|Photos||Video & Audio||Blogs||Statistics||Archive||Shop||Mobile|
Check out the bowling analysis for England in the Australian second innings, and you'd imagine Simon Jones was the worst of the lot
July 23, 2005
Check out the bowling analysis for England in the Australian second innings, and you'd imagine that Steve Harmison was easily the best of the four pace bowlers. And the worst? You'd reckon it would be Simon Jones - after all, his figures don't make for great reading: 69 runs in 18 overs, that's nearly four an over, and just the wicket of Jason Gillespie to show for it. That's pretty ordinary bowling, it would appear.
However, with some luck, those stats could easily have read 4 for 50, or better. Jones had four chances dropped off him, all of which were eminently catchable. As the graphic shows, Jones bowled the highest percentage of potential wicket-taking deliveries - that's balls which beat the bat, were edged, or rapped the batsmen on the pad. Of the 109 balls he bowled, 30 of them forced the batsmen to play a stroke they weren't in control of. And on the third morning, that percentage went up to a whopping 35.71 (15 out of 42 balls) - that's even better than Steve Harmison's 34.8% in Australia's first innings. However, the fielders supported Harmison fairly well - four of his five victims were caught. Jones, on the other hand, had to entirely make his own dismissals, and by the end of the innings, the only person he could trust with catches was himself.
Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th
In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia
India's wretched run away from home began at Lord's in 2011. A young team full of self-belief may have brought it to an end with their victory at the same venue three years later
What's wrong with their cricket? Well, what isn't?
Why not you? Read and learn how!