Essex v England, LV= Challenge Match, Chelmsford, 4th day July 3, 2013

England stroll but Broad a doubt

  shares 22

England 413 for 9 dec (Bresnan 105*, Swann 94, Craddock 5-69) and 279 for 4 dec (Cook 82, Trott 79) beat Essex 278 (Mickleburgh 90, Root 4-72) and 186 for 9 (Mickleburgh 58, Swann 5-68, Onions 4-43) by 228 runs
Scorecard

Graeme Swann proved his fitness for the Ashes with a five-wicket haul to help England to victory over Essex in Chelmsford, but concerns linger over the availability of Stuart Broad.

Swann, who missed all but one of England's games in the Champions Trophy through back and calf injuries, bowled only nine deliveries in the first innings here after sustaining a blow to his right forearm while batting against Tymal Mills, which Andy Flower admitted caused "great concern". But, defying a painfully slow pitch and a draining lack of intensity in a downgraded match, Swann worked his way through the Essex batting line-up until it capitulated and looked in decent rhythm going into the Test series.

Essex lost their last six wickets for 32 runs in nine overs with Graham Onions, as nagging as ever, claiming 4 for 43 including a spell of three wickets without conceding a run in 11 balls. It meant England won by 228 runs.

A doubt remains over the fitness of Broad, however. Broad injured his right shoulder diving to regain his ground while batting in the Champions Trophy final and has had a cortisone injection to reduce the inflammation. Flower expressed himself "pleasantly surprised" by Broad's first attempt at bowling since the injury, during the tea interval on the final day here, and said "we anticipate him being fit. He could not have played this game, but he should be OK."

"We thought Swann might have cracked his ulna," Flower said. "For a couple of hours we thought he might have been missing [from the first Test], which would have been a serious blow. When he came in after batting I was surprised by how swollen it was.

"I was also surprised by how well he played the fast bowler after getting hit that badly. He fought out there and didn't come off and get it seen to. It's a good example of his resilience. Because he's a jokey sort of guy we forget he is a tough competitor as well."

This was an admirably professional performance from England. Despite a pitch that was too slow for purpose and the lack of atmosphere over the last couple of days, they retained their discipline with bat and ball and made the best of the imperfect situation with which they were confronted. With the Champions Trophy finishing only days earlier, there has been no opportunity for the sort of warm-up period from which they benefited in Australia in 2010-11 - they placed great store in performing well in their three first-class warm-up games - but they have at least come together as a squad and played some red-ball cricket.

A couple of areas of concern remain. Several chances were squandered in the field - Swann missed Ravi Bopara in the slips off Steven Finn on the final day, while Kevin Pietersen missed two chances in the first innings - and Jonny Bairstow, who has hardly batted since the Leeds Test against New Zealand and was bowled in both innings here - still looks in need of time at the crease. Pietersen, too, has hardly batted but Flower expressed confidence in his form and no concern about any need for further time at the crease before the Tests.

"There were a few chances that went down," Flower admitted. "And taking chances will be very important in this series. But we're working hard and we're hoping that hard work will pay off.

"We felt Bairstow needed more time in the middle because he has gone three or four weeks without cricket during the Champions Trophy. He's had what he's had; there's nothing more we can do."

Performances in this game - or the game in progress at New Road - are most unlikely to affect selection for the first Test. Flower suggested the identity of the XI that will play at Trent Bridge has been known for some time and this game was more about gaining rhythm and testing potential replacements. In that case Boyd Rankin, who bowled with hostility in spite of the surface, will have done himself no harm, though Nick Compton's place in the selectors' thoughts seems to rely upon injury befalling one of the top three. Joe Root will open for the foreseeable future, however; Flower is not the fickle type.

"I've been very impressed with Rankin," Flower said, "and thought he bowled especially well. He is very impressive physically and he has the pace and bounce which can trouble international batsmen. He's quite an exciting prospect.

"It's nice to see and a good reaction from Compton. It's a really good reaction that he has scored runs consistently and it shows he's a good tough fighter. Of course, he's still in the picture. But he is an opening batsman and if there were an injury to someone batting at six it doesn't necessarily mean that he would be the next cab off the rank. But his best reaction was to score heavy runs and that's what he's doing. That's great."

There were some impressive performances from the Essex players in this game, too. Jaik Mickleburgh, who demonstrated a compact technique and astute shot selection in both innings, belied his lowly average and looked a fine prospect, while Mills' pace and improving control made a large impression on the England management. "His rate of progress is really exciting for Essex," Flower said. " His control has improved and he's really impressive physically. If he continues he might play for England."

Perhaps Onions might feel a little aggrieved. He scarcely bowled a poor ball in this match but, despite finishing with five wickets and remaining the most consistent bowler in county cricket over the last couple of seasons, it seems he will remain on the periphery of the side.

While the likes of Finn, who bowled better than his figures suggests, and now Rankin and Chris Tremlett are preferred for their height, pace and bounce, Onions may be reliant on injury or rotation to Broad or James Anderson to win a further opportunity. In the current England set-up, his qualities - accuracy and consistency - are considered worthy, but less valuable than those offered by his rivals.

In some ways this game did not present an overly flattering demonstration of Essex cricket. The pitch was poor and the sight of a 15-year-old substitute fielder - talented though Aaron Beard looks - lent a faint air of ramshackle amateurishness to proceedings. By the time the game ended, they had drafted in three players to replace injured members of their starting XI - Greg Smith replaced the injured Tom Westley on Wednesday - though David Masters made a bizarre reappearance as a batsman on day four despite a hopeless match situation and a pronounced limp that could have been exacerbated by running between the wickets.

To their immense credit though, Essex is a club that continues to produce talented young players and, in Mills, Mickleburgh, Reece Topley, Ben Foakes et al, they have several cricketers who could follow the path of Alastair Cook into the England team. And that, after all, is their primary role.

George Dobell is a senior correspondent at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • CricketingStargazer on July 3, 2013, 20:00 GMT

    You can only beat what is in front of you and England did it. People tend to forget tha Graeme Swann is returning from an important operation and has had precious little bowling this summer to get rhythm. Steve Finn and Tim Bresnan will also be so much the better for some hard work with the ball. And I still think that giving Joe Root a long bowl was a masterstroke: if Alistair Cook shows some confidence in him he could develop into a useful support bowler and take over that fifth bowler role that becomes so important when there is an injury, or you find yourself with only one spinner on a track that unexpectedly takes turn, or you just need to try something different to break a partnership.

  • RogB on July 4, 2013, 10:56 GMT

    Re your last sentence, "their primary role" is certainly not to supply cricketers to go on and play for England. The primary role of all professional cricket is to entertain the paying public who have come to watch, a fact all to readily forgotten (including by the ICC).

  • jmcilhinney on July 4, 2013, 10:34 GMT

    @Mr.CrickCheat on (July 4, 2013, 9:41 GMT), can you point me to exactly where the England management is complaining? I seem to have missed that.

  • jackiethepen on July 4, 2013, 9:45 GMT

    Too little praise for Onions who demonstrated what death bowling should be. Cook loses his sense of urgency at the death hence England's poor record in this department. Letting Joe Root continue to bowl when it was clear his bowling was ineffectual was just such an example of poor captaincy. Root is a part time bowler at best and against Australia he is likely to be despatched to the boundary. But Cook indulged the idea of him taking 5 wickets in a warm up game aiming to show intent from England's bowlers. Flower continued this indulgent policy by not retiring Cook and Trott when they reached 50s. If Bairstow and Bell had been batting earlier they would have had more time to get in their stride. As it was they had 8 overs in between heavy rain showers and then 1 hour the next morning. Rigidity? Flower and Cook declared on the stroke of midday. Flower has no idea how to manage his players. KP wasn't given another bat and Prior hardly got going. Yet Root got a long bowl!

  • TenDonebyaShooter on July 4, 2013, 9:41 GMT

    @jmcillhiney: the English management have complained about their players lacking match practice when they cause that lack in the first place (why would they need to adopt ridiculous measures like Compton playing for Worcester or Strauss playing for Middlesex if lack of match practice were not the issue?), and if Bairstow lacks match practice because he was in the CT squad, well, whose fault is that?

  • jonesy2 on July 4, 2013, 5:11 GMT

    Australia will be upset if broad doesn't get to play. then they will suddenly be happy when they see that there is literally nobody to replace him. unless Anderson and swann take a collective 50 wickets for the series, I cant see how England are going to win

  • Patchmaster on July 4, 2013, 2:45 GMT

    Doubt remain over Broad's attitude......which render his fitness irrelevant.

  • jackthelad on July 4, 2013, 2:27 GMT

    Broad has always had two problems - he can be devastating but he is inconsistent; and he is one of the most awkward, accident-prone top athletes I've ever seen. Pinning hopes on him to shoulder half the opening attack through two back-to-back series seems, shall we say, optimistic. Compton has replied well to being dropped, but he deserved to be dropped and would have needed more than a couple of fifties against second-string attacks to force his way back into contention at this stage. Having said that, I do feel that the Flowers/Cook steering committee are far too inflexible in their thinking generally, and always have a 'safety first' air about them. It would be nice to see them exhibit a little more adaptability to developing situations (though I accept it's a fine line between that and just twisting in the wind).

  • on July 4, 2013, 2:06 GMT

    the fact broad could be out may well be a blessing in disguise as it was in the last Ashes, i think it will be closer than most think but i cant see England losing, every Aussie will have to be on tip top form to beat us. but stranger things have happened ! especially in cricket !

  • jmcilhinney on July 4, 2013, 1:32 GMT

    @SDH12 on (July 3, 2013, 20:55 GMT), interesting that Flower calls Compton an opening batsman when, while I believe that he has opened for Somerset at times, that's not his regular gig. You seem to be assuming that Compton would come in if an injury befell one of the top three, which seems sensible enough. As for who would be the one to replace someone from #4 to #7, I would think that Taylor should be top of that list but his omission from performance squads seems to cloud that a little. He has continued to play for the Lions though, which is something in his favour.

  • CricketingStargazer on July 3, 2013, 20:00 GMT

    You can only beat what is in front of you and England did it. People tend to forget tha Graeme Swann is returning from an important operation and has had precious little bowling this summer to get rhythm. Steve Finn and Tim Bresnan will also be so much the better for some hard work with the ball. And I still think that giving Joe Root a long bowl was a masterstroke: if Alistair Cook shows some confidence in him he could develop into a useful support bowler and take over that fifth bowler role that becomes so important when there is an injury, or you find yourself with only one spinner on a track that unexpectedly takes turn, or you just need to try something different to break a partnership.

  • RogB on July 4, 2013, 10:56 GMT

    Re your last sentence, "their primary role" is certainly not to supply cricketers to go on and play for England. The primary role of all professional cricket is to entertain the paying public who have come to watch, a fact all to readily forgotten (including by the ICC).

  • jmcilhinney on July 4, 2013, 10:34 GMT

    @Mr.CrickCheat on (July 4, 2013, 9:41 GMT), can you point me to exactly where the England management is complaining? I seem to have missed that.

  • jackiethepen on July 4, 2013, 9:45 GMT

    Too little praise for Onions who demonstrated what death bowling should be. Cook loses his sense of urgency at the death hence England's poor record in this department. Letting Joe Root continue to bowl when it was clear his bowling was ineffectual was just such an example of poor captaincy. Root is a part time bowler at best and against Australia he is likely to be despatched to the boundary. But Cook indulged the idea of him taking 5 wickets in a warm up game aiming to show intent from England's bowlers. Flower continued this indulgent policy by not retiring Cook and Trott when they reached 50s. If Bairstow and Bell had been batting earlier they would have had more time to get in their stride. As it was they had 8 overs in between heavy rain showers and then 1 hour the next morning. Rigidity? Flower and Cook declared on the stroke of midday. Flower has no idea how to manage his players. KP wasn't given another bat and Prior hardly got going. Yet Root got a long bowl!

  • TenDonebyaShooter on July 4, 2013, 9:41 GMT

    @jmcillhiney: the English management have complained about their players lacking match practice when they cause that lack in the first place (why would they need to adopt ridiculous measures like Compton playing for Worcester or Strauss playing for Middlesex if lack of match practice were not the issue?), and if Bairstow lacks match practice because he was in the CT squad, well, whose fault is that?

  • jonesy2 on July 4, 2013, 5:11 GMT

    Australia will be upset if broad doesn't get to play. then they will suddenly be happy when they see that there is literally nobody to replace him. unless Anderson and swann take a collective 50 wickets for the series, I cant see how England are going to win

  • Patchmaster on July 4, 2013, 2:45 GMT

    Doubt remain over Broad's attitude......which render his fitness irrelevant.

  • jackthelad on July 4, 2013, 2:27 GMT

    Broad has always had two problems - he can be devastating but he is inconsistent; and he is one of the most awkward, accident-prone top athletes I've ever seen. Pinning hopes on him to shoulder half the opening attack through two back-to-back series seems, shall we say, optimistic. Compton has replied well to being dropped, but he deserved to be dropped and would have needed more than a couple of fifties against second-string attacks to force his way back into contention at this stage. Having said that, I do feel that the Flowers/Cook steering committee are far too inflexible in their thinking generally, and always have a 'safety first' air about them. It would be nice to see them exhibit a little more adaptability to developing situations (though I accept it's a fine line between that and just twisting in the wind).

  • on July 4, 2013, 2:06 GMT

    the fact broad could be out may well be a blessing in disguise as it was in the last Ashes, i think it will be closer than most think but i cant see England losing, every Aussie will have to be on tip top form to beat us. but stranger things have happened ! especially in cricket !

  • jmcilhinney on July 4, 2013, 1:32 GMT

    @SDH12 on (July 3, 2013, 20:55 GMT), interesting that Flower calls Compton an opening batsman when, while I believe that he has opened for Somerset at times, that's not his regular gig. You seem to be assuming that Compton would come in if an injury befell one of the top three, which seems sensible enough. As for who would be the one to replace someone from #4 to #7, I would think that Taylor should be top of that list but his omission from performance squads seems to cloud that a little. He has continued to play for the Lions though, which is something in his favour.

  • jmcilhinney on July 4, 2013, 1:28 GMT

    @Mr.CrickCheat on (July 3, 2013, 20:04 GMT), um, they're not complaint. That was a comment from a journalist, not a complaint from England. As for why Bairstow was withdrawn from his county, that would be because he was part of the CT squad and needed to be with the team to train and be ready to play in case of injury. As Flower said, it's not ideal but it is what it is and we move on. It is tough on Bairstow though. He's had more than once instance recently where he's come into the team rusty and not performed and that will reflect poorly on him when people look back at his record without considering the context. Assuming that he plays the first Test, it would be ideal if he could come in with a significant score already on the board and he can just play himself into some form for the rest of the series. If he comes in under pressure and fails due to rustiness then it won't look good for him or the team.

  • SaracensBob on July 4, 2013, 0:02 GMT

    This was a nice easy warm-up for the England lads. Can't help but think they would have been better served by playing an MCC XI consisting of the brightest stars in the LV-CC to date. This would have given a feistier more competitive match ( some of the guys playing for such an XI might consider that they were playing for a place). Essex are hardly the sharpest tools in the LV-CC box! The Australians were hardly better served by playing Worcs. They are an 'improving side' but if the Aussies are to play a Div Two side they would have surely got a sterner test at Northants or Glamorgan ECB this is The Ashes coming up - both sides deserve a competitive warm-up before the real action begins.

  • Shan156 on July 3, 2013, 23:45 GMT

    Bresnan is a no-no for me. While he scored a good ton in the warm-up, I feel that his bowling is no way near as effective as it was in 2011. We are playing only 4 bowlers and there is no need to shore up the batting. It is the responsibility of the top 7 to score the runs we need. Unfortunately, I feel that Bresnan will play as I think the Eng. mgmt is underestimating the Aussie batting (or overestimating Swann's abilities against left-handers). I do think Swann is key against the Aussies more than any other bowler but he would need support. Anderson, Onions, Finn, and Swann should be the bowlers in the XI. But, I think it is going to be Anderson, Finn, Bresnan, and Swann. Finn would leak runs at 4 an over although he will pick up some wickets but I don't see Bresnan taking any. That would mean Jimmy and Swann would have to do the bulk of the work. With b2b Ashes, that is not a good sign. I would play Cook, Root, Trott, KP, Bell, Prior, Bres, and the 4 bowlers. Not going to happen:-(

  • 2.14istherunrate on July 3, 2013, 22:38 GMT

    This game was certainly not without its uses.Swann was a worry till today and it was good for Onions too to get wickets.He is a straight bowler so if a batsman misses he hits. Also there was success for some in their auxiliary roles which may make a difference, and for Essex a leggie came to light while Mickelburgh salvaged his season.

  • BRUTALANALYST on July 3, 2013, 22:13 GMT

    MY 3 bowlers are Anderson Onions Finn with Bresnan as the 4th all-rounder ahead of Broad as he has shown his worth with the bat consistently over Broad, there is no competition there in fact I wouldn't even class Broad as an all rounder.

  • on July 3, 2013, 22:01 GMT

    Onions was expensive and lacked penetration until Swann opened up the middle order, Broad has taken more wickets than any other fast bowler after the India tour and Finn and Bresnan have shown more of that 'x-factor' that makes a bowler successful at international level than Onions ever has, even with his amazing record at county level.

    Compton suffers a bit from the same thing when compared to Root but his record in NZ is more than comparable to Root's record over here, and their vice versa records are equally unimpressive, but Root lacked the excuse of broken ribs and fingers. Compton has a sort of anti-x-factor which is dependability and concentration, which doesn't discount Root's obvious talent but should get him in above Bairstow, leaving Root to continue to learn and provide that elusive, Michael Hussey-esque mix of solidity and threat at 6

  • JG2704 on July 3, 2013, 21:37 GMT

    I'm a big Broad fan but he's only bowled well in patches since he got injured in SL.

    So - being that we'll only be playing 4 bowlers (3 pacers) as that's our religion , we surely should not be taking any chances on Broad if he's injured. Wouldn't mind see Onions get a proper opportunity

  • FieryFerg on July 3, 2013, 21:01 GMT

    Flower is in danger of disappearing down the Duncan Fletcher plughole - bowlers only play if the fit a certain physical template regardless of effectiveness. Onions is a far better bet than Bresnan or Rankin - Mickleburgh commented after the first innings about his relentlessness but it doesn't seem to make a difference.

  • SDHM on July 3, 2013, 20:55 GMT

    Interesting remarks about Compton then. If one of KP, Bell, Bairstow or Prior goes down injured, it wouldn't be him that came in, we can infer from that. Who would it be then? Taylor? Bopara? Morgan?

  • BRUTALANALYST on July 3, 2013, 20:53 GMT

    Onions should be in the 11 he'is a far better bowler than Broad always has been imo but he won't be selected because his father isn't Chris Broad. Bairstow looks terrible I would keep Compton opening after his last few innings and have Bairstow out for KP with Root staying at 6 where he has had success.

  • TenDonebyaShooter on July 3, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    "Jonny Bairstow, who has hardly batted since the Leeds Test against New Zealand and was bowled in both innings here - still looks in need of time at the crease". Why do England withdraw players from playing for their counties and then complain "ooh, they haven't had enough match practice"? On an unrelated point, I wouldn't even have a fit Stuart Broad in the line-up for the first test. I'd have Finn, Onions and Anderson as quicks with Bresnan as back up.

  • Tigg on July 3, 2013, 19:57 GMT

    An out of match practice and form Bairstow must surely make way for Compton. Open with him and Cook, stick Root in at 6.

    Surely, Onions has to play. He's been the best bowler in county cricket since his return from injury, Finn has seemed out of form in his alst couple of matches and Bresnan has looked unimpressive. If Broad is iffy, rest him for the first test and play Anderson, Onions and either Finn or Bresnan as your seam attack.

  • Tigg on July 3, 2013, 19:57 GMT

    An out of match practice and form Bairstow must surely make way for Compton. Open with him and Cook, stick Root in at 6.

    Surely, Onions has to play. He's been the best bowler in county cricket since his return from injury, Finn has seemed out of form in his alst couple of matches and Bresnan has looked unimpressive. If Broad is iffy, rest him for the first test and play Anderson, Onions and either Finn or Bresnan as your seam attack.

  • TenDonebyaShooter on July 3, 2013, 20:04 GMT

    "Jonny Bairstow, who has hardly batted since the Leeds Test against New Zealand and was bowled in both innings here - still looks in need of time at the crease". Why do England withdraw players from playing for their counties and then complain "ooh, they haven't had enough match practice"? On an unrelated point, I wouldn't even have a fit Stuart Broad in the line-up for the first test. I'd have Finn, Onions and Anderson as quicks with Bresnan as back up.

  • BRUTALANALYST on July 3, 2013, 20:53 GMT

    Onions should be in the 11 he'is a far better bowler than Broad always has been imo but he won't be selected because his father isn't Chris Broad. Bairstow looks terrible I would keep Compton opening after his last few innings and have Bairstow out for KP with Root staying at 6 where he has had success.

  • SDHM on July 3, 2013, 20:55 GMT

    Interesting remarks about Compton then. If one of KP, Bell, Bairstow or Prior goes down injured, it wouldn't be him that came in, we can infer from that. Who would it be then? Taylor? Bopara? Morgan?

  • FieryFerg on July 3, 2013, 21:01 GMT

    Flower is in danger of disappearing down the Duncan Fletcher plughole - bowlers only play if the fit a certain physical template regardless of effectiveness. Onions is a far better bet than Bresnan or Rankin - Mickleburgh commented after the first innings about his relentlessness but it doesn't seem to make a difference.

  • JG2704 on July 3, 2013, 21:37 GMT

    I'm a big Broad fan but he's only bowled well in patches since he got injured in SL.

    So - being that we'll only be playing 4 bowlers (3 pacers) as that's our religion , we surely should not be taking any chances on Broad if he's injured. Wouldn't mind see Onions get a proper opportunity

  • on July 3, 2013, 22:01 GMT

    Onions was expensive and lacked penetration until Swann opened up the middle order, Broad has taken more wickets than any other fast bowler after the India tour and Finn and Bresnan have shown more of that 'x-factor' that makes a bowler successful at international level than Onions ever has, even with his amazing record at county level.

    Compton suffers a bit from the same thing when compared to Root but his record in NZ is more than comparable to Root's record over here, and their vice versa records are equally unimpressive, but Root lacked the excuse of broken ribs and fingers. Compton has a sort of anti-x-factor which is dependability and concentration, which doesn't discount Root's obvious talent but should get him in above Bairstow, leaving Root to continue to learn and provide that elusive, Michael Hussey-esque mix of solidity and threat at 6

  • BRUTALANALYST on July 3, 2013, 22:13 GMT

    MY 3 bowlers are Anderson Onions Finn with Bresnan as the 4th all-rounder ahead of Broad as he has shown his worth with the bat consistently over Broad, there is no competition there in fact I wouldn't even class Broad as an all rounder.

  • 2.14istherunrate on July 3, 2013, 22:38 GMT

    This game was certainly not without its uses.Swann was a worry till today and it was good for Onions too to get wickets.He is a straight bowler so if a batsman misses he hits. Also there was success for some in their auxiliary roles which may make a difference, and for Essex a leggie came to light while Mickelburgh salvaged his season.

  • Shan156 on July 3, 2013, 23:45 GMT

    Bresnan is a no-no for me. While he scored a good ton in the warm-up, I feel that his bowling is no way near as effective as it was in 2011. We are playing only 4 bowlers and there is no need to shore up the batting. It is the responsibility of the top 7 to score the runs we need. Unfortunately, I feel that Bresnan will play as I think the Eng. mgmt is underestimating the Aussie batting (or overestimating Swann's abilities against left-handers). I do think Swann is key against the Aussies more than any other bowler but he would need support. Anderson, Onions, Finn, and Swann should be the bowlers in the XI. But, I think it is going to be Anderson, Finn, Bresnan, and Swann. Finn would leak runs at 4 an over although he will pick up some wickets but I don't see Bresnan taking any. That would mean Jimmy and Swann would have to do the bulk of the work. With b2b Ashes, that is not a good sign. I would play Cook, Root, Trott, KP, Bell, Prior, Bres, and the 4 bowlers. Not going to happen:-(