cricket would definitely say South Africa is far more talented than England. You guys have been dominated by SA in the last 3 test series (England were desperately lucky not to lose 3-1 in SA). The only advantage England have over SA is in lower order pinch-hitting and wicketkeeper-batsman who is currently the best in business. Though I know you guys like to gloat on Cook and Bell who are just bashers of bad bowling.

  • TimRichman on August 21, 2012, 13:17 GMT

    @Seether1. Excuse the lack of clarity. I was saying that South Africa's victory in Australia in 2008/9 was the first series win BY ANY TEAM IN THE WORLD in Australia since the early 1990s when the West Indies last won there. In other words, it was absolutely massive and a brilliant achievement. Moonda has glossed over it here like it was virtually meaningless.

    She also hasn't heeded the lesson of what came next; our almost immediate drop back down the ladder (because of inexplicable home form and a particularly quiet Test calendar in the next few years). Would be really nice to get some thoughtful, rational sports analysis rather than ra-ra sensationalism. The game itself was sensational enough; just focus on that if you're not going to do your homework.

  • Agila on August 21, 2012, 12:33 GMT

    Wonder when some of the English fans say the teams in this series are "closely" matched, Is loosing by "inninngs and 12 runs" and "by six wickets" close? Wake up gentlemen! Dont count on your victories on some injury ridden, depleted team 12months ago! Comeback to reality! I wouldnt be surprised if this English team meets the same fate in the ODI and T20s too. Dont tell the two teams are "closely matched" after the ODI series scoreline reads 3-0(or even 4-0) or the T20 soreline reading 2-0 or (3-0). I see that there is another thrashing awaiting, as English historically got battered anywhere in the sub-continent.

  • BigDataIsAHoax on August 21, 2012, 12:12 GMT

    @Front-foot-lunge: These two teams are anything but close. SA is way ahead of England. They are a team that can play under all conditions. Exactly why they annihilated England in the 1st test. England was an ordinary #1 and SA is the reigning extraordinary #1. The only way for SA is up and England is down. You are most welcome to India later this year!! Brace up for some spicy curry hospitality.

  • Sarthak1305 on August 21, 2012, 11:49 GMT

    For the first time since the test ranking was introduced we have a team which is liked by everyone and they deserve to be on the Top spot, they dont crib about the type of picth sub continent or otherwise, their bowlers take wickets on all tracks & their batsmen score runs on all kinds of pitches!!!! Kudos to the Saffers

  • mahjut on August 21, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    well, i am afraid i cannot agree that IN THIS SERIES these teams were evenly matched. I do rate england but they did not get themselves into a winning position at any point in the series (everyone knew this was a new ball wicket and england did what they had to, rode their luck a little and put up a great show but predictably (as in all other three innings) the new ball brought a clatter of wickets! SA had put England into a position where they'd have to turn history on its head - it was nigh on impossible and the scoreline is flattering! the second test was the best for England and had Rudolph and Smith not done the necessaries starting out in the third innings there WOULD HAVE BEEN an openning - but they did! unlike a couple of posters here i think the scorelines don't reflect how one-sided this series really was. that is not to say England are bad or SA are going to go on and thrash all before them but they were quite clearly the better team throughout!

  • StJohn on August 21, 2012, 9:56 GMT

    SA were definitely better, but as in the 2008 iteration, the final scoreline doesn't show how close it was. The 1st Test was amongst the most one-sided in history but England had, but failed to take, their chances in the 2nd and 3rd games. This was the first series for a while where England's bowlers have looked pretty innocuous: with Broad and Anderson averaging 40 each, we had no chance; Swann also doesn't look as threatening now as a couple of years ago. But SA's bowlers' stats aren't mind-blowing: Steyn had an-above-career series average of 29 and Morkel's was 35, with Tahir averaging well over 40 too. Those averages aren't amazing, but they are much better than England's. And its in those margins and the dropped catches that this series was really decided. Whenever KP has the best series bowling average (even better than Philander's I think!) you're going to be in trouble! I think England may do better without the pressure of being ranked no.1.

  • on August 21, 2012, 9:39 GMT

    @irfan897,,,I did take note of that fact.Both Hussain and Vaughan ! The problem is the external pressure! Media and public , in England!!!!! They always overhype England.They are good but not great ! The series against Pakistan were signs of a team that could not possibly be undisputed world number 1 !!!!!!!!!!! Strauss' no shot on day 4 , evening , to Philander, was the shot of a player under severe stress !!!!! Feel for him,,,,England are a very good side at home ! Proteas are a very powerful team! If they dont rest on laurels and stagnate, they will dominate for years to come! They have cricketing greats ! Smith is a good captain but like Ponting and Waugh , its easier to flourish when u have the personal ! ie Philanders last 2 wkts to wrap up the game which looked to be slipping away! Smith had the personal to turn to in crucial moments !

  • Nutcutlet on August 21, 2012, 8:21 GMT

    Well played, SA! It was a joy to watch your side over these three Test matches; there is no doubt that this SA side is entirely worthy of #1 ranking status.England is not a bad side, but indeed they were made to look quite ordinary by Smith's men. It is not just the high skill shown by individual members of the side (Amla, Philander & Steyn are all on the edge of greatness, IMO) but the spirit in which this short three match series was played. There was a good feel to the games as both sides strove to perform at their best, no quarter asked or given. As SA now turn their sights on Oz, the cricketing world will soon get an accurate idea of where the top three sides are placed (SA, Oz, Eng). SA has a couple of relatively minor issues: w/k & whether Tahir is their best spinner. Oz is still in its protracted transition & England has changes to contemplate but plenty of contenders for Test places, with Finn & Bairstow now established. These two are England's genuine gains this summer.

  • BellCurve on August 21, 2012, 7:52 GMT

    @TimRichman - Beating England 2-0 means that Australia has to win the series later this year in order to displace SA as No1. For SA a draw will be sufficient. As a result SA are favourites to finish the year at No1. But it will be hard work. This is not the time to relax.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on August 21, 2012, 7:33 GMT

    Well played SA: England took a test to warm up, and showed just how close the two teams are. Very close they are indeed. The top of the test rankings shows two teams that are miles ahead of the other, average-ranked and average-skilled teams that were demolished by England not long ago.

  • Seether1 on August 21, 2012, 7:14 GMT

    @TimRichman: As a South African supporter I agree with everything you say. However there is one error in your comment. SA's 2008/09 victory against Australia in Australia was the first since the 1960s. In the 1990s we only drew one series against them in 1994, courtesy of Fanie de Villiers wrecking Australia in Sydney. Other than that they won every other series.

  • mahjut on August 21, 2012, 7:07 GMT

    wow, Steve Waugh is accredited with a lot of petty quotes - i wonder how many he actually said!? I don't recall him being that insecure (belittling others to aggrandize oneself is standard phsychotic insecurity) ... @thebrotherswaugh - what is 'rational'? Timrichman just posted one of the most miserable, self-doubting comments (in it's context) i have ever read. if that is rational, then give me something else!

  • CowsCorner...WeAreOnTwitter on August 21, 2012, 6:41 GMT

    The question that will define the length and dominance of SA's stay at #1 is: Can SA take their definite #1 status on ability and be able to translate it into a consistent reign of superiority? The team is inconsistent and this is the issue that needs to be addressed by big biff.

  • legfinedeep on August 21, 2012, 4:40 GMT

    I agree with the person who compared smith to S. Waugh. He is not the prettiest or most elegant of guys, but like Waugh he is the man you will want fighting with you in the trenches - a true warrior. He is one of the grittiest, fiercest competitors in the game and was born to lead.

  • CanadaBond on August 21, 2012, 3:32 GMT

    We got to love this handsome boyish looking lad Graeme Smith for being such a sport and for giving so much to Cricket, South Africa and Sportsmanship. He is quite lovable leader and person. Job well done Smith! I am sure you have many many decades of various forms of contribution to cricket even after you call it quits! Enjoy!

  • thebrotherswaugh on August 21, 2012, 1:27 GMT

    @TimRichman, one of the more rational comments I've seen from a fan whose team has just taken the #1 spot (ENG fans should take note). Congratulations on an excellent series win. With Smith at the helm and the course being charted by Kirsten, I can't see the Saffers going the way of the ENG side - just don't buy into any rhetoric or hype from the journos. I'm a one-eyed Oz supporter, but your team has very solid foundations and are led by a mature, intelligent, and tough captain who actually contributes with the bat against all opponents - I'll be happy if Oz manage a drawn series. Your batting lineup is long indeed, and SA / AUS conditions are fairly similar.

  • on August 20, 2012, 23:59 GMT

    Was 7 Feb 2003 he was handed mace!

  • on August 20, 2012, 23:50 GMT

    I recall Shaun Pollock as Captain receiving the mace for number 1 spot! Must have been late 2002/03. then Captain Steve Waugh still said "When we stand and look each other in the eyes he really knows who is number1".

  • mahjut on August 20, 2012, 23:13 GMT

    @TimRichman - i became an accidental SA fan in the 1999 WC where i thought they played a couple of cracking games of cricket vs Aus ... as someone who had never watched cricket until the SAvsZim match in the same WC, I remember a lot of talk at the time of SA being one of two teams that might compete with Oz and indeed they did with Klusener bringing SA back into a game they were out of half way through the chase only to take an ill-advised single against bevan's throw!! anyway I remember two things about that WC: Klusener and SA's exit. Why do i mention this? becasue the team that won today is a better team than the one that won in Oz in many many ways and have beaten a team that is better than the one they beat in Oz 3.5 years ago ... you may or may not have felt it but there was NO point today i felt that there would be any other winner - and that is why i can fogive firdose for taking lierary licence - even if SA lose the next series!!.

  • ozwriter on August 20, 2012, 22:44 GMT

    great piece. Bravo south africa. well done G smith, amla, philander.

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on August 20, 2012, 22:29 GMT

    I would like to congratulate SA on not just becoming the #1 ranked team BUT also the team that most ACCEPT as the #1 ranked team, no argument. They've proven they can win and avoid losing (important) in most conditions and are not overly dependent on batting/Ind or home conditions/Eng.

  • TimRichman on August 20, 2012, 21:14 GMT

    Well, at least Firdose gives South Africa's previous rise to the top of the Test rankings a mention this time around - maybe she read one of the comments on yesterday's piece, where it was entirely absent.

    It really was quite an embarrassing oversight, bearing in mind that SA beat England and Australia away to get there last time, including the first series victory over Australia in Australia since the early 1990s. Both were titanic, record-breaking series, but conveniently glossed over here... What's the reason? A better-sounding story? Laziness?

    Never mind that she writes as if SA will now be entrenched at the top for years. Who's to say we won't be knocked off the perch in Australia at the end of the year?

  • mahjut on August 20, 2012, 21:04 GMT

    they done good job but most people said they outplayed england in the series at home - which was true - rather than they 'deserved' to win

  • on August 20, 2012, 20:28 GMT

    A very enjoyable piece, Firdoose. South Africa have the tools to stay at # 1 for a long old time too. Graeme Smith is probably one of the most impressive men in world cricket as well...94 tests as captain and opening batsman, a batting average of near enough 50, ultra reliable at 1st slip and the mental toughness of a Steve Waugh.

  • noplay on August 20, 2012, 20:27 GMT

    I remember the captaincy being thrown at this kid and wondering... but it shows how SA sets long term goals. And last year when he dared to stand for SL players (opponents) who had not been paid for months I thought the kid has come of age. He has indeed! And most of all he leads one of the few teams (if not the only one) that has not been involved in public spats

  • SurlyCynic on August 20, 2012, 20:22 GMT

    How good does Gary Kirsten's cv look right now.

  • irfan897 on August 20, 2012, 20:13 GMT

    G.Smith finished Nasser Husain's career in 2003 then Michael Vaughan's in 2008 and now its Andrew Strauss turn............

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • irfan897 on August 20, 2012, 20:13 GMT

    G.Smith finished Nasser Husain's career in 2003 then Michael Vaughan's in 2008 and now its Andrew Strauss turn............

  • SurlyCynic on August 20, 2012, 20:22 GMT

    How good does Gary Kirsten's cv look right now.

  • noplay on August 20, 2012, 20:27 GMT

    I remember the captaincy being thrown at this kid and wondering... but it shows how SA sets long term goals. And last year when he dared to stand for SL players (opponents) who had not been paid for months I thought the kid has come of age. He has indeed! And most of all he leads one of the few teams (if not the only one) that has not been involved in public spats

  • on August 20, 2012, 20:28 GMT

    A very enjoyable piece, Firdoose. South Africa have the tools to stay at # 1 for a long old time too. Graeme Smith is probably one of the most impressive men in world cricket as well...94 tests as captain and opening batsman, a batting average of near enough 50, ultra reliable at 1st slip and the mental toughness of a Steve Waugh.

  • mahjut on August 20, 2012, 21:04 GMT

    they done good job but most people said they outplayed england in the series at home - which was true - rather than they 'deserved' to win

  • TimRichman on August 20, 2012, 21:14 GMT

    Well, at least Firdose gives South Africa's previous rise to the top of the Test rankings a mention this time around - maybe she read one of the comments on yesterday's piece, where it was entirely absent.

    It really was quite an embarrassing oversight, bearing in mind that SA beat England and Australia away to get there last time, including the first series victory over Australia in Australia since the early 1990s. Both were titanic, record-breaking series, but conveniently glossed over here... What's the reason? A better-sounding story? Laziness?

    Never mind that she writes as if SA will now be entrenched at the top for years. Who's to say we won't be knocked off the perch in Australia at the end of the year?

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on August 20, 2012, 22:29 GMT

    I would like to congratulate SA on not just becoming the #1 ranked team BUT also the team that most ACCEPT as the #1 ranked team, no argument. They've proven they can win and avoid losing (important) in most conditions and are not overly dependent on batting/Ind or home conditions/Eng.

  • ozwriter on August 20, 2012, 22:44 GMT

    great piece. Bravo south africa. well done G smith, amla, philander.

  • mahjut on August 20, 2012, 23:13 GMT

    @TimRichman - i became an accidental SA fan in the 1999 WC where i thought they played a couple of cracking games of cricket vs Aus ... as someone who had never watched cricket until the SAvsZim match in the same WC, I remember a lot of talk at the time of SA being one of two teams that might compete with Oz and indeed they did with Klusener bringing SA back into a game they were out of half way through the chase only to take an ill-advised single against bevan's throw!! anyway I remember two things about that WC: Klusener and SA's exit. Why do i mention this? becasue the team that won today is a better team than the one that won in Oz in many many ways and have beaten a team that is better than the one they beat in Oz 3.5 years ago ... you may or may not have felt it but there was NO point today i felt that there would be any other winner - and that is why i can fogive firdose for taking lierary licence - even if SA lose the next series!!.

  • on August 20, 2012, 23:50 GMT

    I recall Shaun Pollock as Captain receiving the mace for number 1 spot! Must have been late 2002/03. then Captain Steve Waugh still said "When we stand and look each other in the eyes he really knows who is number1".