England v Sri Lanka, 3rd Test, Rose Bowl, 2nd day

Towering Tremlett raises England's stakes

Chris Tremlett's triumphant return to Hampshire has lasted just 18.2 overs all told, but that's 18 more than it took for David Saker, England's bowling coach, to be persuaded he was a talent

Andrew Miller at the Rose Bowl

June 17, 2011

Comments: 16 | Text size: A | A

Chris Tremlett's pace and bounce was tough to handle, England v Sri Lanka, 3rd Test, Rose Bowl, June 17, 2011
Chris Tremlett's natural attributes proved too much for Sri Lanka to handle on a lively Rose Bowl pitch © Getty Images
Enlarge

If any doubts lingered, they've been emphatically dispelled now. When Chris Tremlett took the plunge at the end of a dismal 2009 season, and said farewell to the Rose Bowl in a bid to further his England ambitions, he did so in the knowledge that his career was at its make-or-break moment. Three promising Tests against India in 2007 had given way to two seasons of flaky form and lost focus, and his shift to Surrey was a final opportunity to prove he had the temperament to use his incredible natural fast-bowling attributes.

Two years on, it is looking like the best decision he has ever made in his life. So far his triumphant return to Hampshire has lasted just 18.2 overs all told, but that's 18 more than it took for David Saker, England's bowling coach, to be persuaded that Tremlett was a talent that no self-respecting team could allow to go to waste. It was in the nets at The Oval last season, bowling to his new county team-mate Kevin Pietersen, that his exhilarating combination of height, strength, accuracy and technique were properly showcased in front of the England management.

"I just watched two balls and went up to Andy Flower and said 'This guy is a Test cricketer'," Saker recalled. "Any bowler with height excites me, but that day in the nets, because I was so close and watching from behind, it looked even better. I said I don't know what's happened in the past, but if we can keep this guy on the park I had no hesitation [in believing] he could play good Test cricket if he could get his body right. I suppose after the last 12 months, he's shown a lot of people in England he can do the job."

On the second day at the Rose Bowl, Tremlett was formidable. His two-wicket burst on the opening day had confirmed the restoration of his rhythm after a stutter at Lord's last week, and on Friday he followed up with three further scalps in a vicious six-over burst, before returning for a final surge shortly before the rain. From his first delivery, Suranga Lakmal flinched a panicky hook to the keeper to secure Tremlett his Test-best figures of 6 for 42, and there's the prospect of one more to come on Saturday morning.

This was fast bowling at its nastiest, albeit delivered from one of nature's nice guys. It was Tremlett's inability to cultivate a killer instinct that frustrated his captain, Shane Warne, and held his career back for most of his nine years at Hampshire, but in his second coming as an England cricketer, he has quite literally let the ball do his talking.

"Chris is a very introverted guy who just gets the ball in the right area time and time again," said Saker. "When he gets his length right, he's a huge handful. He's challenging the stumps, the batsmen's gloves, the splice of the bat, and batters really struggle against tall bowlers who keep hitting the splice regardless of length. All you need then is a bit of sideways movement that brings the rest of the fielders into play, as well as lbws and bowleds."

Tillakaratne Dilshan would certainly concur with that after being struck three times on the same thumb at Cardiff and Lord's, and this time it was Thilan Samaraweera who suffered the exact same impact. Tremlett's second delivery of the day reared brutally into his bottom hand, and before that initial over was out, Sri Lanka's most obdurate batsman had fenced limply to gully. Arguably not since Joel Garner was in his pomp has such a physically imposing cricketer produced such an impact in the Test arena, and while Saker was cautious about inviting comparisons with one of the greats of the game, he did not deny a certain degree of similarity.

Of greater consequence to the England management, however, is the manner in which Tremlett complements and enhances the threat posed by James Anderson at the opposite end of the pitch. With steepling bounce to ram the batsmen back into the crease at one end, and a jagging full length to lure them forward once again at the other, the two men form an alliance that has the same little and large menace that has proven so irresistible for South Africa's Dale Steyn and Morne Morkel.

As it happens, Anderson and Tremlett, plus Ryan Sidebottom, were in harness when India last toured England back in 2007, and all three performed admirably against an array of formidable batsmen. However, both of the survivors from that series have developed exponentially ahead of the rematch that is looming ever larger in July, and if the Rose Bowl conditions can be replicated elsewhere in the country, Saker for one believes that they can be a match for any opposition.

"India are a handful at any time with their batting line-up," said Saker. "But if we get wickets with bounce in them, that will suit Chris. The Indians will be troubled by him, and if he can get the wickets he needs, we're looking forward to that Test series very much. It was very pleasing to see how much it bounced here today, and if we had to wheel out a wicket week in, week out, that's what we'd like to see."

Before that series gets underway at Lord's in a month's time, however, England are desperate for their third seamer, Stuart Broad, to rediscover his best form. He was given every opportunity to scalp some easy wickets today when Andrew Strauss unleashed him on Sri Lanka's bruised lower-order, but instead he was stabbed and swatted for 20 runs in a wicketless six-over spell. It is unlikely that his mood was lifted when Graeme Swann then struck with his second ball of the match, although Saker was adamant that any problems were strictly temporary.

"He's been dreadfully unlucky, and it's only a matter of time before he turns it around," Saker insisted. "He hasn't put too many games together of late so the more he plays the better he's going to get. He beat the bat a lot in this Test, and if he'd got two or three more wickets in this series, not too many people would be talking about him."

Nevertheless, for all the bullish support from his coach, Broad does currently look like a man who has lost his purpose in the team. Not so long ago at the start of the Ashes, he, rather than Tremlett, was Anderson's splice-attacking foil, and yet at Cardiff last month, he found himself being jokingly referred to by his team-mate as a "midget". In five Tests since the last English summer, he has now taken eight wickets at 62.37, and no matter how much England talk up his value as a team performer, those sorts of numbers are going to start to chafe.

"Sometimes when you're looking for wickets, you do change your lengths a bit too much instead of banging away at an area," said Saker. "But as a bowling coach I'm really happy with the way he is going."

For the time being, that happiness involves backing Broad's penchant for the short ball, for Saker - an ugly-tempered paceman in his own playing days - values the intent that's on show every time the ball is banged down in his own half of the pitch. "When Stuart bowls them you can tell there's a lot of vengeance and aggression behind them," he said. "There's probably no better bowler in the world at bowling bouncers than Stuart Broad.

"That's definitely his personality and we do want him to be the enforcer in our team," Saker added. "We've got three different personalities and we try to bowl to their strengths as well as those personalities. Chris is a very introverted guy whereas Stuart likes to attack and he's warrior-like. We like him when he's aggressive and we want him to be like that."

There may yet come a time, with more match fitness and on a less responsive surface than the Rose Bowl, when Broad's stamina and desire does revert to top billing. But right at this moment, all the talk is of a bowler whose best spells come when he moseys along within himself. When your physique alone does the threatening, there's nothing more you need do but hit the spot and reap the rewards.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Deepfreezed on (June 18, 2011, 16:01 GMT)

6 wickets in these kind of helpful conditions combined going in and out due to weather does not mean much. Sri Lanka always bats in the tough conditions while Eng enjoys the placid phase.

Posted by   on (June 18, 2011, 12:11 GMT)

England players as bowlers are very good on their back yard same as Indiaan but let summer if the wickets if dry and less green will be interesting to watch if Tandulkar will allways adjusting him self and is good thatway rest of the batsman up tonumber seven is intestig to watch, Raman Pancholi

Posted by   on (June 18, 2011, 8:42 GMT)

I still believe a comeback for Onions should be on the cards. Anderson the swing bowler, Tremlett the bowler with bounce and Onions the bowler who can get wickets by bowling consistently. In Australia, England planned to bore Australia into doing daft things, but I think Broad, and Finn, bowl too many bad balls for this to happen. Onions would complete England's bowling quartet much better.

Posted by Truemans_Ghost on (June 18, 2011, 8:17 GMT)

Interesting that two of England's recent bowling successes (Trem and Sidebottom) have both been second chances at 30ish- unfortunately meaning we don't get them for long. Hopefully with the likes of Finn and Woakes we will have them making their mark earier

Posted by   on (June 18, 2011, 8:02 GMT)

The problem with Broad is that he is not on current form a 3rd seamer in a 4 man attack and he is not good enough to bat at seven in a modern test side. If he could bat at seven they could bring in another bowler and I think he would slot well into a 5 man attack. Four bowler attacks need all 4 bowlers to be true wicket takers. There is a lot of talk of Finn but personaly Id bring Onions in for him.

Posted by chandau on (June 18, 2011, 7:37 GMT)

The problem for SL batsmen i presume is the tall bowlers' kicking from a good length. Pollock, Morkle, and Gul have all troubled them with this ability, whereas the real fast bowlers like Lee, Tait, Steyn have been dealt with more easily. Even is Auzzy pitches SL batters have fared well despite the bounce which is true unlike in England these days in the pre-summer. The last time someone got hit in the fingers was Sanath in Auzzy many moons ago. Since many people think SL batters are useless and the indians are the ones to watch it will be interesting what kind of weather and pitches greet them in the real summer. Even the pom bowling coach admits the kind of pitch that aides CT and CB will need to be prepared for Indian tour as well. Am not sure if CT has been to the Asian region and how he fared but we all know how CB has been treated al la Youvraj and then more recently at WC by SL. Irrespective of country and race and religion etc., Jimmy is a world class pacie :)

Posted by Clive_Dunn on (June 18, 2011, 6:47 GMT)

"Tremlett or any other English bowler won't be a big problem for the young quality Indian batsmen who've gained enough experience at very young age."

Phew, I guess England are lucky India are sending over a bunch of batsmen in their late 30's then.

Posted by stationmaster on (June 18, 2011, 6:26 GMT)

Really bored of people saying that India batsmen will crush every fast bowler, the only reason India are any good against pace, is because in India the pitches are terrible, and are just like batting on carpet. What a wonderful pitch this has been though - it's makes tests matches a REAL contest, not just 'who can score the most runs', which every test in India is.

Posted by blackjesuz on (June 18, 2011, 5:13 GMT)

Tremlett certainly is quality, but India will be the real test! i hope we will so more pitches like this one, altho, england showed during the Ashes that they can handle seam and a little swing, but add in BOUNCE, and their batsman look inept. Just look at Perth and Brisbane day 1! Very interesting to see how their batsman fair

Posted by landl47 on (June 18, 2011, 4:07 GMT)

Tremlett has bowled very well in this series, as he did in Australia. He seems to have a good rhythm going and the lifting ball (as anyone who remembers Glenn McGrath will testify) is extremely awkward to play. Broad needs to decide what sort of bowler he is, and stick to that. At present he seems to get frustrated if he doesn't get a wicket immediately and he starts trying to do too much. Patience and putting the ball in the right areas consistently is what is needed at test level. Maybe once Bresnan is fit again Broad should be given a chance to work out his problems at county level. I think he has great potential, but until that is matched by consistency, he's not going to do the job England needs him to do. As for India- bring it on. If PremasiriS or anyone else thinks India's young batsmen won't have trouble with Tremlett and Anderson, they're dreaming.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007
Tour Results
Scotland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 13, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 183 runs
Ireland v Sri Lanka at Edinburgh - Jul 11, 2011
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
England v Sri Lanka at Manchester - Jul 9, 2011
England won by 16 runs
England v Sri Lanka at Nottingham - Jul 6, 2011
England won by 10 wickets (with 145 balls remaining) (D/L method)
England v Sri Lanka at Lord's - Jul 3, 2011
Sri Lanka won by 6 wickets (with 10 balls remaining)
More results »
Video / Audio
The Huddle: Maxwell and Miller - masters of the chase
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days